Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Types of Radiation Interactions
Types of Radiation Interactions
Types of Radiation Interactions
Incident Beam N
E o E
θ
l
Types of Radiation Interactions
Output beam
photons of interest
E
o E
E
E
Attenuation tells us
N
the depth.
N
l
l
Angular spread of
N
beam is maintained,
0 θ
projection direction
0
θ
y
detector
Where µ
is the linear attenuation coefficient and in
In general,
I (x,y) = I e
∫
− µ ( x ,y ) dx
d o
transmission
thickness of absorber
hν
3 approaches
1) Restrict geometry to a narrow beam system.
Collimator, place detector at infinity
2) Limit interaction to photo-electric (usually safe to
assume that characteristic photons do not leave the
sample)
3)Energy select detected photons
Can define a build up factor to account for the additional photons at
the detector or even in the sample itself.
Some details of photon interactions
Consider a sample geometry with only a collimator at the output side
Detector
Source
Collimator
The incindent photon energy is much less than the binding energy of the
electron in an atom. The photon is scattered without change of energy.
Low energy relatively unimportant.
Attenuation Mechanisms (Photoelectric Effect)
The photon, E slightly greater than E gives up all of its energy to an inner
shell electron, thereby ejecting it from the atom. The excited atom retains
to the ground state with the emission of characteristic photons. Most of
these are of relatively low energy and are absorbed by the material.
Attenuation Mechanisms (Compton Scattering)
(c) Compton Scattering
The photon energy is much greater than E , and only part of this is given
b
E = 2 × 9.11×10 kg × 3 ×10 m
−31 8
min
sec
= 1.64 ×10 J
−13
= 1.02 MeV
Both the electron and the positron lose energy via ionization until an
annihilation event takes place yielding two photons of 0.51 MeV moving
in opposite directions.
Tissue Transparency
Ultrasound
X-ray Radio-frequency
°
1Α °
100Α 1µm 100µm 1cm 1m 100m
µ dependence
Attenuation
(log plot)
total
Compton
Compton
photoelectric
simple scatter pair
The optimum photon energy is about 30 keV (tube voltage 80-100 kV) where the
photoelectric effect dominates. The Z3 dependence leads to good contrast:
Zfat 5.9
Zmuscles 7.4
Zbone 13.9
⇒ Photoelectric attenuation from bone is about 11x that due to soft tissue, which is
dominated by Compton scattering.
Beam Energy
I (x, y) = ∫ I (ε)e ∫ µ ( x ,y ,ε ) dx
dε
−
d o
This does not include buildup factor or scattering but does include beam
hardening
Beam Energy
N N
E B
µ
k edge, minimal
energy needed to have
photoelectric effect
20 keV h with k shell electrons.
Heterogeneous Case
Interested in the heterogeneous case
α 1
α 2
α 3
α 4
α 5
l 1
l 2
l 3
l 4
l 5
then
I = I e (α o
− 1l 1 + α2l 2 + L + αN l N )
where ∑ l = L i
N i =1
∫
− αdl
4024
1 3
I=Ie o
a line integral over the
sample and defined by the
ray of interaction
I L
−ln = ∫ αdl
I 123 o
0
this is the
projection
Heterogeneous Case
I (θ ,z)
P(θ ,z) = −ln = ∫ α (l)dl
L
I (θ ,z)
o
0
α(l
)
We wish to reconstruct the linear attenuation coefficient
.
In 2D,
µ/ρ
(cm2/g)
2.5
2
1.0
BONE
0.5
0.4 MUSCLE
0.3
FAT
0.2
0.15
PHOTON
0.1 ENERGY
10 20 30 40 50 100 150 200 300 500 (kev)
Unknown
hν
Bremsstrahlung
e −
E
hν = E E − hν
Bremsstrahlung
e −
Electron ejected
e −
Characteristic Radiation
Ionization event.
Electron-electron interactions
e −
e −
X-rays
nucleus
For each interaction, the X-ray spectrum is white and the electron loses
some energy.
“True” Bremsstrahlung
Interaction
Spectrum
Intensity
E max
E E
Unknown
Usually place some material between tube and object to further reduce
low X-rays
Increase in Z:
1. Increase in X-ray intensity since greater mass and positive charge
of the target nuclei increase the probability of X-ray emission total
output intensity of Z
2. Characteristic lines shift to higher energy, K and L electrons are
more strongly held
3. No change in E max