Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Unit 7 - Instructional Approaches For Activating Prior Knowledge
Unit 7 - Instructional Approaches For Activating Prior Knowledge
Student performance was heavily influenced by prior knowledge. Prior knowledge is linked to
reading comprehension, study speed and accuracy, and student enthusiasm in the subject
(Strangman et al., 2004). Strangman et al. examined a few ways for activating prior knowledge
and found that they were effective in enhancing student performance. The tactics of "reflection
Students are asked to recall, state, write down, or record what they know about the issue using
the reflection and recording technique. According to the findings, activating relevant prior
information about the issue is more successful than activating irrelevant prior knowledge or not
activating at all in increasing text memory and understanding. Another study found that during
text reading, conversational elaboration and reflection are more successful than taking notes.
Students' capacity to recall material is also improved by using a brainstorming strategy in prior
knowledge activation by assisting them in creating a semantic map (Strangman et al., 2004). All
of these research suggests that using the previous knowledge technique to activate reflection and
In class, students might practise reflecting and recording to activate prior information. The first
technique is to begin class by asking students to state things that are related to the topic.
When the topic is acids and bases, for example, teachers can begin the class by asking students if
they have heard of acids and bases previously. It can be followed up with questions about where
and when they heard it, what it informs them of, and so on. This practice will help them connect
their existing knowledge to the new material they will be learning. Because the new material is
relevant to students' lives, it will be more meaningful to them. This is in line with cognitive
3
neuroscience theory, which claims that learning occurs when new information is relevant
(Schunk, 2012).
It's also a technique for a teacher to learn about a student's prior knowledge and correct them
earlier in the learning process. It's critical to make this adjustment since research suggests that
discrepancy between existing knowledge and new information stymies learning (Strangman et
al., 2004).
The second approach, as used by UoPeople, is to ask students to write reflective essays about
what they have learnt from reading resources. Students must learn by reading the text
themselves, and reflecting is more successful than taking notes, therefore this practice acts as an
Students' reflective essays can receive feedback in order to help them improve their writing.
The essay will also tell the teacher about the student's abilities. When learning about the periodic
table, for example, the teacher will describe how Mendeleyev organized the components. The
teacher then invites pupils to respond to questions as a guide to writing the reflective essay. The
queries inquired as to what elements they are familiar with, and so on. Because the essay is
reflective, students must recall their prior understanding of the issue, activating their prior
Time is a constraint when it comes to reflection and recording strategies. The procedures
outlined above take time to complete. It takes time to begin the class by questioning students
Even the discussion can veer off into a completely different direction at times. The teacher is
responsible for keeping the conversation on course. The time spent can also be viewed as time
spent learning more about students, which can help to strengthen the teacher-student relationship
4
and create a happy learning environment. Making a reflective essay takes time as well, but the
onus is on the teacher this time. Because providing great comments takes time, don't ask students
to submit too many essays. Only request an essay if the subject is difficult to grasp.
The goal of the interactive discussion strategy is to use interactive discussion to activate
preexisting knowledge. The student is asked to think on and record their past knowledge of the
issue before participating in an interactive discussion. Students' prior knowledge can be used to
complete a semantic map during the talks. This strategy is more successful than no pre-reading
education in boosting reading comprehension, but it is less effective than direct instruction on the
According to the research, this method may aid a novice but not an expert. The success of this
tactic may be influenced by students' experience with the interactive approach (Strangman et al.,
2004).
These research' findings aid in determining the most effective interactive discussion technique.
This method is put into effect by having students participate in an interactive conversation. The
most critical factor in keeping kids engaged is to make the issue intriguing. One of the reasons
that students find a topic interesting is if they can apply it to their own lives. It's also critical to
make the discussion dynamic and involve as many pupils as possible after they've been engaged.
When teaching pupils about relativity, for example, teachers can link the movie "Star Wars" to
The teacher may inquire as to whether it is conceivable for humans to travel to another planet as
depicted in the film, despite the fact that the distance is only a few thousand light years. The
teacher can then directly provide students the essential material after checking students' prior
knowledge and ensuring that they are interested. Direct information is more beneficial than
5
participatory dialogue, according to the study. Nonetheless, the interactive conversation can
interest students and personalize the lecture to their specific requirements. It also gives students
The difficulty in using an interactive discussion technique is making it interactive. The theme
must pique the kids' interest. Frequently, what a teacher considers to be intriguing for students
does not pique their attention. This necessitates the teacher's knowledge of adolescent thought as
well as the student's background. The teacher will also require a broad knowledge base in order
to determine what is appropriate for the interactive conversation. This technique can give
students with a more delightful learning experience if the teacher can overcome this barrier.
6
References:
Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning theories: An educational perspective (6th ed.). Boston, MA:
Pearson. Strangman, N., Hall, T., & Meyer, A. (2004). Background knowledge instruction and
http://aem.cast.org/about/publications/2004/ncac-background-knowledge-udl.html