See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/338701167

DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DUAL STRUCTURAL SYSTEM

Article · June 2019

DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.11663751

CITATIONS READS

14 411

3 authors:

Sagar Jamle Kundan Meshram

Tata Steel Guru Ghasidas University
73 PUBLICATIONS   1,046 CITATIONS    36 PUBLICATIONS   148 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Yash Joshi

2 PUBLICATIONS   22 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Costonomical Concrete View project

Rural Roads Performance Study View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Sagar Jamle on 20 January 2020.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

© 2019 IJRAR June 2019, Volume 6, Issue 2 www.ijrar.org (E-ISSN 2348-1269, P- ISSN 2349-5138)

DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF DUAL

STRUCTURAL SYSTEM
1
Yash Joshi, 2Sagar Jamle, 3Kundan Meshram
1
M. Tech. Scholar, 2Assistant Professor, 3Associate Professor
123
Department of Civil Engineering,
123
Oriental University, Indore (M. P.), India

Abstract : Shear wall show excellent performance under seismic forces, survey of building system during pre and post extreme
earthquakes shows that life hazard due to building collapse is minimal. Shear wall is designed for ductility under repetitive loads.
The shear wall meant to resist earthquakes should be designed for ductility where concrete frame is designed to resist lateral forces.
The aim of this research is to compare the behavior of ten storey buildings having shear wall with bare frame. Performance of ten
storey building also studied under seismic loads. The objectives of the present investigation are to study the response parameters
such as displacement, axial forces, shear forces in beams, base shear, storey drift and time period. Buildings with and without shear
wall has been analyzed through STAAD Pro tool using response spectrum method.

Keywords - Base Shear, Lateral Displacement, Response Spectrum, Shear wall, Storey Drift, Time Period
I. INTRODUCTION
RC building with frames structure is sufficient enough in resisting horizontal and vertical loads and forces. In multi storey
building more than ten storey, sizes of column and beam requires large amount of reinforcement at junction of beam and column
which leads to congestion at joints. At such joints it is very difficult to use vibrator and compact concrete properly. Shear wall in
multi-storey and high-rise structures helps to cover up problem of narrow joints. A shear wall is a structural element which is used to
resist forces from horizontal plane. Dual structural system provides resistance against lateral force by the combination of frames and
walls. In dual system both constituent element provides ductility and stiffness. Structural walls provide ductility in upper storey of
building. Structural walls also dissipate large amount of energy. Due to the stiffness in walls storey drift can be control caused due to
earthquake forces. The shear wall meant to resist earthquakes should be designed for ductility where concrete frame is designed to
resist lateral forces. Reinforced concrete framed building using shear walls have become common due to significant contribution in
lateral stiffness. Especially for taller building the structural configuration using combination of moment resistant frame and shear wall
is generally used in multi-storied buildings. This is termed as dual system. The structural behavior of dual system mainly depends on
height of building. A shear wall acting as vertical cantilever has a bending mode of deflection while a frame under horizontal loads
has a shear mode of deflection. Due to the infinite rigidity of the floor diaphragm, shear walls and frames have same deflections at
each floor which modifies the final behavior of this element.
II. OBJECTIVE
Objective of the present study is analysis of multi-storey frames with and without shear wall and study parameters like lateral
displacement, storey drift and period of time. Objective also includes performance based analysis of building having shear wall with
bare frame building.
III. METHODOLOGY
Response spectra is an analysis based on elastic dynamic approach which assumed that response of structure is analyzed by
considering response of independent modes and natural mode of vibration. Combining response of all modes forms a complete
analysis. In this method it is assumed that structure weight is lumped at the level of floor. Response spectra method initiated by the
determination of the lumped mass developed due to dead load and live load.

Lateral design force on every mode can be calculated using expression as per Cl. 7.8.4.5(c)

Qik = Ak × Øi × Pk × Wi (Eq. 1)

Where,

Ak = design value for horizontal acceleration

Pk = the modal participation factor

IV. MODELING AND ANALYSIS

Table 1: Element Dimension of 10 Storey without Shear Wall Building

Height of Storey 3m
Beam Size 200 mm ×500 mm
Column Size 500 mm ×500 mm

IJRAR19K3659 International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews (IJRAR)www.ijrar.org 518

© 2019 IJRAR June 2019, Volume 6, Issue 2 www.ijrar.org (E-ISSN 2348-1269, P- ISSN 2349-5138)

Table 2: Element Dimension of 10 Storey with Shear Wall Building

Height of Storey 3m
Beam Size 200 mm ×500 mm
Column Size 500 mm ×500 mm
Shear Wall Thickness 150 mm

V. LOADING DETAILS

Following loading conditions are applied in the study:

1. Dead Load of intensity 4 KN/m2 has been applied on the all the floor.

2. Live Load of intensity 4 KN/m2 has been applied on the all the floor.

3. Earthquake Loads are assigned as per IS 1893 (Part-I):2002.

Figure 1: Bare Frame Building Without Shear Wall Figure 2: Bare Frame Building With Shear Wall

VI. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Building performance with and without shear wall is assessed for two earthquake zone III and zone V under various load cases.

1. DISPLACEMENT

It has been found that on using shear wall in 10 Storey building displacement decreases for zone 5. For zone 3 building without
shear wall offers more displacement.

IJRAR19K3659 International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews (IJRAR)www.ijrar.org 519

© 2019 IJRAR June 2019, Volume 6, Issue 2 www.ijrar.org (E-ISSN 2348-1269, P- ISSN 2349-5138)

Figure 3: Displacement Comparison in Zone 3 Figure 4: Displacement Comparison in Zone 5

2. AXIAL FORCE IN COLUMN

On analyzing 10 storey building in zone 3 and zone 5, it has been found that building in zone attracts more axial forces in column.
Building with full shear wall has more axial more for both zone 3 and zone 5.

Figure 5: Axial Force Comparison in Zone 3 Figure 6: Axial Force Comparison in Zone 5

3. SHEAR FORCE IN BEAM

It can be concluded that building without shear wall situated in zone 3 or zone 5 attracts more shear forces. On incorporating shear
wall shear forces decreases for both zone.

IJRAR19K3659 International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews (IJRAR)www.ijrar.org 520

© 2019 IJRAR June 2019, Volume 6, Issue 2 www.ijrar.org (E-ISSN 2348-1269, P- ISSN 2349-5138)

Figure 7: Shear Force Comparison in Zone 3 Figure 8: Shear Force Comparison in Zone 5

4. BASE SHEAR

On analyzing 10 storey building in zone 3 and zone 5, it has been found that building in zone 5 attracts more base shear forces.
Building with full shear wall has gain more base shear in zone 5.

Figure 9: Base Shear Comparison in Zone 3 Figure 10: Base Shear Comparison in Zone 5

IJRAR19K3659 International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews (IJRAR)www.ijrar.org 521

© 2019 IJRAR June 2019, Volume 6, Issue 2 www.ijrar.org (E-ISSN 2348-1269, P- ISSN 2349-5138)
5. STOREY DRIFT

On analyzing without and with shear wall building, it has been found that on using shear wall in 10 storey building storey drift
decreases by about 50%.

Figure 11: Storey Drift Comparison in Zone 3 Figure 12: Storey Drift Comparison in Zone 5

6. TIME PERIOD

On incorporating shear wall time period decreases significantly for zone III and zone V

Figure 13: Storey Drift Comparison in Zone 3 Figure 14: Storey Drift Comparison in Zone 5

IJRAR19K3659 International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews (IJRAR)www.ijrar.org 522

© 2019 IJRAR June 2019, Volume 6, Issue 2 www.ijrar.org (E-ISSN 2348-1269, P- ISSN 2349-5138)
VII. CONCLUSION

Regular 10 storey building is modeled as per the Indian standard loading conditions subjected to seismic excitations. Two
different modeling approaches has been identified and applied on the models. Results have been analyzed for seismic zone 3 and
zone 5. Following conclusion can be drawn from the study.

1. On providing shear wall in higher seismic zones, displacement decreases in multi storey building.
2. It can also be concluded from the study that on providing shear wall in seismic areas, axial forces in vertical members increases
significantly.
3. Shear forces in beams due to seismic excitation decreases on providing shear wall.
4. Multi storey building with shear wall attracts large base shear values in higher zones.
5. Storey drifts and time period decreases notably in building with shear wall.
6. Building with shear wall performs well in terms of seismic parameters.
VIII. ACKNOWLEDGMENT
I do feel extremely thankful and respectful to my supervisor Mr. Sagar Jamle, Assistant professor, Department of Civil
Engineering, Oriental University, Indore (M.P.) that he always point to critical insights during the discussion, guides me perplexing
setbacks and helps me discover the fun of devising state of the art solutions. In addition, he gave me great freedom as an M. Tech.
student and created a lively and accommodating atmosphere.

REFERENCES
[1] Archit Dangi, Sagar Jamle, 2018, “Determination of Seismic parameters of R.C.C. Building Using Shear Core Outrigger, Wall
Belt and Truss Belt Systems”, International Journal of Advanced Engineering Research and Science, 5(9): 305-309.
[2] Archit Dangi, Sagar Jamle, 2019, “Stability Enhancement of Optimum Outriggers and Belt Truss Structural System”,
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 6(2): 772-780.
[3] Dr. Uttamasha Gupta, Shruti Ratnaparkhe, Padma Gome, 2012, “Seismic Behaviour of Buildings Having Flat Slabs with
Drops”, International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering, 2(10): 416-421.
[4] Ema Coelho, Paulo Candeias, Giorgios Anamateros, Raul Zaharia, Fabio Taucer, Artur V. Pinto, 2004, “Assessment of the
seismic behaviour of RC shear wall building structures”.
[5] Govindan Nandini Devi, 2013, “Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Dual Structural System Strength, Deformation
Characteristics, and Failure Mechanism. IACSIT International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 5.
[6] IS 1893 (Part 1)2002: Indian Standard Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures, Part 1General Provisions and
Buildings (Fifth Revision), Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.
[7] IS: 456.2000. Indian standard “plain and reinforced concrete” code of practice, Bureau of Indian standards, New Delhi.
[8] J. P. Singh, Indrajit Chowdhury, 2008, “Practical Approach to Shear Wall Frame Interaction Considering Foundation
Compliance”, Challenges and Applications of Mathematical Modeling Techniques in Building Science and Technology, 7(8).
[9] Malik A., M. Mulham B., Isam S., “The Optimum Level for Wall Curtailment in Wall Frame Structures to Resist Lateral
Loads”: 1-7.
[10] Neeraj Patel, Sagar Jamle, 2019, “Use of Shear Wall Belt at Optimum Height to Increase Lateral Load Handling Capacity in
Multistorey Building”, International Journal for Research in Engineering Application & Management, 4(10): 596-603.
[11] Nollet, M.J., 1991, “Behavior of wall frame structures: a study of the interactive behavior of continuous and discontinuous
wall frame structures”,Ph. D. thesis, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
[12] Sagar Jamle et. al., 2017, “Flat Slab Shear Wall Interaction for Multistoried Building under Seismic Forces”, IJournals:
International Journal of Software & Hardware Research in Engineering, 5(3): 14-31.
[13] Sagar Jamle et. al., 2017, “Flat Slab Shear Wall Interaction for Multistoried Building Analysis When Structure Length is
greater than width under seismic Forces”, IJournals: International Journal of Software & Hardware Research in Engineering,
5(3): 32-53.
[14] Umesh. N. Karadi and Shahzad Jamil Sardar, 2013, “Effect of Change in Shear wall Location on Storey Drift of Multistory
Building Subjected to Lateral Loads” International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology,
2(9).
[15] Youngmi Park, Jaok Jo, Seungyong Oh, Sangwhan Han, “A modified equivalent frame method under lateral loads”, Magazine
of Concrete Research: 1-12.

IJRAR19K3659
View publication stats
International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews (IJRAR)www.ijrar.org 523