EXCEL ENGINEEzuNG COLLEGE

\\ PA LLA KAPALAYAM

DEPARTMENT OF ECE
AROUT DESIGN
ACTION TAKEN REPORT ON STAKE HOLDER FEEDBACK
AND REVIEW OF SYLLABUS

ACADEMIC YEAR: 2018-19

suggesl that
1. II ECE, III ECE and lV ECE students ( averagely 25%-30% of the studcnLs )
depth ofthe syllabus was less
(t 2. II ECE and MCE student ( averageiy l5%-40% of the students ) suge'st
that tne coursc

was nol well stuctued to achieve course outcome

3.llEcE'andlVECEstudent(averagelyl5g/o-30%ofthesiudents)suggcstthatsizeoithe
syllabus interms of students load was high
st thal the syllaLrlLj
4. Ii ECE and MCE students ( averagely 209lo-307o of the students ) sugge
was not related to real world problem
sug! \l that coufso
5. Il E( l' and IV ECE students ( averagely l07o-30% ofthc stLtdeDLs )
objective was not clear.
piescfibecl text book
6. ItiECC srudenrs ( a\teftgely l5yo-25yo ofthe students ) suggest llrat
/reference books were not relevant to syllabus'
s\ iiirbLls \\'as not
?. IV F( E students (averagely 10%-30% ofthe students)suggcst that lhe
canicr oriented
u'as nol
8. IV L( E students (averagely l5%-30% ofthe students) sugSest thrt lhe -'i liabus
cover industry standard
(,
TEACHERS FEEDBACK ANALYSIS

]. 2{)q;oftheteachersnotsatisfiedtheexistingsyllabrrshandlingdueli.llca\yconlcnl,
2. 20Voto30yoofrheteachers sugg€st that prerequisitc
ofthes)lLabu'\!asnota\ajlabl'
in the previous semestel
was not well organized
3. l5 % ofthe teachers suggest that the syllabus
organized ard an(l nr)l easy t(' lbllo ''
4. I 1 %o ofthe students suggest that syllabus was not
uP
ofthe teacher s suggest that the reference books and text books
are less standafci
5. 15 %o
are not clear to lhe need ol tne
6. 13 o/o ofthe teachers suggest that the course objective
students.
 4. 60 % ofthe parents suggest that courses in the curriculttm does not promote fbr
Entrepreneurship or stafiups Skills for their wards.
5.20%oftheparentssuggestthatcoursesdoesnotfulfilltheindustrial cxpectation

ACTION TAKEN BY DEPARTMENT ACADEMIC ADVISORY COMMITEE

1. To fillthe gap in syllabus, attaining CO and leam Content beyond tbe syllabus at part with
present market trends all students are encouraged to attend ceftificirte progfiim. and value
added couses.
2. Students are advised to undergo in plant training, intemship/field ptojecls- tield visits to
conelate the syllabus and solve the real world problems
-. 3. The DAAC committee suggests that a letter ofrepresentation to AnnaUniversity be initiatcd
( ,, to expfess inadequacy in syllabus to meet cunent industrial trends arid also review the te\l
books and reference books with high standards.
4. The DAAC committee also suggests that each subject lasl unit shall be iuclLrded lo apploault
Anna University to implement real world problems in the syllabus in the rlcxt regulalion.
5. The DAAC cornmittee suggested that the department shall conduct entrepfcneurship/starttrps
skills program in various domain based on the requirement ofthe stakehol(lers.
6. The DAAC committee suggest that depaftment may conducl man\ Dunrblf ofactivilies 1('

irnplenlent the syllabus in practical.

o.

(t y'^#
\r\9\' .n
STAFF
.t
INCHARGE
ry HOD
'
HEAD OF T}i[ DEPARTMSNT,
ILECTRONIC:i lt {Ol'J:t'l :li6f,
lxfIl,lll:a,:ll;i'::.1llc ::jrI i.]
J: ll

l ll l.: li':r hi. .:,l.i.l ...:.

 EXCEL ENGINEERING COI.LEGE,KOMARAPATAYAM-637 303
Department of Electronica and Communication
AcademicYear 2018-19

SYLLABUS REVIEW FEEDBACK FORM: STUDENTS

CONSOIIDATED COPY

Tot l no ol F€edb.ck Re.elved: 760

DESCRIPTIONS

what is the Depth of the syllabus

22

(
Whethef Syllabus k caiiie. orlented?

Whether the couue was well

strucrured to achleve cou6e t9

Rate the size ofthe syllabus in term

13

Wheathercouue objeclive s clear? 3

Are the books prescribed as a text

book/ Relrence book in re aten to 77 77

whether syllabus is relavant to feal

2A 2A

wherherthe syllabus ls covered wlth

1a

(.)

v,r
HFAn OF Trrr r's- ^-i:Yi'rENT
'Eiecuo'l,* t'ul
'u
t jr-q

Excel Eri.l,,1..i ilrili 1'r 'rD.l!'-

- uJ/ JiJr'
. Komarapalayam
 EXCEL ENGINEERING COLLEGE,KOMAMPALAYAM.63T 303
Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering
A.ademlc Year 2018-19

SYI.LABUS REVIEW FEEDBACK FORM I STUDENTS

CONSOLIDATED COPY

Total no ofFeedback Recelved:

320

DESCRIPTIONs % Excelle (41 %cood(3) % Poo{1l

What is the Depth of the syllabu!

34 33 3

2 wheiher Syllabus is carrier onented? 28 35 6

Whether the cou6e w.s wel

( 3 Shuctured to achieve cou6{ 30 5 3

Rate the siue of the syllabus in terms

28 31

5 wheather course objedive is clear ? 26 38 6 3

Are the books prescribed as a text

6 book/ Renence book in reated to 29 35 5 3

Whether syllabus is relav.nt to real

J 32 32 5

Whether the syllabus G covered with

8 27 35 t3

()

WK- "\^tt/
HL.A0 Ut, Il.1E DF.t:.A ri : j:t-:!ii
Fhrir ,i:tr'.rdlrinirurr i. :., j.j
Lr.,ri ; ) ri r_.lrrn! i,, :' .,.r
li.rriir'i'r):.i:t):!t:l !J/ :rll
 EXCEL ENGINEERING COLLEGE,KOMARAPAIAYAM-637 303

Department of Electronics and Communication

Academl€ Year 201&19

SYILABUS REVIEW TEEDBACKFORM I STUDENTS

CONSOLIDATED COPY

loral no of Feedback Receiv€d iiom students: 720

1
What k the Depth ot the rylLabus
26 2A

Whether Syllabus is carner odented? 3

( whetherrhe coutse was well structured

ro achleve couue outcomes?
11

Rate the sire ofrhe syllabut Jn lems ol

Wheather couEe obje.tive is clear ? 23 33 21 t2

Are tne books presc bed as a texr

boold Refrehce book in relaled to 33

Whether syllabus k rela€nt to real

whether the syLlabus is covered wlth

3 27

(,

drhv Kd ndq
'rcdlnt

HEAD OF TFIE DEP^R'IVIENT

llecltonics Ard connnrnicaticn En'-{ii€ering
Excel Engineering Coiiege
Komarapalayam - 637 303,
 ffi EXCEL ENGINEERING COTI-EGE,
KOMARAPALAYAM-637303'
entof Electronicsandcommunlncation Endneerint
AcademicYear 2018-19
SYLLASUs REVIEW FEEDBACK FORM TEMPIOYER

FEEDEACK CONSOLIDATED

Regulation:2013
TotalNo. of Feedback Rece,ved from E

%Excellent(4) %Good(3)
5,No

s the cource capabl€ ofadding learning values, 33 33 0

v^fo<i^nrr.rhi.crndhumanvaluesinstudents.
33 0
2 hoursyllabus compatiblewith the r€alworld problens 6-l

whatisthe effods rcquned bvthe stodentsto learn the 33 !l !7 33

3
sy|abLs?

57 50 I7 0
Rate the depth of knowledge aboutthe courses

50 50 17 77
('' ls the syllabus meet the industrial standards

k the syllaous burld the students reaoi'v em plovable 33 33 0

67
6
without tra:ni.8
lsthesyllabuss!fficienttoanal\/sesengineeringproblem 100 33 0 0

Arethecou6esprovidegoodbalancebelweentheory 100 33 0 0

8
ls thesyllabus he p5 the students to work in a team and 100 33 0 0
9
50 11 o
10 s the syllabus meetthe expectation ofthe industrY

B
{{
*
{

r' T
I
ta 'I
_!l
{t
ll
*",9:- "'n5-

.. ,-\ ^,\{\h
S-TAFF INCHAI{(]I:

i,:t?-31[:"'fJ,if T:i]
rXCEt INC !N t i ii l. i af, r;.;
i.:rla ).,.,r.-: :' :
 ffi EXCEI ENGINEERING COLIEGE
KOMAMPAI.AYAM-637 303
,

ent of Electronics and Communincation EngineerinS

Academic Year 20$'19
SYLLABUS REVIEW FEEDSACK FORM :PARENIS
FEEOBACK CONSOIIOATED

ReEulation:2013
15

%Excellent{4) %Good(3) %Pootl2l

5.No

Are all the co! rses well structured and caterstne 53 27

.^nn
^o
nrp.r{ )n.l.:rninr ourcome ofvour ward?

Hasthe coulses e nabled vour ward to secure overarl 60 2A 20 0

development?
Has the couues enriched vourwards skills and 67 7 13
3
knowledge?
Haveyou found from your ward that there is balan€e 67 13 13
between theo-y "1d aPPlication?
Haveyourward acquircrealworld knowledg€through 67 20 13 0
(l 5
the courses?
Hasthe courses in thecurriculum promote 27 33 27 t3
5
Entrepren€uBhlp/startups skills?
33 40 13 13
Has the courses f ill the industrial expectation?
'Jlf

(\ t *

y..G^firrn HOD
STAFF INCHARGE
t., : t: ./.r:.:,.1....:_
iri-i.( , ili lr :. : ; tiii i lr.:,i.
CX([i l\'i,]'. : tti.,rt !r)t.; r.t,i
iia)l!.,t..t I.i ril-l l,i ,!:rr r.,.l t r-.1
 EXCEL ENGINEERING COLLEGE,KOMARAPATAYAM'637 303
Depaltment of Electronics and Communication Engineering
Academic Year 2018_19
SYI.I.ABUS REVIEW FEEDBACK FORM :ALUMINI
consolldat€d coPY

AcademicYear:2018'19
Batch:2013-2017
Regulation 12013

Total no of feedback !999ry9!..lil9g3!g!lqq4:llE j 25

%Excell.rt(4) o/"cood(3) %Moder8te(2) %Poor(r)

S.No Descriptions
Gsthe courses wellstlrlctured to achieve course 60 40 0
'L

60 20 20 0
2 Didthe courses enable to build your future career?

Hasthe courses enable the skills required 40 40 8 t2

3
(
40 40 l6 4
4 Rate the depth of knowledge aboutthe courses

are the course sufficidntto enable the students to 60 32 8 0

5 --n i.r6nrifi,thA na..<saw solutions?
---r,-^
l2 8
6 Rate the syllabus and curriculam?

Are the relevant books prescribed for reference/ 76 t2 8 4

1
rext?
Arethe courses provide good balance between theory 40 40 l6 4
8
and application?

teedback Rate: Excellent4 Good 3, Moderate 2,Poor

r

O 611

e"- HOD

li[,4D Ol,J'ltt: irilp ti,.n?r..;,

tttcltoNrCS & i.:)itM ..t.,.
EXCIL ftttCrrutLrirrU ,J I i]: ;.
;r0A,l;t }td t11 .111,4 , 5.;. . ,
 COLIECE,
EXCEL ENGINEERIN6
KOMARAPALAYAM.63T 303
Oepanment of Eledronics and Communincation Engineering
AcademicYear 201&19
SYLLABUS REVIEW FEEDBACK FORM :TEACHERS

FEEDBAC( CONSOLIDATED
NAME OFTHE CLASS /SEM:llECE/lll
TotalNo. ol Leedbacl Received from reacheG:
Oescdptlons %Exc€llent{4) %cood(3) %Modelate(2) %Poo(1)

ls the course obj€ctiv€s are illustrated clearlyto the need

1 100 0 0 0

Are you satisfy the existingsyllabus which you are

2 50 50 0 0
handling?

3 lsthe syllabusdesigned based on averase students level? 63 38 0

lsthe syllabus provided the basi€ knowlledge to carry out

55 0 6
the f ield projecvintehship
ls the prcrequest forthe syllabus avilabl€ in the
(. 5 63 38 0 6

ls the syllabus wellorganized and easy to follow bythe

5 75 0 0

kthesyllabuscover€dfundametak,advancedtopicsand 0
7 75 0
ensuresbalance between theory & applications

lsthetextand R€fer€nce books prescribed in the

0
a 94 6 0
syllabus is standard or not?

I I

-'-'l

.h;,ffiffi$,tg
H[,AI] o! i lli' D[f,ARTM0N'1,
r, ,l0L;ll. tjNG6.,
I
llEcl"iori:r\ '.r,i,t.r1,1fCt,
gx{tl.l ) , 1

i:! rir ' '.r i:-'3ll:'

 EXCEL ENGINEERING COLLEGE ,
KOMARAPALAYAM-637 303
Depanment ot Electronlcs and Communincation Endneerint
AcademicYear 201&19
SYIIABUS REVIEW FEEDBACK FORM TTEACHERS
FEEDBACK CONSOTIDATED

NAME OFTHE CLAsS /SEM:ltlECE/Vl

TotalNo. ol Feedback Received fromTeacherr.
5.No Descriplions %Excellent{4) %Good(3) %Modelate{2) %Poo(11
lsthecoulse objedives arc illustlated clearlytothe need
1 94 6 0 0

Are you satisfythe existing syllabus which you are

2 19 69 6 0
handlinc?

3 ls the syllabLrs designed based on averaSe n!dents level? 69 0 o

ls the syllabus provided the basic knowl edge to carry out

31 0 0
the f ield project/inte.nship
ls the prerequ€stforthe syllabus avilable in the
[. 5 81 13 0 0

ls the syllabus w€llorganized and easy to follow bythe

6 56 38 6 0

f! ndam€tals,advanced topicsand
ls the syllabus cov€ red
7 50 0 o
ensures balance between theory & applications

lsthe text and Reference books prescribed in the

3 69 0 0
syllabus is standard or not?

(J

k'll4otrt.*-
STAFF INCHA(GE

i,"i
' :::r\li:r. \1:':
:

-j,,i.' i,.i. :. .r,

 EXCEL ENGINEERIN6 COIIEGE ,
KOMAMPATAYAM.53T 303
Oepartment ot Eledronics and Communincation Engineering
AcademicYear 2018-19
SYll.aBUS REVIEW FEEDBACK FORM TTEACHERS
FEEDBACK CONSOLIDATEO

NAME OFTHE CLASS /SEMIV ECE/VII

TotalNo. of Feedback Received fromleacheE:
%Excellent(a) %Good(3) %Mod€rate{2) %Poo(11

ls the course objectiv€s are illustrated dearlyto th€ n€ed

I 100 0 0 0

Are you satkfythe existin8 syllabus which you are

2 75 0 0
handling?

3 ls the syllabus designed based on averagestudents level? 25 75 0 0

lsthesyllabus provided the basic knowled8e to carryout

75 1l 0
the f ield project/internship
ls the prereq u€st for the syllabus avilable in the
(. 5 38 50 0

ls the syllabus wellorganized and easy to follow bythe

6 75 13 0 0

ls the svllabus covered fundametals,adva nced topics and

7 50 38 0
ensures balance between theory& app ications

lsthetextand Reference booksprescribed inthe

8 50 38 0
syllabus isstandard or not?

(.,

V@a't*
STAFF INCHARGF,

HEAD OF Tr.tE DEPARTiVTENT

!leclronrcs ArJ lcntfi unkllioi !n!iiruclno
Excel Engineerirrg Cor,ege
._
- 632 303.
^omarapatayanr