Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 3

Department of

Electrical & Electronic Engineering


Independent University, Bangladesh BAETE Accredited

COURSE REVIEW REPORT


Course and Instructor’s Information
Course Title Power Electronics and Drives Course Code EEE 332 Section 01
Term Spring Summer Autumn Year 2021
Instructor Dr. Md. Abdur Razzak Designation Professor
*Any changes of COs from previous semester?
NO YES Specify, if yes
*
Provide explanation in a separate sheet on why and how CO has been changed.
Grade Distribution
Letter Grade A, A- B+, B, B- C+, C, C- D+, D F W I Total

Number of Students 3 8 4 1 1 0 0 17

Percentage (%) 17.65 47.06 23.53 5.88 5.88 0 0 100

Average Grade B-
CO Attainment (KPI >= 50% )
Attainment Attainment
COs CO Statement Remarks for CQI
% Level*
Identify the characteristics of various
Continue with the same TL &
types of dc-dc converters, rectifiers
CO1 94.12 Level 5 assessment to retain the same
(AC-DC converters) and inverters (DC-
level of attainment of CO1.
AC converters).
Emphasize needs to be given on
Design power converters (ac-dc, dc-dc, the design aspects of converters
CO2 64.71 Level 2
dc-ac) with specific requirements. so that CO2 can be achieved at
a higher level.
Emphasize needs to be given on
Develop applications using the
the design aspects of converters
CO3 designed power converters for 41.18 Below KPI
so that CO3 can be achieved a
sustainable development.
higher level.
Identify a contemporary problem
Continue with the same TL &
through literature review whose
CO4 100 Level 5 assessment to retain the same
solution will be designed, developed
level of attainment of CO4.
and verified using power electronics.
* 90 – 100 = Level 5, 80-89.9 = Level 4, 70 – 79.9 = Level 3, 60 – 69.9 = Level 2, 50 – 59.9 = Level 1, < 50 = Below KPI

PO Attainment ( KPI >= 50% )


PO Attainment Attainment
Corresponding PO Remarks for CQI
No % Level*
Continue with the same TL & assessment to
PO2 Problem Analysis 94.12 Level 5
retain the same level of attainment of PO2.
Emphasize needs to be given on the design of
Design / development
PO3 64.71 Level 2 converters so that PO3 can be achieved at a
of Solutions
higher level.
Emphasize needs to be given on the application
Environment and design using converters addressing
PO7 41.18 Below KPI
Sustainability environment so that PO7 can be achieved at a
higher level.
Continue with the same TL & assessment to
PO12 Life Long Learning 100 Level 5
retain the same level of attainment of PO12.
* 90 – 100 = Level 5, 80-89.9 = Level 4, 70 – 79.9 = Level 3, 60 – 69.9 = Level 2, 50 – 59.9 = Level 1, < 50 = Below KPI

Feedback on Curriculum, Teaching-Learning and Assessment


Item Questions Comments
Have the students met the
Completely Mostly Partially None
expected COs?
Have the students met the
Completely Mostly Partially None
Curriculum expected POs?
Any modification needed for NO Specify, if yes
curriculum? YES
Any change on Teaching- NO Specify, if yes
Teaching-
Learning delivery methods
Learning YES
specified in the course outline?
Any change on assessment tools NO Specify, if yes
specified in the course outline? YES
Assessment Test Specify, if others
Please state the best assessment
tools that reflect students’ Assignment
achievement.
Project
Remarks on curriculum, teaching-learning and Some part from the curriculum may be omitted from the
assessment for CQI. curriculum in the next revision.
Feedback on Knowledge Profile, Complex Engineering Problems and Complex Engineering
Activities
K1 (Natural Sciences) K5 (Engineering Design)
What knowledge
Knowledge profile attributes K2 (Mathematics) K6 (Engineering Practice)
Profile have been K3 (Engineering Fundamentals) K7 (Comprehension)
addressed?
K4 (Specialist Knowledge) K8 (Research Literature)
P1 (Depth of knowledge) P5 (Extent of applicable codes)
What complex
Complex engineering P2 Range of conflicting P6 (Extent of stakeholder
Engineering problem attributes requirements) involvement and conflicting
Problems have been P3 (Depth of analysis) requirements)
addressed?
P4 (Familiarity of issues) P7 (Interdependence)
What complex A1 (Range of resources) A4 (Consequences to society
Engineering engineering
A2 (Level of interactions) and the environment)
Activities activities have been
addressed? A3 (Innovation) A5 (Familiarity)
Remarks on knowledge profile,
complex engineering problems and
complex engineering activities.
Reflections
Have your last semester recommendation(s)
Yes No Not Applicable
been implemented?
Please state action plan that should be taken for For the assignments and projects, students may be asked to
the next Instructor to teach this course. build and test the hardware prototype (at least one).
Please include areas of improvement and action Minor revision of curriculum may be done in the next revision
plan to be taken at course or program level. cycle.

Signature of Instructor Abdur Razzak Date 23 / 09 / 2021

You might also like