Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 4

Clin. Cardiol.

22, 357-360 (1 999)

Weight Gain and Insulin Resistance during Nicotine Replacement Therapy


A.R. ASSiu.I,M.D., Y. BEIGEL,M.D.,*
R. SCHRE!.BMAN,R.D.,* Z . SHAFER,M.SC.,* M . F ~ A R u , M . D . *
Lipid Research Laboratory, Cardiology Department, and *Department of Medicine A, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Campus, Petah
Tiqva, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

Summary but the withdrawal of another, unknown ingredient in cigarette


smoke is responsible for the weight gain associated with
Buckground: Although the cessation of smoking reduces smoking cessation.
the increased risk for ischemic heart disease, it is associated
with n~arkedweight gain and presumably insulin resistance,
both of which heighten the risk of coronary heart disease. Key words: insulin resistance, nicotine, smoking
Hypothesis: We investigated the isolated effect of nico-
tine on body weight and insulin resistance during smoking
cessation. Introduction
Mpthods: Eleven healthy, middle-aged heavy smokers
were studied. Insulin sensitivity was assessed by an insulin- Smoking is a major risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovas-
enhanced, frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance cular disease, cancer, and lung disease.' Insulin-resistance
test with minimal model analysis. The subjects were studied syndrome is associated with visceral obesity. elevated plasma
at baseline (last day of smoking) (phase I), at the end of the insulin, elevated blood pressure, dyslipidemia, decreased fib-
6-week nicotine replacement program (phase 2), and after 8 nnolysis, and premature atherosclerosis;2~recent studieshave
weeks without smoking or nicotine replacement (phase 3). found that it is also related to Cigarette smokers as
Resufts:The subjects started to gain weight during nicotine a group are leaner and are insulin resistant compared with non-
replacement (phase 2) (0.3 k 0.2 kglweek, mean f. standard s m o k e r ~ . ~Although
* ' ~ ~ the cessation of smoking reduces the
deviation) and continued to do so at a steady rate after nicotine increased risk of ischemic heart disease, it tends to lead to
replacement was stopped (0.2 & 0.2 kg/week) (p = 0.3). Insulin marked weight gain and an increase in waist-to-hip ratio,x.
sensitivity decreased by 14 & 2.6% during nicotine replace- both risk factors for cardiovascular disease. The components
*
ment but increased by 16 5. I % (compared with phase 2 ) dur- of tobacco smoke responsible for these opposing effects have
ing phase 3, even though the weight gain continued (p = 0.047; not been identified, although nicotine has been implicated by
95% confidence interval: 0.05-5.73). some a u t h o r ~ . ~ , ~ , ~ - ~
Conclusions: Smoking cessation is associated with weight Temporary nicotine substitution by rate-controlled trans-
gain and improvement in insulin resistance. Nicotine is the dermal application has been shown to be effective in assisting
main ingredient in cigarette smoke causing insulin resistance, individuals to stop smoking.'* In this study, we took advantage
of the temporary use of transdermal nicotine replacement in a
group of heavy smokers to investigate the isolated effect of
nicotine on weight gain and insulin resistance and thereby dif-
ferentiate its effects from those of other ingredients of inhaled
cigarette smoke.
The study was supported by a grant from the Yacobson Company,
the representative of CIBA Geigy in Israel.
Methods
Address for reprints:

Prof. M. Fainaru Subjects


Lipid Research Laboratory
Department of Medicine A Seventeen healthy, middle-aged smokers (>20 cigarettes/
Rahin Medical Center day for more than 5 years) were recruited by advertisement on
Petah Tiqva 49 100, Israel the hospital bulletin board. None had a history of heart, liver,
Received: August 1 I , 1998 kidney, metabolic, hematologic, pulmonary, gastrointestinal,
Accepted with revision: October 26, 1998 or neurologic disease, nor detectable abnormalities on physi-
358 Clin. Cardiol. Vol. 22, May 1999

cal examination or laboratory testing. They were all normoten- 27,30,40,50,60,90, 120, and 180 min. Blood glucose was
sive (blood pressure < 140/90 mmHg) and took no regular determined by the glucose-oxidase method (Boehringer.
medications. The study was approved by the hospital Ethics Mannheim) and serum insulin by radioimmunoassay (Sorin.
Committee, and all subjects gave informed consent to partici- Biomedica, Saluggia, Italy).
pate in the study. The subjects were studied at baseline, on the last day of
Dietary habits were confinned by weekly dietary recall and smoking (phase I), at the end of nicotine replacement ther-
interviews. Subjects were encouraged not to change their di- apy (phase 2), and 8 weeks without smoking or nicotine re-
etary habits or physical activity during the study period. Two placement (phase 3). Due to the effects of the menstrual cy-
weeks after stabilization of smoking and dietary habits, the cle on plasma lipids and insulin sensitivity,lh% the studies in
subjects stopped smoking and started replacement therapy women were synchronized on the same day +. 2 days of the
with Nicotine11 ITS@patch (Ciba-Geigy AG, Basel, Switzer- menstrual cycle.
land). The patches were taped daily at 8 A.M. for 24 h. All sub-
jects used 30cm2patches (providing 2 I mg of nicotine over 24 Statistical Analysis
h) for the first 2 weeks, followed by 20 cm2patches (14 mg/24
h) for 2 weeks, and then 10cm2patches (7.7 mg/24 h) for the
Data are presented as mean f standard deviation (SD).
last 2 weeks. Body weight was recorded weekly, and, using a
Significanceof differences between phases were evaluated by
nonelastic tape with the subjects standing, waist and hip cir-
Student's t-test for paired data. Repeated measures analysis of
cumferences were measured according to the World Health
variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the different peri-
Organization criteria.13
ods, and Pearson correlation coefficient was used to study the
Plasma cholesterol, triglyceride, and high-density lipopro-
degree of association between changes in SI and weight. A p
tein (HDL) levels were determined by enzymatic methods
value of 25% was considered significant.
(Boehringer-Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany) after a 12-h
overnight fast. Plasma lipoproteins were determined by the
beta-quantification method designed for the Lipid Research
Clinics p r o t ~ c o l .Insulin
'~ sensitivity (SI) was assessed by an RWultS
insulin-enhanced, frequently sampled intravenous glucose
tolerance test (FSIGT) with minimal model analysis. l 5 The Of the 17 subjects enrolled in the study, 6 did not comply
FSIGT was conducted after an overnight fast and 30 min with the study protocol and were excluded from the analysis (5
recumbency. An intravenousline was inserted into each ante- resumed smoking and 1 had a skin allergy to the nicotine
cubital vein, one for glucose and insulin administration and patches). The baseline characteristicsof the remaining 1 1 sub-
one for sampling. Glucose (0.3 g k g ) and insulin (0.03 Ukg) jects (6 men and 5 women) are shown in Table I. The number
were injected intravenously at 0 and 20 min, respectively,and of cigarettes smoked daily was 24 ? 6 and the duration of
blood samples for glucose and insulin determination were smoking was 3 1 f 12 years (mean f SD).
collected at -5, - 1,2,4,6,8, 10, 12,14, 16, 19,22,23,25,

TABLE II Changes from baseline of anthropometricand metabolic


TABLE I Baselinecharacteristicsof the study group (phase 1) (mean parameters during smoking cessation (A% mean r SD)
c SD)
Nicotine No nicotine
Men Women replacement rep1aceiiient
(6 weeks) (8 weeks)
No. of subjects 6 5
Age (years) 40.8 f 6.7 43.2 2 8. I Body weight +2.5 r 2.4% 4 . 5 2 3.4
Weight (kg) 80.5 f 18.7 61.5 r7.0 Waist-hipratio - +3.3+ 5.6
BMI (kg/m2) 27.7 +. 5.2 23.05 22.4 Fasting glucose - 1 .sk 20 +?.I * 17s
Waist-hip ratio 0.96 +.0.07 0.87 r 0.05 Fasting insulin +II r34 +7 f 38
Smoking (pack X years) 36.7 20.6 36.8 r 12 Insulin sensitivityindex
Fasting glucose (mg/dl) 89.7 k 14.5 85.4 +. 5.2 (1 0-4 x min-V(pU/ml) -14i26" +2 f 5 I"
Fasting insulin (pU/ml) 10.1 k7.6 8.8 r 2.5 Serum cholesterol
Insulin sensitivity index Total - 2 r 12 -9k 15.5"
(lo4 x min-'/(pU/nd) 7.6 r 5.5 10.4r5.7 HDL +16r 14'' +13f 19.2"
Serum cholesterol(mg/dl) LDL -5k14 -42 14
Total 213.2 2 29.1 184.0k 19.0 Serum triglyceride +I 2.35 +31t31
HDL 33.5 r3.9 42.4k 17.6
a p = 0.047.
LDL 144.2 +: 32.9 115.2+17.1
Serum triglyceride(mg/dl) 110.5 +.40.5 *
68.4 22.0 bp=0.06.
'p= 0.004.
Ahhreviations: SD = standard deviation, BMI = body mass index, d p=0.08.
HDL = high-densitylipoprotein,LDL = low-densitylipoprotein. Abbreviationsas in Table I.
A. R. Assali et al.: Insulin resistance in smokers 359

Changes in the anthropometric variables and biochemical 20 1 I


analyses during the study are shown in Table 11. Subjects be-
*
gan to gain weight during nicotine replacement (0.3 0.2 kg/
week for 6 weeks) and continued to do so after nicotine re-
placement was stopped (0.2 2 0.2 kglweek for 8 weeks) (p =
0.3).The fasting insulin levels increased during phase 2 (nico-
tine replacement therapy) but decreased during phase 3 (no
smoking,no nicotine replacement).The mean SI decreased by
14% during phase 2 in correlation with the 2.5% increase in
body weight (Table 11, Fig. I), but increased by 16% during
phase 3 (in comparison with phase 2) [p = 0.047; 95% confi-
-25 I
dence interval (CI): 0.05,5.73], although weight gain contin- 6 Weeks 14 Weeks
ued at a rate not different from phase 2 (repeated measures No smoking with NRT N o smoking without NRT
analysis of variance p = 0.63; 95% CI: -2.81, +1.79). The FIG.1 Percent changes from baseline in weight and insulin sensi-
Pearson correlationcoefficientsbetween the changesin SI and tivity during smoking cessation and nicotine replacement ( mean f
percentage weight gain were -0.79 (p = 0.005) for period 2 standard error of the mean). NRT = nicotine replacement therapy.
and -0.05 (p = 0.70) for period 3 (Fig. 1). Serum lipid and = Weight, = insulin sensitivity.
1 ipoprotein concentrations showed smaller changes during
both periods (2 and 3): low-density lipoproteins (LDL) de-
creased by 5% during phase 2, but increasedby 1% in phase 3,
and total cholesterol decreased by 2 and 7%, respectively. ever the reason for the weight gain observed during smoking
High-densitylipoproteinconcentrationincreasedby 16% (p = cessation, it was associated with an increase in insulin resis-
0.004) in phase 2 compared with baseline and decreased by tance in our subjects during nicotine replacement therapy and
3% in phase 3 compared with phase 2. is consistent with previous reports.lXIn contrast. the increase
in insulin resistance stopped and even improved during contin-
uous weight gain observed after nicotine replacement was
Discussion stopped. Therefore, it is conceivable that nicotine rather than
weight gain is responsible for the initial increase in insulin re-
We have demonstratedthat smoking cessation is associated sistance observed in the present study.
with a steady weight gain (0.2 kglweek for 14 weeks and Cigarette smoking is associated with decreased insulin
more),whichis not prevented by transdermal nicotine replace- ~ensitivity.~, It is known that smoking acutely impairs insulin
ment. As expected,IXthis weight gain was associated with a action and leads to insulin resistance.&-"'These reports sup-
decrease in insulin sensitivity during the nicotinereplacement port a causative relationship between nicotine and insulin
period, although a similarweight gain after nicotinewithdraw- action and c o n f m the observation of Eliasson rt a/. that
al was associated with an increase in insulin sensitivity. nicotine is one of the major mediators of insulin resistance in
It has been known for years that smoking cessation results smokers. Nicotine is known to enhance the activity of the
in weight gain (mean 2.8 k 4.4 kg in men and 3.5-5.0 kg in sympathetic nervous system, to raise the circulating levels of
w ~ m e n ) ;l 9~indeed,
~ ~ . the increase in the prevalence of over- catecholamines, growth hormone, adrenocorticotropic hor-
weight in the United States has been attributedin part to smok- mone, cortisol, prolactin, and beta-endorphin, and to decrease
ing ce~sation.~ Although the exact mechanism for this effect is estrogen levels,23all powerful antagonists of insulin action.
not known, several contributory factors have been proposed, The conflicting observations of Bolli et ~ 1 . ' that
~ nicotine-
such as increased food intake?() alteration in physical activi- based chewing gum did not alter glucose uptake during a 6-h
ty,2' and change in metabolic rate.9,22Some authors have im- clamp in type I1 diabetic patients and those in the present
plicated nicotine, one of the myriad chemicals present in in- work could be due to differences in lifestyle, diet, the pres-
haled tobacco smoke, for this weight gain,23but others have ence of non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM),
failed to prevent this weight gain with the use of nicotine re- and degree of physical activity.
placement during smoking c e ~ s a t i o n25. ~Our
~ ~results are in Our study has several limitations. First. we confirmed
agreement with those of Hajek et u E . * ~ and Sutherland et ul.= smoking cessation by self-reports and not by laboratory anal-
which suggestthat ingredientsin inhaled tobacco smoke other ysis. Second, serum nicotine and cotinine levels were not
than nicotine play an important role in weight gain. Thus, al- measured, and therefore we cannot compare the nicotine ex-
ternative approachesare needed to minimizeweight gain after posure during active smoking in the study cohort with that
smoking cessation. during nicotine patch replacement.Third, we failed to prevent
Insulin resistanceis associated with weight gain.18.26 Insul- weight gain by a weight control program when our prelim-
in-mediated glucose disposal declines by 30 to 40% when an inary objective was to isolate the effect of nicotine replace-
individual is 40% over ideal body weight.27This increase in ment on insulin sensitivityfrom that of expected weight gain.
insulin resistance seems to result from alterationsin both the Nevertheless, our use of a prospective approach. compared
number of insulin receptors and postreceptoractivity.26What- with earlier cross-sectional studies, increases the importance
360 Clin. Cardiol. Vol. 22, May 1999

of our observations.In addition, our longitudinal design was 12. Henningfield JE: Nicotine medication for smoking cessation. N
better suited to test the role of nicotine while keeping diet and EnglJMed 1995;333:1196-1203
physical activity constant. 13. World Heath Organization: Measuring obesity-classificatioii and
description of anthropometricdata: Report on a WHO consultation
on the epidemiology ofobesity. War.saw:fokrrrd, WHO 1987;2-7
14. Lipid Research Clinics Manual of Laboratory Operations: Lipid
Conclusion andLipopr#teinAnal~si,s. DHEW Publications No. ( N I H ) 75: 618.
May 1974
Nicotine is the main ingredientin cigarette smoke causing 15. Welch s,Gebhart SSP, Bergman RN, Phillips LS: Minininl model
analysis of intravenousglucose tolerance tests derived insulin \en-
insulin resistance,as observed in smokers and ex-smokers re- sitivity in diabetic subjects. J Clipz Eiidoc.rirro/ M m h d Ic)90;7I :
ceiving nicotine replacement therapy. However, it is the with- 1508-1 5 18
drawal O f ingredients other than nicotine in Cigarette smoke 16. Jones DY, Judd JT, Taylor pR, Campbell ws,Nair pp: ~ e n s t r l l n ~
that i s responsible for the weight gain associated with cessa- cycle effect on plasma lipids. Merubolisrii 198837: 1-2
tion of smoking. 17. Valdes CT, Elkind-Hirsch KE: Intravenous glucose tolerance test
derived insulin sensitivity changes during the menstrual cyclc. .I
Clin Endocrinol Metab 199I ;72:642-M6
18. Caro JF: Insulin resistance in obese and nonobese man. J Clirr
References EndocrinolMefub 1991;73:691495
19. Moffatt RJ, Owens SG: Cessation from cigarette smoking:
I . McBride PE: The health consequences of smoking. Med Clin Changes in body weight, body composition, resting metabolism,
North A m 1992;76:333-353 and energy consumption.Metdxdism I99 1 ;40:465470
2. Reaven GM: Role of insulin resistance in human disease. Diabetes 20. Elgerot AU: Psychological and physiological changes during
198837: 1595-1607 tobacco abstinence in habitual smokers. J Clhi Psjcliol 197834:
3. Desprks JP, Lamarche B, Mauribge P, Cantin B, Dagenais GR, 759-764
Moorjani S. Lupien PJ: Hyperinsulinemiaas an independent risk 21. Perkins KA, Epstein LH, Marks BL, Stiller RL, Jacob RG: The ef-
factor for ischemic heart disease.NEnglJMed 1996;334:952-957 fect of nicotine on energy expenditure during light physical activi-
4. Attvall S, Fowelin J, Lager I. Von Schenck H, Smith V Smoking ty. N Engl J Med 1989;320:898-903
induces insulin resistance: A potential link with the insulin resis- 22. Hellerstein MK, Benowitz NL, Neese RA, Schwartr JM, Hoh 11.
tance syndrome.Jlnteni Med 1993;223:327-332 Jacob P, Hsieh J, Faix D: Effects of cigarette smoking nnd its ccss;i-
5. Facchini FS, Hollenbeck CB, Jeppesen J, Chen V-DI, Reaven tion on lipid metabolism and energy expenditurein heavy smokers.
GM: Insulin resistance and cigarette smoking. Lancet 1992;339: J Clin Invest 1994;93:265-272
1128-1 130
6. Frati AC. Iniestra F, Raul Ariza C: Acute effect of cigarette smok-
23. Benowitz NL: Pharmacologic aspects of cigarette smoking and
ing on glucose tolerance and other cardiovascular risk factors. nicotineaddiction.NEnglJMed 1988;319:1318-1330
Diuhetes Care I 996 19 I I 2- 1 I 8 24. HajekP,Jackson P, Belcher M: Long tenn use of nicotine chewing
7. Eliasson B, Attvall S, Taskinen MR, Smith V: The insulin resis- gum: Occurrence, determinants and effect on weight gain. J A r r r
tance syndrome in smokers is related to smoking habits. Arterio- Med Assoc 1988;260:1593-156
d e r Tliroiizb 19911;14:1946-1 950 25. Sutherland G, Stapleton JA, Russell MA, Jarvis MJ, Harek P, Bel-
8. Shimokata H, Muller DC, Andres R: Studies in the distributionof cher M, Feyerabend C: Randomized controlled trial of nasal nico-
body Lbt. 111. Effects of cigarette smoking. J A m MedAssoc 1989; tine spray in smoking cessation.Lancer I992:34O:324-329
261 : I 169-1 I73 26. Eckel RH: Insulin resistance: An adaptation for weight maintc-
9. Flegal KM, Troiano RP, Pamuk ER, Kuczmarski RJ, Campbell nance. Lancet 1992340: 1452-1453
SM: The influence of smoking cessation on the prevalenceof over- 27. Golay A, Felber JP, Jequier E, DeFronzo RA, Ferrannini E: Meta-
weight in the United States.N Engl JMed 1995;333:I 165-1 170 bolic basis of obesity and non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus.
10. Eliasson B, Taskinen MR. Smith V Long term use of nicotine gum Diabetes Metab Rev 1988;4:727-747
wiated with hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance. Circu- 28. Bolli G, Perriello G, De Feo P, Motolese M. Brunetti P: Effects of
Irtriori 1996;94:878-88 I cigarette smoking and transdermal nicotine on glucose regulation
I I , Rher MD. Rampling MW, Brown J, Robinson R, Richmond W, in noninsulin dependent diabetes mellitus. In Smoking u s ( I C U P
Cholerton S, Bain BJ, Sever PS: Acute changes in atherogenicand diovuscular Risk Factor-New Strategies j b r Smokirig Cc,.ssotiorr
thrombogenic factors with cessation of smoking. J Roy Soc Med (Ed. Wilhelmsen L), p. 52-57. Lewiston N Y Hogrete Xr Huher
I090;83: 1 4 6I48 Publishers, 1991

You might also like