Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Literatura Norteamericana Tema 3
Literatura Norteamericana Tema 3
Literatura Norteamericana Tema 3
Anne Bradstreet
Learning objectives
Activity
previous units together. Due to the specific difficulties which might arise, you
will receive plenty of practical assistance and detailed advice for responding
not only to Anne Bradstreet’s poems but to the works of many other poets as
well. Hence,all of your present effort will be rewarded now andlater, when
you apply this knowledgeto the analysis of other poems written in English.
— locking: / x
— syllable: / x x
— forgetting: x / x
— sorrow:
— acquaintance:
— thousand:
— manifold:
— bridegroom:
— heavens:
— recompense:
— immortality:
1. First, divide the lines into syllables, and count them. The following
examples have been drawn from the four different poems by
Bradstreet which are included in the textbook:
— Thou /ill- / formed / off / spring / of / my / fee / ble / brain, (10 syllables)
— I/prize / thy / love / more / than / whole / mines / of / gold (10 syllables)
— In/si/ lent / night / when / rest / I / took, (8 syllables)
— Let’s / say / He’s / mer / ci ful / as / well / as / just. (10 syllables)
28 A STUDY GUIDE FOR AMERICAN LITERATURE TO 1900
. Divide the lines into feet, marking them with vertical lines. Note that
notall the lines in a poem need to be madeup of the same numberof
feet. Identify what kind of foot is dominant by lookingat the repetition
of a fixed pattern of syllables. Common types of metrical feet are:
. Count the numberof feet in each line, bearing in mindthat there may
be variations. Lines are classified into the following types according
to the numberof metrical feet they have:
— Tetrameter: fourfeet.
— Pentameter:five feet. The line of five iambic feet, which is called
iambic pentameter, is preeminent in English poetry.
— Heptameter: sevenfeet.
— Octameter: eightfeet.
. Do not expectto find uniform regularity in all the lines, since some of
them maybeshorter or longer than the predominant meter. Regularity
Unit 3: ANNE BRADSTREET 29
In the following example, the caesura does not occur right in the
middle of the line, but after the second foot of the pentameter:
7. Readers may differ over the scansion of a given line. One person’s
four-stress line may be another’s three- or five-stressline.
The term rhymerefersto the use of similar soundsin the stressed syllables
at the ends of two or more words. The pattern of end rhymes in a poem is
called rhyme scheme. To learn how to determine the rhyme scheme of any
given poem, bear in mindthe following tips:
30 A STUDY GUIDE FOR AMERICAN LITERATURETO 1900
3. Whenthe final vowel sounds are the same, as well as any consonant
sounds that follow the vowels, we call it exact rhyme, which is also
named perfect rhymeor full rhyme(e.g. the word cat rhymes with
bat, fat, hat, mat, sat and rat). A rhymethat is not exact because there
is a repetition of the consonant sounds following the vowel sounds, but
the vowel sounds are not identical, is called para-rhyme, partial
rhyme, imperfect rhyme, half rhymeor slant rhyme(e.g. the words
room and storm).
4. In eye rhyme:the spellings are similar, but the pronunciations are not
(e.g. brow and blow; flood and good).
usually have a set pattern of meter and rhyme. Stanzasare classified into the
following types according to the numberoflines they have:
— Couplet: a stanza formed by twolines that generally rhyme and have the
same length. Although couplets form distinct units, they are frequently
not separated from each other by a space on the page. If the pair
compriseslines that have different lengths, it is called a distich (usually
a dactylic hexameter followed by a dactylic pentameter).
— Tercet: a three-line stanza.
— Quatrain: a four-line stanza. It is the most common stanzaic form in
English.
— Sestet: a six-line stanza.
— Octave or octet: an eight-line stanza. The most famous is the oftava
rima, consisting of iambic pentameters rhyming abababcc.
Bibliography
Primary sources:
Secondary sources:
Cowell, Pattie, and Anne Stanford, eds. Critical Essays on Anne Bradstreet.
Boston: G.K. Hall, 1983.
Dolle, Raymond F. Anne Bradstreet: A Reference Guide. Boston: G.K. Hall,
1990.
Gordon, Charlotte. Mistress Bradstreet: The Untold Life of America’s First
Poet. New York:Little, Brown, 2005.
Hammond, Jeffrey A. The American Puritan Elegy: A Literary and Cultural
Study. New York: Cambridge UP, 2000.
Martin, Wendy. An American Triptych: Anne Bradstreet, Emily Dickinson,
Adrienne Rich. Chapel Hill: U of North Carolina P, 1984.
Nicolay, Theresa Freda. Gender Roles, Literary Authority, and Three American
Women Writers: Anne Dudley Bradstreet, Mercy Otis Warren, and Margaret
Fuller Ossoli. New York: Peter Lang, 1995.
UNIT 3
AnneBradstreet (c. 1612-1672)
family and her husband’s emigrated to the New World with John Winthrop’s
fleet aboard the Arbella to escape religious persecution. They were not
Separatists like William Bradford, but Non-Separatist Puritans who wanted to
reform the Church of England from within and were persecuted for their
radical theology. Whereas Separatists like William Bradford settled Plymouth
Plantation, the Non-Separatists settled the Massachusetts Bay Colony.
Anne Bradstreet’s husband, a graduate of Cambridge University, was
secretary to the Company. He became the wealthiest man in Roxbury and for
a time was governor of the Massachusetts Bay Colony. The couple’slife in
America was much harder than it had been in England, however, and Anne
disliked the “manners” of the New World. They movedhousesseveral times,
always to more remote areas (from Boston to Newtown, then to Ipswich,
and finally to North Andover) in order to improve their financial situation.
They had to confront manyofthe difficulties and dangersthatall settlers had
to face, often enduring sickness and being constantly vulnerable to attacks. Of
the large party who were under the leadership of Governor John Winthrop,
some two hundred died within eighteen monthsoftheir arrival. In spite of her
ill health, Anne gavebirth eight times andall of her children—four sons and
four daughters— grew to adulthood. She often felt the threat of death,
especially in childbirth, which she anticipated with great apprehension, but she
lived to be sixty years old.
Literary critics generally consider two aspects of Anne Bradstreet: on the
one hand, her public self as a member of a community of devout andstrict
Puritans, as the dutiful daughter of a prominent man and as the submissive wife
of a well-known colonyofficial; and, on the other hand, her private self,
emotionally attached to her family as a wife, mother and grandmother. Her
work showsthe complex struggle to reconcile both aspects: the public voice,
whichtendsto be imitative, and the private voice, which is more original. She
is often seen as a poet of ambivalencesandhesitancies, of unresolved conflicts,
of tensions between herreligious duty and her inner feelings. She probably
experienced somekindofself-division based on the tensions between what she
thought she ought to feel and whatshe really felt. Puritan theology told her
what she had to believe and rigorous social codes told her how she had to
behave, but she also had to cope with her own deep feelings and personal
perceptions in the both attractive and harsh life of a colony. For instance,
Puritan theologians had warnedthat the senses were unreliable and that appeals
to the imagination were dangerous. This particular religious doctrine was
contrary to her nature, for she found great pleasure in the agreeable realities of
the present and wascaptivated by the beautiful landscape of the New World.
She wasalso terrified when she crossed the Atlantic in a small overcrowded
ship, and extremely distressed whenever she had to confront misfortune, in the
UNIT 3: ANNE BRADSTREET(c. 1612-1672) 43
form of material loss (e.g. the burning of her Andover house) or, even worse,
when several of her grandchildren died. Her later poems show how difficult it
was for her to control some of her impulses. Furthermore, she acknowledged
that she had been troubled by religious doubts all her life, due to spiritual
confusion “concerning the verity of scriptures,” a remark that should be taken
into account when analysing her extensive use of biblical sources.
Asfor herliterary strategies, she felt she had to abide by the principles of
Puritan aesthetics, which encouraged her to adopt somefeatures of the typical
“plain style,” but her work was also deeply rooted in the ornamented style of
the Renaissance tradition. She was very much influenced by sixteenth-century
poets such as Sir Edmund Spenser (c.1552-99), Sir Philip Sidney (1554-86), Sir
Walter Raleigh (c.1554-1618), and the French Calvinist poet Guillaume du
Bartas (1544-90), whom she called her “literary godfather.” Following their
example, in her early verse she was prone to use elaborate conceits and strained
metaphors. She wasalso inspired by her British contemporaries, the English
Metaphysical poets, such as John Donne (1572-1631) and George Herbert
(1593-1633). In spite of the official Puritan condemnation of figurative
language (that is, language that departs from the literal meaning of the words
used), sensual imagery and all other forms of verbal artifice, many poems
written by Puritans reveal a high degreeofliterary complexity. They draw not
only from the Bible as a source of inspiration, but also from classical models
and her contemporary writers. Apart from the Scriptures, they are full of
allusions to the works of Ovid, Virgil, Cicero and Horace, and include
references to Spenser, Sidney, Shakespeare, Herbert and Vaughan. The
discovery of a number of such poemshasled critics to indicate a wide gap
between Puritan theory and practice. In fact, a major shift in the development
of New England Puritanism took place around the middle of the seventeenth
century, when eminent Puritans endorsed this movement towards verbal artistry
both in oral and written forms, It was argued that figurative and symbolic
language could enhancethe believers’ abilities to perceive divine will. Though
caution wasstill preached, someliterary experimentation was encouraged.
Thus, rather than condemning the use of all kinds of metaphors, it was
suggested that some of them could help the elect to understandreligioustruths.
Despite biographical differences between the Puritan mother and the
Catholic nun, Anne Bradstreet and Sor Juana Inés de la Cruz (1651-95), also
known as “the tenth muse” of the New World, share some experiences(ill
health, inner spiritual crises, a deep sense of religion combined with a genuine
concern for secular problems, and the difficulties of writing in a male-
dominated intellectual world) and poetic themes (e.g. speaking about their
poemsas their children). Both of them adhered to the major aesthetic
conventions of their times, and wittily repudiated prejudices against women
44 AMERICAN LITERATURE TO 1900
Anne Bradstreet wrote this poem as the new preface to the second edition of
her collection of verses, posthumously published in Boston underthetitle of
Several Poems Compiled with Great Variety of Wit and Learning (1678). John
Woodbridge, Anne Bradstreet’s brother-in-law, had inserted a well-intentioned
preface to the first edition of the volume entitled The Tenth Muse (1650), in
which heasserted that she had not neglected her family duties in order to
write poetry: “These poemsare the fruit but of some few hours, curtailed
from her sleep and other refreshments.” As womenat that time were pressured
to stay out of the public eye, in his preface Woodbridge emphasized that he was
solely responsible for the publication of the volume, without the author’s
approval. He introduced Bradstreet’s poetry using a reproductive metaphorin
which he presented himself as an impatient midwife who forced the birth
before its due time, thus provoking the mother’s pain. When he explained
how hedaredto “expose her labors to the world’s disdain,” he wasreferring
both to the publication of Bradstreet’s poemsandthe last stage of pregnancy,
thus uniting mental and physical processes. In “The Author to Her Book,”
Bradstreet responded to Woodbridge’s birth metaphor, which was common
among seventeenth-century writers. The specific metaphor of book as offspring
can be traced back to Plato, and was also used by male poets such as Sir
Philip Sidney, Sir Edmund Spenser, John Donne, and even Guillaume du
Bartas, Bradstreet’s acknowledged “literary godfather.” Nevertheless,
Bradstreet departed from her masters by taking the metaphor much further and
by usingit in order to claim her ownlegitimacyasa writer.
The speakerof “The Author to Her Book”is the poet, likened to a mother
whose child is her book of poems. The poet, well aware of her society’s
reaction to women whodareto venture out of their prescribed place, portrays
herself in the more acceptable role of a powerless mother who lacks the
resources to care for her family. In order to assure readers that her writings are
not intended as a challenge, she presents her book as a poorandillegitimate
child, dressed in “homespun cloth” and fatherless. Although she humbly
apologizes forthe “ill-formed offspring of the feeble brain,” unwisely exhibited
in public without her consent, she acknowledges her work.In the first line, she
calls attention to the fact that her book/child sprang from her mind,not her
womb, and wasconceived without the intervention of any masculine force.
Asis the case in other poems by Bradstreet, many aspects remain uncertain
and it would be unwise to rush into simplistic interpretations. For instance,
there is no absolute certainty that she was completely ignorant of the
publication of her first book, since some poets (men and women) of the
period oversaw the publication of their poems while disclaiming any
46 AMERICAN LITERATURE TO 1900
1. Analyse the extended metaphorin this poem. Bear in mind that a metaphor
is an implicit comparison or identification of one thing with another,
suggesting an analogy between them. An extended metaphoris a detailed
and complex metaphorthat extends over a long section of a work through
several points of comparison.
48 AMERICAN LITERATURE TO 1900
Among the various poems which the author wrote about her happy marriage
to Simon Bradstreet, we have selected her best-known and mostoften quoted
lyric. Here the poet is also the speaker, who expresses her passionate and
ardent love for her husband, a love that outlasts death. As this particular
poem focuses on her desire and longing for her husband,rather than on her
duty as a wife, it provides a contrasting image with the popular view of the
supposedly invariable Puritan reserve andrestraint.
Although Puritans believed that conjugal love was a proof of piety, they
worried that married couples would lose sight of God. Loving one’s spouse
and children “excessively and for their own sake” wasseen as a dangerous
attachment. This important Puritan belief has been called the “doctrine of
weanedaffections,” which emphasized gradual detachment from everything in
this world. According to Christian doctrine, however, secular love must not be
rejected becauseit can be linked to eternal love, blessed by God. Bradstreet
develops the central idea of this poem in a clear and logical manner: she
feels so loved by her husbandthat the only way she can reciprocate is by
asking the heavens to repay him; earthly love is the best of this world, only to
be surpassed by the union of lovers in eternity.
Bradstreet uses a highly allusive biblical language. The beginning ofthis
poem calls to mind Ephesians 5, which defines the nature and duties of
marriage. While directing the couple to love one another, Saint Paul in
Ephesians 5:25 likens the love in an earthly marriage to the mystical marriage
of Christ, as bridegroom, and the Church, as bride. In thefirst part of line 1 the
poet echoes the phrase “and they two shall be one flesh” (Ephesians 5:31).
Then, in the middle section of the poem, Bradstreet shifts her biblical allusions
from the Pauline epistle to the Old Testament, by echoing in line 7 the phrase
“Many waters cannot quench love” (Song of Solomon 8:7).
Regarding metre, the following lines are rhymed iambic pentameters. As
the twelve lines rhymein pairs, the poem is formed by six rhymed couplets.
Analyse the three metaphorsin lines 5-7 noting that Bradstreet’s images of
desire—thirst and wealth—are derived from The Song of Solomon.
An iambic pentameteris a line of five iambic feet. Look at the metre ofthis
poem and watchfor any key variations, bearing in mind that generally any
variation from the norm or disruption points to special emphasis. Note in
particular the effect of the irregularity of the first line and that of the extra
syllable in the last couplet, that is, the final twolines.
This poem is written in couplets. Look over the rhyme and find one word
that does not fit the rhyme scheme.It is an example of para-rhyme, also
knownaspartial rhyme, because the sounds almost rhyme. What effect
doesthis variation have?
SPR en af PSEA RES
5. When Bradstreet wrote this poem, European adventurers had not given up
their hope of finding a shortcut to the riches of the Indies. This is an
example of allusion, that is, a reference to something with which readers
are assumed to be familiar. Why do you think Bradstreet made this
comparison between love and “the riches of the East,” in spite of the fact
that Puritans rarely mentioned such material purposes and emphasized
spiritual ones?
6. Find the wordsrelated to ownership and then trace the imagery of wealth and
debt throughout the poem. In your analysis, bear in mind that indebtedness
implies a need to repay, either in one’s lifetime or after one’s death.
7. Check the definitions of “ought” (line 8) and explain how twodifferent
meanings of this word may be working together.
8. Explain the paradoxin the last line of the poem. A paradoxis a statement
which appears,at first glance, to be self-contradictory, yet which, on close
examination, reveals an unexpected, valid meaning.
9. Are there any indications in this poem that the author considers her social
role equal or subordinate to her husband’s? Does she declare herinability
to reciprocate her husband's affections? Is there a daminance/submission
relationship, or is the wife’s love balanced against her husband's love for
her? Does the poet convey the idea of mutual love within marriage?
10. To what extent is this poem an expression of individual feeling? Do you find
any unresolved conflicts between the author’s inner feelings and the rigid
tenets of Puritan orthodoxy?
This poem provides a clear example of the tension the poet experienced
between her domestic concerns and herspiritual aspirations. The speaker,
whois once more the poet herself, sadly recalls in detail the prized material
possessionsshelost in the fire which destroyed her house. Bradstreet dwells
on her misfortune for the first 35 lines when, suddenly,in line 36 there is an
abrupt changeof direction. She turns to the Bible and finds comfort in the
promise of a permanent housein heaven.
In this poem the rhyming couplets are also formed by iambs, but each line
has eight syllables, instead of the ten syllables in the lines of the other three
poems in ourselection. If lines formed by five metrical feet were called
pentameters, the ones with only four metrical feet are called tetrameters.
Therefore, the following poem is written in rhymed iambic tetrameters.
52 AMERICAN LITERATURE TO 1900
Line 54. Treasure lies Above, see “Sell that ye have, and give alms; provide yourselves bags
which wax not old, a treasure in the heavens that faileth not, where no thief
approacheth neither moth corrupteth, For where yourtreasure is, there will your
heart be also” (Luke 12:33-34).
. Analyse how the author grieves for the home and worldly goods she haslost.
. How well did the author express the struggle between her love of this
world and herreliance on the next? Do you think that Bradstreet finally
resolved the conflict between hernatural attachmentto earthly things and
the awareness that material goods are not worth one’s attention when
comparedto eternal values? oe
10, Whatis the author trying to communicate in this poem? Does she seek to
influence or change the way her readers think? Commenton the poet’s
overall intention. a
UNIT 3: ANNE BRADSTREET(c. 1612-1672) 55
In Classical times, an elegy was any poem on any subject (death, war, love,
etc.) written in elegiac metre.’ Since the Renaissance, however, an elegy
has been a meditative poem on the death of a person. Although mostelegies
focus on the deeds and accomplishments of the deceased person, elegies on
infant deaths cannot dwell on such events for obvious reasons and,
consequently, form a class apart. Bradstreet’s poems mourning the deaths of
her grandchildren resemble Elizabethan elegies such as Ben Jonson’s “On My
First Son.” Bradstreet does not break abruptly with the tradition of Christian
elegies, which are supposed to close with consolation and the affirmation
that death is part of a divine plan, but she does not easily accept with pious
resignation the death of her own grandchildren as part of the providential
scheme. Each oneofher elegies expresses in a different mannerthe internal
conflicts which the author experienced when she had to confront the
frightening and sorrowful reality of infant mortality.
In the elegy to her grandchild Elizabeth Bradstreet, who died in 1665 at the
age of “a year and a half,” the author compares the death of old people to that
of babies by evoking full grown trees and ripe fruit in contrast with new
plants and buds prevented from achieving their natural cycle. The elegy
written in 1669 in memory of another grandchild, Anne Bradstreet, at the age
of “three years and seven months,” showsan even deepergrief, but the poet
finally seems to be able to control her sadness thanks to the expectation of
immortality. In one of Anne Bradstreet’s last poems, “To the Memory of My
Dear Daughter-in-Law, Mrs. Mercy Bradstreet,” the author admits that her
intellect is unable to make sense of Mercy’s death, which occurred a few
days after giving birth to a girl, whoalso died.
In the elegy we haveselected, the author expresses how hard it is for her to
reconcile the deep love she feels for her deceased grandson and her duty to
maintain her faith in spite of her suffering. In the first stanza, she reveals a
sorrow which threatens to overwhelm her because she seemsto be left alone
to struggle with despair. In the second stanza the poet appears to be able to
master her grief and accept the divine will, although it could be argued that
such acceptanceis not really complete. If the irony of the poem is emphasized,
it can be interpreted as a direct criticism of the goodness of God.
This elegy is written in rhymed iambic pentameters.
1 Classical elegiacs were usually written in strophic units of two rhymed lines, of different
lengths, expressing a complete idea. The typical couplet of such elegies was the distich, a
rhymed couplet comprising a dactylic hexameter followed by a dactylic pentameter. A
dactyl is a metrical foot consisting of one stressed syllable followed by two unstressed ones.
56 AMERICAN LITERATURE TO 1900
Line 7. “He putteth his mouth in the dust; if so be there may be hope” (Lamentations 3:29).
1. How doesBradstreet bring to the surface the most important features of her
grandson? What comparisons does she make to get at the essential
attributes of the baby?
2. Analyse the first two lines of this poem. Why doesit begin so harshly? What
is the overall effect of this opening?
3. Comment onthe repetitive use of the exhortative “let’s.”
4. Apostropheis a figure of speech in which thing, a place, an abstract quality,
an idea, a dead or absent person is addressed as if present and capable of
understanding. Can you find an example of apostrophein this elegy?
5. Explain the relationship between the speaker and thelistener (the character
to whom thespeakeris talking) in this poem.
6. It has been suggested that biblical allusions in Bradstreet’s elegies offer
comfort and reinforce trust in God, whereas natural imagery emphasizes
mortality. Can you find any evidence that supports this theory?
7. There is ambiguity when more than one meaningor interpretation is possible.
Ambivalence means that more than oneattitude is being displayed by the
poet. Can youfind any evidence of ambiguity and ambivalencein this poem?
UNIT 3: ANNE BRADSTREET(c. 1612-1672) 57
10. Reread the whole poem and explain why you acceptor reject the view that
Bradstreet demonstrates the need to be resigned and to keepfaith in the
redemptive future, since human reason cannot explain God’s will.
. Look for the theme, that is, the central idea or statement of each poem,
which may be stated directly or indirectly. How would you describe
Bradstreet’s handling of her themes?
. To what extent does Bradstreet’s poetry reflect Puritan thinking? Can you
find any explicit evidence of Puritanism in her poems? Doeshervision also
express a departure from conventional Puritan thinking?
Point out the elements derived from the tradition of Renaissance humanism
and those taken from the Christian tradition. Note that Bradstreet underwent
a Puritan upbringing in a culturally liberal atmosphere.
10. Compare the metre of the four poems in order to point out similarities
and differences. Can you suggest any reasons why the author used
tetrameters instead of pentameters in one of the four poems?
4. Whatis the best restatementof “Thy love is such | can no wayrepay”(line 9)?
a. You love me so muchthat | am unableto reciprocate.
b. Such love as yours deservesto bepaidfor.
c. Such love as mine deservesto be paid for.
d. Your love deservesthat | give you somethingin return.
5. Whatis the main idea of this poem?
a. It is the duty of a married couple to love each other.
b. Conjugallove is a proof ofpiety.
c. Loving one’s spouse maylead to a dangerous attachment.
d. Married couples who love each other passionately without losing sight of
Godwill enjoyeternallife.