Www-Theepochtimes-Com - Foie Gras - Delicacy or Cruelty

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 3

Home Subscribe Print Edition A dvertise National Editions Other Languages SEA RCH

Advertisem ent
Nation Home > | Region: United States > C hicago
World
Printer version | E-Mail article | Give feedback
China
Business
Opinion Delicacy or Cruelty
Life The debate behind Chicago's foie gras ban
Health
Science By Conan Milner
Arts & Jul 06, 2006
Epoch Times Chicago Staff
Entertainment
Sports
To most people, the word "delicacy" brings
Features
to mind a culinary oddity that is both rare
Nine Commentaries and expensive. If individuals who partake
on the Communist
Party of such indulgences can face revulsion
FIFA World Cup 2006 from those of less sophisticated palates, a
Organ Harvesting in high price tag becomes the only obstacle to
China's Labor Camps enjoyment. However, on July 26, one such
Hunger Strikes for delicacy will become illegal in Chicago.
China
Bird Flu In April, the Chicago City Council voted
Gao Zhisheng overwhelmingly (49 to 1) in favor of a ban
Quitting the CCP on the sale of foie gras�the enlarged, DUC K, DUC K, GOOSE LIVER: A crate of foie gras.
Epoch Times Reporters fatty livers of geese and ducks. The This "delicacy" of enlarged livers from ducks and
Jailed in China
measure makes Chicago the first city to geese is produced by force-feeding these birds.
The Real Story of Jiang Many claim the production of foie gras involves
Zemin implement this type of legislation. inhumane treatment and will soon be banned from
Previous Features C hicago restaurants. (David Silverman/Getty
From its inception, the ordinance saw Images)
support from Farm Sanctuary, a national
organization working to combat the abuses of industrialized farming, and specifically bent on ending
the production of foie gras worldwide. Adding this Chicago law to their list of accomplishments, Farm
Sanctuary's mission is making significant headway in recent years.
Israel�the world's 4th largest foie gras producer�has since put an end to the product on the basis of
cruelty. California recently passed a measure to ban foie gras production in the state, fazing out its
sale by 2012. While no such farm currently exists, a ban on the raising of foie gras in Illinois passed
the Senate unanimously, with the Illinois House (on the agenda for 2007) being the last obstacle for
its production in the land of Lincoln.
Independent of these measures, far north side Chicago Alderman Joe Moore put in a proposal last
year banning sale of the bird liver city-wide. In an effort to convince the rest of city council, a charge
was led by Farm Sanctuary, with other animal rights organizations and individuals�including PETA
A dvertisement (the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals) and Loretta Switt, of MASH fame�joining in chorus
to testify in committee.
Losing a Freedom of Choice
Most of Chicago residents likely has never eaten- and would perhaps have difficulty even
pronouncing- foie gras (fwa-gra), but for those who enjoy the fatty liver as a precious delicacy, the
city's ordinance came as a stunning disappointment.
"It's one of a kind," says renown chef Allen Sternweiller owner of Allen's, The New American Caf��a
swank eatery in Chicago's gallery district. He claims the flavor and texture of foie gras has no
comparison. "If you get different colored carrots, they all taste like a carrot. If you get hundreds of
different types of apples they generally taste like an apple with different flavor variances. But we
can't match foie gras; foie gras doesn't taste like anything else."
This uniqueness makes the product a good seller for chef Sternweiller. "I have a tremendous amount
of foie gras sales, even before the ban was announced," he says.
In fact, the new ordinance has only increased popularity of the now-banned bird liver. Sternweiller
says that orders for foie gras have doubled or even tripled in the last few months with publicity of
the soon-to-be-enacted city ordinance.
While restaurateurs, gourmands and others aimed to block the amendment, decrying the measure as
encroaching upon a freedom of choice, their argument was unable to sway city aldermen. However,
despite losing what many consider a precious gourmet ingredient to city law, Chicago's pro-foie gras
camp intends to go out with a bang.
On Tuesday, July 11th, a Chicago culinary association known as Chefs for Choice is putting on a
fundraising event dubbed "A Festival of Foie Gras." The affair, held at Sternweiller's caf�, boasts a

converted by Web2PDFConvert.com
who's who of A-list chefs from some of Chicago's most elite restaurants and bistros, including
Copperblue, Tru and Blackbird. They will be joined by other chefs from out of state to showcase foie
gras in all its glory. The gathering promises a variety of foie gras presentations for a mere $150 per
person, with proceeds for the evening going to support the association's "Freedom of Choice Fund."
"Hopefully we can raise some positive awareness about foie gras," says Sternweiller. But others paint
a different picture of the coming evening.
"This event is a cruelty orgy," exclaims Bruce Friedrich, spokesman for PETA, "These guys will live to
be ashamed of themselves."
Friedrich explains that foie gras farms are not some "Club Med for birds" as purveyors of the
specialty foodstuff might have one believe. "There are three foie gras farms in the U.S. and they
have all been investigated in the last few years," Friedrich says. "Each investigation found sick, dead
and dying animals, some with holes in their necks from pipe injuries. One investigation found ducks
with bloody beaks and their wings twisted together, jammed into wire cages. In another farm, birds
were dangling from wires as blood spilled from their necks and onto the birds beneath them."
Despite evidence strongly suggesting animal cruelty, those who enjoy foie gras do not concede to
that understanding.
"My wife and I belong to the Lincoln Park Zoo, to the Brookfield Zoo, we donate money to the anti-
cruelty society," admits Sternweiller, "In the chef's community and with people who eat foie gras, I've
not met anyone who's pro-cruelty to animals. I'm not out to combat the [animal activists]. I'm out to
make sure that the freedom of choice is still available in the country." "This is not an issue of
choice," says Bernard Sieracki, a lobbyist for Farm Sanctuary and professor of Political Science at
Illinois State University in Bloomington, "it's like saying sex with children is an issue of choice. There
are some things that are not relative and this is certainly one of them.
Sieracki explains that culture is defined by the laws it enacts. "And our culture does not condone the
torture of small animals," he says.
Cruelty Debate
To convince Chicago City council of the cruelty involved in foie gras, animal rights advocates ran a
video as part of their testimony. The five minute length documentary depicted torturous conditions
seen on foie gras farms. Hosted by past James Bond star Roger Moore, the graphic footage proved
convincing evidence.
"As revolting as it is to eat an animal's diseased organ," says Moore in the documentary, "the cruel
treatment of the birds is even more disturbing."
But others question allegations that the force-feeding process is a kind of torture. According to some
estimates, mankind has been feasting on the enlarged fatty livers of migratory birds as far back as
2500 B.C. Before a migratory journey, some fowl naturally eat to the point of liver enlargement to
sustain their travel. While it is not nearly to the degree as seen on modern factory farms, those in
support of foie gras claim that the practice of force-feeding (known as gavage) mimics a natural
behavior.
Sternweiller and others claim that a better solution would have been to work for regulatory measures
on foie gras farms rather than banning consumption.
"I'm not a lawyer and I'm not a duck farmer, but with the research that I've done there are a lot of
things that animal activists say to possibly manipulate the general American public," says
Sternweiller.
"The Chicago Aldermen are not particularly concerned about animal welfare anymore than the general
public," Freidrich points out. "And they voted 49 to 1 to ban the stuff because they saw what reality
was like on foie gras farms and they said, 'not in our town.' The video shows the reality of foie gras
farming and it is so cruel that even a guided tour for Charlie Trotter couldn't be cleaned up to the
degree that he felt he could serve it."
Indeed, local celebrity chef Trotter will not be seen at "The Festival of Foie Gras" event, having
banned the bird liver from his establishment long before the city council deemed its sale illegal.
Friedrich says that Trotter was outraged by what he saw at foie gras farms.
Even so, some critics of the foie gras ban point to this legislation as the start of a dangerous
direction. Due to the treatment of veal calves, boiling live lobsters, or even eggs, some fear foods
that many now enjoy could become forbidden.
Mayor Daley also did not favor the ban, complaining that the city council was wasting time on foie
gras in the face of so many other pressing matters. As Chicago had passed a smoking ban mere
months earlier, the Mayor expressed that laws in the city could progress to the point where people
could soon not even drink.
"I have a fish tank. I don't want any aldermen coming up there, putting their hands in and start
eating sushi," Daley sarcastically commented to the committee. "My little fish there. That would
really bother all of us."
"Foie gras really is the worst of the worst," comments Friedrich. "Everyone from Pope Benedict XVI to

converted by Web2PDFConvert.com
the Israeli Supreme Court has condemned foie gras production because when people find out what's
entailed, they don't think it should be legal. The slippery slope argument is an argument of
convenience for those that are trying to protect this violent industry. But each practice should stand
or fall on the basis of whether Americans believe the practices should be legal or not. That's what
democracy is about."
For a city once characterized as "Hog butcher to the world," many note the irony in the Chicago law.
However, some suggest that legislation from the beginning of Chicago's history points to sensitivity
in this matter. "This is very much in conjunction with what [Chicago] has been doing since the day of
its inception," explains Sieracki. "In 1837 when Illinois legislators charted Chicago as a city, it gave
them 37 areas that [lawmakers] could regulate. One of those areas was the slaughter of animals in
the marketplace."

C hoose your edition | About Us | C ontact Us | Site Map | Rights and Permissions | Privacy Policy | Feeds
C opyright 2000 - 2006 Epoch Times International

converted by Web2PDFConvert.com

You might also like