Professional Documents
Culture Documents
English: Whole Brain Learning System Outcome-Based Education
English: Whole Brain Learning System Outcome-Based Education
OUTCOME-BASED EDUCATION
GRADE
ENGLISH 10
3
LEARNING QUARTER
MODULE WEEK 4
QUARTER 3
WEEK 4
Development Team
Writer: Mary Jane P. Leaño
Editor: Anthony M. Rafatan
Reviewer: Adelyn C. Domingo
Illustrator: Ronie P. Fiesta
Layout Artist: Ronie P. Fiesta
Management Team: Vilma D. Eda Arnel S. Bandiola
Lourdes B. Arucan Juanito V. Labao
Adelyn C. Domingo
Learning Objectives:
1. Define critiquing.
2. Enumerate the purposes of writing a critique.
3. Identify the common structures of a critique.
4. Identify the patterns in writing a critique.
5. Enumerate the hints in writing a critique.
Pre-Test
The following are information that concern the topic on critiquing. Read and understand the
items below. Select the best answer for each item, then write your choice on a separate sheet.
Do not write anything on this module.
Critical thinking is one of the highest forms of skills that needs to be developed in order
to make the communication process more effective. The ability to break down complex
information and analyze situations for better understanding is very significant. It does not only
promote your capacity to understand and process information, above all, but it will also very
much give you better judgement of what to do next or how to respond to the situation
accordingly. With the digital rise coupled with an open and more inclusive principles and ideas,
analyzing is the key to better understanding. Critical thinking unlocks the power to pass better
judgement and learning becomes more effective as it gears towards a higher level of thinking.
Reading, writing, and speaking skills may not come hand in hand nonetheless their
effectiveness relies on the same foundations. The competency of being able to compose a
critical assessment of a text based on certain criteria is crucial and a very significant move to
achieve successful language learning.
What’s In
Previously, you have learned how to use a variety of informative persuasive and
argumentative writing techniques. This time you will master the art of critically giving evaluation
on certain texts based on an acceptable set of criteria and guidelines through analysis and
critical thinking. You will be processing information presented in a text to be able to pass better
judgement to either persuade, inspire, or stimulate your readers into initiating necessary action
or just simply emphasizing certain principles. Your ability to break down complex information
will greatly affect your readers to critically understand the texts and at some point, may also
agree to your assessment hence making understanding towards one general idea about the
said text become unanimously clear to all readers.
What’s New
Activity 1. Be Judgmental!
DIRECTION: Below are pictures of house designs. Write your thoughts, comments,
observations, and assessment on each of the given pictures below. Write at least 4
sentences for each picture.
PICTURE A
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
@mulyadivau30 PINTEREST
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
What is it
CRITIQUE
a. describe - give the reader a sense of the writer’s overall purpose and intent
b. analyze - examine how the structure and language of the text convey its meaning
c. interpret - state the significance or importance of each part of the text
A good review should provide critical commentary on the quality of the selection. It contains
➢ the thesis and major argument
➢ the organization and style
➢ the author’s values and assumptions
The review should pay more attention to evaluating the strengths and weaknesses of the
selection. It should ultimately answer the question- Is this a good selection that is worth
reading? (http://www.hunter.cuny.edu/rwc/handouts/the-writing-process-1/invention/Writing-
a-CritiqueHunter RWC)
The purpose for writing a critique is to evaluate somebody's work (a book, an essay,
a movie, a painting...) in order to increase the reader's understanding of it. A critical analysis
is subjective writing because it expresses the writer's opinion or evaluation of a text. Analysis
means to break down and study the parts. Writing a critical paper requires two steps: critical
reading and critical writing.
Critical reading
• If the purpose is to inform, has the material been presented clearly, accurately, with
order and coherence?
• If the purpose is to persuade, look for evidence, logical reasoning, contrary evidence.
https://www2.southeastern.edu/Academics/Faculty/elejeune/critique.htm
STRUCTURES OF A CRITIQUE
Here are two structures for critiques, one for nonfiction and one for fiction/literature.
Introduction
➢ name of author and work
➢ general overview of subject and summary of author's argument
➢ focusing (or thesis) sentence indicating how you will divide the whole work for
discussion or the particular elements you will discuss
Body
➢ objective description of a major point in the work
➢ detailed analysis of how the work conveys an idea or concept
➢ interpretation of the concept
➢ repetition of description, analysis, interpretation if more than one major concept is
covered
Conclusion
➢ overall interpretation
➢ relationship of interpretations to subject as a whole
➢ critical assessment of the value, worth, or meaning of the work, both negative and
positive
Introduction
➢ name of author and work
➢ brief summary/description of work as a whole
➢ focusing sentence indicating what element you plan to examine
➢ general indication of overall significance of work
Body
➢ literal description of the first major element or portion of the work
➢ detailed analysis
➢ interpretation
➢ literal description of second major element
➢ detailed analysis
➢ interpretation (including, if necessary, the relationship to the first major point)
and so on
Conclusion
➢ overall interpretation of the elements studied
➢ consideration of those elements within the context of the work as a whole
➢ critical assessment of the value, worth, meaning, or significance of the work, both
positive and negative
STRUCTURE OF A CRITIQUE
Once you know what you want to say, follow this pattern: ·
Introduction
Introduce the work by stating the author, title, and source along with the date of
publication. Polish the one- to two-sentence summary of the work that you developed earlier
and add it to the introduction, leading up to your thesis statement.
Body
Use about three to five points to support your thesis statement. The questions you
answered as you read should serve as a guide to help you select your points.
For example, you can discuss the author’s credentials or lack of credentials; the
audience he or she aims at and the appropriateness of the vocabulary; the amount and kinds
of support used to back up his or her major ideas; the use and correct identification of outside
research; how the author handles any biases or opposing opinions; the logic of the argument;
how the author’s ideas correlate with knowledge you already have.
Conclusion
Here you can summarize your main points, restate your thesis statement in fresh
words, and discuss the success or failure of the author to convince the reader. Is his or her
work significant? How does it impact readers? This is where you wrap up by stating whether
you agree with the author. Back up your decision by stating your reasons. Give a general
opinion of the work. Critiques are usually written in third person point of view (HunterRWC
http://www.hunter.cuny.edu/rwc/handouts/the-writing-process-1/invention/Writing-a-Critique)
logical expert
statistics appeals facts opinions emotional
opinions
appeals
➢ Look up the unfamiliar words, and then carefully and slowly read the article
again. This time look for the ideas the author uses to support the main point.
➢ Summarize the article in your own words, using just one or two sentences.
➢ Check out the author’s credentials and the reliability of the sources. Is this a
reliable author? Can he or she be considered an authority on the subject? Are
the sources upon which the article is based clearly and accurately indicated?
➢ Read the article one more time to analyze how the author has supported his
or her ideas. Are there examples, facts, or opinions? What is the author’s
bias? Are opposing arguments addressed competently? Are you convinced or
unconvinced about the author’s main point? Why? Will you incorporate the
information you read into your life or do you reject it? Why? (You may agree
with some points and disagree with others (https://www.jmu.edu/uwc/files/link-
library/CritiqueHandout.pdf; The Academic Support Center
www.chesapeake.edu/asc/ Chesapeake College 410-827-5854).
Now that you have thoroughly read and analyzed the work, you are ready to plan how
you will WRITE about it. The key is to identify what you want to say about the article in an
effective thesis statement.
These days, every new addition to the Disney Princess movie canon arrives with the
approximation of “doing better.” Better, more progressive female characters; better
representation of people of colour; a better understanding of how to translate elements from
other cultures to the animated form. Less hackneyed cultural appropriation, more authentic
inspiration. At least, that's the idea.
With its distinct south-east Asian setting, taking influence from countries as diverse as
Thailand, Burma, and Indonesia, with Asian writers (Qui Nguyen, Adele Kim) and a voice cast
of predominately Asian descent (Kelly Marie Tran, Awkwafina, Gemma Chan), Disney is
clearly looking to redefine their relationship with other cultures with their fifty-ninth film, Raya
and the Last Dragon. To top it off, we have a strong, independent female character who
never loses her agency, but is empowered as a hero right from the very start without any
pandering or talking down. Great!
https://we-love-cinema.com/reviews/raya-and-the-last-dragon/
Whether the idea of a fictional south-east Asia-like world is actually better than a film
set plainly in the real region will depend on the viewer, but there's no denying Kumandra is an
evocative and magical place – even if the names of its divided lands, named after dragon
parts, are not (“Tail”? Come on!).
Where Raya and the Dragon feels less inspired, though, is the story itself. How many
times do we really need to watch a vague mass of “badness” – this one called “the Druun” –
as it sets out to consume the landscape? At least once more, Raya argues. Shouldn't these
faceless, abstract entities be a last resort for any blockbuster movie baddie, though? Surely
any actual, breathing villain is better than the anonymous force of darkness that Hollywood
filmmakers continually fall back on, time and time again?
This quest, we’ve seen, and Raya sorely misses an interesting narrative to match its
visual invention and intimate research. We should ask why. Disney is operating at a point
where they can afford to experiment and innovate and redefine what an animated film means
in 2021. Here the narrative – essentially a two-hour fetch quest – has Raya moving from land-
to-land collecting crystal shards in hope that she can bring back a population of people who
have been tuned to stone, restore some dragons, and banish an ancient evil. But there are
too many familiar elements at play, the plot unnecessarily convoluted and quickly leaning on
an overcomplicated narration to untangle itself right from the word go. In Frozen, now eight
years old, the story ideas at work felt fresh and progressive; like a studio coming to terms with
its own complicated legacy. Raya’s sense of independence is undoubtably modern, but the
events she’s dealing with feel as old as time itself.
https://we-love-cinema.com/reviews/raya-and-the-last-dragon/
Raya and the Last Dragon is one hell of a looker – it's just a shame the story isn’t as
fine-tuned as its heroine's intricate swordplay ( https://we-love-cinema.com/reviews/raya-
and-the-last-dragon/)
1. expert 2.
statistics opinions
ethical 3. emotional
4.
appeals appeals
logical
5.
__________1. “The author has very fine writing in this book. And he presented a persuasive
argument. He also did a great job of expressing his personality through his
choice of words and examples.”
https://www.artfuleditor.com/sample-critique
__________2. “In his book, Hamlet: Poem Unlimited, Harold Bloom declares William
Shakespeare’s Hamlet as “unlimited,” coming “of no genre,” because its
greatness “… competes only with the world’s scriptures.” This amazing
significance cannot emerge from a work, which is about tendentious and
politicized things.
https://literarydevices.net/critique/
__________3. “The purpose of the study was to determine possible differences in leadership
behaviors, using the Revised Leadership for Sport Scale (RLSS), between
male and female coaches and among different coaching levels. The
researchers submitted two hypotheses.”
https://www.westga.edu/~kielborn/studentexample.html
__________4. “The short story “Who‘s Passing for Who” by Langston Hughes was influenced
by Hughes’ background in his society.”
https://www.bartleby.com/essay/Short-Story-Critique-PKJ7YE43VC
__________5. “The bunnies are adorable. The rhymes are exquisite. I found it pretty fun, but
possibly a little dated given many of those things aren't normal routines
anymore. But the lessons to take from it are still powerful. Loved it! I want to
sample some more books by this fine author and her illustrators.”
https://reedsy.com/discovery/blog/book-review-examples
The following are information that concern the topic on critiquing. Read and understand
the statement. Write TRUE if the statement is true as discussed in this module. Write FALSE
if it is the other way around. Do not write anything on this module.
___________2. The Introduction of the critique Introduces the work by stating the author,
title, and source along with the date of publication.
___________3. Arguments, evidence, and detailed analysis of the selection or text can be
written on the conclusion part.
___________4. The purpose for writing a critique is to evaluate somebody's work in order to
increase the reader's understanding of it.
PRETEST
1. C
2. A
3. C
4. B
5. D
Activity 1: Be Judgmental
(Answers vary)
ASSESSMENT
1. TRUE 2. TRUE 3. FALSE 4. TRUE 5. TRUE
Celebrating Diversity Through World Literature. Grade 10, English Learners’ Material, p. 388
https://www.jmu.edu/uwc/files/link-library/CritiqueHandout.pdf
Transcript of Amanda Gorman's inaugural poem. BY THE HILL STAFF - 01/20/21 01:32
PM EST. https://thehill.com/homenews/news/535052-read-transcript-of-amanda-
gormans-inaugural-poem