CPR International Institute for Conflict Prevention and Resolution

Gateway

Dispute Resolution Ethics

Chris Honeyman
President, CONVENOR
Director, Broad Field Project

Definition:

The ethics of dispute resolution are the rules and codes of behavior by which acceptable practice is
defined. Both rules and codes of practice vary according to the subject matter of the dispute, the type
of process that is being used, the role of the person governed by the rule or code, and the location.
Thus ethical rules and codes for divorce mediators in Mississippi may be very different than for
commercial arbitrators in Manhattan.

Users:

Everyone who encounters a dispute resolution process needs at least a basic understanding of the
ethics of that process, and of how ethical conduct is encouraged and enforced.

Description:

Ethical problems are presented differently according to circumstance and role. For this reason, ethics
codes and rules tend to address quite different problems for neutrals than for parties and their
advocates. While the specific concerns of these rules can vary quite widely, a common theme of ethics
codes for parties and their negotiators is to demand negotiation in good faith, a concept which includes
prohibiting dragging out the negotiations unnecessarily, sending representatives who have no authority
to conclude an agreement, and other forms of conduct which tend to make an honest search for mutual
agreement impossible. For neutrals, the concerns are different, and may include prohibitions on
accepting business in another context from someone who is a party in a case before that neutral;
requirements to keep matters discussed in the negotiations confidential; and requirements to disclose
friendships and other relationships which might cause concern to either party as to whether the neutral
really is neutral.

Example:

A hypothetical example concerns a mediator, employed by a Texas state agency, who is assigned to
mediate a dispute between a would-be truck driver and a truck driving training school, when the driver
refused to pay the school fees, claiming that the practice trucks were unsafe. The mediator, operating
under typical confidentiality rules, helps the parties reach a settlement, but later gets a phone call from
the chair of the Texas State Assembly's (fictional) Committee on Highway Safety. This powerful state
legislator, whose jurisdiction also includes the budget of the agency the mediator works for, demands
to know what was said in the mediation about the safety of the trucks — and wants the information right
quick. While acknowledging the uncomfortable (or even, potentially, career-ending) dilemma presented
to the mediator, mediator groups have been virtually unanimous in arguing that the mediator must
refuse to provide the requested information.

Examples of ethics codes for mediators and mediation organizations include the 1994 Model
Standards of Conduct for Mediators jointly adopted by the Society of Professionals in Dispute
Resolution, American Bar Association, and American Arbitration Association; and two publications of an
independent body, the CPR-Georgetown Commission on Ethics and Standards of Practice in ADR, the
Principles for ADR Provider Organizations, and the Model Rule for the Lawyer as Third-Party Neutral. These
documents and other ethics codes established by a variety of national and state organizations cover a
variety of issues, but focus most often on common problems: recurring themes include impartiality,
confidentiality, and a neutral's duty to avoid claiming expertise where the neutral has none. If violation
of an ethics principle or rule is suspected, the first step is to check what, if any, code of ethics is
specified in the organization's materials, and to read that specific code, because these differ on many
points. Consistency of enforcement of the stated principles, also, is questionable; it is often dependent
on the particular enforcement mechanism set up as part of the particular mediation or arbitration forum
the dispute was submitted to, and may include rights that can be asserted in court, boards of
professional review, other mechanisms — or, sometimes, no effective mechanism at all.

Application:

Mediators, negotiators, and the parties they represent all need to understand at least the basic
problems and principles of ethics for both neutrals and advocates, in order to protect themselves and
avoid situations in which they will be accused of unethical conduct.

Links to Related Articles:

Arbitrator Certification, Credentialing, and Rosters

Mediator Certification, Credentialing, and Rosters

CRInfo Version IV
Copyright © 1999-2004 The Conflict Resolution Information Source
CRInfo™ is a Registered Trademark of the University of Colorado
Project Acknowledgements

The Conflict Resolution Information Source

Guy Burgess and Heidi Burgess, Co-Directors
c/o Conflict Research Consortium, University of Colorado
Campus Box 580, Boulder, CO 80309
Phone: (303)492-1635; Fax: (303)492-2154; Contact