First, 16-year-olds do not have the psychological capacity for critical thinking needed to make large political decisions and would be easily manipulated by their families' ideologies. Second, many young people lack experience and political knowledge as their priorities are personal development, not politics. Third, most young people make impulsive, short-term decisions without considering consequences due to their naivety, which could endanger society and make voting less meaningful.
First, 16-year-olds do not have the psychological capacity for critical thinking needed to make large political decisions and would be easily manipulated by their families' ideologies. Second, many young people lack experience and political knowledge as their priorities are personal development, not politics. Third, most young people make impulsive, short-term decisions without considering consequences due to their naivety, which could endanger society and make voting less meaningful.
First, 16-year-olds do not have the psychological capacity for critical thinking needed to make large political decisions and would be easily manipulated by their families' ideologies. Second, many young people lack experience and political knowledge as their priorities are personal development, not politics. Third, most young people make impulsive, short-term decisions without considering consequences due to their naivety, which could endanger society and make voting less meaningful.
option for Spain as many demand that it is a right just as they are able to drive or have sexual relationships. However, they do not take into consideration what a problem this can be for society.
First of all, a 16-year-old child does
not have the capacity to make decisions on this scale as it has been psychologically proven that children of this age are much more vulnerable. This would not only cause many of them to be manipulated by the ideologies of their families, but it would also slow down their ability to Furthermore, it is clear that many of think critically. today's young people are looking for quick and easy money. Therefore, it In addition, most of these young would be a danger to let them vote people lack of experience and because of the number of votes that political knowledge as their priorities could be bought. This would clearly at that age are not the politics of our affect the resolution of the votes, country but are focused on their considering it as cheating and generating evolution as teenagers. This can even new problems such as a re-election. pose a danger to the rest of society as these young people are less risk Ultimately, young people in need of conscious. expressing their political opinions have Also, most young people tend to many other resources to turn to as many make decisions in the short term and political programmes and clubs have are often driven by their impulsivity been implemented in Spain where they as they are not afraid of the are taught how to develop their ideas. consequences and sometimes do not even take them into consideration due In conclusion, voting should not be to their naivety. In this way, voting something that should be done without would cease to be something knowledge but should take many factors exclusive and important and would into consideration as we put at risk the become something less coherent and well-being of our country. accessible to everyone.