Teacher's Scoring Rubric: Video Project

You might also like

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3

VIDEO PROJECT

Teacher’s Scoring Rubric

ACTIVITY Exemplary Proficient Partially Proficient Incomplete POINTS

Concept 20-25 points 14-19 points 7-13 points 0-6 points

The concept describes a The concept describes a The team has Little effort has been
clear picture of what relatively clear picture of brainstormed their spent on
students are trying to what they are trying to concept but has no brainstorming and
achieve including an achieve including what clear focus. refining a concept.
adequate description of the team is trying to do Goals/final product The team appears
what they are trying to do overall but without are not clearly unclear on their goals
and generally how each specifics on how each defined. and how the project
team member’s work will team member’s work will objectives will be met.
contribute to contribute to the final
the final project. project.

Content/ 20-25 points 14-19 points 7-13 points 0-6 points


Organization
The content includes a clear Information presented is The project does not Content lacks a
statement of purpose or a present a clearly central theme, clear
theme and is creative, connected theme with stated theme, is point of view and/or
compelling, and clearly accurate and vague, and/or some of logical sequence of
written. A rich variety of current supporting the supporting information. Much of
supporting information in information contributing information does not the supporting
the video contributes to the to understanding of the seem to fit the main information is
understanding of the project’s main idea. idea. Citations and irrelevant to the
project’s main idea. Events Details are logical and facts are minimal. overall message.
and messages are persuasive information is The viewer is unsure
presented in a logical order. used effectively. The what the message is.
Includes properly cited content includes a clear Information is
sources. point of view with a incorrect, out of date,
progression of ideas and or incomplete. No
supporting information. citations included.
Includes
properly cited sources.

Quality 15-20 points 9-14 points 5-8 points 0-4 points

The video project was Video was completed and Video was produced There was no video,
completed and included contained many of the but had very little or video was unedited
most of the suggested suggested elements. editing. Many poor- without transitions or
elements. The video was Editing was incomplete or quality shots remain. audio support.
well edited and moves poorly done. Some poor Video was fragmented
smoothly from scene to shots remain. Video is still and choppy with little
scene with proper use of somewhat choppy. Audio to no audio
transitions. and other enhancements reinforcement.
Audio was clear and were utilized, but not for
understandable and other maximum effect.
enhancements were well
used.

Teamwork 12-15 points 8-11 points 4-7 points 0-3 points

Students met and had Students met and had Minimal team Meetings were not
discussions regularly. All discussions regularly. meetings were held. held and/or not all of
students on the team Most of the students on Most of the students the team members
contributed to the the team contributed to on the team contributed to the
discussion and were part of the discussion and were contributed, but most project. Teamwork
the final project. Team part of the final project. of the work was done was not evident.
members showed respect Team members mostly by one or two.
to one another. showed respect toward
each other.

Timeliness 12-15 points 8-11 points 4-7 points 0-3 points

All project deadlines were Most project deadlines Many project Deadlines were
met. were met. Those that deadlines were not disregarded,
were late did not have met, negatively having a significant
significant impact on the impacting the finished impact on the final
finished project. project. project.
Final Score

You might also like