Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

POSITION STATEMENT

EMS SPINAL PRECAUTIONS AND THE USE OF THE LONG BACKBOARD


National Association of EMS Physicians and American College
of Surgeons Committee on Trauma
Prehosp Emerg Care Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by 216.61.187.254 on 08/13/13

ABSTRACT b Blunt trauma and altered level of consciousness


b Spinal pain or tenderness
This is the official position of the National Association of b Neurologic complaint (e.g., numbness or motor
EMS Physicians and the American College of Surgeons
Committee on Trauma regarding emergency medical ser-
weakness)
b Anatomic deformity of the spine
vices spinal precautions and the use of the long back-
b High-energy mechanism of injury and any of the
board. Key words: spine; backboard; EMS; position state-
ment; NAEMSP; ACS-COT. following:
PREHOSPITAL EMERGENCY CARE 2013;17:392–393  Drug or alcohol intoxication
Inability to communicate
For personal use only.

The National Association of EMS Physicians and the  Distracting injury


American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma
believe that: r Patients for whom immobilization on a backboard is
not necessary include those with all of the following:
r Long backboards are commonly used to attempt to b Normal level of consciousness (Glasgow Coma
provide rigid spinal immobilization among emer- Score [GCS] 15)
gency medical services (EMS) trauma patients. b No spine tenderness or anatomic abnormality
However, the benefit of long backboards is largely b No neurologic findings or complaints
unproven. b No distracting injury
r The long backboard can induce pain, patient ag- b No intoxication
itation, and respiratory compromise. Further, the r Patients with penetrating trauma to the head, neck,
backboard can decrease tissue perfusion at pres- or torso and no evidence of spinal injury should not
sure points, leading to the development of pressure be immobilized on a backboard.
ulcers. r Spinal precautions can be maintained by application
r Utilization of backboards for spinal immobilization
of a rigid cervical collar and securing the patient
during transport should be judicious, so that the po- firmly to the EMS stretcher, and may be most appro-
tential benefits outweigh the risks. priate for:
r Appropriate patients to be immobilized with a back- b Patients who are found to be ambulatory at the
board may include those with: scene
b Patients who must be transported for a protracted
time, particularly prior to interfacility transfer
b Patients for whom a backboard is not otherwise
indicated
r Whether or not a backboard is used, attention
Approved by the National Association of EMS Physicians Board of
Directors December 17, 2012. to spinal precautions among at-risk patients is
Approved by the American College of Surgeons Committee on
paramount. These include application of a cervi-
Trauma October 30, 2012. Received January 15, 2013; accepted for cal collar, adequate security to a stretcher, mini-
publication January 15, 2013. mal movement/transfers, and maintenance of in-
line stabilization during any necessary movement/
doi: 10.3109/10903127.2013.773115 transfers.

392
Position Statement: Spinal Precautions 393

r Education of field EMS personnel should include as many stakeholders in the trauma/EMS system as
evaluation of the risk of spinal injury in the context possible.
of options to provide spinal precautions. r Patients should be removed from backboards
r Protocols or plans to promote judicious use of long as soon as practical in an emergency depart-
backboards during prehospital care should engage ment.
Prehosp Emerg Care Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by 216.61.187.254 on 08/13/13
For personal use only.

You might also like