Professional Documents
Culture Documents
National Association of Postal Supervisors v. Postal Service and United Postmasters and Managers of America, February 22, 2022)
National Association of Postal Supervisors v. Postal Service and United Postmasters and Managers of America, February 22, 2022)
National Association of Postal Supervisors v. Postal Service and United Postmasters and Managers of America, February 22, 2022)
No. 20-5280
v.
I. BACKGROUND
A. Legal Framework
B. Factual Background
1. Field Employees
3. Postmaster Employees
4. Procedural History
II. ANALYSIS
A. Standard of Review
The Postal Service does not contest that ultra vires review
of its decisions is available. Br. for Appellee 17, 27. Rather, it
argues that the narrow scope of non-APA review precludes the
Association’s claims in this case because the statutory
provisions at issue are not “clear and mandatory” limitations
on the Postal Service’s authority enforceable through ultra
13
vires review. Id. at 24-25 (citing Leedom v. Kyne, 358 U.S. 184,
188 (1958)), 30-31. The Postal Service contends that because
the statutory language states that “[i]t shall be the policy of the
Postal Service” to provide pay differentials and comparable
compensation, Congress intended these provisions to be
“simply [some] of many (often conflicting) ‘policy’ goals
noted in the statute.” 39 U.S.C. §§ 1003(a), 1004(a) (emphasis
added); Br. for Appellee 18, 30-31. The Postal Service suggests
that Congress’s use of the word “policy” indicates that these
provisions are merely “advisory goals” that cannot be enforced.
Br. for Appellee 31. We disagree because the Postal Service’s
position is directly at odds with our precedent.
Managers
Postmasters
Supervisors
III. CONCLUSION