Epidemiology (Ms. Palicpic)

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 7

EPIDEMIOLOGY various aspects of the health status of the

By Ms. Maria Francisca F. Palicpic, R.N. population.


- Aside from assessing the health status of the
Greek Words: population, these are also used for:
epi = “upon” a. Determining factors that may contribute to
demos = “people” causation & control of diseases.
logos = “study b. Identifying public health problems & needs.
c. Indicating priorities for resource allocation.
According to Last, EPIDEMIOLOGY is the study of d. Monitoring implementation of health
the distribution & determinants of health-related states programs.
or events in specified populations, & the application of e. Evaluating outcomes of health programs.
this study is the prevention & control of health
problems. Types of Health Indicators & their examples:

This field of study makes use of concepts & methods


from numerous other fields such as biology, sociology,
demography, geography, environmental science &
policy analysis & most notably from statistics.

Practical Applications of Epidemiology Morbidity Indicators


 Are generally based on the disease-specific
 Assessment of the health status of the community incidence or prevalence for the common & severe
or community diagnosis. diseases.
 Elucidation of the natural history of disease.  These indicators answer 2 epidemiologic
 Determination of disease causation. questions:
 Prevention & control of disease. a. What are the health problems in the area?
 Monitoring & evaluation of health interventions. b. How many cases occur in the area?
 Provision of evidence for policy formulation.
 Prevalence proportion (P)
ASSESSMENT OF THE HEALTH STATUS OF
THE COMMUNITY (COMMUNITY
DIAGNOSIS)

Health Indicators Prevalence provides an indication of the magnitude of


- Are quantitative measures (rates, ratios or a health problem & is used for projecting the scope of
proportions) that describe & summarize health services needed by the community.
Factors affecting Prevalence  Incidence density rate
- Is used in the event of losses to follow-up
(censoring): follow-up period is relatively long,
cohort members are lost to follow-up due to
death, out-migration or refusal to continue.
- This morbidity indicator measures the average
instantaneous rate of disease occurrence.
- If the rate of disease occurrence is low, as with
many chronic diseases, it is also a good estimate
of the CI or risk of developing the disease.

Morbidity Indicators Since it may not be possible to measure disease-free


 Incidence period precisely,
- Measures the number of new cases, episodes or
events occurring over a specified period of
time (a year), within a specified population at
risk.
- Best indicator whether a condition is  Specific morbidity rates
decreasing, increasing or remaining static. - Shows disease rates in specific population
Hence, the best measure to use for evaluating groups such as by age, sex, occupation,
the effectiveness of health interventions. education, exposure to risk factors, place of
 Cohort residence, or combination of these factors
- Is a group of people who share a common - Answers the questions: (descriptive
defining characteristic epidemiology – orienting a disease as to time,
 At-risk group place & person characteristics through various
- Members of the group are free of the disease but study designs including ecologic studies)
have the potential for developing a particular a. Who is affected?
disease within the specified period of time. b. Where do they occur?
c. When do they occur or increase?
 Types of Incidence Measures:
a. Cumulative Incidence (or incidence
proportion)
b. Incidence density rate Mortality Indicators
 Cumulative Incidence (CI)  Mortality statistics provide important information
- Can be derived if there are no losses to follow- of the health status of the people in the
up & the duration of follow-up is the same so community. The pattern of causes of death
that the denominator is the initial size of the indicates the most life-threatening diseases that are
cohort being followed-up. prevalent in the community, although it fails to
- Risk period: measures the average risk or detect the nonfatal conditions but are nonetheless
probability of developing the disease within a widespread.
specified period of time.  Crude death rate (CDR)
- Attack rate: is used instead of CI when the risk - Rate with which mortality occurs in a given
period of the occurrence of disease is very population.
short. - Factors that affect the level of CDR:
a. Age & sex composition of the population
b. Adverse environmental & occupational
conditions
c. Peace & order conditions of the place
 Maternal Death
 Specific mortality rate - Defined as death of a female from any cause
- Rate of dying in a specific population groups. related to or aggravated by pregnancy or its
management (excluding accidental or
incidental causes) during pregnancy &
 Cause-of-death rate childbirth or within 42 days of termination of
- Rate of dying due to specific causes. pregnancy, irrespective of the duration & the
- This is also a crude rate but made specific by site of pregnancy.
relating the deaths from a specific cause &  Maternal Mortality Ratio (MMR)
group to the midyear population of that - Measure of obstetric risk & is affected by
specified group. maternal health practices, diagnostic
- Factors affecting: ascertainment & completeness of registration
a. Completeness of registration of deaths of births.
b. Composition of the population
c. Accuracy of ascertaining the cause of death
- Identifies the greatest threat to the survival of
the people, hence prevent death.  Case Fatality Rate (CFR)
- Proportion of cases that end up fatally.
- Quantifies the risk of dying among persons
 Infant mortality rate (IMR) afflicted with a particular disease.
- Defined as the number of deaths of infants - The magnitude of CFR depends on the nature
under 1 year of age in a calendar year per 1,000 of the disease itself, the diagnostic
live births in the same period. ascertainment & the level of reporting in the
- It is used as an approximation of the risk of population.
dying within the 1st year of life but not a true
measure of risk because not all infants who die
in a calendar year were also born in that year.
Population Indicators
- Include not only the population growth
indicators (CBR, general fertility rate, total
- The IMR is a good index of the level of health fertility rate, & annual growth rate) but also
in a community because infants are very other population dynamics (migration) that can
sensitive to adverse environmental conditions. affect the age-sex structure of the population
- High IMR = low levels of health standards & vv.
secondary to poor maternal health & child  Crude Birth Rate (CBR)
health care, malnutrition, poor environmental - Measures how fast people are added to the
sanitation, or deficient health service delivery. population through births.
 Neonatal Mortality Rate & Postneonatal Mortality - Useful measure of population growth.
Rate - It is affected by: fertility, marriage pattern &
- Neonatal death (infants less than 28 days old) practices of the place, sex, & age composition
due mainly to prenatal or genetic factors. of a population & birth registration practice.
- Postneonatal death (later months) are - A crude rate since it is related to the population
influenced by environmental & nutritional including men, children & the elderly who are
factors (infections). not capable of giving birth.
provincial, regional & national) are mandated
by Act 3573 (Law on Reporting of
Communicable Diseases) to report notifiable
 General Fertility Rate (GFR) diseases.
- More specific than CBR since birth is related  Disease Registry
to the segment of the population deemed to be - A compilation of information about a
capable of giving birth (women in reproductive particular disease and aims to include all cases
age: 15-44 years old). of the disease without duplication and this aim
is dependent on the cooperation of agencies &
health facilities that feed the registry & on a
unique patient identifier that will allow record
linkage.
 Population Pyramid - Example: Cancer Registry in Metro Manila &
- Graphical representation of the age-sex HIV/AIDS Registry in Rizal Province
composition of the population.  Public Health Surveillance System
- The shape of the pyramid provides insights - WHO – the ongoing, systematic collection,
into the fertility & mortality patterns of the analysis & interpretation of health-related data
community as well as the most probable health needed for the planning, implementation &
problems that would likely need health evaluation of public health practice.
services. - Application of epidemiologic principles &
- Study Figure 8.2 of page 165 (green book of methods is essential to achieve the primary goal
Famorca) of serving as an early warning system for
impending epidemics of diseases & other
Sources of Health Data public health emergencies.
 Primary Sources: - Before VS Now:
a. Government Agencies – Department of a. Before – developed for monitoring high
Health burden diseases, detecting disease outbreaks &
b. Others – Research Institutions, private sector monitoring progress to control, eliminate &
(insurance companies, etc.) eradicate specific disease.
 Secondary Sources: b. Now – advocates inclusion of detection of
a. Census toxins, hazardous chemicals, genetically
b. Vital registration system modified products & risky behaviors.
c. Disease notification Types:
d. Disease registries a. Passive – a system by which public health staff
e. Surveillance system receives reports from hospitals, clinics, public
f. Hospital data health units or other sources.
g. Health insurance b. Active – a system by which public health staff
h. School health program members actively & regularly contact health
i. Downloadable data sets care providers or the population to obtain
j. Surveys (morbidity, demographic & health) information about the disease of interest.
 Disease Notification - Active is ore expensive but it yields more
- Many people who need services do not have accurate and timely data. This allows early
access to health facilities that is why Disease detection of the disease & more valid
Notification plays an integral part of disease evaluation of the impact of public health
surveillance. interventions. Therefore, a very active
- In the Philippines, all individuals, health surveillance system should be used so that
facilities (private & government), in all levels of every case that occurs can be detected.
governance (barangay, municipal, city,
- Disease Surveillance Systems in the Philippines  The applicable level of prevention that is
(PIDSR – Philippine Integrated Disease administered to the patient is dependent on the
Surveillance & Response) stage of the disease when the patient was
➢ Notifiable Disease Reporting System diagnosed.
(NDRS) (Read further the discovery of AIDS in page 169, green
➢ Field Health Service Information book of Famorca)
System (FHSIS)  Stages in the Natural History of Disease & the
➢ National Epidemiology Sentinel Level of Prevention
Surveillance System (NESSS) 1. Stage of Susceptibility (Prepathogenesis)
➢ Expanded Program on Immunization - The person is not yet sick but may be exposed
Surveillance System (EPI Surveillance) to the risk factors of the disease.
➢ HIV-AIDS Registry - Primary level of prevention – health education
➢ Study Box 8.3 page 168 (green book of & immunization to avoid the development of
Famorca) the disease.
2. Stage of Subclinical Disease
 Downloadable data sets - The person is still apparently healthy since
- This is common in first world countries like the clinical manifestations of the disease are not yet
USA where several data resources can be shown, although pathologic changes have
downloaded from the Internet. Unfortunately, already occurred.
not for the Philippines. - Secondary level of prevention – diagnostic
procedures to prompt treatment to avoid
Considerations in the analysis & interpretation of progression of the disease.
Health Indicators - Stages in the Natural History of Disease & the
1. Is the denominator of the rate the most Level of Prevention
appropriate one? 3. Stage of Clinical Disease
2. Is the numerator an accurate count of the - The patient now manifests recognizable signs
number of events? & symptoms.
3. There should be correspondence in time & - Tertiary level of prevention – limit disability &
geographical location of the events in the restore the functional capability of the patient.
numerator & the population in the 4. Resolution Stage
denominator. - - The patient either recovers completely from
4. Time specifications are usually on an annual the disease, becomes a chronic case, with or
basis. However, special indicators may have without disability or dies.
other period specifications & these should be DETERMINATION OF
stated. DISEASE CAUSATION
5. The factor used in the computation of the  Questions:
different rates may be any number of the base a. What factors contribute to disease causation?
10. b. Why does disease occur?
- Answering these epidemiologic questions
ELUCIDATION OF THE based on valid evidence will contribute to the
NATURAL HISTORY OF DISEASE success of health interventions.
 The natural history of the disease is its course over  A revie of the theoretical & research literature & an
time, starting from the prepathogenesis stage to its understanding of the natural history of the disease
termination. will contribute to the development of an
 A prospective cohort study could plot better the epidemiologic disease model representing the
history of the disease because of the benefit of factors that influence disease causation.
observing the cohort from the time that the  An epidemiologic approach assumes a causal path
members are disease-free to the time they develop & posits that changing or breaking a link in that
the disease through its termination.
causal path can either prevent the occurrence of  Spider’s Web or Web-like
the disease or alter its course, so that the more - When there is an interconnection of multitude
serious sequelae can be avoided. of factors.
- Under this model, disease can be prevented by
Models of Disease Causation breaking the weakest strand of the causal web
 Epidemiologic Triad or Triangle Method through various types of epidemiologic studies.
- The agent and the susceptible host are - Study Figure 8.5 page 173 (green book of
interacting freely in a common (physical, Famorca)
biologic, socioeconomic) environment.
- For as long as the balance is maintained or is PREVENTION AND CONTROL
tilted in favor of the host (good nutritional OF DISEASES
status, high levels of immunity) disease does - Epidemiologic information should be utilized
not occur. However, when the balance is tilted by health workers who are tasked to plan
in favor of the agent (increased dosage & preventive programs so that the probability of
pathogenicity of the agent), disease eventually attaining the program objectives is increased.
occurs.  Outbreak Investigation
- WHO – occurrence of cases of disease in
excess of what would normally be expected in
a defined community, geographical area or
season.
- Occurrence of outbreak:
a. Previously unknown disease
Asdasd b. Disease never occurred in the area
c. Disease has been absent from the population
 Wheel Model for a long time
- Gives emphasis on the role of genetic makeup - Impending outbreak is detected through:
of the host that is presented as the inner core (report unusual disease or large number of
of the wheel’s hub. cases)
- The outer core of the hub includes host a. Surveillance system
characteristics (sex, age, socioeconomic status b. Perceptive clinicians
& behaviors). c. Infection control nurse
- The rim or the outer edge represents the d. Laboratory workers
biologic, physical & chemical environment. - Outbreak investigation should be conducted in
order to identify then eliminate the source of
infection and thus prevent the occurrence of
more cases.
- Basic steps in an Outbreak Investigation:
1. Operationally define what constitutes a case.
2. Based on the operational definition, identify
the case.
3. Based on the number of cases identified, verify
the existence of an outbreak.
4. Establish the descriptive epidemiologic
features of the case.
5. Record the clinical manifestations of cases.
6. Based on the clinical manifestations,
incubation period, available laboratory
findings, & other information gathered,
formulate a hypothesis regarding the probable  Example: Republic Act 9288 – Newborn Screening
etiologic agent, the sources of infection, the Act of 2004 (NBS)
mode of transmission & the best approach for
controlling the outbreak.
7. Test the hypothesis by collecting relevant
specimens from the patients & from the
environment.
8. Based on the results of the investigation,
implement prevention & control measures to
prevent recurrence of a similar outbreak.
9. Disseminate the findings of the investigation
through media & other forms to inform the
public.

MONITORING & EVALUATION OF


HEALTH INTERVENTIONS
 Monitoring
- An ongoing activity during program
implementation to assess the current status if
its implementation in terms of compliance to
the design of the program, timelines &
attainment of midterm goals.
- Results of monitoring:
a. Assess the progress of program
implementation
b. Identify problems
c. Take corrective action
d. Have a tool for quality assurance &
management
e. Measure achievement of midterm program
objectives
f. Lay the groundwork for program evaluation.
 Evaluation
- Is a process that systematically & objectively
assesses compliance to the design of the
program, the performance, relevance &
success of a project.
- This process employs research techniques &
applies the methods of epidemiology & health
statistics.
- Primary purpose:
a. Provide feedback on the results or outcomes
b. Impact of the project to inform policymakers
& planners about the efficacy of the
intervention.
 Epidemiologic evidence is necessary for the
formulation of health policy .

You might also like