Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Review Notes in Fundamentals of Criminal Inves.
Review Notes in Fundamentals of Criminal Inves.
HISTORICAL BACKGROUND
The historical background of criminal investigations could be traced back to the medieval stage where
acts deemed unacceptable to a group have been remedied by some means and the responsibility of
maintaining the moral code was assigned to family or tribal members.
Any criminal acts by individuals were to be detected and investigated by the group.
The codification of law came into being by the Laws of Hammurabi which were developed in Babylon
around 2100 B.C. (Gilbert; 1986).
The civilizations of Egypt, Rome and Greece assigned criminal detection responsibilities to military
units.
European Origins
There was a shift from the responsibility of Government to group responsibility in the later stages of the
Middle Age.
The Frank-Pledge system came into existence.
It allowed a system of mutual protection within subgroup called tithing.
The tithing were responsible for detecting and controlling negative behavior on the part of its members
(Germann, 1974).
There was again a shift during the reign of the Duke of Normandy where policing was assumed by the
government and merchants.
They developed the early patrols which are similar to the present day beat patrols which were mainly
developed to prevent crime.
The industrial revolution ushered in a new wave of criminality that needed new methods of crime
prevention and detection.
The direct result of the crime problems in London ushered in the origin of modern criminal
investigations.
A master criminal, Jonathan Wild developed a system of employing a thief to catch a thief as an
effective way to reduce crime.
This could be analogous to the modern day use of moles or covert operations in order to penetrate a cartel
for example, drug cartels.
Paris had its own thief catcher in the person of Euge’ne Vidocq.
Generally, in this particular epoch, the use of criminal informants, undercover operations, surveillance
were relegated to thief catchers who were men of questionable character.
The 18th century evidenced the creation of the Bow Street runners by the Fielding brothers who were also
responsible for crime detection.
In 1829, one Sir Robert Peel contribution through the Metropolitan Act created the modern day
uniformed and plain clothes Police and a new era in crime investigation.
The Scotland Yard police popularized as Bobbies.
One London politician viewed the plain clothes detectives as “police spies armed with extraordinary
authority to harass and dog the steps of peaceable citizens, to enter their houses and exercise the right of
search on any small pretense or trumped up story”.
In the United States, the first New York City patrol men were recognized as the rattle watch.
It consisted of six men sounding rattles, yelling such phrases as ‘by grace of God two o’clock in peace’.
Early investigative unit came into being Philadelphia and spread to other cities in the United in the
1890s.
The legendary Texas Rangers whose responsibility to prevent were localized later infused into state-
authorized police and devoted their time to field criminal investigations.
Allan Pinkertorn is credited as the ‘founder of Criminal Investigation’.
He developed a code of ethics and on his employ by the US Federal government was able to prevent one
assassination plot of President Lincoln.
He was able to establish the practice of handwriting examination in U.S. courts and promoting a plan for
centralization of criminal identification records thus the creation of the Federal Bureau of Investigation in
the ensuing years.
Pinkerton advanced the cause of international police cooperation by sharing information with Scotland
Yard and French Surete that building the precursor to modern day International Police (Interpol).
Definition of CRIME:
In the criminological context, a crime is “a transgression of the law; the violator is guilty of the
violation and the state may impose a punishment (Colette and Stevens)”.
Any act or omission to act that violates some values, norms, expectations, standards or specifications
of a society constitutes criminal behavior if the society attaches the criminal label to it.
1
Characteristics of a Crime:
The characteristics of a crime may be determined if viewed against wrongs which do not constitute a
crime. Such wrongs are classified as civil wrongs or depicts or torts.
A crime affects the state or general public whereas a civil wrong affects the aggrieved individual.
Prosecution in a criminal action is to punish the offender but civil action is to redress the affected
individual.
The state has a right to exact punishment in a criminal action whereas in a civil action the aggrieved
party may claim.
The State may forgo punishment in a crime and the complainant may not withdraw but in a civil
action the aggrieved party may withdraw.
There are three parties to a crime but in a civil wrong there are two parties.
Elements of Crime:
Three aspects of a crime that must be established before guilt can be determined in a criminal
proceeding:
a) the ability of the defendant to commit the crime (ability/means),
b) the reason the defendant felt the need to commit the crime (motive/desire), and
c) whether or not the defendant had the chance to commit the crime (opportunity).
For example, if a criminal shot someone with a handgun and took his/her money when the victim was
in an isolated, secluded area at night;
a) the means would be the handgun,
b) the motive financial (i.e., the money they stole), and
c) the opportunity the fact that it would be unlikely someone else would witness or stop them.
For the majority of crimes, means and opportunity are the easiest to prove; however, for some
offenses (such as rape or serial killing), the motive can be hard to define.
3 I’s OF INVESTIGATION
1) Information
a) greatest tool for use by the police investigators in the performance of their duties.
b) It may consist unorganized data. It may come from persons, things and places.
c) Sources may be from records and files or informants and witnesses.
2) Interview and Interrogation
Interview – simple questioning
Interrogation – vigorous or forceful questioning
3) Instrumentation – application of method and applied sciences.
POLICE INVESTIGATION
is the action of initiating a meticulous inquiry to a formal complaint filed by the private aggrieved
party or public complainant after the fact of the incident, but no arrest can be legally effected against
the suspect as the circumstances attendant thereto are not those specifically allowed by law.
POLICE OPERATION
is a lawful clandestine intelligence and detective networking to gather information and evidences to
determine with certainty the commission of a crime, the identity of the perpetrators thereof, and as
may be necessary, to arrest the culprits under those instances as authorized by law.
GENERAL RULE:
◄ A person arrested by virtue of a warrant of arrest is not covered by criminal investigation and
must not be placed under interrogation/investigation, unless:
FIRST:
♂ A criminal investigation must necessarily proceed as a legal inquiry by virtue of a complaint based on
a given set of facts, after the commission of an act or omission.
SECOND:
♂ The act or omission subject matter of criminal investigation “must be a felony or an offense
punishable by law”.
THIRD
♂ As a general rule, criminal investigation is not concerned with the arrest of the felon.
Main task is to establish that:
a) a crime of felony was committed and that the perpetrator is probably guilty thereof, or
b) no crime or felony was committed and there exist no factual and legal ground to hold the suspect
answerable thereto.
c) although a crime or felony was committed, the suspect cannot be held criminally liable there
from.
◄ Technically speaking, the subsequent acts of filing an information in court, the issuance of a warrant
of arrest and the arrest of the accused thereafter, are not part of criminal investigation but rather, a
mere necessary consequence thereof.
3
◄ Should a warrant of arrest be issued thereafter, the task of arresting the accused is the duty of the
subpoena and warrant section of the law enforcement agency concerned.
◄ The exceptions to the rule are those specific instances expressly provided under Arts 157 and 158 of
RPC.
Take note:
◄ Criminal investigation is not a “track and field game”.
◄ Investigators must be advised that the rationale behind the rule of “prescription of crimes” is
precisely to provide adequate time and reasonable opportunity for the government thru its law
enforcement agencies to prosecute criminal offenders before a court of justice within the period
allowed by law.
◄ Extreme patience and extra-ordinary caution are the most essential traits of an effective investigator
(achiever) to attain a satisfactory accomplishment in criminal investigation.
◄ There is no room for “short-cutting methods”, undue haste, patent negligence, naked ignorance or
unjustifiable aggressiveness in the process of a police inquiry leading to an investigation.
◄ THERE IS NO SUBSTITUTE TO A LEGALLY ACCOMPLISHED CRIMINAL
INVESTIGATION!
♂ A HOT CASE is one where the violation of law or regulation has just been unearthed or discovered
and the suspects and the witness to the case are still emotionally affected, upset or involved.
♂ A COLD CASE is a dormant case where the witness and suspect have had luxury of ample time to
mull over the ramification of the case to put up their respective alibis or defenses or otherwise form
subjective impression of the case.
It is usual to bear this distinction in mind so that in hot cases an investigator should lose no time in taking
down the sworn statement.
INSTIGATION
is the means whereby the instigator practically induces the could be accused into the commission of
the offense and himself becomes a co-principal.
ENTRAPMENT
is the process whereby ways and means are resorted to for the purposes of trapping and capturing the
law breaker in the execution of his criminal plan.
Kinds of Informants:
1) Ordinary informants
♂ usually the anonymous type
2) Mercenary informants
♂ paid informants
3) Rival elimination informants
♂ give information to do away with competition
4) Double crosser informants
♂ will attempt to gather facts for him
5) Voluntary informants
♂ legitimate informants to protect their interest
6) False informants
♂ concocted information to deviate police efforts
7) Self-aggrandizing informants
♂ underworld informants who give information to please himself or gain attention
ADMISSION VS CONFESSION
ADMISSION
is a statement made by a party, or by someone for whom he is responsible, as to the existence of a
relevant fact which is against his interest or unfavorable to him or inconsistent with the facts alleged
by him (Gomez v. Lituania, 65 O.G. 7592).
4
CONFESSION
is a declaration made at any time by a person, voluntarily and without compulsion or inducement,
stating or acknowledging that he had committed or participated in the commission of a crime (U.S.
vs. Corales, 28 Phil 365).
Concept of an Admission:
♂ In an admission, the perpetrator does not need to accept responsibility for the crime (i.e. admit he was
wrong); he only needs to admit that he, for whatever reason, had committed the crime.
“An admission or oral confession made before the start of custodial investigation is admissible in evidence”
1) Police investigating the scene of the crime on the basis of an eye-witness account.
FACTS:
♂ An eye-witness told the police that the person who shot the security guard was wearing what
looked like a security guard’s uniform also. He did not know who the guard was.
♂ The police went to the scene and saw a man fitting the description and asked him about his
involvement in the shooting of the security guard. He admitted he shot the guard!
2) Admission is made to the policeman first at the scene to investigate report of a death
FACTS:
♂ A report came - in that a tourist had been shot dead in a bar in Boracay.
♂ A policeman went to the bar to find out what happened. Another foreigner told the policeman that
he had shot the tourist, and then he surrendered his gun to the policeman.
Inadmissible Confessions:
1) A barangay captain, even if he is a lawyer, is NOT an independent counsel because he is a
peacekeeping officer and that his role is in direct conflict with the rule of providing competent legal
counsel to accused under custodial investigation.
♂ A competent counsel means an effective and vigilant counsel, who must be present to advise and
assist his client at every turn of the investigation, and stopping the interrogation once in a while
either to give advice to the suspect that he may either continue, choose to remain silent or to
terminate the interview.
5
♂ The lawyer should ascertain that the confession is made voluntarily and that the person under
investigation fully understands the nature and consequence of his extrajudicial confession in
relation to his constitutional rights.
Rights of persons arrested, detained or under custodial investigation; duties of public officers.
(a) Any person arrested detained or under custodial investigation shall at all times be assisted by counsel.
(b) Any public officer or employee, or anyone acting under his order or his place, who arrests, detains or
investigates any person for the commission of an offense shall inform the latter, in a language known
to and understood by him, of his rights to remain silent and to have competent and independent
counsel, preferably of his own choice, who shall at all times be allowed to confer privately with the
person arrested, detained or under custodial investigation. If such person cannot afford the services of
his own counsel, he must be provided with a competent and independent counsel by the investigating
officer.
(c) The custodial investigation report shall be reduced to writing by the investigating officer, provided
that before such report is signed, or thumb marked if the person arrested or detained does not know
how to read and write, it shall be read and adequately explained to him by his counsel or by the
assisting counsel provided by the investigating officer in the language or dialect known to such
arrested or detained person, otherwise, such investigation report shall be null and void and of no
effect whatsoever.
(d) Any extrajudicial confession made by a person arrested, detained or under custodial investigation
shall be in writing and signed by such person in the presence of his counsel or in the latter's absence,
upon a valid waiver, and in the presence of any of the parents, elder brothers and sisters, his spouse,
the municipal mayor, the municipal judge, district school supervisor, or priest or minister of the
gospel as chosen by him; otherwise, such extrajudicial confession shall be inadmissible as evidence
in any proceeding.
(e) Any waiver by a person arrested or detained under the provisions of Article 125 of the Revised Penal
Code, or under custodial investigation, shall be in writing and signed by such person in the presence
of his counsel; otherwise the waiver shall be null and void and of no effect.
(f) Any person arrested or detained or under custodial investigation shall be allowed visits by or
conferences with any member of his immediate family, or any medical doctor or priest or religious
minister chosen by him or by any member of his immediate family or by his counsel, or by any
national non-governmental organization duly accredited by the Commission on Human Rights of by
any international non-governmental organization duly accredited by the Office of the President. The
person's "immediate family" shall include his or her spouse, fiancé or fiancée, parent or child, brother
or sister, grandparent or grandchild, uncle or aunt, nephew or niece, and guardian or ward.
When Custodial Investigation Begins?
1) The (constitutional) rights of a suspect become available when the investigation is no longer a general
inquiry into an unsolved crime but has begun to focus on a particular suspect, or when the suspect has
been taken into police custody, and the police is carrying out a process of interrogations that lends
itself to eliciting incriminating statements. (People vs. Andal, 279 SCRA 474, 495)
2) The law does not distinguish between preliminary questions and questions during custodial
investigation, as any question asked of a person while under detention is considered a question asked
while under custodial investigation. (People vs. Isla, 278 SCRA 47, 57)
3) The moment there is a move of the investigator to elicit admissions or even plain information from
the suspect which may appear innocent or innocuous at the time, the suspect should be assisted by
counsel, unless he waives his right, but the waiver should be made in writing and in the presence of
counsel. (Gamboa vs. Cruz, 162 SCRA 642)
6
4) RA 7438 expanded the definition of “custodial investigation” to include the practice of issuing an
invitation to a person who is investigated in connection with an offense he is suspected to have
committed. Thus, where an accused is on board the police vehicle on the way to the police station
he is already under custodial investigation and should therefore be accorded his rights under
the Constitution. (People v. Bolanos, 211SCRA 262)
5) When the police investigation is no longer a general inquiry into an unsolved crime but has begun to
focus on a particular suspect who has been taken into custody by the police to carry out a process of
interrogation that lends itself to incriminatory statements and not the signing by the suspect of his
supposed extrajudicial confession. (People v. Compil, 244 SCRA 135)
Kinds of Confession:
A. Circumstantial Evidence
♂ There should be more than one
♂ Must be proven
♂ In order to produce the quantum of evidence beyond reasonable doubt.
B. Associative Evidence
♂ physical proof which may identify the perpetrator from the arrangement of the objects at the crime
scene. (garments, tools, fingerprints impressions, blood stains, hair fibers, wallet).
ARREST
Rule 13 (Revised POP)
is the actual restraint of the person to be arrested or by his submission to the custody of the person
making the arrest.
All arrests should be made only on the basis of a valid Warrant of Arrest issued by a competent
authority, except in cases specified under the Doctrine of Citizens Arrest (Sec. 5, Rule 113. Rules on
Criminal Procedure).
WARRANT OF ARREST
7
is an order in writing issued by a judge in the name of the People of the Philippines and directed to a
police officer commanding him to take a person into custody in order that he may be bound to answer
for the commission of an offense.
8
INTERVIEW and INTERROGATION TECHNIQUES
INTERVIEW Defined:
is the questioning of a person believed to possess knowledge that is of official interest to the
investigator.
Basic Assumptions:
◄ NOBODY HAS TO TALK TO LAW ENFORCERS.
◄ NO LAW COMPELS A PERSON TO TALK TO THE POLICE IF HE DOES NOT WANT
TO.
◄ THEREFORE, PEOPLE WILL HAVE TO BE PERSUADED, ALWAYS WITHIN LEGAL
AND ETHICAL LIMITS, TO TALK TO LAW ENFORCERS.
Note: That the above safeguards are applicable only during interview or in the course of
interrogation, a counsel must be present or in case of a valid waiver, a relative must be
present.
1. Chronological Questioning
♀ This technique is considered the easiest and the interrogator is always almost sure of getting all the
information.
2. Going Backward
♀ This technique is the exact opposite of the chronological technique. The interrogator starts with the
last known act, and goes backward t the very idea of committing the crime.
3. General to Specific
♀ This technique is most often used within one of the above techniques. Hence, if the suspect is asked
of the embezzlement of the total amount (general), questions can be asked about details of
Component sums (specific)
Note: Of course, whatever technique is utilized, the idea is to cover the cardinal points in an
investigation, namely, What, Where, When, Who, Why and How.
INTERVIEW FORMAT:
The interview of a witness can be described by the acronym IRONIC which stands for Identity,
Rapport, Opening Statement, Narration, Inquiry, and Conclusion.
Identity
♀ prior to the commencement of an interview, the investigator should identify himself to the witness by
name, rank and agency except when there is no need to know the Officer’s Identity.
Rapport
♀ it is good to get the positive feeling of the subject towards the investigator, such friendly atmosphere
is vital for both the subject and the investigator to have a better interaction.
Opening Statement
♀ the investigator must have to indicate why the subject is being contacted.
Narration
♀ the witness should be allowed to tell all he knows with little interruption from the investigator.
Inquiry
♀ after all information has been given by the subject that is the time for the investigator to ask question
to clarify him about the case under investigation.
9
Conclusion
♀ after the interview, it is but proper to close the interview with utmost courtesy and thanking the
subject for his cooperation.
Note: The Question and Answer is more preferable than the Narrative type because it is easy to elicit
or develop the essential elements of the crime.
GUIDELINES
These attributes are summarily put in a poetic way which is identified below:
♀ One should have the wisdom of Solomon
♀ The courage of David
♀ The physical strength of Samson
♀ The patience of Job
♀ The leadership qualities of Moses
♀ The friendliness and compassion of the Good Samaritan
♀ The strategy of Alexander
♀ The faith of Daniel
♀ The diplomacy of Lincoln and
♀ The tolerance of the carpenter of Nazareth
A. The statement of the victim should be in a language understood or used by him and should contain
the following basic parts:
1) The title or identification of the statement containing the name and address of the affiant, the name of
the investigator as well as his rank, the witness/es, (if any) to the statement, information as to where
and when the statement was taken;
2) The crime/incident committed;
3) The name of the suspect/s and other personal circumstances, if possible;
4) The time, date and place of the commission of the crime/incident;
5) The motive of the incident;
6) The name and other personal circumstances of the victim;
7) The question - to support that he/she is telling the truth;
8) The gravity of the injuries he/she suffered or inflicted upon him/her;
9) The signatures of the affiant/victim and the witnesses (if any); and
10) The certification of the investigator.
SEARCH WARRANT
It is an order in writing issued in the name of the People of the Philippines, signed by a Judge
directing a peace officer, commanding him to search for any property described therein and bring it
before the Court.
Note: Validity – ten (10) days from the date of the issuance.
13
♀ In areas where no SOCO team would be readily available, the Investigator should assume the
responsibilities of the scene of the crime operatives.
WHY????
♂ The successful investigation and prosecution of crimes require, in most cases, the collection,
preservation, and forensic analysis of evidence.
♂ Forensic analysis of evidence is often crucial to demonstrations of guilt or innocence.
♂ To obtain corroborative evidence
♂ If a death has occurred, to determine whether the cause of the injuries are compatible with
the environment where they supposedly occurred and as described by the doctors
REMEMBER!!!!
♂ MAKE SURE YOU GET A SEARCH WARRANT! And if you don’t get one, explain
why…
♂ THE CONTENTS OF THE WARRANT WILL DEPEND ON WHAT THE VICTIM OR
COMPLAINANT HAS DESCRIBED TO YOU THAT MAY BE FOUND AT THE
SCENE.
BASIC PREMISES:
♀ The best search is the most difficult and time-consuming.
♀ There is only one chance to search the scene properly.
♀ There are two search approaches:
a) A cautious search of visible areas
b) A vigorous search of concealed areas
PREPARATION:
♀ Obtain a search warrant, if necessary
♀ Discuss the search with involved personnel before arrival at the scene, if possible
♀ Establish a command headquarters for communication and decision making in major or complicated
crime scene searches
♀ Ensure that personnel are aware of the types of evidence usually encountered and the proper handling
of evidence
♀ Make preliminary personnel assignments before arrival at the scene, if possible
♀ Ensure that assignments are in keeping with the aptitude, training, and experience of personnel.
♀ Person in charge
a) Scene security
b) Administrative log
c) Preliminary survey
d) Narrative description
e) Problem resolution
f) Final decision making
♀ Photographer
a) Photography and log
♀ Sketch preparer
a) Sketch and log
♀ Evidence recorder
a) Evidence custodian and log
♀ Put together evidence collection and packaging materials and equipment
♀ Provide protective clothing, communication, lighting, shelter, transportation, equipment, food, water,
medical assistance, and security for personnel
♀ Long searches need team shifts.
♀ Identify and establish the perimeters and secure the scene by isolation (ropes, barriers, etc) and
through police guards.
♀ Do not let anybody in – not even the mayor or the president of the country.
♀ Only authorized personnel involved in the official investigation should be allowed entry
♀ Do not use any facility such as telephones, toilet, appliances, etc at the scene – record their condition
only.
SCENE PROCESSING:
◄ OBSERVE, DESCRIBE AND RECORD
♀ Document through photographs, sketches, measurements and descriptions
♀ Do not conduct a search of the scene until the documentation and procedures such as dusting for
prints are completed
♀ Do not add markings [like chalk] until original scene photos are taken
♀ Formulate the search method by considering the theory of the investigation and the size of the area to
be searched
PRELIMINARY SURVEY:
♀ Cautiously walk through the scene
♀ Maintain administrative and emotional control
♀ Select a narrative technique (written, audio, video)
♀ Take preliminary photographs
♀ Identify and protect easily contaminated/destroyed physical evidence
♀ Develop a general theory of the crime
♀ Take extensive notes to document the scene, physical and environmental conditions, and personnel
movements
NARRATIVE
♀ Nothing is insignificant to record if it catches your attention
♀ Use photos and sketches to supplement, not substitute for the narrative
15
PHOTOGRAPHS
♀ Take photos of suspect, if at the scene; witnesses, crowd around the scene, bystanders
♀ If body is at the scene, take general, full body and close-up views; more shots after removal
♀ Eliminate extraneous objects from shots [e.g. pointing finger of a policeman]
◄ Note: From “the general to the specific”
◄ One can never take too many photographs
♀ Photograph the crime scene and prepare a photographic log that records all photographs and a
description and a location of evidence
♀ Establish a progression of overall, medium, and close-up views of the crime scene
♀ Photograph from eye level to represent the normal view
FOR SCENE OR LOCATION
◄ Over-all shot
◄ Medium shot
◄ Close up shot
SKETCH
♀ This establishes a permanent record of items, distance and size
♀ It supplements photographs
♀ Sketch number designations should coordinate with evidence log number designations
Scene sketch:
◄ Make a simple line drawing of the scene
◄ Identify sketcher and assistant, note time and date of sketch, exact address of the place
◄ Indicate location of the compass north, scale used to depict measurements/distance, and
legend to identify objects at the scene as depicted in the sketch.
Physical evidence
♀ Prints, fiber, body hair, etc. – can show that the victim or perpetrator was in a certain location
a) i.e. bedroom, car
♀ Sexual aids and toys
a) Vibrators, lubricants, condoms
b) Pornographic materials
c) Instruments of the crime - sexual paraphernalia? Pattern? Look for it.
♀ Writings and/or records
a) Diary’s or notes, Sketch
b) Receipts or other papers that show victim’s statement is correct
♀ Other physical evidence
a) Clothing – suspects garments may lead to his identification when described by the victim
b) Physical marks
c) Victim’s description of the place
ASSOCIATIVE EVIDENCE
is one which can easily be seen like shell, knife; while
TRACE EVIDENCE
is called microscopic evidence like hairs, fibers, glass fragments.
CORROBORATIVE EVIDENCE
Other medical evidence
a. Statements of doctor
b. Present and past medical records
Specialized medical exam:
a. Findings might reveal evidence of crime
Note: The wounds would reveal what kind of weapons used and the extent of injuries sustained.
Whether same is committed by one or more persons
WITNESSES
♂ A. Saw victim/perpetrator in places or actions that confirm victim statement.
♂ B. Witnesses to the acts.
♂ C. Witnesses to prior consistent statements by victim or admissions by perpetrator.
DISCLOSURE
♂ A. To whom
♂ B. When
♂ C. How
♂ D. Why
CHAIN OF CUSTODY
this reflects the movement of evidence from the point of origin to its final disposition
18
RELEASE OF THE CRIME SCENE:
♂ Release the crime scene after the final survey
♂ Crime scene release document should include the time and date of release, to whom released, and by
whom released
♂ Ensure that evidence is collected according to legal requirements, documented, and marked for
identification
CLASSIFICATION OF POLICE REPORTS
A. In Broad Terms
1. Informal Report
Usually a letter or memorandum or any of many prescribed or based in day to day operations.
2. Formal Report
Suggest a full dress treatment – cover, title, page, letter or transmittal summary sheet, text
conclusion and recommendations and other supplementary materials like appendixes, index
and bibliography.
5. Administrative Report
Deal with the routine functioning of the department or agency, proper uniform reporting
procedure and grievance
6. Operational Report
Deals with the activities of law enforcement officers. They are:
a) Patrol Service Reports
b) Arrest Reports
c) Preliminary Investigation Reports
d) Supplemental Progress Report (FOLLOW – UP REPORT)
WHO?
This pertains to some information regarding the victims, suspect, witness, owners and property.
WHAT?
This question considered the following factors:
a) Type of property attached e.g. buildings, residents, alley, vacant lot, etc.
b) Type of property stolen, lost or found. What items related to the crime were found at the scene
an accurate description of all such property stolen, lost or found? An accurate description of
all such property should be entered in the notes.
c) Offense committed, e.g. “Armed Robbery”, “Serious Physical Injuries”.
WHERE?
This question is concerned with the geographical location of the crime scene, property or evidence.
WHEN?
This question includes the data and the time when the offense was committed: property found,
suspect apprehend?
HOW?
This question refers to the general manner in which the crime was committed.
WHY?
Under this reading is listed the subject or desire which motivated the offense.
◄ Generally, the WHO, WHEN, and WHERE will appear at the beginning of the report. The reader need to
know the person involved, the time and the incident happened, and the location at which it took place.
What happened is usually unfolded to the WHAT? The WHY may belong before or after the WHAT,
depending on the situation. Six questions cover the essential typical reports.
1. ACCURACY
♂ must be based on factual information, exactness and non-commission of errors.
2. BREVITY
♂ include only relevant details and exclude all other matters that has no bearing in the investigation.
3. CLARITY / CLEARNESS
♂ must be in simple language and direct to the point by the following a logical sequence in the order in
which they occur.
COMPLETENESS
♂ include all available facts in answer to the 5W’s and 1H.
FAIRNESS
♂ the investigator should take the facts as he finds them if ever he had theories, it must be consisted
with these facts.
20
♂ the arrangement of the materials should be in manner which will make the report easy to read. Form
includes proper paragraphing, proper underscoring, proper capitalization and proper heading.
The report should be written clearly and concisely in simple, direct standard English. It should be
written in third person, the investigator referring to himself as “this Investigator”.
21