Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 91 views

    Criteria Weight Exceptional Admirable Marginal Unacceptable

    Uploaded by

    Irish Ligaya
    The document provides a rubric for evaluating an emergency/disaster response plan with criteria in four areas: content, focus, visual appeal, and mechanics. Each criteria is weighted and defined at different achievement levels from exceptional to unacceptable. Content makes up 50% of the score and focuses on including appropriate details to support the main idea. Focus, weighted at 20%, centers on how clearly the main idea and evacuation plan are conveyed. Visual appeal, also weighted at 20%, relates to the overall design and appearance. Mechanics, weighted at 10%, addresses grammatical errors.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Criteria Weight Exceptional Admirable Marginal Unacceptable

    Uploaded by

    Irish Ligaya
    91 views1 page
    The document provides a rubric for evaluating an emergency/disaster response plan with criteria in four areas: content, focus, visual appeal, and mechanics. Each criteria is weighted and defined at different achievement levels from exceptional to unacceptable. Content makes up 50% of the score and focuses on including appropriate details to support the main idea. Focus, weighted at 20%, centers on how clearly the main idea and evacuation plan are conveyed. Visual appeal, also weighted at 20%, relates to the overall design and appearance. Mechanics, weighted at 10%, addresses grammatical errors.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    Rubric-Disaster-Plan

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document provides a rubric for evaluating an emergency/disaster response plan with criteria in four areas: content, focus, visual appeal, and mechanics. Each criteria is weighted and defined at different achievement levels from exceptional to unacceptable. Content makes up 50% of the score and focuses on including appropriate details to support the main idea. Focus, weighted at 20%, centers on how clearly the main idea and evacuation plan are conveyed. Visual appeal, also weighted at 20%, relates to the overall design and appearance. Mechanics, weighted at 10%, addresses grammatical errors.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    91 views1 page

    Criteria Weight Exceptional Admirable Marginal Unacceptable

    Uploaded by

    Irish Ligaya
    The document provides a rubric for evaluating an emergency/disaster response plan with criteria in four areas: content, focus, visual appeal, and mechanics. Each criteria is weighted and defined at different achievement levels from exceptional to unacceptable. Content makes up 50% of the score and focuses on including appropriate details to support the main idea. Focus, weighted at 20%, centers on how clearly the main idea and evacuation plan are conveyed. Visual appeal, also weighted at 20%, relates to the overall design and appearance. Mechanics, weighted at 10%, addresses grammatical errors.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    Criteria Weight Exceptional Admirable Marginal Unacceptable

    Content 50% Appropriate details Most details support main Few details support main No details to
    support main idea idea idea support main idea

    Accurate and detailed Accurate information for Lacking accurate information Information is not
    information almost all subject matte accurate
    Focus 20% Main idea is clearly Main idea is appropriate Main idea not clearly stated; No main idea,
    appropriate to topic to topic with evacuation evacuation plan but lacking evacuation plan or
    with evacuation plan plan and steps steps steps
    and steps
    Visual 20% Overall design is Overall design is mostly Lack of harmonious design in Project has sloppy
    Appeal pleasing pleasing presentation appearance
    Mechanics 10% Free of grammatical Mostly free of Frequent grammatical errors Very frequent
    errors grammatical errors grammatical errors
    Presentation is illegible and
    Words are legible and Most words are legible confusing Distractive
    pertinent to topic and pertinent to topic elements make
    illustration
    ineffective
    Rubric for Emergency/Disaster Response Plan

    You might also like