Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Western States Folklore Society
Western States Folklore Society
Western States Folklore Society
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Western States Folklore Society is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Western
Folklore.
http://www.jstor.org
1.
Accordingto German scholarshipthe term "religidseVolks-
kunde" was coined in 1901 by a Lutheranministernamed Paul
Drews.' In that year he published an articleentitled"Religi6se
Volkskunde,eine Aufgabeder praktischenTheologie." His con-
cernwas to investigate,
as he put it,"religiousfolklife"in its total-
[2]
8. Cf. The Folk Culture of Yucatan (Chicago, 1941), 261, 267. Since there appears to
be no summaryof the developmentof the term"folk religion" in anthropologicaland
sociological scholarship,I will appreciate citations fromreaders on earlier uses than
Redfield's and Trachtenberg's.
wiseregisteredtheincreasedacademicacceptanceof theterm.And
in the academic world courses in Folk Religion have been taught in
various universities,John Messenger's at Indiana University and
my own (since 1957) at the University of Pennsylvania furnishing
two examples.
Two recent volumes, dealing with non-American contexts,have
used the term "folk religion" in their titles and both provide some
insight into the problems of defining the term. Hori's book sees
Japanese folk religion existing in special relationships with the
high-cultural formsof Japanese religion:
And again Hori provides us with this insight: "I believe that the
essence of Japanese folk religion lies in the interaction of two be-
lief systems:a little tradition,which is based on blood or close com-
munityties; and a great tradition,introduced fromwithout, which
is adopted by individual or group choice. The belief patternsfound
everywhere in Japanese rural society are complex, multilayered,
and syncretistic."10
Leslie's AnthropologyofFolk Religion (1960) helps us particular-
ly in its chapterson India and Yucatan. In the sections dealing with
India (by McKim Marriott) we have folk religion as the interpreta-
tion by the little community of the religion of the great tradition
(what Toynbee refersto as the process of "parochialization" rather
than "universalization").11 In the chapters on Yucatan (from Red-
field) we have folk religion as the syncretizationof the religions of
two civilizations.12
2.
The problems indefining folkreligionarefirst ofall conditioned
bythepreconceptions heldbyvariousdisciplines inrelationtonon-
standard religiousphenomena in culture. Two disciplines in the
UnitedStateswhosesubjectmatter shadesoverintotheareaoffolk
religion-folklore andreligiousstudies-have showncomparatively
lessinterestin theareathanhavetheirEuropeancounterparts, the
folk-culturaland history ofreligionfields.
In thefieldofreligiousstudiesin theUnitedStatestheinterest
in folk-religiousphenomena has been minimal.The teachingof
religious studiesin the United Stateshas concentrated largelyon
thetheological and institutional level,whicheitherneglectsfolk
practices and folk interpretations ofreligionas unimportant or it
neglects them because thediscipline has too rigid a framework to
includesuchphenomena. In thestandard church history journalfor
the UnitedStates,ChurchHistory,in contrast to the European
churchhistoriographical journals, therehasneverbeentheslightest
interestin practices or beliefswhichdepartfromthetheological
and liturgical norm.This wasgraphically displayedin thesober-
sidesprogram of theAmericanSocietyof ChurchHistorywhich
metseveralyearsago in Nashville, thecenterofcountry and gospel
musicwithitshandon thepulseofthebasicreligiouscharacter of
Mid-America. The papersofthesessionindicated no concern what-
soeverwithanyaspectsofeitherfolkor popularreligion.In con-
trastEuropeanjournalsof ecclesiastical history includeall levels
and typesofreligiousexpression.13
The tensions between"high"orofficial religionandfolkreligion
are ofcoursediscoverable in anycomplexsociety. E. R. Leach,in
his recentvolume,Dialecticin PracticalReligion(1968),distin-
guishesbetween"philosophical" and "practical"religion.14 The
first
is thereligionoftheintellectual elite,bywhichthereligionis
usuallyjudgedbyscholarship, thelatteris the"religious principles
whichguidethebehaviorofan ordinary churchgoer." In thefield
ofcomparative religionthecommonfailuretodistinguish between
philosophical and
religion practical religionhas often led toserious
misunderstanding. The Western of
interpretationBuddhism, for
13. Cf. the Bldtter fiir PfdlzischeKirchengeschichteund religi6se Volkskunde.
14. E. R. Leach, ed., Dialectic in Practical Religion (Cambridge, 1968), 1.
If religiousscholarshiphas neglectedthestudyofwhatTrachten-
bergcalls "theinnerlifeofthepeople themselves," so,unfortunate-
ly,has much of our folklorescholarship in this country.The chief
reasonfortheslowdevelopmentofthestudyoffolkreligionin this
countryby folklorists has been, as I see it, the thornyquestion of
definitionof the fieldof folklore.Most Americandefinitionsof
folkloreprovideno categoriesin which to include religiousphe-
nomena, unless it includes them under that impossiblesurvival
fromtheEnlightenment, theword"superstition," whichblocksany
sympathetic understanding of the belief elements in folkreligion.
is
"Religion" obviously not a "genre," and cannot be in-
therefore
cluded in the old-fashionedgenre-oriented definitions.With the
newer culture-oriented definitions.obviouslyreligion can be in-
cluded as it has been in Europe.
The term"superstition," as we all know,has itsdefenders.It was
even used in its Germanform,A berglaube,in the titleof the best
workon folkbeliefsproducedin Europe,theHandw6irterbuch des
deutschenA berglaubens,all tenvolumes,althoughit was minimal-
lyused in thetextitself.Europeanscholarswho opposeA berglaube
as a value judgment,understandablesolelyin relationto a system
of hard orthodoxywhichsees truthonlyin its own terms,have of
courseproposedtheneutralsubstitutetermVolksglaube,whichis
now also widelycurrentin its Englishform"folkbelief."'7
21. Alfred Bertholet, W6rterbuch der Religionen (Stuttgart, 1952), 508-9; Kurt
Goldammer,Die Formenweltdes Religi6sen: Grundrissder systematischenReligions-
wissenschaft(Stuttgart,1960), 14.
22. A. Roy Eckhart, The Surge of Piety in America: An Appraisal (New York, 1958),
deals with the "revival" of religion in the 1950s.Chapter 2 is entitled "Folk Religion:
Its Ways and Works." He "suggests" the term "folk religion" for this phenomenon
because the "return to religion" was "very much a popular movement." He seems to
know nothing of the term's prior use in religious and folk-culturalscholarship.
3.
ofPennsylvania
University