Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Controlling and Costing Materials Inventory - Module On Cost Accounting
Controlling and Costing Materials Inventory - Module On Cost Accounting
Controlling and Costing Materials Inventory - Module On Cost Accounting
Costing Problem
To illustrate the problem of costing materials inventory, assume that the materials ledger card shows unit prices of materials purchases
ranged from P100 to P175. Assume further that 150 units of materials are issued, and 25 units are on hand at the end of the month.
The problems which have to be resolved are:
a. What would be the value of the P150 units issued?
b. What would be the value of the 25 units on hand?
If other factors remain the same, the higher the ending inventory valuation, the lower the cost of goods sold resulting in greater profits or
smaller losses. On the other hand, the lower the ending inventory valuation, the higher the cost of goods sold, resulting in a smaller
profit and greater losses.
Illustration: To illustrate the application of these methods, assume the following transactions relating to Material IJ-4, ink jet:
May 1: The beginning balance on hand is 150 units, costing P150 each.
6: 150 units are purchased under Purchase Order 08 at P155 each.
10: 180 units are issued for use per Requisition 10.
21: 150 units are purchased on Purchase Order 9 for P156.
23: 160 units are issued for use on Requisition 16.
25: 10 units are returned to the storeroom as noted on Returned Materials Report 3. These units had been issued on May 10 for use
on Requisition 10.
Arguments in favor of the first in, first out method are that that it is easier and less costly to use because FIFO requires less record
keeping.; it reflects the actual physical flow of goods; and that the inventory shown in the balance sheet is more relevant because it
includes the most recent costs.¹
A strong argument against the first in, first out method is that it does not match current costs against current sales revenue, because
under this method, the ending inventory is priced at the most recent costs, resulting on the cost of goods sold to be priced at the oldest
costs. When the net income is computed, the cost of goods sold that is deducted from sales revenue does not include the most recent
costs.
Using the same transactions for Material IJ-4, the Materials Ledger Card under the LIFO method is shown below:
The major argument in favor of the last in, first out method is that the current costs are matched against current revenue, because the cost
of goods sold contains the most recent costs.
The argument against the LIFO is that it represents an unrealistic physical flow of goods.
Moving Average Method
Under this method, the units and cost of each new purchase are added to the balances already on hand when the purchase is received and
a new average cost per unit is computed. When materials are issued, they are charged out at this average cost until another purchase is
received or a return is recorded, when a new average cost per unit is computed.
MATERIALS LEDGER CARD ( Moving Average Method)
One advantage of the moving average method is that it is relatively simple to apply, especially with computers. Moreover, the moving
average method produces inventory valuation that approximates current value if there is a rapid turnover of inventory.
The main argument against the moving average method is that there may be a considerable lag between the current cost and inventory
valuation since the average unit cost involves early purchases.
Philippine Accounting Standards (PAS) No. 2 (Inventories) prescribes the use of FIFO and the Moving Average Methods to compute the
cost of inventories. LIFO is no longer permitted under PAS 2.