Professional Documents
Culture Documents
v75 - Ex. 1083 Cowen and Company - Therapeutic Categories Outlook (201702) - Excerpt
v75 - Ex. 1083 Cowen and Company - Therapeutic Categories Outlook (201702) - Excerpt
v75 - Ex. 1083 Cowen and Company - Therapeutic Categories Outlook (201702) - Excerpt
Health Care
February 2017
Alzheimer’s Disease
Bone Diseases
Cardiovascular
Central Nervous System
Dermatology
Diabetes/Obesity
Epilepsy
Gastrointestinal/Ulcer
Hepatitis
Infectious Diseases
Liver Disease
Multiple Sclerosis
Non-Malignant Hematology
Oncology/Hematology
Ophthalmology
Orphan Diseases
Pain Management
Respiratory
Rheumatology
Women’s Health
www.cowen.com @CowenResearch
WATSON LABORATORIES, INC. , IPR2017-01622, Ex. 1083, p. 1 of 10
Cowen and Company Therapeutic Categories Outlook Respiratory
Equity Research February 2017
much worse than it used to be. As community physicians have grown more
comfortable treating mild patients with oral therapies, patients are increasingly being
referred to expert centers only after their disease has become more severe.
Despite the relatively small number of patients afflicted, the market for pulmonary
hypertension therapies is actually quite large in dollar terms. Infused and inhaled
prostanoids can demand $100,000+ per patient per year for treatment. With
approximately 110,000 patients worldwide, and perhaps 50,000+ patients in the U.S.
itself, worldwide sales for major PAH drugs surpassed $5B in 2016.
There are currently 13 drugs indicated for the treatment of PAH in the U.S., and these
can be broadly categorized based on their route of administration. Oral therapies
include Adempas (riociguat) from Bayer, Revatio (sildenafil) from Pfizer, Adcirca
(tadalafil) and Orenitram (treprostinil) from United Therapeutics, Tracleer (bosentan),
Opsumit (macitentan), and Uptravi (selexipag) from Actelion, and Letairis
(ambrisentan) from Gilead. These therapies tend to be used in newly presenting, less
severe patients. There are three branded infused (intravenous and subQ) prostacyclins
on the U.S. market including Remodulin (treprostinil) from United Therapeutics, Flolan
(epoprostenol) from GlaxoSmithKline, and Veletri (epoprostenol) from Actelion. In
addition, in 2008 Teva launched a generic version of Flolan. These therapies are
considered the most potent, and are used in the most severe patients (WHO FC-III and
IV). There are currently two inhaled options, Actelion’s Ventavis (iloprost), and United
Therapeutics’ Tyvaso (treprostinil), and these therapies are typically positioned for use
in patients who require treatment benefit beyond oral therapies, but whose condition
is not considered severe enough to warrant infused prostanoids.
There are three major biochemical pathways that have been shown to be associated
with PAH: the endothelin pathway, nitric oxide pathway and prostacyclin pathway.
These pathways play a critical role in the regulation of vascular tone, and their
dysregulation results in vasoconstriction and pulmonary smooth muscle cell
proliferation.
Nitric oxide (NO) is a vasodilator and plays a major role in smooth muscle cell
signaling. NO is normally produced continuously by the endothelial cells from the
conversion of L-arginine to L-citrulline aided by the enzyme NO synthase. NO diffuses
into the vascular smooth muscle cells and binds to Guanylate Cyclase to stimulate the
synthesis of cGMP, a second messenger that inhibits cell proliferation and produces
muscle relaxation. In PAH patients there is decreased bioavailability of NO, resulting in
reduced cGMP in smooth muscle cells. In addition, cGMP levels are also affected by
the phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE-5) enzyme, which inactivates cGMP in smooth muscle
cells. There are two class of approved drugs that target the NO pathway in PAH
patients – soluble guanylate cyclase stimulators (GCS) and PDE-5 inhibitors. GCS
directly bind to guanylate cyclase and mediates the synthesis of cGMP. Riociguat
(Adempas from Bayer) is the only drug approved in this category. PDE-5 inhibitors
preserve cGMP levels by blocking the inactivation of cGMP by the PDE-5 enzyme.
Tadalafil (Adcirca from United Therapeutics) and sildenafil (Revatio) are the two major
PDE-5 inhibitors approved for PAH. Drugs targeting the nitric oxide pathway (Adcirca,
Revatio, and Adempas) reported worldwide sales of ≈$920MM in 2016. Cumulative
sales from these drugs are expected to marginally increase for the next four years.
Revatio sales have eroded due to generic entry and Adcirca is also expected to see
competition from generic entry at the end of 2017. Adempas, launched in 2013, is
expected to grow strongly during this time period.
pathway in PAH patients. Epoprostenol (Flolan from GSK and Veletri from Actelion),
iloprost (Ventavis from Actelion) and treprostinil (Remodulin, Tyvaso and Orenitram
from United Therapeutics) are prostacyclin analogues approved to treat PAH.
Selexipag (Uptravi from Actelion) is the only approved prostaglandin IP receptor
agonist in the market. Drugs targeting the prostacyclin pathway (Remodulin, Tyvaso,
Uptravi, Orenitram, Flolan, Veletri and Ventavis) reported a worldwide sales of ≈ $1.6B
in 2016. Cumulative sales from these drugs are expected to grow sharply for the next
four years, primarily due to the growth expected in oral prostacyclin agent (Uptravi
and Orenitram).
Worldwide Sales (Reported And Consensus) From PAH Drugs Targeting Major Pathways
$4,000
$3,500
$3,000
Worldwide Sales ($MM)
$2,500
$2,000
$1,500
$1,000
$500
$0
2010A 2011A 2012A 2013A 2014A 2015A 2016A 2017E 2018E 2019E 2020E
In 2016, drugs targeting the prostacyclin, endothelin and nitric oxide pathways
contributed 30%, 53%, and 17% to the worldwide PAH sales, respectively. In 2020,
prostacyclin drugs are expected to contribute a majority share of 54%, whereas
endothelin drugs are predicted to decline to a 35% market share. Nitric oxide pathway
drugs market share are also expected to decline to 11% by 2021.
Low-risk WHO FC II and intermediate-risk WHO FC III patients start treatment with
either a single agent or a combination of agents. ERA, PDE-5i, GCS, IP agonists drugs
are used in the monotherapy setting, and ERA+PDE-5i is commonly used in the
combination setting. For WHO FC III patients, due to their higher risk profile, can also
start with a prostacyclin as a monotherapy. A prostacyclin is then added to the ERA or
ERA+PDE-5i in the combination setting. High risk WHO FC IV patients can be initiated
with a prostacyclin or prostacyclin in combination with ERA or ERA+PDE-5i. Given
that PAH is a chronically progressive disease, initial treatment regimens tend to
produce less adequate clinical responses over time. In such scenarios, double or triple
drug combinations therapies have become increasingly employed.
The latest treatment guidelines from the European Society of Cardiology and the
European Respiratory Society, presented in 2015, provides a hierarchy of
recommendations for the use of approved drugs in patients with PH based on the
level of available evidence, general consensus, efficacy and safety. Drugs are
classified as class I (recommended), class IIa (should be considered), class IIb (may be
considered), and class III (not recommended) for WHO functional class II, III and IV.
The table below provides the hierarchy for drugs for use as monotherapy, initial
combination and sequential combination.
Physicians traditionally did not consider that there was sufficient data to support the
use of combination therapy in treatment naïve patients. However, in 2015 Gilead/GSK
reported that the AMBITION trial of first-line Letairis + Adcirca, compared to either
agent as a monotherapy, demonstrated a significant reduction in the risk of clinical
failure. This was not an expected result and the findings from the AMBITION study are
considered paradigm changing, and has prompted the standard of care to include the
use of combinations earlier in the course of treatment in the first-line setting. Data
from AMBITION was added to the Letairis label in October 2015.
If a patient has not improved within 6-8 weeks, or if a patient progresses through their
first-line therapy, a second agent is typically added. For patients on a PDE-5 inhibitor,
an endothelin receptor antagonist (ERA) such as Actelion’s Opsumit, Actelion’s
Tracleer or Gilead’s Letairis, is then added. For those patients already on an ERA, then
UTHR’s Adcirca is typically added.
Within the PDE-5 class Adcirca is the physicians’ first choice therapy as it is dosed
once per day, which is more convenient than Revatio, which is dosed three times per
day. Physicians also note that the labeled dose of Adcirca is considered more effective
than the labeled dose of Revatio, which is lower than the optimal dose in Revatio’s
clinical trials. Although Revatio generics are available, thus far physicians do not
report being forced by payors to use them ahead of Adcirca.
Our consultants suggest each ERA has certain benefits and drawbacks. Which agent
they choose for any particular patient depends on the etiology of the patient’s PAH,
and on the data that has been generated for each agent in the specific patient
population. Physicians generally prefer either Letairis or Opsumit over Tracleer, as the
former are dosed once per day (while Tracleer is dosed twice per day), and Tracleer is
associated with a higher rate of liver toxicity (~10% of Tracleer patients develop
elevated liver enzyme levels, while few patients on either Opsumit or Letairis do).
Patients whose disease deteriorates further are prescribed an oral, inhaled or infused
(for very severe disease) prostacyclin. For their infused option, our consultants prefer
subcutaneous Remodulin, and will switch a patient to intravenous Remodulin if
injection site pain becomes a problem. They typically do not use much epoprostenol.
Drugs for PAH are typically approved based on randomized clinical trials comparing
the drug to placebo. Head-to-head trials are seen in the combination setting and are
generally not required to gain approval as a single agent. Single agent trials have been
historically performed with no background therapy or on top of an ERA and/or a PDE-
5i. For the primary endpoint, 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) is the historically
preferred endpoint for regulatory approval. However, this is changing with the advent
of drugs like Uptravi, which was approved based on what is increasingly viewed as a
more clinically relevant TTCW (time to clinical worsening) endpoint.
6MWD: The 6-minute walk distance test, a submaximal exercise test, has been the
preferred primary endpoint used in clinical trials to demonstrate efficacy. The test is
generally reproducible, safe, not complicated to perform, and familiar to patients.
Results of the 6MWD test, however, have been shown to be influenced by several
factors: age, sex, body habitus, learning curve, coaching and motivation, hence
making it a less than ideal clinical endpoint. Superiority in 6MWD over placebo
results in a label indicating that the drug has been shown to improve exercise
capability in PAH patients.
TTCW: A new primary endpoint is emerging in the form of an event driven endpoint
denoted by Time To Clinical Worsening. This composite endpoint takes into account
key morbidity outcomes as well as mortality. TTCW is now favored over 6WMD as it is
less subjective and considered a more clinically relevant measure of therapeutic
efficacy. Three recent trials (SERAPHIN, AMBITION, and GRIPHON) have successfully
used this endpoint and results have had a major influence on treatment selection in
PAH.
Actelion’s Tracleer Was The First Oral Therapy For PAH; Its Final Orange Book Listed
Patent Has Expired
Actelion’s Tracleer (bosentan) is an oral endothelin-1 antagonist. Endothelin-1 is a
potent vasoconstrictive peptide that also plays a role in vascular remodeling. Tracleer
binds to both the ETA and ETB endothelin receptors, resulting in vasodilation of the
pulmonary arterial system. Tracleer may also ameliorate vascular remodeling. With a
half-life of roughly five hours, Tracleer is administered twice per day.
Remodulin 2014A 2015A Q1:16A Q2:16A Q3:16A Q4:16A 2016A Q1:17E Q2:17E Q3:17E Q4:17E 2017E 2018E 2019E 2020E 2021E
Avg # s.c. Remodulin patients, US 1706 1843 1768 2058 1950 1941 1929 1873 1873 1910 1910 1891 1790 1550 1390 1250
# s.c. Remodulin patients, ROW 394 325 350 350 350 350 350 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400
# s.c. Remodulin patients, W/W 2100 2168 2118 2408 2309 2291 2282 2273 2273 2310 2310 2291 2190 1950 1790 1650
Revenue/patient (000s) 132 132 33 33 33 33 132 33 33 33 33 132 140 140 140 140
S.C. Remodulin revenue (000s) $277,218 $286,110 $69,894 $79,464 $76,197 $75,603 $301,158 $75,000 $75,000 $76,230 $76,230 $302,460 $306,600 $273,000 $250,600 $231,000
Avg # i.v. Remodulin patients, US 2015 1847 1768 2057 1950 1941 1929 1873 1873 1910 1910 1891 1790 1550 1390 1250
# i.v. Remodulin patients, ROW 80 325 350 350 350 350 350 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400
# i.v. Remodulin patients, W/W 2095 2172 2118 2407 2309 2291 2281 2273 2273 2310 2310 2291 2190 1950 1790 1650
Revenue/patient (000s) 132 132 33 33 33 33 132 33 33 33 33 132 140 140 140 140
I.V. Remodulin revenue (000s) $276,508 $286,727 $69,906 $79,431 $76,197 $75,603 $301,137 $75,000 $75,000 $76,230 $76,230 $302,460 $306,600 $273,000 $250,600 $231,000
Infused Remodulin revenue (000s) $553,726 $572,837 $139,800 $158,895 $152,394 $151,206 $602,295 $150,000 $150,000 $152,460 $152,460 $604,920 $613,200 $546,000 $501,200 $462,000
Tyvaso 2014A 2015A Q1:16A Q2:16A Q3:16A Q4:16A 2016A Q1:17E Q2:17E Q3:17E Q4:17E 2017E 2018E 2019E 2020E 2021E
Avg # inhaled prostacyclins patients, US 4500 5000 5100 5100 5100 5100 5100 5100 5100 5100 5100 5100 5100 5100 5100 5100
Revenue/patient (000s) 126 126 32 32 32 32 126 32 32 32 32 126 126 126 126 126
# patients on Tyvaso 3675 3731 3244 3397 3232 2971 3211 3200 3200 3200 3200 3200 3300 3200 2976 2556
U.S. Tyvaso revenue $463,068 $470,067 $102,200 $107,006 $101,808 $93,587 $404,600 $100,800 $100,800 $100,800 $100,800 $403,200 $415,800 $403,200 $375,000 $322,000
# inhaled prostacyclin patients, ROW 2000 2000 2600 2700 2800 2900 2750 2800 2800 2800 2800 2750 2800 2800 2800 2800
Revenue/patient (000s) 126 126 32 32 32 32 126 32 32 32 32 126 126 126 126 126
# patients on Tyvaso 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 198 397 476
ROW Tyvaso revenue $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $25,000 $50,000 $60,000
Tyvaso Inhaled Remodulin revenue (000s) $463,068 $470,067 $102,200 $107,006 $101,808 $93,587 $404,600 $100,800 $100,800 $100,800 $100,800 $403,200 $415,800 $428,200 $425,000 $382,000
Adcirca 2014A 2015A Q1:16A Q2:16A Q3:16A Q4:16A 2016A Q1:17E Q2:17E Q3:17E Q4:17E 2017E 2018E 2019E 2020E 2021E
Diagnosed PAH Patients, US 25526 26803 27500 27950 28350 28772 28143 29550 29550 29550 29550 29550 31028 32579 34208 35920
Avg # Adcirca patients, US 14520 17734 18284 22666 23700 27550 23050 20000 22000 24000 14583 20146 2015 1007 907 889
Revenue/patient (000s) 15 16 4 4 4 4 16 4 4 4 4 17 17 18 18 18
U.S. Adc irc a Revenue (000s) $221,472 $278,832 $72,601 $90,901 $95,998 $112,708 $372,207 $83,048 $91,352 $99,657 $60,556 $334,613 $34,465 $17,750 $16,454 $16,000
Orenitram 2014A 2015A Q1:16A Q2:16A Q3:16A Q4:16A 2016A Q1:17E Q2:17E Q3:17E Q4:17E 2017E 2018E 2019E 2020E 2021E
Diagnosed PAH Patients, US 25526 26803 27500 27950 28350 28772 28143 29550 29550 29550 29550 29550 31028 32579 34208 35920
Revenue/patient (000s) 200 155 35 35 35 35 140 38 38 38 38 150 160 170 170 170
# patients on Orenitram 206 801 1149 1086 1163 1094 1123 1075 1100 1150 1200 1131 1300 1450 1600 1765
U.S. Orenitram revenue $41,266 $118,450 $40,200 $38,010 $40,705 $38,290 $157,205 $40,313 $41,250 $43,125 $45,000 $169,688 $208,000 $246,500 $272,000 $300,050
Diagnosed PAH Patients, ROW 25526 26803 27500 27950 28350 28772 28143 29550 29550 29550 29550 29550 31028 32579 34208 35920
Revenue/patient (000s) 100 100 25 25 25 25 100 25 25 25 25 100 100 100 100 100
# patients on Orenitram 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 150 500 700 1000
ROW Orenitram revenue $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,000 $50,000 $70,000 $100,000
Orenitram revenue (000s) $41,266 $118,450 $40,200 $38,010 $40,705 $38,290 $157,205 $40,313 $41,250 $43,125 $45,000 $169,688 $223,000 $296,500 $342,000 $400,050
As initially designed, patients in FREEDOM-C were started on 1mg Orenitram BID, and
patients were to be up-titrated by 1mg BID every week. Not only was 1mg the starting
dose, and expected dose increment, but the drug was available only in a 1mg pill size,
meaning lower doses or smaller dosing increments were not possible. This dosing
paradigm was problematic. Prostacyclins like treprostinil have relatively harsh side
effects such as nausea, vomiting, and flushing that are dose-related. To minimize the
side effects, patients are typically started at low doses, and as the patients acclimate,
the dose is increased to get the patient into the therapeutic range gradually, over
weeks. Unfortunately, Orenitram was somewhat more bioavailable than United
Therapeutics had originally thought, meaning that patients were being started on and
up-dosed by too large of a dose. Many patients experienced harsh prostacyclin-like
side effects. United Therapeutics realized its mistake, and worked to introduce smaller
Orenitram pill sizes that would permit both a lower starting dose and smaller dose
increments. A 0.5mg pill was introduced in July 2007 when the trial had enrolled about