Heliocentrism and the Catholic Church Timeline

1543: Nicolas Copernicus published a book supporting the heliocentric theory.

1545: Pope Paul III called the Council of Trent to stop the spread of
Protestantism and to revive the Catholic Church. It said only the Church
could interpret the Bible, and it set up the Inquisition to combat heresy.

1564: Galileo Galilei was born.

1600: The Inquisition tried Giordano Bruno and burned him at the stake for
heresy. He supported the heliocentric theory.

1609: Galileo invented a telescope that convinced him of the heliocentric model.

1615: The Catholic Church told Galileo to stop sharing his theory in public.

1615: Paolo Antonio Foscarini published a book defending Copernicus and

arguing the heliocentric model did not go against the Bible.

1616: The Catholic Church added Copernicus’s work (and others supporting the
heliocentric model) to its list of banned books.

1632: Galileo published Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems.

1633: The Inquisition charged Galileo with heresy and tried him in Rome.

1642: Galileo died.

1661: Isaac Newton began teaching Galileo and Copernicus’s ideas in England.

1758: The Catholic Church ended the ban on books teaching the heliocentric
model.

1939: Pope Pius XII called Galileo a hero of research.

1979: Pope John Paul II ordered an investigation into the Church’s treatment of
Galileo.

STANFORD HISTORY EDUCATION GROUP sheg.stanford.edu

 Document A: Galileo’s Letter (Modified)

Galileo wrote the following letter to Duchess Christina of Tuscany in 1615.

In this letter, he defends himself against the charges of heresy.

Some years ago I discovered in the heavens many things that had not
been seen before our own age. The novelty of these things . . . stirred up
several professors against me. They hurled various charges and published
numerous writings filled with vain arguments, and they made the grave
mistake of sprinkling these with passages taken from places in the Bible,
which they failed to understand properly.

The reason given for attacking the opinion that the earth moves and the
sun stands still is that in many places in the Bible one may read that the
sun moves and the earth stands still. Since the Bible cannot err, it follows
that anyone who claims that the sun is motionless and the earth movable
takes an erroneous and heretical position.

With regard to this argument, I think in the first place that it is very pious to
say and prudent to affirm that the holy Bible can never speak untruth-
whenever its true meaning is understood. But I believe nobody will deny
that the Bible is often very complex, and may say things which are quite
different from what its bare words signify. . . .

I do not believe that the same God who has given senses, reason and
intellect has intended us to not to use them. . . . He would not require us to
deny sense and reason in physical matters of direct experience. . . . Can an
opinion be heretical and yet have no concern with the salvation of souls?

Source: Galileo Galilei, “Letter to the Grand Duchess Christina of

Tuscany,” 1615.

Vocabulary

novelty: original or unusual pious: devoutly religious

vain: conceited prudent: wise
err: to be wrong signify: mean
erroneous: wrong

STANFORD HISTORY EDUCATION GROUP sheg.stanford.edu

 Document B: Cardinal Bellarmine
Cardinal Robert Bellarmine was in charge of dealing with difficult issues
connected to the Church’s power and beliefs during the Galileo controversy. He
wrote the following letter to Paolo Antonio Foscarini in response to Foscarini’s
book defending Galileo. Historians don’t believe Bellarmine ever saw Galileo’s
1615 letter (Document A).

As you know, the Council [of Trent] prohibits interpreting the Scriptures contrary
to the common agreement of the holy Fathers. And if you would read not only the
Fathers but also the commentaries of modern writers on Genesis, Psalms,
Ecclesiastes and Joshua, you would find that all agree in explaining that the
sun is in the heavens and moves swiftly around the earth, and that the earth is
far from the heavens and stands immobile in the center of the universe. . . .

It would be just as heretical to deny that Abraham had two sons and Jacob
twelve, as it would be to deny the virgin birth of Christ, for both are declared by
the Holy Ghost through the mouths of the prophets and apostles. . . .

I say that if there were a true demonstration that the sun was in the center of the
universe and the earth in the third sphere, and that the sun did not travel around
the earth but the earth circled the sun, then it would be necessary to proceed
with great caution in explaining the passages of Scripture which seemed
contrary, and we would rather have to say that we did not understand the
Scripture than to say that something was false which has been demonstrated.
But I do not believe that there is any such demonstration; none has been shown
to me. . . . [One] clearly experiences that the earth stands still and that his eye is
not deceived when it judges that the moon and stars move.

Source: Cardinal Robert Bellarmine, “Letter on Galileo’s Theories,” 1615.

Vocabulary

contrary: against or the opposite of prophets: someone who speaks for God
something apostles: religious messengers
Genesis, Psalms, Ecclesiastes scripture: text from the Bible
and Joshua: sections of the Bible

STANFORD HISTORY EDUCATION GROUP sheg.stanford.edu

 Document C: Condemnation of Galileo (Modified)

In 1632, Galileo, who had been teaching and writing about the idea that the Earth
moved around the sun, was summoned to Rome to stand trial. After questioning
the relevant witnesses, the judges issued the following condemnation of Galileo.

You, Galileo of Florence, were denounced in 1615, by this Holy Office, for
holding as true a false doctrine taught by many, namely, that the sun is
immovable in the center of the world, and that the earth moves . . . also, for
explaining the Scriptures according to your own meaning. Therefore . . . by the
desire of his Holiness and the Most Eminent Lords, Cardinals of this supreme
and universal Inquisition, the two propositions of the stability of the sun, and the
motion of the earth, were qualified as follows:

1. The proposition that the sun is in the center of the world and immovable
from its place is absurd, philosophically false, and formally heretical;
because it is expressly contrary to Holy Scriptures.
2. The proposition that the earth is not the center of the world, nor
immovable, but that it moves is also absurd, philosophically false, and,
theologically considered, at least erroneous in faith.

Therefore, in the most holy name of our Lord Jesus Christ and of His Most
Glorious Mother Mary, We pronounce, judge, and declare, that you Galileo . . .
have made yourself suspected by this Holy Office of heresy, that is, of having
believed and held the doctrine (which is false and contrary to the Holy and Divine
Scriptures) that the sun is the center of the world, and that it does not move from
east to west, and that the earth does move, and is not the center of the world;
also, that an opinion can be held and supported as probable, after it has been
declared contrary to the Holy Scripture.

Source: “The Crime of Galileo: Indictment and Abjuration of 1633.”

Vocabulary

condemnation: a statement of very doctrine: a set of beliefs

strong criticism eminent: distinguished, high in station
scripture: text from the Bible proposition: a statement expressing a
denounce: to declare something is judgment or opinion
wrong or evil

STANFORD HISTORY EDUCATION GROUP sheg.stanford.edu

 Document D: New York Times Article (Modified)

In 1979, Pope John Paul II ordered an investigation of the Catholic

Church’s treatment of Galileo. The following article from 1992 summarizes
the conclusions of the investigation.

Vatican Science Panel Told By Pope: Galileo Was Right

Moving formally to right a wrong, Pope John Paul II acknowledged in a

speech today that the Roman Catholic Church had erred in condemning
Galileo 359 years ago for asserting that the Earth revolves around the Sun.

The address by the Pope before the Pontifical Academy of Sciences closed
a 13-year investigation into the Church's condemnation of Galileo in 1633,
one of history's most notorious conflicts between faith and science. Galileo
was forced to recant his scientific findings to avoid being burned at the
stake and spent the remaining eight years of his life under house arrest.

John Paul said the theologians who condemned Galileo did not recognize
the formal distinction between the Bible and its interpretation.

"This led them move a question which in fact pertained to scientific

investigation into the realm of the doctrine of the faith.”

Though the Pope acknowledged that the Church had done Galileo a wrong,
he said the 17th-century theologians were working with the knowledge
available to them at the time.

Source: “Vatican Science Panel Told by Pope: Galileo Was Right,” New
York Times, November 1, 1992.

Vocabulary

err: to make a mistake theologians: individuals who study religion

condemn: express complete disapproval doctrine: a set of beliefs
recant: to say that one no longer holds a
belief

STANFORD HISTORY EDUCATION GROUP sheg.stanford.edu

 Guiding Questions

Document A: Galileo’s Letter

1. (Sourcing) When was this document written?
This document was written in 1615
2. (Contextualization) Look at your timeline. Why might Galileo write a letter
defending himself at this time?
Galileo wrote a letter at this time because the catholic church is telling galileo to
stop sharing his ideas in public

3. (Close Reading) According to Galileo, why do some people think his teachings
are heretical?
He says that pople think his teacheings are heretical, because a miricale happened
in the bible where the sun stood still

4. (Close Reading) How does Galileo defend himself against these charges?
Galileo suggests that the earth was stop from rotating as a mirical, instead of the
sun moving at all.

5. (Context) Using the information on your timeline, do you think the Catholic
Church would accept Galileo’s defense? Why or why not?
I think that they will accept the idea, but not from him, because some dude named
Paolo Antonio Foscarini published a book defending Copernicus and arguing the
heliocentric model did not go against the Bible, and he was fine, but eventually the
charged galileo with hersey and he was tried in rome

STANFORD HISTORY EDUCATION GROUP sheg.stanford.edu

Document B: Cardinal Bellarmine

1. (Close Reading) Explain two reasons Cardinal Bellarmine gave for believing the
geocentric theory.
a.
It would get him killed (for heresy)

b.
The scriptures give several examples of the sun and stars moving around the
earth

2. (Close Reading) How did Cardinal Bellarmine respond to the following arguments
from Galileo?
a. The Bible passages about the earth standing still should not have been
interpreted literally.
Most of the bible agrees that everything moves around the earth

b. The model of the universe (heliocentric or geocentric) is not a matter of

salvation.
to say that geocentric is false, is saying that the entire bible is false

3. (Context) Why do you think the Catholic Church was so committed to defending
the literal meaning of the Bible passages?
The Church was so commited to defending the literal meaning of the bible,
because of of two reasons, we are creatures of habit, we dont like change, and it
would make people question the Church, and that means no more power for the
church.

STANFORD HISTORY EDUCATION GROUP sheg.stanford.edu

 Judgment of Galileo
Imagine you are a member of the Inquisition at Galileo’s trial. You have the following
evidence: Heliocentrism and the Catholic Church Timeline, Document A, and Document
B. Decide your answer to the question: Was Galileo really a heretic? Explain your
response below.
was not (was/was not) a heretic because . . .
Galileo __________
1. Reason 1:
He was still christian, but he just didnt agree with that one thing, and that maybe he
thought they were understanding it all along, like when he said

Quote from a document to support your reason:

"Bible can never speak untruth whenever its true meaning is understood"

2. Reason 2:
He says this has nothing to do with the salvation of souls

Quote from a document to support your reason:

"Can an opinion be heretical and yet have no concern with the salvation of souls"

STANFORD HISTORY EDUCATION GROUP sheg.stanford.edu

Document C: Condemnation of Galileo

1. (Contextualization) Given what you know about the time period, how do you think
the Catholic Church ruled in Galileo’s case? Why?

2. (Close reading) By the end of the trial, what was the Catholic Church’s position
on the heliocentric theory?

3. (Close Reading) What two reasons did the Church give for declaring Galileo was
a heretic?
a.

b.

Document D: The New York Times

1. (Close Reading) Why did Pope John Paul say the Church’s treatment of Galileo
was wrong?

2. (Contextualization) Why was it easier for the Church to side with Galileo in 1992
than in 1633?

STANFORD HISTORY EDUCATION GROUP sheg.stanford.edu