Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lecture 6 - Peak Response SDOFs and Response Spectra
Lecture 6 - Peak Response SDOFs and Response Spectra
Structural Dynamics
Prof. Eduardo Miranda
1
OBJECTIVES
OBJECTIVES
PARAMETERS
PARAMETERS DEFINING
DEFINING A
A SDOF
SDOF SYSTEM
SYSTEM
2
PARAMETERS
PARAMETERS DEFINING
DEFINING A
A SDOF
SDOF SYSTEM
SYSTEM
1 2π m W
Tn = = = 2π = 2π
f n ωn k kg
PARAMETERS
PARAMETERS DEFINING
DEFINING A
A SDOF
SDOF SYSTEM
SYSTEM
c c c cω
ζ = = = = n
ccr 2mωn 2 km 2k
3
PARAMETERS
PARAMETERS DEFINING
DEFINING A
A SDOF
SDOF SYSTEM
SYSTEM
1. With ζ, k and m
2. With c, k and m
3. With Tn and ζ
4. With Tn, c and ccr
5. With Tn, c and m
6. With Tn, c and k
7. With fn and ζ
8. With fn, c and ccr
PARAMETERS
PARAMETERS DEFINING
DEFINING A
A SDOF
SDOF SYSTEM
SYSTEM
Then, the SDOF system can be defined in various alternative ways (cont.):
4
PEAK
PEAK RESPONSE
RESPONSE
r0 = max r (t )
t
PEAK
PEAK RESPONSE
RESPONSE
D = u0 = max u (t )
t
20.0
10.0
Tn = 2.0s, ζ = 0.02
0.0
-10.0
NS Comp of El Centro record
-20.0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
TIME [s]
D = 7.47 in
5
PEAK
PEAK RESPONSE
RESPONSE
Vel. [in/s]
Relative Velocity Time History
50.0
Tn = 2.0s, ζ = 0.02
25.0
0.0
-25.0 NS Comp of El Centro record
-50.0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
TIME [s]
V = 41.6 in/s
PEAK
PEAK RESPONSE
RESPONSE
6
EFFECT
EFFECT OF
OF PERIOD
PERIOD OF
OF VIBRATION
VIBRATION
EFFECT
EFFECT OF
OF PERIOD
PERIOD OF
OF VIBRATION
VIBRATION
NS Comp of El Centro record
Displ. [in] Relative Displacement Time History
20.0
10.0
Tn = 1.0s, ζ = 0.02
0.0
-10.0
D = 5.93 in
-20.0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Displ. [in] Relative Displacement Time History
TIME [s]
20.0
10.0
Tn = 2.0s, ζ = 0.02
0.0
-10.0
D = 7.47 in
-20.0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
TIME [s]
7
EFFECT
EFFECT OF
OF PERIOD
PERIOD OF
OF VIBRATION
VIBRATION
EFFECT
EFFECT OF
OF PERIOD
PERIOD OF
OF VIBRATION
VIBRATION
NS Comp of El Centro record
Displ. [in] Relative Displacement Time History
20.0
10.0
1.0 s Tn = 1.0s, ζ = 0.02
0.0
-10.0
1.0 s
-20.0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
TIME [s]
Displ. [in] Relative Displacement Time History
20.0
10.0
2.0 s Tn = 2.0s, ζ = 0.02
0.0
-10.0
2.0 s
-20.0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
TIME [s]
Displ. [in] Relative Displacement Time History
20.0
10.0 3.0 s Tn = 3.0s, ζ = 0.02
0.0
-10.0 3.0 s
-20.0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
TIME [s]
8
EFFECT
EFFECT OF
OF PERIOD
PERIOD OF
OF VIBRATION
VIBRATION
EFFECT
EFFECT OF
OF PERIOD
PERIOD OF
OF VIBRATION
VIBRATION
NS Comp of El Centro record
Accel. [in/s 2] Absolute Acceleration Time History
500.0
250.0 A = 234.5 in/s2 Tn = 1.0s, ζ = 0.02
0.0
-250.0
-500.0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
TIME [s]
Absolute Acceleration Time History
Accel. [in/s 2]
500.0
250.0 A = 73.8 in/s2 Tn = 2.0s, ζ = 0.02
0.0
-250.0
-500.0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
TIME [s]
Accel. [in/s 2] Absolute Acceleration Time History
500.0
Tn = 3.0s, ζ = 0.02
250.0
0.0
-250.0
A = 68.2 in/s2
-500.0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
TIME [s]
9
EFFECT
EFFECT OF
OF PERIOD
PERIOD OF
OF VIBRATION
VIBRATION
EFFECT
EFFECT OF
OF PERIOD
PERIOD OF
OF VIBRATION
VIBRATION
NS Comp of El Centro record
Displ. [in] Relative Displacement Time History
20.0
10.0
Tn = 1.0s, ζ = 0.02
0.0
-10.0
-20.0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
t = 4.82 s TIME [s]
Relative Displacement Time History
Displ. [in]
20.0
10.0
Tn = 2.0s, ζ = 0.02
0.0
-10.0
-20.0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
TIME [s]
t = 11.20 s
Displ. [in] Relative Displacement Time History
20.0
10.0
Tn = 3.0s, ζ = 0.02
0.0
-10.0
-20.0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
TIME [s]
Structural Dynamics
t = 13.44 s © Eduardo Miranda
20
10
EFFECT
EFFECT OF
OF PERIOD
PERIOD OF
OF VIBRATION
VIBRATION
EFFECT
EFFECT OF
OF DAMPING
DAMPING RATIO
RATIO
11
EFFECT
EFFECT OF
OF DAMPING
DAMPING RATIO
RATIO
NS Comp of El Centro record
Displ. [in] D = 15.53 in Relative Displacement Time History
20.0
10.0
Tn = 3.0s, ζ = 0.02
0.0
-10.0
-20.0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
TIME [s]
Relative Displacement Time History
Displ. [in]
20.0
10.0
Tn = 3.0s, ζ = 0.05
0.0
-10.0
-20.0
D = 10.81 in
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
TIME [s]
Relative Displacement Time History
Displ. [in]
20.0
10.0
D = 8.54 in Tn = 3.0s, ζ = 0.10
0.0
-10.0
-20.0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
TIME [s]
Structural Dynamics 23 © Eduardo Miranda
EFFECT
EFFECT OF
OF DAMPING
DAMPING RATIO
RATIO
12
EFFECT
EFFECT OF
OF DAMPING
DAMPING RATIO
RATIO
NS Comp of El Centro record
Accel. [in/s 2]
A = 422.1 in/s2 Absolute Acceleration Time History
500.0
250.0
Tn = 0.5 s, ζ = 0.02
0.0
-250.0
-500.0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Accel. [in/s 2] TIME [s]
A = 354.2 in/s2 Absolute Acceleration Time History
500.0
250.0
Tn = 0.5 s, ζ = 0.05
0.0
-250.0
-500.0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Accel. [in/s 2]
A = 276.8 in/s2 TIME [s] Absolute Acceleration Time History
500.0
250.0
Tn = 0.5 s, ζ = 0.10
0.0
-250.0
-500.0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
TIME [s]
Structural Dynamics 25 © Eduardo Miranda
EFFECT
EFFECT OF
OF DAMPING
DAMPING RATIO
RATIO
13
RESPONSE
RESPONSE SPECTRUM
SPECTRUM
RESPONSE
RESPONSE SPECTRUM
SPECTRUM
10.0
Tn = 1.0s, ζ = 0.02
0.0
-10.0 D = 5.93 in
-20.0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
TIME [s]
14
RESPONSE
RESPONSE SPECTRUM
SPECTRUM
20.0
10.0
Tn = 2.0s, ζ = 0.02
0.0
-10.0 D = 7.47 in
-20.0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
TIME [s]
RESPONSE
RESPONSE SPECTRUM
SPECTRUM
15
RESPONSE
RESPONSE SPECTRUM
SPECTRUM
RESPONSE
RESPONSE SPECTRUM
SPECTRUM
40.0
30.0
20.0
10.0
0.0
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
PERIOD [s]
Structural Dynamics 32 © Eduardo Miranda
16
RESPONSE
RESPONSE SPECTRUM
SPECTRUM
1.0
0.5
PGA
0.0
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
PERIOD [s]
Structural Dynamics 33 © Eduardo Miranda
EFFECT
EFFECT OF
OF DAMPING
DAMPING ON
ON RESPONSE
RESPONSE SPECTRA
SPECTRA
S d [in]
18.0
ζ = 0.02
16.0
ζ = 0.05
14.0 ζ = 0.10
12.0 ζ = 0.15
10.0 ζ = 0.20
8.0
6.0
4.0
2.0
0.0
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
PERIOD [s]
Structural Dynamics 34 © Eduardo Miranda
17
EFFECT
EFFECT OF
OF DAMPING
DAMPING ON
ON RESPONSE
RESPONSE SPECTRA
SPECTRA
30.0
20.0
10.0
0.0
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
PERIOD [s]
EFFECT
EFFECT OF
OF DAMPING
DAMPING ON
ON RESPONSE
RESPONSE SPECTRA
SPECTRA
0.75
0.50
0.25
0.00
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
PERIOD [s]
18
DAMPING
DAMPING REDUCTION
REDUCTION FACTORS
FACTORS
S d (Tn , ζ )
B=
S d (Tn ,5%)
DAMPING
DAMPING REDUCTION
REDUCTION FACTORS
FACTORS
B ζ = 0.02
2.0 ζ = 0.05
ζ = 0.10
1.8
ζ = 0.15
1.6 ζ = 0.20
1.4
1.2
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
PERIOD [s]
19
DAMPING
DAMPING REDUCTION
REDUCTION FACTORS
FACTORS
Sd [cm]
35
30 ξ=5%
25 10%
20
20%
15 30%
50%
10
5
(a) El Centro 1940
0
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0
PERIOD [s]
DAMPING
DAMPING REDUCTION
REDUCTION FACTORS
FACTORS
B
1
ξ=10%
0.8
0.6 20%
30%
0.4
50%
20
DAMPING
DAMPING REDUCTION
REDUCTION FACTORS
FACTORS
DAMPING
DAMPING REDUCTION
REDUCTION FACTORS
FACTORS
B
1.0
ξ =10%
0.8
20%
0.6
30%
40%
50%
0.4
21
DAMPING
DAMPING REDUCTION
REDUCTION FACTORS
FACTORS
1 .5
B= + 0 .5
B 40ξ + 1
1.0
ξ =10%
0.8
20%
0.6
30%
40%
50%
0.4
DAMPING
DAMPING REDUCTION
REDUCTION FACTORS
FACTORS
aT 0.30
B =1− a = 1.303 + 0.436 ln(ξ )
B
(T + 1)0.65
1.0
ξ =10%
0.8
20%
0.6
30%
40%
50%
0.4
22
DAMPING
DAMPING REDUCTION
REDUCTION FACTORS
FACTORS
DAMPING
DAMPING REDUCTION
REDUCTION FACTORS
FACTORS
For those interested you may read more damping reduction factors in the
following paper (optional reading):
23
DAMPING
DAMPING REDUCTION
REDUCTION FACTORS
FACTORS
For those interested you may read more damping reduction factors in the
following paper (optional reading):
EFFECTS
EFFECTS OF
OF RECORD
RECORD PROCESSING
PROCESSING ON
ON
RESPONSE
RESPONSE SPECTRA
SPECTRA
It is beyond the scope of this course to cover these effects but some examples
and further reading is provided in the following pages.
24
EFFECTS
EFFECTS OF
OF RECORD
RECORD PROCESSING
PROCESSING ON
ON
RESPONSE
RESPONSE SPECTRA
SPECTRA
EFFECTS
EFFECTS OF
OF RECORD
RECORD PROCESSING
PROCESSING ON
ON
RESPONSE
RESPONSE SPECTRA
SPECTRA
Effects of base line correction:
(After Boore 2001, Effect of Baseline Corrections on Displacements and Response Spectra for Several Recordings of the 1999 Chi-
Chi, Taiwan, Earthquake, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 91, 5, pp. 1199–1211, October 2001)
Structural Dynamics 50 © Eduardo Miranda
25
EFFECTS
EFFECTS OF
OF RECORD
RECORD PROCESSING
PROCESSING ON
ON
RESPONSE
RESPONSE SPECTRA
SPECTRA
Effects of base line correction:
(After Boore 2001, Effect of Baseline Corrections on Displacements and Response Spectra for Several Recordings of the 1999 Chi-
Chi, Taiwan, Earthquake, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 91, 5, pp. 1199–1211, October 2001)
Structural Dynamics 51 © Eduardo Miranda
EFFECTS
EFFECTS OF
OF RECORD
RECORD PROCESSING
PROCESSING ON
ON
RESPONSE
RESPONSE SPECTRA
SPECTRA
Effects of high-pass filtering:
(After Boore and Bommer 2005, Processing of strong-motion accelerograms: needs, options and consequences
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 25 (2005) 93–115)
Structural Dynamics 52 © Eduardo Miranda
26
EFFECTS
EFFECTS OF
OF RECORD
RECORD PROCESSING
PROCESSING ON
ON
RESPONSE
RESPONSE SPECTRA
SPECTRA
Effects of high-pass filtering:
(After Boore and Bommer 2005, Processing of strong-motion accelerograms: needs, options and consequences
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 25 (2005) 93–115)
Structural Dynamics 53 © Eduardo Miranda
PSEUDO-VELOCITY
PSEUDO-VELOCITY RESPONSE
RESPONSE SPECTRUM
SPECTRUM
⎛ 2π ⎞
V = ωn S d = ωn u0 = ⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ S d
⎝ n ⎠
T
⎛ 2π ⎞
S v ≈ ωn S d = ⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ S d
⎝ n ⎠
T
27
PSEUDO-ACCELERATION
PSEUDO-ACCELERATION RESPONSE
RESPONSE SPECTRUM
SPECTRUM
2
⎛ 2π ⎞
A = ω S d = ω u = ⎜⎜
2
n
2
n 0
⎟⎟ S d
⎝ Tn ⎠
2
⎛ 2π ⎞
S a ≈ ω S d = ⎜⎜
2
n
⎟⎟ S d
⎝ Tn ⎠
Structural Dynamics 55 © Eduardo Miranda
PEAK
PEAK STRUCTURAL
STRUCTURAL RESPONSE
RESPONSE FROM
FROM THE
THE
RESPONSE SPECTRUM
RESPONSE SPECTRUM
u0 = D = S d = max u (t )
t
28
PEAK
PEAK STRUCTURAL
STRUCTURAL RESPONSE
RESPONSE FROM
FROM THE
THE
RESPONSE SPECTRUM
RESPONSE SPECTRUM
The peak equivalent static lateral force in the system (base shear) is
computed as the peak relative displacement times the lateral stiffness:
f s 0 = Vb 0 = kD = kS d
Since A = ω n S d
2
then the lateral force in the system can also be
computed as:
A
f s 0 = Vb 0 = mA = W
g
PEAK
PEAK STRUCTURAL
STRUCTURAL RESPONSE
RESPONSE FROM
FROM THE
THE
RESPONSE
RESPONSE SPECTRUM
SPECTRUM
Sa
f s 0 = Vb 0 ≈ mS a = W
g
29
DESIGN
DESIGN OF
OF LINEAR
LINEAR SDOF
SDOF SYSTEMS
SYSTEMS USING
USING
RESPONSE
RESPONSE SPECTRUM
SPECTRUM
1.0
0.61g
0.5
0.0
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
PERIOD [s]
Structural Dynamics 59 © Eduardo Miranda
DESIGN
DESIGN OF
OF LINEAR
LINEAR SDOF
SDOF SYSTEMS
SYSTEMS USING
USING
RESPONSE SPECTRUM
RESPONSE SPECTRUM
Tn2 (1) 2
D = Sd ≈ Sa = 0. 61(386 . 2) = 5.97 in
4π 2 4π 2
30
DESIGN
DESIGN OF
OF LINEAR
LINEAR SDOF
SDOF SYSTEMS
SYSTEMS USING
USING
RESPONSE
RESPONSE SPECTRUM
SPECTRUM
S d [in]
20.0
18.0
16.0
14.0
12.0
10.0
8.0
5.93 in 6.0
4.0
2.0
0.0
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
PERIOD [s]
DESIGN
DESIGN OF
OF LINEAR
LINEAR SDOF
SDOF SYSTEMS
SYSTEMS USING
USING
RESPONSE
RESPONSE SPECTRUM
SPECTRUM
4π 2 4π 2 231.1
f s 0 = Vb 0 = mωn2 S d = m 2
S d = m 2
5.93 ≈ W = 0.606W
Tn (1) g
D = S d = 5.93 in
31
DESIGN
DESIGN OF
OF LINEAR
LINEAR SDOF
SDOF SYSTEMS
SYSTEMS USING
USING
RESPONSE
RESPONSE SPECTRUM
SPECTRUM
In general for rock and firm sites, short period structures are
subjected to high lateral forces. If lateral forces want to be kept small,
the period must be lengthen. Example if V<0.4W then T>1.2s
S a [g]
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
PERIOD [s]
Structural Dynamics 63 © Eduardo Miranda
DESIGN
DESIGN OF
OF LINEAR
LINEAR SDOF
SDOF SYSTEMS
SYSTEMS USING
USING
RESPONSE
RESPONSE SPECTRUM
SPECTRUM
In general for rock and firm sites, short period structures are
subjected to small lateral displacements. If lateral displacements
want to be kept small, the period of vibration must be kept small. .
Example if D<7 in then T<1.5s
S d [in]
20.0
18.0
16.0
14.0
12.0
10.0
8.0
6.0
4.0
2.0
0.0
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
PERIOD [s]
Structural Dynamics 64 © Eduardo Miranda
32