Professional Documents
Culture Documents
OM Merged
OM Merged
ON
1. You are unable to hear/see the faculty member, Re-join the meeting.
2. I go offline, will Re-join the meeting in 3-4 minutes.
3. When asked, write SEAT_ENROLL_First NAME in chat e.g. 14_1234_Sidd
4. For first 55 minutes : Lecture.
5. During the lecture leave your questions in chat.
6. After 55 minute, I will address the questions from chat. For any
pending question see faculty during consultation hours.
Session 1
Operations Management
• Chronological
• Sequence of
• Tasks/activity
• Towards producing product/rendering service
Types of Operations/ transformation
process
• Physical (manufacturing process)
Types of Operations/ transformation
process
• Storage ( warehouse)
Types of Operations/ transformation
process
• Location(transportation)
Types of Operations/ transformation
process
• Exchange (retail operations)
Types of Operations/ transformation
process
• Information (as in comm)
Types of Operations/ transformation
process
• Physiological (as in heallthcare)
Types of Operations/ transformation
process
• Psychological (as in entertaitment)
Quiz:
Which transformation process we can observe in video?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qlxk6oLzCTw
Operations
• Goodsare physical items that include raw materials, parts, such as motherboards that go
Goods
into computers, and final products such as cell phones and automobiles.
• Examples
Examples: Automobiles, Commodities, Groceries
•Services
Servicesare activities that provide some combination of time, location, form, or psychological
value.
• Examples
Examples: : Healthcare, Banking, Mobile Communications
Operations Management, & Value
Addition
• Operations
Operations Management
management (OM) : the design, operation, and improvement of the systems that
create and deliver the firm’s primary products and services.
• Value Addition in Goods: How Raw Materials are Collected, Step-by-Step Distributed,
and Utilized to Develop the Final Product for Consumer Use.
• Managing resources
• Inventory management
• Ensures operation systems compliance with organizations
goals
• Manufacturing
• Quality Control
• Maintenance
Quiz: What roles the professor Playing here?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BKCLQbWkEKE
Historical Evolution of OM
• Industrial Revolution
• Scientific Management
• Decision Models and Management Science
• Influence of Japanese Manufacturers
Industrial Revolution
• Pre-Industrial Revolution
• Craft production - System in which highly skilled workers use simple, flexible
tools to produce small quantities of customized goods
• Some key elements of the industrial revolution
• Began in England in the 1770s
• Division of labor - Adam Smith, 1776
• Application of the “rotative” steam engine, 1780s
• Cotton Gin and Interchangeable parts - Eli Whitney, 1792
• Management theory and practice did not advance appreciably during this
period
Scientific Management
• Movement was led by efficiency engineer, Frederick Winslow
Taylor
• Believed in a “science of management” based on observation,
measurement, analysis and improvement of work methods, and
economic incentives
• Management is responsible for planning, carefully selecting and
training workers, finding the best way to perform each job, achieving
cooperate between management and workers, and separating
management activities from work activities
• Emphasis was on maximizing output
Scientific Management - contributors
• Frank Gilbreth - father of motion studies
• Henry Gantt - developed the Gantt chart scheduling system and recognized the
value of non-monetary rewards for motivating employees
• Henry Ford - employed scientific management techniques to his factories
• Moving assembly line
• Mass production
Decision Models & Management Science
• F.W. Harris – mathematical model for inventory management, 1915
• Dodge, Romig, and Shewart – statistical procedures for sampling and quality control, 1930s
• Tippett – statistical sampling theory, 1935
• Operations Research (OR) Groups – OR applications in warfare
• George Dantzig – linear programming, 1947
Influence of Japanese Manufacturers
• Refined and developed management practices that increased productivity
• Credited with fueling the “quality revolution
• Just-in-Time production
Assignment
• https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KVcqbqpMfQY
• https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1qlrRmRTbVY
ON
1. You are unable to hear/see the faculty member, Re-join the meeting.
2. I go offline, will Re-join the meeting in 3-4 minutes.
3. When asked, write SEAT_ENROLL_First NAME in chat e.g. 14_1234_Sidd
4. For first 55 minutes : Lecture.
5. During the lecture leave your questions in chat.
6. After 55 minute, I will address the questions from chat. For any
pending question see faculty during consultation hours.
Session 2
Supply Chain Management
Manufacturing
Suppliers Manufacturing Distribution Customers
Supply Chain
Feedback: To ensure
that the desired outputs
are obtained, an
organization takes
measurements at
various points
Transformation Process:
The creation of goods or
services involves
transforming or converting
inputs into outputs Control: Compare
Why Trucking is
feedback with
circled?
established standards
What is control in this What would be the to check need for
case? Feedback for trucking? corrective action
Logistics:
• The part of a supply chain
involved with the forward
and reverse flow of
goods, services, cash, and
information.
Managing Supply & Demand
Operations &
Supply Chains Sales & Marketing
Wasteful
Supply
> Demand Costly
Opportunity Loss
Supply
< Demand Customer
Dissatisfaction
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v3WK1Sgmu50
Bullwhip Effect
The magnification of variability in orders in the supply-chain
• Improvement-driven
• Financially-driven
• Revenue-driven
• Cost-driven
• Employee-driven
Benefits of Outsourcing
• Lower prices may result from lower labor costs
• The ability of the organization to focus on its core strengths
• Permits the conversion of some fixed costs to variable costs
• It can free up capital to address other needs
• Some risks can be shifted to the supplier
• The ability to take advantage of a supplier’s expertise
• Makes it easier to expand outside of the home country
Risks of Outsourcing
• Inflexibility due to longer lead times
• Increased transportation costs
• Language and cultural differences
• Loss of jobs
• Loss of control
• Lower productivity
• Loss of business knowledge
• Knowledge transfer and intellectual property concerns
• Increased effort required to manage the supply chain
NEXT Session : Case- ZARA: Future Ready?
Case Preparation Questions
• Identify Risk sources for ZARA.
• Identify Benefits of Outsourcing for ZARA
• Identify probable supply chain for ZARA
Video Resources:
• https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2OvBYL6u0cg
• https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ir1b-ez2x5g
• https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tLfNUD0-8ts
• https://hbr.org/webinar/2015/11/a-new-approach-to-manage-supply-
chain-risk
Questions?
Thank you
Siddhartha Kushwaha
ksiddhartha@ibsindia.org
Dos & Don’ts
ON
1. You are unable to hear/see the faculty member, Re-join the meeting.
2. I go offline, will Re-join the meeting in 3-4 minutes.
3. When asked, write SEAT_ENROLL_First NAME in chat e.g. 14_1234_Sidd
4. For first 55 minutes : Lecture.
5. During the lecture leave your questions in chat.
6. After 55 minute, I will address the questions from chat. For any
pending question see faculty during consultation hours.
Mission
Goals
Organizational Strategies
Functional Goals
Decisions on Processes
and Infrastructure Build New Factory
• Volume flexibility:
• Ability to ramp production up and down to match market demands
Durability
Flexibility Delivery
Location
Quality
ON
1. You are unable to hear/see the faculty member, Re-join the meeting.
2. I go offline, will Re-join the meeting in 3-4 minutes.
3. When asked, write SEAT_ENROLL_First NAME in chat e.g. 14_1234_Sidd
4. For first 55 minutes : Lecture.
5. During the lecture leave your questions in chat.
6. After 55 minute, I will address the questions from chat. For any
pending question see faculty during consultation hours.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M92I6rAbRfU
• Output .
Labor + Capital + Energy
or
• Output .
Labor + Capital + Materials
Productivity Growth =
Current Period Productivity – Previous Period Productivity
Previous Period Productivity
MFP = Output
Labor + Materials + Overhead
MP = (7040*1.1)/520
Capital Quality
Technology Management
10/hr
Machine #1
10/hr
Machine #2
Bottleneck 30/hr
Operation
Machine #3
10/hr
Machine #4 10/hr
Session 10
Facility Location
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XqCLkE2ILBM
4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l1Zm9MtrYuM
6
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGhjgNVnx-U
8
Thanks
Dos & Don’ts
Examples:
1. Honda transforms steel, rubber, and plastic into cars
2. McDonald’s transforms meat, lettuce, tomatoes,
potatoes, and sauces into packaged food
3. A hospital transforms a patient into a healthy person
using equipment, nurses, doctors, medicines
Process Analysis
Storage :
Raw Materials, RM
Work in Process, WIP
Finished Goods Inventory, FGI
Queue, Waiting line
Processing step
Decision point
HYPEBEAST
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4J_kxwT9zX4
Top QIP
Sole Joining
Packaging
Make-to-order vs. make-to-stock
FGI
Task 1 Task 2
Demand
Task 1 Task 2
Some examples…
What are the tradeoffs?
Process Analysis: the performance measures
A B
Bottleneck is the
process stage with the
Longest cycle time
(smallest throughput rate)
WIP
Little’s Throughput time =
Law Throughput rate
How do we analyze a complex process…
ON
1. You are unable to hear/see the faculty member, Re-join the meeting.
2. I go offline, will Re-join the meeting in 3-4 minutes.
3. When asked, write SEAT_ENROLL_First NAME in chat e.g. 14_1234_Sidd
4. 5. During the lecture leave your questions in chat.
6. I will address the questions from chat. For any pending question see faculty during consultation hours.
Forging
pack and
assembly
ship
Forgeing
Let’s analyze the hammer process…
Forging
pack and
assembly
ship
Forging
Process Data:
Forging: Set up 80 min. 4 min per unit processing. Batch
size 200. Identical lines.
Assembly: Manual by two workers (no set up). Each
hammer requires 40 min processing. 34 workers
available.
Pack and ship: 30 min set up, 2 min per unit processing.
Lot sizes of 100.
Step 1: Forging
Look at one line. 200 units require:
80 + 200 4 = 880 minutes/200 units
The throughput rate is:
200 / 880 = 0.227 units/minute
= 13.63 units/hour
But we have two identical lines, so for the forging step
capacity is 2 13.63 = 27.26 units/hour.
Step 2: Assembly
Which Stage is
Bottleneck?
Assembly 25.50
0/2
1 0
1 1
More Examples..
Let’s study this make-to-stock system.
CT = 3s CT = 1s
CT = 3s CT = 1s
CT = 1s CT = 3s
CT = 1s CT = 3s
Reduce interruptions
More Examples..
Let’s study this make-to-stock assembly system:
CT = 3s CT = 3s
FGI
Task 1 Task 2 CT = 2s
CT = 4s Task 4
Task 3
CT = 3s CT = 3s
Task 1 Task 2 CT = 2s
CT = 4s Task 4 FGI
Task 3
• Tasks 1 and 2 are blocked by Task 3 for 1 second per product.
• Task 4 is starved for 2 seconds per product.
• The capacity of the process is 15 units/hour (limited by Task 3).
Questions?
ON
1. You are unable to hear/see the faculty member, Re-join the meeting.
2. I go offline, will Re-join the meeting in 3-4 minutes.
3. When asked, write SEAT_ENROLL_First NAME in chat e.g. 14_1234_Sidd
4. 5. During the lecture leave your questions in chat.
6. I will address the questions from chat. For any pending question see faculty during consultation hours.
Which Stage is
Bottleneck?
Assembly 25.50
0/2
1 0
1 1
Process Throughput Time Reduction
Perform activities in parallel
Reduce interruptions
Session 15
Process Selection and Layout
Dr. Siddhartha Kushwaha
ksiddhartha@ibsindia.org
Job process
• Machining precision metal tubes
• SOFA manufacturing/hair
Customization
Batch process
• Forging process to make fittings for pressure
vessels
• Shoe (Hpebeast), bakery- bread
Line process
• Auto assembly
• Automobiles/Laptops/ Mobiles/metro rail
cabin-cars
Continuous process
• Oil refining process/pharma/
chemicals
Low
Low High
Volume
Low volume, make-to-order
process Volume and Process
Decisions for
Project process
Less vertical integration • Installing ERP for a manufacturing
More resource flexibility firm’s business processes
More customer involvement
Manufacturing
Process design choices
Batch process
• Forging process to make fittings for pressure
High volume, make-to- vessels
stock process
More vertical integration
Line process
Less resource flexibility • Auto assembly
Less customer involvement
More capital intensity/
automation Continuous process
• Oil refining process
Low High
Volume
Process Selection Criteria
Type of product
Type of customer
Product demand frequency
Demand volume
No. of product in product line
Production system
Equipment
Worker Skill
Cost per unit
Cost of the process system
Which process is this?
Which Process is this?
Which Process is this?
Which Process is this?
Which process is this ?
Facilities Layout
Layout: the configuration of departments, work centers, and
equipment, with particular emphasis on movement of work
(customers or materials) through the system
Importance of Layout Decisions
Requires substantial investments of money and effort
Involves long-term commitments
Has significant impact on cost and efficiency of short-
term operations
The Need for Layout Decisions
Inefficient operations
For Example: Changes in the design
High Cost of products or services
Bottlenecks
Accidents
The introduction of new
products or services
Safety hazards
The Need for Layout Design (Cont’d)
Changes in
environmental Changes in volume of
or other legal output or mix of
requirements products
Morale problems
Changes in methods
and equipment
Basic Layout Types
Product layouts
Process layouts
Fixed-Position layout
Combination layouts
Basic Layout Types
Product layout
Layout that uses standardized processing operations to
achieve smooth, rapid, high-volume flow
Process layout
Layout that can handle varied processing requirements
Fixed Position layout
Layout in which the product or project remains
stationary, and workers, materials, and equipment are moved as needed
Product Layout
Product Layout
(sequential)
In 1 2 3 4
Workers
Out 10 9 8 7
Process Layout
Process Layout
(functional)
Cellular Production
Layout in which machines are grouped into a cell that
can process items that have similar processing
requirements
Group Technology
The grouping into part families of items with similar
design or manufacturing characteristics
Functional vs. Cellular Layouts
ON
1. You are unable to hear/see the faculty member, Re-join the meeting.
2. I go offline, will Re-join the meeting in 3-4 minutes.
3. When asked, write SEAT_ENROLL_First NAME in chat e.g. 14_1234_Sidd
4. 5. During the lecture leave your questions in chat.
6. I will address the questions from chat. For any pending question see faculty during consultation hours.
Job process
• Machining precision metal tubes
• SOFA manufacturing/hair
Customization
Batch process
• Forging process to make fittings for pressure
vessels
• Shoe (Hpebeast), bakery- bread
Line process
• Auto assembly
• Automobiles/Laptops/ Mobiles/metro rail
cabin-cars
Continuous process
• Oil refining process/pharma/
chemicals
Low
Low High
Volume
FACILITIES LAYOUT
Layout: the configuration of departments, work centers,
and equipment, with particular emphasis on movement of
work (customers or materials) through the system
NEED
Inefficient operations
Product service design change/new design
Change in demand
Accidents
Legal & regulation
Methods/equipment change
Moral
Basic Layout Types
Product layouts
Process layouts
Fixed-Position layout
Combination layouts
Session 16
Process Layout
Dr. Siddhartha Kushwaha
ksiddhartha@ibsindia.org
P production /time_unit
C= =
D demand(out put)/time_ unit
3. Determine required workstations (theoretical
minimum)
T task_times
Nt = =
C cycle_time
4. Set rules for assigning tasks (number of
following tasks, longest task time)
Assembly Line Balancing
Tasks & A
B
Roll dough
Place on cardboard backing
None
A
50
5
C Sprinkle cheese B 25
Immediate D
E
Spread Sauce
Add pepperoni
C
D
15
12
Predecessors F
G
Add sausage
Add mushrooms
D
D
10
15
H Shrinkwrap pizza E,F,G 18
I Pack in box H 15
Total task time 165
Precedence Diagram
Layout Calculations
1
Layout Calculations Step 5: Assign tasks to workstations
Start at the first station & choose the longest eligible task following
precedence relationships
Continue adding the longest eligible task that fits without going over the
desired cycle time
When no additional tasks can be added within the desired cycle time,
begin assigning tasks to the next workstation until finished
Efficiency (%) =
t
=
165 sec.
(100) = 91.7%
NC 3 stations x 60 sec.
165/(4 X 50) = 82.5% ( FOR REVISED PROBLEM)
Session 10
Product Design
DESIGN THINKING
• https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_r0VX-aU_T8
4
• Main focus
• Customer satisfaction
• Secondary focus
• Function of product/service
• Cost/profit
• Quality
• Appearance
• Ease of production/assembly
• Ease of maintenance/service
8
• Legal
• FDA, OSHA, IRS
• Product liability
• Uniform commercial code
• Ethical
• Releasing products with defects
• Environmental
• EPA
10
Saturation
Maturity
Demand
Decline
Growth
Introduction
Time
14
© 2010 Wiley 14
15
Standardization
• Standardization
• Extent to which there is an absence of variety in a product, service or process
• Standardized products are immediately available to customers
16
Advantages of Standardization
• Fewer parts to deal with in inventory & manufacturing
• Design costs are generally lower
• Reduced training costs and time
• More routine purchasing, handling, and inspection procedures
17
Disadvantages of Standardization
• Designs may be frozen with too many imperfections remaining.
• High cost of design changes increases resistance to improvements.
• Decreased variety results in less consumer appeal.
19
Mass Customization
• Mass customization:
• A strategy of producing standardized goods or services, but incorporating
some degree degree of customization
• Delayed differentiation
• Modular design
• Commonality
• Complementarity
• Integration
20
Delayed Differentiation
• Delayed differentiation is a postponement tactic
• Producing but not quite completing a product or service until customer
preferences or specifications are known
21
Modular Design
Modular design is a form of standardization in which component parts
are subdivided into modules that are easily replaced or interchanged. It
allows:
• easier diagnosis and remedy of failures
• easier repair and replacement
Reliability
• Reliability: The ability of a product, part, or system to perform its
intended function under a prescribed set of conditions
• Failure: Situation in which a product, part, or system does not perform
as intended
• Normal operating conditions: The set of conditions under which an
item’s reliability is specified
23
Improving Reliability
• Component design
• Production/assembly techniques
• Testing
• Redundancy/backup
• Preventive maintenance procedures
• User education
• System design
24
Product Design
• Product Life Cycles
• Robust Design
• Concurrent Engineering
• Computer-Aided Design
• Modular Design
25
Robust Design
Robust Design: Design that results in products or services that
can function over a broad range of conditions
26
Degree of Newness
1. Modification of an existing product/service
2. Expansion of an existing product/service
3. Clone of a competitor’s product/service
4. New product/service
28
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jU-imkEarvU
30
© 2010 Wiley 30
31
Idea Feasibility
generation Product or service study Performance
concept specifications
Functional Production
design design
Design specifications Manufacturing or
New product or delivery
service launch specifications
Pilot run
Final design and final tests
& process plans
33
Idea Generation
Research based
34
Reverse Engineering
Manufacturability
• Manufacturability is the ease of fabrication and/or assembly which
is important for:
• Cost
• Productivity
• Quality
37
Concurrent Engineering
Concurrent engineering
is the bringing together
of engineering design and manufacturing
personnel
early in the design phase.
39
Concurrent Engineering
Computer-Aided Design
• Computer-Aided Design (CAD) is product design using computer
graphics.
• increases productivity of designers, 3 to 10 times
• creates a database for manufacturing information on product specifications
• provides possibility of engineering and cost analysis on proposed designs
41
Product design
• Design for manufacturing (DFM)
• Design for assembly (DFA)
• Design for recycling (DFR)
• Remanufacturing
• Design for disassembly (DFD)
• Robust design
42
Questions?
43
Thank you
Siddhartha Kushwaha
ksiddhartha@ibsindia.org
Dos & Don’ts
Performance Specifications
Customer Customer
requirements expectations
Delivery Specifications
Service
Service Delivery System
Low High
BIXI: Membership
• https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1rx4xooo-TQ
Design for High-and-Low Contact
Services (1 of 2)
DESIGN DECISION HIGH-CONTACT SERVICE LOW-CONTACT SERVICE
Facility location Convenient to customer Near labor or transportation
field/facility
assembly
self service customer contact and interation
personalised
Questions?
Assignment: Service Blueprint for BIXI service
Thank you
Siddhartha Kushwaha
ksiddhartha@ibsindia.org
Dos & Don’ts
Service blueprinting
A method used in service design to describe
and analyze a proposed service
A useful tool for conceptualizing a service
delivery system
Major Steps in Service Blueprinting
1. Establish boundaries
2. Identify sequence of customer interaction
3. Prepare a flowchart
4. Develop time estimates
5. Identify potential failure points
6. Determine which factors can influence
profitability
Example of Service Blueprinting
Standard Brush Apply Collect
execution time Buff
shoes polish payment
2 minutes
30 30 45 15
secs secs secs secs
Total acceptable
execution time
Wrong
5 minutes
color wax
Clean Fail
shoes point Materials
Seen by
(e.g., polish, cloth)
customer 45
secs
W W
Line of visibility
Receive Final
payment payment
Notify
Decline
customer
Issue
Confirm
Deny
check F
F
Verify Print
Credit Close
income Accept payment Delinquent
check account
data book
Confirm
F Credit Branch
Employer
bureau records
Bank
F
Accounting
accounts
Data base
records
2. It is user-friendly
FedEx
3. It is robust and easy to
sustain
7. It is cost-effective
1. Variable requirements
2. Difficult to describe
3. High customer contact
4. Service – customer encounter
Guidelines for Successful Service Design
1. Define the service package
2. Focus on customer’s perspective
3. Consider image of the service package
4. Recognize that designer’s perspective is different from
the customer’s perspecticve
5. Make sure that managers are involved
6. Define quality for tangible and intangibles
7. Make sure that recruitment, training and rewards are
consistent with service expectations
8. Establish procedures to handle exceptions
9. Establish systems to monitor service
Questions?
Thank you
Siddhartha Kushwaha
ksiddhartha@ibsindia.org
Questions?
Thank you
Siddhartha Kushwaha
ksiddhartha@ibsindia.org
Questions?
Thank you
Siddhartha Kushwaha
ksiddhartha@ibsindia.org
Questions?
Thank you
Siddhartha Kushwaha
ksiddhartha@ibsindia.org
Dos & Don’ts
ON
1. You are unable to hear/see the faculty member, Re-join the meeting.
2. I go offline, will Re-join the meeting in 3-4 minutes.
3. When asked, write SEAT_ENROLL_First NAME in chat e.g.
14_1234_Sidd
4. During the lecture leave your questions in chat.
6. I will address the questions from chat. For any
pending question see faculty during consultation hours.
Session 23
Aggregate Sales and Operations Planning
Process planning
Long
range
Strategic capacity planning
• Medium-range planning
• Six to eighteen months
• Usually with weekly, monthly or quarterly increments
• Short-range planning
• One day to less than six months
• Usually with weekly or daily increments
Strategic Capacity Planning Aggregate Planning Short-Term Planning
1. Long Term (more than 12 months or 18 1. Intermediate Term (3- 12/18 1. Short Term (less than 3
months) months months)
0
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Required Inputs to the Production Planning System
Competitors’behavior Raw material availability Market
demand
External to firm
$260,408.62
Level Workforce Strategy (Surplus and Shortage Allowed)
Lets take the same problem as before
but this time use the Level Workforce
strategy J an
D e m and 4 ,5 0 0
This time we will seek to use a
workforce level of 6 workers Be g. inv. 250
N e t re q. 4 ,2 5 0
W o rke rs 6
P ro duc tio n 6 ,3 8 0
Ending inve nto ry 2 ,1 3 0
Surplus 2 ,1 3 0
Sho rtage
Below are the complete calculations for the remaining months in the six month planning horizon
$241,600.00
Questions?
Thank you
Siddhartha Kushwaha
ksiddhartha@ibsindia.org
Dos & Don’ts
Number
of units
on hand
Q Q Q
R
2. Your start using L L
them up over time. 3. When you reach down to a
Time
R = Reorder point level of inventory of R, you
Q = Economic order quantity place your next Q sized order.
L = Lead time
Cost Minimization Goal
By adding the item, holding, and ordering costs together, we
determine the total cost curve, which in turn is used to find the
Qopt inventory order point that minimizes total costs
Total Cost
C
O
S Holding
T
Costs
Annual Cost of
Items (DC)
Ordering Costs
QOPT
Order Quantity (Q)
Basic Fixed-Order Quantity (EOQ) Model TC=Total annual
Formula cost
D =Demand
Total Annual Annual Annual
C =Cost per unit
Annual = Purchase + Ordering + Holding
Q =Order quantity
Cost Cost Cost Cost
S =Cost of placing
an order or setup
cost
R =Reorder point
D Q
TC = DC + S+ H L =Lead time
Q 2 H=Annual holding
and storage cost
per unit of inventory
Deriving the EOQ
Using calculus, we take the first derivative of the total
cost function with respect to Q, and set the derivative
(slope) equal to zero, solving for the optimized (cost
minimized) value of Qopt
2D S 2(A nnual D em and)(O rd er or S etu p C ost)
Q OPT = =
H A nnual H olding C ost
_
We also need a R e o rd e r p o in t, R = d L
reorder point to tell us _
when to place an d = average daily demand (constant)
order L = Lead time (constant)
EOQ Example (1) Problem Data
_
R = d L = 2 7 .3 9 7 u n its / d a y (1 0 d a ys) = 2 7 3 .9 7 o r 2 7 4 u n its
Place an order for 366 units. When in the course of using the
inventory you are left with only 274 units, place the next order of 366
units.
Fixed-Time Period Model with Safety Stock Formula
q = Average demand + Safety stock – Inventory currently on hand
q = d(T + L) + Z T + L - I
Where :
q = quantitiy to be ordered
T = the number of days between reviews
L = lead time in days
d = forecast average daily demand
z = the number of standard deviations for a specified service probabilit y
T + L = standard deviation of demand over the review and lead time
I = current inventory level (includes items on order)
Multi-Period Models: Fixed-Time Period Model:
Determining the Value of T+L
T+ L 2
T+ L = di
i 1
D Q
TC = DC + S+ iC
Q 2
TC(0-2499)=(10000*1.20)+(10000/1826)*4+(1826/2)(0.02*1.20)
= $12,043.82
TC(2500-3999)= $10,041
TC(4000&more)= $9,949.20
Finally, we select the least costly Qopt, which is this problem occurs in the
4000 & more interval. In summary, our optimal order quantity is 4000 units
Miscellaneous Systems:
Optional Replenishment System
Maximum Inventory Level, M
q=M-I
M
Actual Inventory Level, I
So, identify inventory items based on percentage of total dollar value, where
“A” items are roughly top 15 %, “B” items as next 35 %, and the lower 65%
are the “C” items
Inventory Accuracy and Cycle Counting
Master
Design Inventory
Production
Changes Changes
Schedule
Bill of Inventory
MRP
Materials Records
System
File File
Master Production Schedule (MPS)
Specifies what is to be made and when
Must be in accordance with the aggregate
production plan
Aggregate production plan sets the overall level of
output in broad terms
As the process moves from planning to execution,
each step must be tested for feasibility
The MPS is the result of the production planning
process
Master Production Schedule (MPS)
MPS is established in terms of specific products
Schedule must be followed for a reasonable length
of time
The MPS is quite often fixed or frozen in the near
term part of the plan
The MPS is a rolling schedule
The MPS is a statement of what is to be produced,
not a forecast of demand
Master Production Schedule
• A master production schedule (MPS) is time-phased plan
specifying how many of each end item you plan to build and when.
Time Fences
• A time fence is a date fixed by management beyond which
no changes (or only limited changes) in the master
schedule are allowed.
Source: http://www.tycothermal.com/
Sample Bill of Materials (2)
Source: R. A. Russell, B. W. Taylor, Operations Management, 3rd edition, Prentice Hall, 2000.
Multi-Level versus Single-Level Lists
Sample Multi-Level Indented Bill of
Materials
Source: R. A. Russell, B. W. Taylor, Operations Management, 3rd edition, Prentice Hall, 2000.
BOM Product Hierarchy
Low-level coding
BOM Example
Level Product structure for “Awesome” (A)
0 A
1 B(2) Std. 12” Speaker kit C(3) Std. 12” Speaker kit w/
amp-booster
Amp-booster
12” Speaker 12” Speaker
BOM Example
Level Product structure for “Awesome” (A)
0 A
Part B: 2 x number of As = (2)(50) = 100
BPart C(3) = Std. 12” Speaker kit w/
1 (2) Std.
C: 12” Speaker
3 x numberkit of As = (3)(50) amp-booster 300
Part D: 2 x number of Bs
2 E(2) + 2 x number of Fs = E(2)(2)(100) + (2)(300)
F(2) Std.= 12” Speaker
800
Part E: 2 x number of Bs booster assembly
3 D(2) + 2Packing
x number box of
andCs = (2)(100)
G(1) + (2)(150)
D(2) = 500
installation kit of wire,
Part F: 2 x number
bolts, andofscrews
Cs = (2)(150) = 300
Part G: 1 x number of Fs = (1)(300) = 300
Amp-booster
12” Speaker 12” Speaker
• Given the following bill of material
Time 0 3 10 20 28 33
WC
1 B E D C A
Idle
WC
2
Job
completed
Time 0 3 10 20 28 33
WC
1 B E D C A
Idle
WC
2
B E D C A
Job
Time 0 1 3 5 7 9 10 11 12 13 17 19 21 22 2325 27 29 31 33 35 completed
B E D C A
© 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. 15 - 30
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or
transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or
otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher.
Printed in the United States of America.
KEEP CAMERA ON
1. If you are unable to hear/see the faculty member, Re-join the meeting.
2. If I go offline, will Re-join the meeting in 3-4 minutes.
3. When asked, write SEAT_ENROLL_First NAME in chat e.g. 14_1234_Sidd
4. During the lecture leave your questions in chat.
6. I will address the questions from chat.
C(7) F(8)
A(21) G(2)
21 28 28 36
0 21 36 38
A(21) G(2)
0 21 36 38
21 26 26 28 28 33
𝑎 = 𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑚𝑢𝑚 𝑎+4𝑚+𝑏
𝑏 = 𝑚𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑚𝑢𝑚 𝐸𝑇 =
6
𝑚 = 𝑚𝑜𝑠𝑡 𝑙𝑖𝑘𝑒𝑙𝑦
𝐸𝑇 = 𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑒 𝑏 −𝑎 2
𝜎2 =
𝜎 2 = 𝑣𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒 6
Three Time Estimates
Network with Time Estimates
21 28 28 36
C(7) F(8)
21 28 28 36
0 21 36 38
A(21) G(2)
0 21 36 38
21 26 26 28 28 33
21 26 26 28 31 36
Advantages of PERT
• Forces managers to organize
• Provides graphic display of activities
• Identifies
• Critical activities
• Slack activities 4
2
1 5 6
3
Limitations of PERT
• Important activities may be omitted
• Precedence relationships may not be correct
• Estimates may include 4
a fudge factor
2
• May focus solely
on critical path
1 5 6
142 weeks
3
Assignment:
A PERT problem is detailed in the table below. Times are given in weeks.
Text Book
"Quantitative Analysis for Management" by ,Barry Render, Ralph M. Stair, and Michael E. Hanna
Prentice Hall Latest Edition
To accompany
Quantitative Analysis for Management, Tenth Edition,
by Render, Stair, and Hanna © 2008 Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Power Point slides created by Jeff Heyl © 2009 Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Learning Objectives
After completing this chapter, students will be able to:
Figure 10.1
© 2009 Prentice-Hall, Inc. 10 – 11
Introduction
Assignment model
The assignment problem refers to the class of
LP problems that involve determining the most
efficient assignment of resources to tasks
The objective is most often to minimize total
costs or total time to perform the tasks at hand
One important characteristic of assignment
problems is that only one job or worker can be
assigned to one machine or project
EVANSVILLE $8 $4 $3
FORT LAUDERDALE $9 $7 $5
Table 10.1
Boston
Cleveland
Factory
Des Moines
Evanston Warehouse
Albuquerque
Fort Lauderdale
Figure 10.2
Des Moines
Transportation table for Executive Furniture capacity
constraint
DES MOINES $5 $4 $3
100
FACTORY
EVANSVILLE $8 $4 $3
300
FACTORY
FORT LAUDERDALE $9 $7 $5
300
FACTORY
WAREHOUSE
300 200 200 700
REQUIREMENTS
Cell representing a
Table 10.2 Total supply source-to-destination
Cost of shipping 1 unit from Cleveland (Evansville to Cleveland)
Fort Lauderdale factory to and demand
warehouse shipping assignment
Boston warehouse demand that could be made
© 2009 Prentice-Hall, Inc. 10 – 19
Setting Up a Transportation Problem
DES MOINES $5 $4 $3
100 100
(D)
EVANSVILLE $8 $4 $3
300
(E)
FORT LAUDERDALE $9 $7 $5
300
(F)
WAREHOUSE
300 200 200 700
REQUIREMENTS
DES MOINES $5 $4 $3
100 100
(D)
EVANSVILLE $8 $4 $3
200 300
(E)
FORT LAUDERDALE $9 $7 $5
300
(F)
WAREHOUSE
300 200 200 700
REQUIREMENTS
DES MOINES $5 $4 $3
100 100
(D)
EVANSVILLE $8 $4 $3
200 100 300
(E)
FORT LAUDERDALE $9 $7 $5
300
(F)
WAREHOUSE
300 200 200 700
REQUIREMENTS
DES MOINES $5 $4 $3
100 100
(D)
EVANSVILLE $8 $4 $3
200 100 300
(E)
FORT LAUDERDALE $9 $7 $5
100 300
(F)
WAREHOUSE
300 200 200 700
REQUIREMENTS
DES MOINES $5 $4 $3
100 100
(D)
EVANSVILLE $8 $4 $3
200 100 300
(E)
FORT LAUDERDALE $9 $7 $5
100 200 300
(F)
WAREHOUSE
300 200 200 700
REQUIREMENTS
$5 $4
Des Moines–Boston Factory
100
D
shipping route – +
Factory
+ $8 – $4
E 200 100
TO FACTORY
ALBUQUERQUE BOSTON CLEVELAND
FROM CAPACITY
$5 $4 $3
DES MOINES 100 100
$8 $4 $3
EVANSVILLE 200 100 300
$9 $7 $5
FORT LAUDERDALE 100 200 300
WAREHOUSE
300 200 200 700 Table 10.4
REQUIREMENTS
© 2009 Prentice-Hall, Inc. 10 – 35
Five Steps to Test Unused Squares
with the Stepping-Stone Method
Evaluating the unused Warehouse A Warehouse B
$5 $4
Des Moines–Boston Factory
99
100 1
D
shipping route – +
Factory 201 + $8 99 – $4
E 200 100
TO FACTORY
ALBUQUERQUE BOSTON CLEVELAND
FROM CAPACITY
$5 $4 $3
DES MOINES 100 100
$8 $4 $3
EVANSVILLE 200 100 300
$9 $7 $5
FORT LAUDERDALE 100 200 300
WAREHOUSE
300 200 200 700 Table 10.4
REQUIREMENTS
© 2009 Prentice-Hall, Inc. 10 – 36
Five Steps to Test Unused Squares
with the Stepping-Stone Method
Evaluating the unused Warehouse A Warehouse B
$5 $4
Des Moines–Boston Factory
99
100 1
D
shipping route – +
Factory 201 + $8 99 – $4
E 200 100
TO FACTORY
ALBUQUERQUE BOSTON CLEVELAND
FROM Result
CAPACITY of Proposed
$5 $4 $3 Shift in Allocation
DES MOINES 100 100
= 1 x $4
$8 $4 $3 – 1 x $5
EVANSVILLE 200 100 300 + 1 x $8
– 1 x $4 = +$3
$9 $7 $5
FORT LAUDERDALE 100 200 300
WAREHOUSE
300 200 200 700 Table 10.4
REQUIREMENTS
© 2009 Prentice-Hall, Inc. 10 – 37
Five Steps to Test Unused Squares
with the Stepping-Stone Method
Step 4. We can now compute an improvement index
(Iij) for the Des Moines–Boston route
We add the costs in the squares with plus signs
and subtract the costs in the squares with minus
signs
Des Moines–
Boston index = IDB = +$4 – $5 + $5 – $4 = + $3
Table 10.5
Des Moines–Cleveland
improvement index = IDC = + $3 – $5 + $8 – $4 + $7 – $5 = + $4
$8 $4 $3
E 200 100 300
– +
$9 $7 $5
F 100 200 300
+ –
WAREHOUSE
300 200 200 700
REQUIREMENTS
Table 10.6
$8 $4 $3
E 100 200 300
$9 $7 $5
F 100 200 300
WAREHOUSE
300 200 200 700
REQUIREMENTS
Table 10.7
D to B = IDB = + $4 – $5 + $8 – $4 = + $3
(closed path: + DB – DA + EA – EB)
D to C = IDC = + $3 – $5 + $9 – $5 = + $2
(closed path: + DC – DA + FA – FC)
E to C = IEC = + $3 – $8 + $9 – $5 = – $1
(closed path: + EC – EA + FA – FC)
F to B = IFB = + $7 – $4 + $8 – $9 = + $2
(closed path: + FB – EB + EA – FA)
© 2009 Prentice-Hall, Inc. 10 – 46
Obtaining an Improved Solution
Path to evaluate for the EC route
TO FACTORY
A B C
FROM CAPACITY
$5 $4 $3
D 100 100
E 100
$8
200
$4 Start $3
300
– +
$9 $7 $5
F 100 200 300
+ –
WAREHOUSE
300 200 200 700
REQUIREMENTS
Table 10.8
ROUTE
DESKS PER UNIT TOTAL
FROM TO SHIPPED x COST ($) = COST ($)
D A 100 5 500
E B 200 4 800
E C 100 3 300
F A 200 9 1,800
F C 100 5 500
3,900
TO FACTORY
A B C
FROM CAPACITY
$5 $4 $3
D 100 100
$8 $4 $3
E 200 100 300
$9 $7 $5
F 200 100 300
WAREHOUSE
300 200 200 700
REQUIREMENTS
Table 10.9
D to B = IDB = + $4 – $5 + $9 – $5 + $3 – $4 = + $2
(closed path: + DB – DA + FA – FC + EC – EB)
D to C = IDC = + $3 – $5 + $9 – $5 = + $2
(closed path: + DC – DA + FA – FC)
E to A = IEA = + $8 – $9 + $5 – $3 = + $1
(closed path: + EA – FA + FC – EC)
F to B = IFB = + $7 – $5 + $3 – $4 = + $1
(closed path: + FB – FC + EC – EB)
Program 10.1A
Program 10.1B
$8 $4 $3
R2 E 200 100 300
$9 $7 $5
R3 F 100 200 300
WAREHOUSE
300 200 200 700
REQUIREMENTS
Table 10.10
© 2009 Prentice-Hall, Inc. 10 – 57
Solving the Executive Furniture
Corporation Problem with MODI
The first step is to set up an equation for each
occupied square
By setting R1 = 0 we can easily solve for K1, R2,
K2, R3, and K3
(1) R1 + K1 = 5 0 + K1 = 5 K1 = 5
(2) R2 + K1 = 8 R2 + 5 = 8 R2 = 3
(3) R2 + K2 = 4 3 + K2 = 4 K2 = 1
(4) R3 + K2 = 7 R3 + 1 = 7 R3 = 6
(5) R3 + K3 = 5 6 + K3 = 5 K3 = –1
$8 $4 $3
E 200 100 300 1
$9 $7 $5
F 100 200 300 2
Table 10.11
OPPORTUNITY
31 03 02 COSTS
TO TOTAL
FROM
A B C AVAILABLE
$5 $4 $3
D 100 X X 100 1
$8 $4 $3
E 300 1
$9 $7 $5
F 300 2
Table 10.12
$8 $4 $3
E 200 300 1
$9 $7 $5
F X 300 2
Table 10.13
TO TOTAL
FROM
A B C AVAILABLE
$5 $4 $3
D 100 X X 100
$8 $4 $3
E X 200 100 300
$9 $7 $5
F X 300
Table 10.14
TO TOTAL
FROM
A B C AVAILABLE
$5 $4 $3
D 100 X X 100
$8 $4 $3
E X 200 100 300
$9 $7 $5
F 200 X 100 300
Table 10.15
$8 $4 $3 0
E 50 200 50 300
$9 $7 $5 0
F 150 150 300
WAREHOUSE
300 200 200 150 850
REQUIREMENTS
$10 $5 $8
PLANT X 175
$12 $7 $6
PLANT Y 75
Totals
WAREHOUSE 450
DEMAND
250 100 150
500
do not
balance
Table 10.17
$10 $5 $8
PLANT X 50 100 25 175
$12 $7 $6
PLANT Y 75 75
0 0 0
PLANT Y 50 50
WAREHOUSE
250 100 150 500
DEMAND
Table 10.18
© 2009 Prentice-Hall, Inc. 10 – 77
Degeneracy in Transportation
Problems
Degeneracy occurs when the number of occupied
squares or routes in a transportation table
solution is less than the number of rows plus the
number of columns minus 1
Such a situation may arise in the initial solution
or in any subsequent solution
Degeneracy requires a special procedure to
correct the problem since there are not enough
occupied squares to trace a closed path for each
unused route and it would be impossible to apply
the stepping-stone method or to calculate the R
and K values needed for the MODI technique
TO WAREHOUSE
CUSTOMER 1 CUSTOMER 2 CUSTOMER 3
FROM SUPPLY
$8 $2 $6
WAREHOUSE 1 100 0 100
$10 $9 $9
WAREHOUSE 2 0 100 20 120
$7 $10 $7
WAREHOUSE 3 80 80
CUSTOMER
100 100 100 300
DEMAND
Table 10.19
Possible choices of
cells to address the
degenerate solution
© 2009 Prentice-Hall, Inc. 10 – 81
Degeneracy During
Later Solution Stages
A transportation problem can become degenerate
after the initial solution stage if the filling of an
empty square results in two or more cells
becoming empty simultaneously
This problem can occur when two or more cells
with minus signs tie for the lowest quantity
To correct this problem, place a zero in one of the
previously filled cells so that only one cell
becomes empty
$15 $10 $7
FACTORY B 50 80 130
$3 $9 $10
FACTORY C 30 50 80
WAREHOUSE
150 80 50 280
REQUIREMENT
Table 10.20
$15 $7
FACTORY B 50
– +
$3 $10
FACTORY C 30 50
+ –
Table 10.21
Table 10.22
ESTIMATED PRODUCTION COST
PER UNIT AT PROPOSED PLANTS
Seattle $53
Birmingham $49
TO LOS
FROM DETROIT DALLAS NEW YORK ANGELES
CINCINNATI $25 $55 $40 $60
SALT LAKE 35 30 50 40
PITTSBURGH 36 45 26 66
SEATTLE 60 38 65 27
BIRMINGHAM 35 30 41 50
Table 10.23
TO LOS FACTORY
FROM DETROIT DALLAS NEW YORK ANGELES CAPACITY
73 103 88 108
CINCINNATI 10,000 1,000 4,000 15,000
85 80 100 90
SALT LAKE 1,000 5,000 6,000
88 97 78 118
PITTSBURGH 14,000 14,000
84 79 90 99
BIRMINGHAM 11,000 11,000
WAREHOUSE
10,000 12,000 15,000 9,000 46,000
REQUIREMENT
Table 10.24
TO LOS FACTORY
FROM DETROIT DALLAS NEW YORK ANGELES CAPACITY
73 103 88 108
CINCINNATI 10,000 4,000 1,000 15,000
85 80 100 90
SALT LAKE 6,000 6,000
88 97 78 118
PITTSBURGH 14,000 14,000
113 91 118 80
SEATTLE 2,000 9,000 11,000
WAREHOUSE
10,000 12,000 15,000 9,000 46,000
REQUIREMENT
Table 10.25
Program 10.2A
© 2009 Prentice-Hall, Inc. 10 – 96
Locating a New Factory for
Hardgrave Machine Company
Output from Excel QM analysis
Program 10.2A
© 2009 Prentice-Hall, Inc. 10 – 97
Assignment Model Approach
The second special-purpose LP algorithm is the
assignment method
Each assignment problem has associated with it
a table, or matrix
Generally, the rows contain the objects or people
we wish to assign, and the columns comprise the
tasks or things we want them assigned to
The numbers in the table are the costs associated
with each particular assignment
An assignment problem can be viewed as a
transportation problem in which the capacity
from each source is 1 and the demand at each
destination is 1
© 2009 Prentice-Hall, Inc. 10 – 98
Assignment Model Approach
The Fix-It Shop has three rush projects to repair
They have three repair persons with different
talents and abilities
The owner has estimates of wage costs for each
worker for each project
The owner’s objective is to assign the three
project to the workers in a way that will result in
the lowest cost to the shop
Each project will be assigned exclusively to one
worker
PROJECT
PERSON 1 2 3
Brown 8 10 11
Cooper 9 12 7
Table 10.26
PRODUCT ASSIGNMENT
LABOR TOTAL
1 2 3
COSTS ($) COSTS ($)
Adams Brown Cooper 11 + 10 + 7 28
Adams Cooper Brown 11 + 12 + 11 34
Brown Adams Cooper 8 + 14 + 7 29
Brown Cooper Adams 8 + 12 + 6 26
Cooper Adams Brown 9 + 14 + 11 34
Cooper Brown Adams 9 + 10 + 6 25
Table 10.27
Not
Set up cost table for problem Revise opportunity cost table
optimal
in two steps:
Step 1 (a) Subtract the smallest
number not covered by a line
from itself and every other
Find opportunity cost
uncovered number
(a) Subtract smallest number in
(b) add this number at every
each row from every number
intersection of any two lines
in that row, then
(b) subtract smallest number in
each column from every
number in that column Optimal solution at zero
locations. Systematically make
final assignments.
Step 2
(a) Check each row and column
for a unique zero and make the
Test opportunity cost table to first assignment in that row or
see if optimal assignments are column
possible by drawing the
minimum possible lines on (b) Eliminate that row and
columns and/or rows such that Optimal column and search for another
all zeros are covered unique zero. Make that
assignment and proceed in a
like manner.
Figure 10.3
© 2009 Prentice-Hall, Inc. 10 – 105
The Hungarian Method
(Flood’s Technique)
Step 1: Find the opportunity cost table
We can compute row opportunity costs and
column opportunity costs
What we need is the total opportunity cost
We derive this by taking the row opportunity
costs and subtract the smallest number in that
column from each number in that column
PROJECT PROJECT
PERSON 1 2 3 PERSON 1 2 3
Brown 8 10 11 Brown 0 2 3
Cooper 9 12 7 Cooper 2 5 0
Adams $5 $8 $0 Adams $5 $6 $0
Brown 0 2 3 Brown 0 0 3
Cooper 2 5 0 Cooper 2 3 0
PROJECT
PERSON 1 2 3
Adams $5 $6 $0
Cooper 2 3 0
Adams $3 $4 $0
Brown 0 0 5
Cooper 0 1 0
Table 10.32
Adams $3 $4 $0
Cooper 0 1 0
Adams to project 3 6
Brown to project 2 10
Cooper to project 1 9
Total cost 25
1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3
Table 10.34
Program 10.3A
© 2009 Prentice-Hall, Inc. 10 – 117
Using Excel QM for the Fix-It Shop
Assignment Problem
Excel QM output screen
Program 10.3A
Table 10.35
SECTOR
SHIP A B C D
1 20 60 50 55
2 60 30 80 75
3 80 100 90 80
4 65 80 75 70
Table 10.36
SECTOR
SHIP A B C D
1 80 40 50 45
2 40 70 20 25
3 20 0 10 20
4 35 20 25 30
Table 10.37
ASSIGNMENT EFFICIENCY
Ship 1 to sector D 55
Ship 2 to sector C 80
Ship 4 to sector A 65