Professional Documents
Culture Documents
925 Final Facilitatinglearning Session
925 Final Facilitatinglearning Session
925 Final Facilitatinglearning Session
Learning
Session
Prayer
Application
form, ER-TR, Oct 5,
Institutional 2018
Pre-Test
Projector Area
Orientation of
CBT 8:00
All Trainees Laptop a.m. to
Introduction of 8:30
Bread and a.m.
Pastry
Production
LO 1: PREPARE
SPONGE AND
CAKES
LO 2: PREPARE
AND USE FILLINGS
LO 3: DECORATE
CAKES
- Read: Kylle P. CBLM Learning Oct. 5, Compete
Pulmones Resource 2018 nt
Information 8:30-
Sheet 3.5-1 Area 10:00
and Answer a.m.
Self-check 3.5- Acquin, CBLM Oct. 5,
1 Joemar Learning 2018
Resource 10:00-
Compete
Area 12: 00 nt
noon
- Read: Oct. 5,
Information 2018
Sheet 3.5-2 Romagos, Refrigerator Practical 1:00- Compete
Answer Self- Enzo Work Area
2:00 nt
p.m.
check 3.5-2 Baking tools,
Sumalpo
Agenda:
Present:
18 hours
BASIC COMPETENCIES
18 hours
COMMON COMPETENCIES
105 hours
CORE COMPETENCIES
105 hours
CORE COMPETENCIES
Rationale
Facilitating the learning session is to expose the learners to demonstrate
their competency in presenting the CBT, CBLM and unit of competency with
appropriate form of discussion. In this view, the learners are given specific
criteria to follow. This will give them a chance to determine the strong and
points of the ability to facilitate learning session.
Objectives
a. To identify the strong points of each learner as they present the activity.
b. To identify the weak points of each learner for improvement.
Methodology
Quantitative research was used in conducting the Training Evaluation
Report. The pre test and post test scores of the students were analyze
using the t-Test. There were 15 trainees for the training evaluation
report.
6.Sumalpong, 44 46
Catherine
7.Villamor, 30 35
Rizadel
8.Doyungan, 40 49
Joy
9.Pajaron 42 46
Xygrecia
10.Mamac, Ella 43 43
11. Limana, 41 42
Jaylord
12. Alquizola, 44 46
Kyla
13. Torcende, 45 45
Carina
14. Blanco, 46 46
Francis
47 49
15. Epili, Jercy
120
100
80
40
20
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Interpretation
The average for post test is equal to 44.36 and for pre test is 42. The t- statistic is
equal to 3.53 and t-critical value = 1.77.
Since t-statistic is greater than t-critical value, we reject the null hypothesis.
Conclusion:
Therefore, there is a significant difference between the post test and pre test
result, or there is learning acquired.
Recommendation
I recommend that the trainer must used varied teaching methods and
techniques to properly address each trainee’s needs and to provide additional
assistance for struggling students through one on one instruction or with the
help of a more knowledgeable and skillful trainee.