The Philippine Government, through the Commission on
Higher Education, gives guidance on the deployment of available flexible learning and other alternative modes of delivery quality tertiary education in lieu of the on-campus or the traditional face-to- face learning. We cannot deny the fact that the shift in the mode of teaching and learning from the traditional face-to-face to distance education raised numerous concerns along the way. Setbacks such as availability of necessary devices, weak and intermittent internet connection that can result to digital divide, lack of environment that is conducive for students to learn at home, and effectiveness of lectures delivered through different platforms challenged the delivery of higher education. Likewise, some faculty members might have experienced problems in transitioning to online classes since some of them have had to learn new skills and modify their respective syllabi. On the bright side, we can all agree that together, we can overcome all these hurdles. It should always be construed that distance education must not only be confined to online learning; instead, it must be considered as an opportunity for us to develop and implement an approach that engages diversified methods and focuses on the design and delivery of academic programs and learning interventions that accommodate our students’ individual needs, which can eventually boost their enthusiasm to continue learning and freedom to actively participate. The promotion and practice of distance education is a sensitive response to the constraints that our community is currently experiencing and is a measure in securing our students’ health and welfare against the threat of COVID-19.