Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Compressive Membrane Action in RCC Slabs
Compressive Membrane Action in RCC Slabs
Compressive Membrane Action in RCC Slabs
Seminar on
Submitted By
Sadaf Fatima
CE-05
M-Engg, Batch 2009-10
Submitted To
Contents 1
List of Figures 2
Introduction 4
Impetus of Research 5
Membrane Action 8
Experimental Research 11
Conclusion 19
References 20
List Of Figures
Figure-4: Schematic Load-Deflection curve of a slab with full edge restraint (Park
1964)
To my husband Shariq,
my son Sameer,
my daughter Rania,
my mother-in-law,
for their never ending support, love and patience throughout the period of
accomplishing this task, without which I would never have gotten this far,
whose teachings have awaken in me the passion to learn more, and has
my beloved mother,
Introduction
Reinforced concrete slabs are one of the most common structural engineering
elements. Their behavior strongly depends on the support condition and
interaction of slab with the surrounding structure.
If the edges of slabs are restrained against lateral movement by stiff boundary
elements, compressive membrane forces are induced in the plane of slab when,
as the slab deflects, changes of geometry cause the slab edges to move outward
and to react against the bounding elements. The compressive forces so induced
enhance the flexural strength of slab sections at the yield lines which will cause
the ultimate load of the slab to be greater than the ultimate load calculated using
Johansen’s theory of yield lines. This action enhances not only the flexural
capacity of slabs, but also their punching capacity in case of beamless slabs.
At larger deflections, the slab edges tend to move inward, and, if the edges are
laterally restrained, tensile membrane forces are induced that may enable the
slab to carry significant load by catenary action of the reinforcing steel.
The three factors, membrane action, flexural behavior and punching shear are
interdependent. The type and degree of membrane action will depend on the
loading ,support conditions and the shape (both plan and cross sections) of the
slab. The flexural strength is generally improved in a compressive membrane
field. The punching shear strength will decrease as the amount of cracking due to
flexure increases. Therefore, as membrane action improves the flexural strength,
it also aid the punching strength, unless the shear failure load is much below the
flexural failure load.
The presence of compressive membrane action has been recognized for many
decades now, but its obvious benefits are not fully utilized in design and
assessment codes.
Impetus of Research
RCC slabs have taken many forms with the development of methods of
construction, economics, stability of particular slab system as per requirement
and advancement in methods of analysis of slabs.
Beamless Slabs
One of the advantages of beamless slabs is that they are easier to construct due
to simplicity in the formwork. Design is usually governed by the shear strength at
columns. Deflection is also a major concern under heavy loading (See Figure-1).
If severe deflection limits are imposed, two-way slab will introduce moderately
stiff beams which will reduce deflection more than largest column capital. Beams
are also easily reinforced for shear.
They are used in structures which are to resist large horizontal loads by frame
action as they provide greater lateral stiffness because of both the presence of
the beams and the greater efficiency of the beam-column connections (See
Figure-2).
The distribution of moments and shear found by elastic theory is such that,
Limit Analysis
However, yield line theory does not take account of membrane effects in the
slab, which are often present in reinforced concrete slabs at the ultimate load as
a result of boundary conditions and the geometry of deformations of slab
segments.
Membrane Action
Figure-3: Axial forces developed in laterally restrained slab: a) slab subjected to transverse
loading, b) slab elongates upon cracking, c) restrained elongation induces axial compression.
The net tensile strain resulting at the slab mid-depth causes the slab to expand,
producing outward horizontal displacements at the slab ends.
The tendency to expand will be prevented, to some degree, by the lateral
stiffness of supporting columns, beams, or walls. Adjoining slab panels will also
form an extremely stiff diaphragm which will oppose the expansion of the loaded
slab. As a result, compressive membrane force will be induced in the loaded slab
owing to restrained expansion. The compressive force, in turn, produces an
increase in the nominal flexural capacity of the slab section. This mechanism is
known as membrane action and can lead to significant increases in the load
carrying capacity of slab. In more advanced stages, of deformation, the concrete
may crush completely leaving only the reinforcement to act as a tensile net. This
second stage behavior is termed as Catenary Action.
Figure-4: Schematic Load-Deflection curve of a slab with full edge restraint (Park 1964)
Figure-4 shows the load –central deflection curve of a uniformly loaded two-way
rectangular reinforced concrete slab with laterally restrained edges.
Phase-1, From A to B: As the load is increased from A to B, the yield line pattern
develops, and with the help of compressive membrane forces, the slab reaches
its enhanced ultimate load at B. The introduction of compressive membrane
forces in the slab can be thought of as being due to jamming of the slab
segments between boundary restraints, which causes the slab strips to arch from
boundary to boundary. The induced compressive membrane force in slab results
in an enhancement of the flexural strength of slab section.
Experimental Research
Vecchio and Tang conducted test on two large-scale slab strip specimens
consisted of 100mm thick, 1500mm wide slab strip built integral with two stub
columns 200x200 mm in cross section with 100mm thick drop panel provided at
each column. Transverse edge beams were included at the ends to facilitate the
desired support conditions. The results demonstrated the influence of membrane
action in reinforced concrete slabs. Axial forces induced because of membrane
action served to increase the flexural stiffness and load-carrying capacity of slab
by about 30 to 40% relative to an unrestrained slab. However, test results also
indicated that geometric non-linearity effects had also a significant influence over
capacity. The high axial forces induced, coupled with large slab deflections at
ultimate load, created large secondary moments which partially negated the
beneficial influence of membrane action.
Two ¼ scale models of a reinforced concrete nine-panel (3x3) flat slab system
supported by four interior columns and by a continuous wall around perimeter
have been tested under uniform static and dynamic loading by Criswell, and
showed a 30% increase in the ultimate load due to compressive membrane
forces from the restraint of the boundry walls. Comparison of this test result with
the load enhancement obtained by Ockleston, Lienbenberg and Gamble et al.
illustrates that the increase in ultimate load due to membrane action is more
significant for slab-and-beam systems than for flat slab systems.
In a paper presented by G.S.T. Armer (1968) on the ultimate load test of slabs by
strip method, it was shown that in slabs having relatively higher reinforcement
ratio, it was possible to increase load beyond the limiting state without collapse
resulting. The applied load was then carried by a combination of flexural and
compressive membrane action. This was not possible in the slab with low
reinforcement ratio because of its low moment capacity.( See Figure-5) As
shown in Figure-5, the main difference between two slabs is their behavior after
the limiting (maximum) compressive membrane action has been generated by
the partial restraint of the edge beams.
Figure-7: Comparison of load carrying capacity with code predictions (Alam, Amanat, Seraj)
The Ontario Highway Bridge Design Code first introduced provisions for
compressive membrane action in 1979. This code (and later editions including
Canadian Highway Bridge Design code) contains an empirical deck slab design
method for slab on girder bridges that reduces amount of steel required in
concrete slab decks. The code allows this to be done only if certain restrictions
on span length, slab thickness, detailing of diaphragms and connection between
slab and beam are met.
In 2002, the United Kingdom Highways Agency published guidelines for the use
of compressive membrane action in bridge decks. This allows for both simplified
and rigorous analysis to utilize the beneficial effects of membrane action where
adequate deck slab restraint exists.
Some of the present-day code provisions usually specify the punching shear
strength as a function of compressive strength of concrete alone. Thus, these
codes do not take adequate account of possible role of specimen size and edge
restraint.
Wood and Park were two of the earliest researchers to develop analytical
methods to assess the strength of reinforced concrete slabs where compressive
membrane action exists. The theoretical formulations have generally been based
on plasticity theory. Because of the complexity of this approach, many
assumptions and simplifications have been required in those analyses. This lead
to formulations that, while being fundamentally and theoretically important, did
not provide accurate predictions of the strength and loading behavior methods.
To use these methods in practical situations, knowledge of the surround stiffness
that exists for the slab is required.
A floor that has been designed by Johansen’s yield line theory to carry a
particular ultimate load on all panels can, in fact, carry on some panels an
ultimate load much greater than the design ultimate load, provided that the
surrounding panels are lightly loaded, since the steel in lightly loaded adjacent
beams and panels can be used to develop the compressive membrane action in
the heavily loaded panels.
Also, steel placed in beams for earthquake or wind loading could be utilized to
carry some additional gravity loading alone.
Conclusion
2- The slab-and-beam floors with only alternate panels loaded could carry
extremely high ultimate loads on the loaded panels.
References
4- Linus C.S. Lim, “Membrane action in fire exposed concrete floor systems”,
thesis submitted for the partial fulfillment of the requirements for the PhD,
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Canterbury, New Zealand,
2003.
6- G.S.T. Armer, “Ultimate load tests of slabs designed by the strip method”,
Discussion on paper published. Proc. Instn civ. Engrs, 1968, 41(oct) 313-
331.