Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 6

Professional Book Reviews

Reviews
iewss
view

Read to Lead:
k Reevi

Resources That Help Teachers


Book
ook
Boo R

Enhance Literacy Leadership


ionall B
Professional
sion
fessi

Jennifer Turner, Chrystine Hoeltzel, and Jiahang Li


Profes
of

L
iteracy leadership has become the new The CAFÉ Book:
buzzword in many schools. Oftentimes, Engaging All Students
reading specialists, literacy coaches, staff in Daily Literacy
development teachers/trainers, and even adminis- Assessment and
trators are considered literacy leaders. However, Instruction
we believe that classroom teachers are the most Written by Gail Boushey
critical literacy leaders that work with our chil- and Joan Moser
dren. As Roland Barth proclaimed, “All teach- Stenhouse,
ers can lead! Most teachers want to lead. And 2009, 240 pp.,
schools badly need their ideas, invention, energy, ISBN 978-1-57110-728-2
and leadership” (as cited in McAndrew, 2005,
p. 1). In this era of testing and accountability, data-
driven instruction is crucial for literacy achieve-
Many classroom teachers may not initially ment. But many classroom teachers are
see themselves as literacy leaders. Planning les- overwhelmed by the massive amount of data they
sons, grading papers, teaching new informa- collect, and they don’t know how to organize it,
tion, and working with reading groups may not analyze it, or use it to make appropriate instruc-
seem to be the stuff of literacy leadership. Yet any tional decisions. The CAFÉ Book, written by Gail
teacher, whether a novice or a 20-year veteran, Boushey and Joan Moser (2009), addresses these
can be a literacy leader by (a) exhibiting a pro- concerns by providing teachers and students with
found love and respect for the printed word and “a structure for conferring, a language for talk-
personal professional excellence, (b) organizing ing about reading development, and a system for
classrooms conducive to reader engagement, and tracking growth and fostering student indepen-
(c) orchestrating responsive and rigorous instruc- dence” (p. 5). CAFÉ is an acronym for Com-
tion for students (Turner, Applegate, & Apple- prehension, Accuracy, Fluency, and Expanding
gate, 2009). As university instructors who train vocabulary, and these four elements serve as the
elementary teachers, we believe that teachers core of the program. In Chapter 1, Boushey and
enhance their capacity for literacy leadership by
July 2010

Moser articulate the research base for the CAFÉ


keeping their own professional knowledge cur- system, emphasizing four key principles: (a) stu-
rent and transforming their pedagogy through dents need “good it” books that they can select
professional reading, relection, and learning
No. 6 ●

independently; (b) small-group instruction should


(McAndrew, 2005). Because classroom teach- be lexible and be determined by students’ reading
ers must “read to lead,” we highlight three pro- goals rather than reading levels; (c) instructional
fessional resources in this column that may be
Vol. 87 ●

fairness requires responsive pedagogy rather than


useful to teachers who are striving to work as lit- equal time; and (d) teachers must orchestrate a
eracy leaders within their own classrooms and combination of whole-group, small–group, and
schools.
Language Arts ●

side-by-side instruction/coaching experiences to


maximize literacy learning.

472

Copyright © 2010 by the National Council of Teachers of English. All rights reserved.
The CAFÉ Menu Assessment system is built conventional wisdom and to embody what they

Professional Book Reviews


upon a premise that is simple, yet profound: have termed “major shifts” in their own think-
assessment is a process that teachers do with stu- ing about integrating assessment into reading
dents rather than to them (Seraini, as cited in instruction. In contrast to the long, uninterest-
Edwards, Turner, & Mokhtari, 2008). Chapters ing, and stilted whole-group lessons that Boushey
2 and 3 provide the nuts-and-bolts of the CAFÉ and Moser taught with their basal programs, the
assessment system and explore the various tools CAFÉ system centers on brief, targeted read-
for organizing (e.g., the calendar), gathering (e.g., aloud sessions that (a) present particular reading
the Conferring Notebook), analyzing (e.g., the strategies, (b) provide opportunities for teaching
Strategy Lesson form), and displaying (e.g., the and guided practice with these strategies, and (c)
CAFÉ Menu bulletin board) assessment data. introduce children to high-quality literature (see
These assessment tools yield rich data that is not more in Chapter 6).
only informative for teachers, but also useful for Another critical shift Boushey and Moser dis-
students, because classroom assessment systems cuss is the move from guided reading groups to
like CAFÉ “can socialize children into monitoring strategy groups in Chapter 7. Unlike guided read-
and guiding their own literacy learning” (John- ing groups, which are determined by students’
ston, 2005, pp. 684–685). reading levels, strategy groups are lexible and
Students begin to learn about themselves as responsive to students’ goals and needs. Dur-
readers during individual conferences as they ing group meetings, teachers tailor instruction by
“read a bit to [the teacher], talk about their read- modeling, coaching, and reinforcing strategies,
ing, and assess their progress toward their goal” and use a range of texts (e.g., individual “good it”
(p. 62). In these brief, but focused, conferences, books, common texts) for instruction and prac-
teachers and students use the CAFÉ language tice. To support teachers as they implement these
for (a) goal setting; (b) coaching, reteaching, and powerful pedagogical innovations, numerous
practicing speciic strategies; and (c) for planning resources are provided, including read-aloud book
next steps. By offering snapshots of conferences lists, tips for launching the program and teaching
with students who represent diversity in home essential strategies in the irst week, sample strat-
language (e.g., English Language Learners) and egy lessons for whole-and small-group instruc-
literacy needs (e.g., student reads luently but has tion, and a CD with reproducible forms.
trouble with comprehension), Boushey and Moser The CAFÉ book builds classroom teachers’
illustrate how all children can take ownership of capacity for literacy leadership. As teachers who
their reading habits, talk speciically about their have worked against mandated programs in their
reading development, and develop new metacog- own schools, Boushey and Moser contend that lit-
nitive strategies (see Chapters 4 and 5). Students eracy leaders need more than courage; they must
also actively participate in the CAFÉ assess- be constantly engaged in inquiry to learn about
ment system—they write and illustrate the strat- their students. The CAFÉ system promotes “the
egy cards, post their names under particular goals habit of taking notes, observing children, and
(e.g., comprehension, luency) on the CAFÉ menu making teaching decisions based on data” (p. 9).
bulletin board, and become “experts” on particu- Because Boushey and Moser characterize the
lar strategies. Through the CAFÉ Menu system, CAFÉ system as a “work in progress” rather than
students grow into resilient readers who have “the a scripted program, teachers are encouraged to
disposition to articulate their learning processes use their professional expertise to adapt the pro-
and perspectives, including their struggles, in gram in ways that address their students’ needs
ways that sustain strategic lexibility and mutual and interests. If teachers need to deepen their pro-
engagement” (Johnston, 2005, p. 686). fessional expertise, Boushey and Moser enthu-
The CAFÉ assessment system is anchored by siastically recommend that they use technology
whole-group and small-group instruction, and to visit the authors’ websites (www.thedaily
many classroom teachers may believe that they cafe.com), read updates about the program,
have a irm understanding of how these peda- and blog with teachers using the CAFÉ system
gogical elements work. However, Boushey and in schools across the country. One of the most
Moser developed the CAFÉ system to challenge important tasks literacy leaders can do is write

473
thoughtfully about good literacy assessment and different levels of support and experiences with
Professional Book Reviews

instructional programs, as Boushey and Moser books, and she provides examples of how she
have so aptly done. achieved success connecting to these types of
students. Although the positive effects of inde-
The Book Whisperer: pendent reading are hotly debated since the pub-
Awakening the Inner lication of the National Reading Panel (2000)
Reader in Every Child report, Miller contends that independent read-
Written by Donalyn Miller ing is the crux of any language arts program. She
Jossey-Bass, also evaluates current missed opportunities for
2009, 240 pp., students to independently interact with books,
ISBN 978-0-470-37227-2 offering an outline for how to develop a reading
community in one’s classroom. By fostering the
As literacy educators rights of the reader (Pennac, 2006), requiring stu-
are inundated with new dents to read 40 books in a year, eliciting student
initiatives to drive state choice, and framing instruction around genre,
test scores up, test prep- Miller has helped her students become voluntary
aration has become the focal point of classrooms, readers while still being able to meet district man-
and helping students cultivate a love of read- dates and state standards.
ing is often lost. In her inspiring book, The Book
Whisperer, Donalyn Miller (2009) calls for lit- Miller believes that “teachers lose credibil-
eracy education to encompass authentic reading ity with students when they ignore the cultural
in authentic contexts where students have ample trends and issues that interest them and instead
opportunities to read books that interest them. design instruction around books that are ‘good
Miller describes the typical language arts pro- for you’” (p. 85). In addition to the instructional
gram where teachers trust anthologies and novel recommendations listed above, Miller supports
units to teach essential language arts skills, and a reader’s journal for each student; this journal
she seriously questions whether these practices serves several valuable functions: to document
ever really help develop student-centered reading a listing of book genres, to maintain a read-
communities. Instead, Miller advocates for teach- ing list, to record titles for a book wish list, and
ers to act as literacy leaders by challenging the to provide a space for responding to the books
status quo of a perpetuating cycle where teach- students read. Woven throughout this book are
ers continue to do what has always been done just examples of the importance of teacher modeling
because it has always been done. This insightful and the need for teachers to be knowledgeable
book contains thought-provoking ideas about how about books in order to make good recommen-
to reach students as well as instructional tips and dations that will help students connect to those
resources to help teachers instill lifelong reading books.
habits in students. The last few chapters of The Book Whisperer
The irst few chapters of the book take readers provide speciic advice for teachers trying to
through Miller’s teaching journey as she recounts expand reader book boundaries. Miller believes
July 2010

her mistakes and documents her knowledge about that teachers need to develop their own inner
student readers and conditions for learning. In her reader in order to effectively inspire students to do
irst few years of teaching, Miller took great pride the same. In Chapter 6, Miller exposes common
No. 6 ●

in developing extensive novel units with the hope traditional practices that stile reader motivation,
that she could engage students in the books’ plots such as whole-class novels, comprehension tests,
and extend student learning. She did not real- book reports, reading logs, round-robin and pop-
Vol. 87 ●

ize until it was too late that students rarely con- corn reading, and incentive programs. She offers
nected with these books that were so completely valuable alternatives that teachers can incorpo-
detached from their interests and lives. rate into their classrooms in place of those less
successful practices. Miller explains that “teach-
Language Arts ●

Miller categorizes the three types of read- ers tie so many strings to reading that students
ers that educators encounter in their classrooms: never develop a pleasurable relationship to read-
developing readers, dormant readers, and under- ing inside or, regrettably, beyond the classroom”
ground readers. All three types of readers need (p. 121). Armed with this information, Miller

474
devotes the last chapter to parley the importance With easy, step-by-step instructions, K–6 teach-

Professional Book Reviews


of teachers standing up for student readers. ers will learn more about the instructional process
Miller also argues that our education system of planning, teaching, and assessment in a tech-
needs literacy leaders who are going to advocate nology-rich environment. Moreover, many useful
and provide opportunities for independent read- classroom examples show how the Internet and
ing, even though our culture may say it is not reading and writing software further enable teach-
important. She worries that “canned programs ers to grasp the idea of literacy–technology inte-
drain every ounce of joy from reading that stu- gration. By providing explicit directions for key
dents have or will have in the future” (p. 169). instructional moves (e.g., teacher modeling, think-
Donalyn Miller’s message is clear—if developing aloud), teachers can help their students to develop
lifelong readers is our goal, then connecting stu- new reading and communication competencies in
dents through books is essential, and reading ulti- a technology-enriched classroom environment.
mately belongs to the students. Chapters 1 and 2 build on the argument made
Miller concludes this refreshing book by saying by New Literacy scholars that “as technology
that “students will read if we give them the books, increasingly becomes an integral part of what
the time and the encouragement to do so . . . and we understand to be literacy, achieving liter-
that to keep our students reading, we have to let acy will require a wider range of skills, greater
them” (p. 177). Along with her valuable insight skill sophistication, and the ability to apply these
and advice, Miller provides resource appendi- skills more quickly than ever” (p. 4). New lit-
ces (such as classroom library ideas and the ulti- eracy allows us to use “Internet and other ICTs
mate library list) and student forms (such as an (information and communication technologies) to
end-of-the-year teacher evaluation and student identify important questions, locate information,
surveys). These documents and the information critically evaluate the usefulness of that infor-
presented in the book enable teachers to plan lit- mation, synthesize information to answer those
eracy instruction with students in mind. Through questions, and then communicate the answers to
thoughtful orchestration, teachers are better able others” (Leu, Kinzer, Coiro, & Cammack, 2004,
to design instruction to meet the needs and inter- p. 1572), so it is imperative to include these tech-
ests of their students (Turner, Applegate, & Apple- nological advances in the deinition of literacy
gate, 2009). Miller has a lofty goal in mind, and used in schools. Drawing upon this work, Taffe
her book acts as a tool for teachers to create class- and Gwinn assert that, given such rapidly chang-
rooms of interested and lifelong readers. ing technology, teachers should communicate and
collaborate interactively with their colleagues in
Integrating Literacy order to provide meaningful technology-based
and Technology: experiences for children in a digital age. They
Effective Practice conclude in Chapter 2 that purposeful literacy–
for Grades K–6 technology integration requires teachers to “be
Written by willing to explore teaching in ways that may be
Susan Watts Taffe and new and different” (p. 28). When teachers are lit-
Carolyn Gwinn
eracy leaders, they are willing to take risks and try
Guilford, 2007, 146 pp., new pedagogical innovations with technology in
ISBN 978-1-59385-452-2 order to make literacy instruction more responsive
and rigorous for their students.
In their book, Susan
Watts Taffe and Caro- Moving from theory to practice, the authors
lyn Gwinn (2007) pro- explore the role of technology in planning,
vide elementary school teachers with theories, instruction, and assessment in Chapters 3 through
skills, and instructions about how to use tech- 6. After a thorough discussion about the impact of
nology effectively in the literacy classroom. technology on the instructional cycle (planning,
Designed to “describe in detail the decision mak- teaching, assessment, and relection), the authors
ing behind meaningful purpose-driven literacy– outline a range of concrete activities that teachers
technology integration” (p. x), this book engages could use with new technologies and in different
teachers in the process of inquiry and relection. instructional contexts. One example is the use of
KidPix, computer software that has the capability

475
to present information using text, graphics, and exploring new territories and possibilities, and
Professional Book Reviews

voice in a slide show format. They show how this facing dificulties and failures in a positive way.
program can help teachers complement tradi- Taffe and Gwinn’s book is extremely help-
tional print literature/books with additional online ful because it is a well-organized and teacher-
information. friendly guide for integrating technology into
The authors go on to describe the many com- everyday literacy instruction for elementary stu-
prehension strategies used in digital literacy learn- dents. The authors offer simple guidance about
ing, such as making inferences, dealing with how to effectively integrate technology and lit-
graphic information, and evaluating information. eracy in classroom teaching by providing numer-
The authors suggest that teachers can use tech- ous tools, software, websites, tips, worksheets,
nology to enhance the comprehension instruc- and guides. Further, this book offers tools to
tion in their classrooms. They also point out enhance professional development experiences,
how to use assessment as a vital component in such as teacher group meeting sites, online men-
literacy–technology integration and cite concrete toring and discussion forums, and websites (e.g.,
case studies as examples throughout the book to www.readwritethink.org), which will help teach-
illustrate this kind of integrated instruction. For ers to develop their own literacy leadership
instance, using a second-grade teacher’s (John around integrating technology and literacy.
David) case of linking assessment with literacy–
technology integration, the authors suggest that CONCLUDING THOUGHTS
portfolio assessment, including both handwritten
and technology-based materials (e.g. video) can It is truly unfortunate that many school practices
help teachers monitor students’ academic growth across the United States are unintentionally
and literacy development. destroying students’ desire to read. Now, more
than ever before, we need classroom teachers to
The last two chapters discuss the importance step up and be literacy leaders. We need liter-
of teachers as change agents in the integration and acy leaders who are willing to expand their pro-
impact of technology on the professional lives of fessional knowledge and apply that knowledge in
teachers. Based on a practical as well as theoreti- classrooms to enhance student learning. We need
cal explanation of teacher attributes, attitudes, and literacy leaders who participate in regular inquiry
actions, the authors argue that “the great poten- and relection, because they want to understand
tial and possibilities for student learning afforded how their pedagogy impacts students as liter-
by new technologies can best be realized when ate beings. And, we need literacy leaders who are
teachers act as agents” (p. 92). Such agency is motivated to learn about technology and use it not
a key component of literacy leadership, and can only in K–8 classrooms, but also to deepen their
help teachers to build capacity to work with own professional competencies and expertise.
technology—an arena that may be very unfamiliar
or uncomfortable for educators in today’s schools. The three books reviewed for this column help
According to the authors, teachers who act as literacy leaders to evaluate their current literacy
change agents should have critical attributes, instructional practices and begin to take risks in
an effort to make positive changes within class-
July 2010

including self-eficacy, decision-making compe-


tencies, and vision. Teachers who effectively inte- rooms. While making small changes within their
grate technology into literacy instruction also classrooms, literacy leaders also have an oppor-
tunity to move beyond conventional thinking
No. 6 ●

have a deep understanding of curricular standards,


pedagogical content, and methods, and are aware and share knowledge with colleagues in order to
that not every new technology will it into teach- expand (sometimes oppositional) views. These
books serve as touchstones and include a num-
Vol. 87 ●

ing. Moreover, teachers must believe that it is


their responsibility to teach students new litera- ber of relevant resources to assist teachers as
cies. In order to fulill this goal, teachers should they take up signiicant, yet sometimes unpopu-
be proactive as they try literacy–technology inte- lar, instructional ideas and advocate for student-
Language Arts ●

gration in their classrooms by communicating centered pedagogy, programs, and policy as liter-
and collaborating with students and colleagues, acy leaders.

476
References Pennac, D. (2006). The rights of the reader. London: Walker

Professional Book Reviews


Books.
Edwards, P. A., Turner, J. D., & Mokhtari, K. (2008). Balanc-
ing assessment of learning and for learning in support of Turner, J. D., Applegate, T., & Applegate, M. (2009). Teach-
student literacy achievement. The Reading Teacher, 61, ers as literacy leaders. Reading Teacher, 63, 254–256.
682–684.
Johnston, P. (2005). Literacy assessment and the future. The Jennifer D. Turner is associate professor of Reading in
Reading Teacher, 58, 684–686. the College of Education at the University of Maryland,
College Park. Her teaching and research interests focus
Leu, D. J., Jr., Kinzer, C. G., Coiro, J., & Cammack, D. (2004). on successful literacy instruction for African American
Toward a theory of new literacies emerging from the elementary students, culturally responsive literacy
Internet and other information and communication tech- teacher education, and preparing literacy leaders for
nologies. In R. R. Ruddell & N. J. Unrauh (Eds.), Theoretical diversity. Chrystine Hoeltzel is a doctoral student in
models and processes of reading (5th ed., pp. 1570–1613). Reading Education at the University of Maryland, Col-
Newark, DE: International Reading Association. lege Park. She also works as a Reading Coach for the
McAndrew, D.A. (2005). Literacy leadership: Six strate- Berks County Intermediate Unit in Reading, Pennsyl-
gies for peoplework. Newark, DE: International Reading vania. Jiahang Li is a doctoral student in Reading
Association. Education at the University of Maryland, College Park.
His research interests include multicultural literature,
National Institute of Child Health and Human Develop-
multicultural education, and online reading.
ment. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teach-
ing children to read: An evidenced-based assessment of the Rebecca Rogers and Martille Elias, both profes-
scientiic research literature on reading and its implications sors of Literacy Education at the University of Missouri
for reading instruction (NIH Publication No. 00-4769). St. Louis, served as editors for this book review column.
Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Ofice.

477

You might also like