Deformed frogs and salamanders are being found at rates up to 60% in some areas, with abnormalities including missing or extra legs, abnormal eyes, and issues with digestive and reproductive systems. The causes are believed to be widespread use of pesticides and herbicides containing substances like vitamin A, as well as toxins released into water sources from agriculture and industry. Frogs spend significant time in water bodies that receive agricultural and industrial runoff, allowing toxins to be easily absorbed through their thin skin. No single cause has been identified, but frogs may serve as an indicator of broader environmental hazards negatively impacting human health.
Deformed frogs and salamanders are being found at rates up to 60% in some areas, with abnormalities including missing or extra legs, abnormal eyes, and issues with digestive and reproductive systems. The causes are believed to be widespread use of pesticides and herbicides containing substances like vitamin A, as well as toxins released into water sources from agriculture and industry. Frogs spend significant time in water bodies that receive agricultural and industrial runoff, allowing toxins to be easily absorbed through their thin skin. No single cause has been identified, but frogs may serve as an indicator of broader environmental hazards negatively impacting human health.
Deformed frogs and salamanders are being found at rates up to 60% in some areas, with abnormalities including missing or extra legs, abnormal eyes, and issues with digestive and reproductive systems. The causes are believed to be widespread use of pesticides and herbicides containing substances like vitamin A, as well as toxins released into water sources from agriculture and industry. Frogs spend significant time in water bodies that receive agricultural and industrial runoff, allowing toxins to be easily absorbed through their thin skin. No single cause has been identified, but frogs may serve as an indicator of broader environmental hazards negatively impacting human health.
certain area. • More frogs are deformed, missing/extra legs, abnormal eyes (external), non- functioning digestive syst., grossly distended bladders, abnormal reproductive syst. Environmental Hazards & Human Health • The cause? Widespread use of pesticides (retinoid, substance like Vit-A in pesticides residue) & herbicides in agriculture, toxins (arsenic,mercury, selenium, cadmium) released into the air & water. • Frogs spend most time in water-body (ponds/wetlands) which receive most waste, toxic could be easily absorb through their thin skin. • UV – frog eggs & young sensitive to UV. • No single,simple cause. Environmental Hazards & Human Health • No good historic data to support the find. • Ominous warning – Canary that early miners took into the mines to warn of life- threatening condition. • Frog = indicator species (Why ?) Nature of environmental hazards & concequences of exposures • Exposure to hazards – what is it in the environment that brings the risk of injury, diseases or death to people. • 4 classes of hazards – cultural,biological,physical & chemical. • Cultural Hazards – a matter of choice. Risky behavior:eat too much,drive too fast,use addictive drugs,consume alcohol beverages,smoke,sunbathe,hang glide,risky sexual practices,too little excercises,or choose hazardous occupations Vrrooommmm !!! Biological Hazards • Pathogenic bacteria & viruses - One third of death- biological hazards • Epidemics-Black plague & typhus (Europe in the middle ages),smallpox (New world). • 19th century- first vaccination (bacteriology) • 20th century-virology (great discovery of antibiotics;immunizations to eradicate smallpox,polio & whoopy cough.) Biological Hazards
• Acute respiratory infections
(pneumonia,diphtheria,tuberculosis,whooping cough,influenza,strep throat) –among children at the developing countries. • Tuberculosis (largest cause of adult death)-AIDS epidemic. • Diarrheal (cholera,dysentery,salmonellosis,giardiasis) – 2.5 million deaths in 1997,most obvious link to the environment. Cause = food/water contaminated by Salmonella,Campylobacter, E.coli. From human waste. • Malaria-infectious diseases in the tropics. Physical Hazards • Natural disaster- hurricanes,tornadoes,floods,earthquakes,l andslides & volcanic eruptions. • A great tendency of human to assume that accident only happen to others. Chemical Hazards • Industrialization-cleaning agent,pesticides,fuels,paints,medicines etc… • Exposure through ingestion,breathing or absorption through skin. • Toxicity (the capability of being harmful) depends not only on exposure but on the actual dose. • Different people has different threshold level to detect toxicity. • Children are at greater risk-growing rapidly,incorporating more of their food into new tissue. • Greater sensitivity occurs during embryonic development. Zika virus & Microcephaly Chemical Hazards • Chemical especially heavy metals,organic solvents & pesticides are harmful even at small dose. • Some chemical = known carcinogenic (cancer- causing) • Cancer develops over 10 to 40 years, hard to connect the cause of effects. • 74 chemicals known to be carcinogens • Potential effects = impairment of immune system, brain impairment, infertility and birth defects. • 13 of the 15 cities with worst air pollution are found in Asia. • http://ptcl.chem.ox.ac.uk/MSDS/carcinogens.html Radioactive Hazard-Radon (Rn 86) • Radioactive gaseous element. • Invisible, tasteless, odorless. • When breathed into lungs, some Radon undergoes radioactive decay –> solid chemical that lodged in the lung – > cancer over time. • From breakdown of URANIUM in rock,soil & water. • Ways that radon enters a house is through the foundation by a variety of paths: – cracks in basement floors – drains – sump pumps – exposed soil – construction joints (mortar, floor-wall) – loose fitting pipes
• Underground Miners develops lung cancer at higher rates.
Radioactive Hazard-Radon (Rn 86) • US EPA – 4 picocuries per liter of Radon inhaled over a lifetime capable of causing lung cancer in > 1 /1000 person. • 15,000 to 23,000 death/year in US. • Smokers at higher risk of radon-induced cancer due to the synergistic effects of radon and smoking . • Exposure to radon is the second leading cause of lung cancer after smoking (www.epa.gov/radon). • Remedies – seal cracked foundation, install ventilation for basement. • www.epa.gov/radon Pathway to Risk
• Poverty..is the biggest killer (WHO)
• Education-woman/mother may improve hygience, immunized children etc.. • Nutrition • Relative gap of the wealthy & poor.(SriLangka vs.America) • Cultural risk of smoking (risk of harm) = personal pollutants. • 2nd.hand smoking • Occupation-black lung disease associate with coal mine workers who are also smokers. Risk & Infectious Diseases • Epidemiology=study of disease in human populations. • Trace disease as it occurs in geographic locations, mode of transmission & consequences of disease. • Major pathway of risk is contamination of food & water due to lack of adequate sewage treatment & hygience. • Drinking water = best mode of transport of feces related human pathogens. • Cholera & typhoid disease can be deadly. Small children -> mulnutrition & dehydration • http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/collections/epidem/epid.1.sht ml. Ebola outbreak in Africa 2014- 2015 • Fungal contamination on peanut- Aflatoxins from the Aspergillus flavus = a human carcinogens that have been found to cause liver cancer in animals and humans Developed vs. Developing Countries • Developing country-climate ideal for year-round propagation of insect-borne disease. (Yellow fever,dengue fever,elephantiasis, Japanese encephalitis & malaria) • Malaria by far most serious. • Mosquitoes developed resistance to all of the pesticides employed; Plasmodium protozoan developed resistance to one treatment drug to another. Chloroquine was quite effective against malaria in Africa, now it is ineffective. • Use of mosquito net. • WHO documented increases in malaria cases related to land-use changes (deforestration, irrigation & creation of dam) Aswan Dam Toxic Risk Pathway • Airborn pollutants most difficult to control. • Indoor air pollutants pose higher risk • Total exposure assessment (TEA)=concept to evaluate more accurately the impact of air pollutants on human health. • TEA calculate pollutants in the air space & exposure on the basis of the time spent in those space. • www.who.int/ech/risks/cehchemicals/en/index.ht ml Risk pathway for Developed country • 90% time spend indoor • Increasing number & types of products and equipment used in home & office -> give off potentially hazardous fumes. • Building is better insulated & sealed. • Small children, pregnant women, the elderly & chronically ill. Risk pathway for Developing country • Biofuel-wood & animal dungs. • Children-acute respiratory infections,chronic lung diseases like asthma & bronchitis,lung cancer & birth-related problems. • Solution-well ventilated stove, conversion to bottled gas or liquid fuels like kerosene. Indoor air pollutants • Formaldehyde/synthetic compounds for plywood, particle board, foam rubber, plastic upholstery, non-iron sheets & pillow case Indoor air pollutants - Formaldehyde Indoor air pollutants • Food burned on stove/oven • Incomplete combustion from fuel-fired heating system (gas or oil furnace, kerosene heaters & wood stoves) • Fumes from household cleaners Indoor air pollutants
• Fumes from glues and hobby materials
• Pesticides • Air fresheners & disinfectants. Most air fresheners work by dulling the sense of smell so that u don’t notice noxious odors / introduce ‘high-intensity’ smells that cover up odors. • Aerosol sprays of all sorts (oven cleaners,pesticides,hair sprays,cooking oil) • Radon.Radioactive gas,by-product of disintegration of Uranium in rock,soil & water,can accumulate in basement . Indoor air pollutants • Asbestos-natural mineral has fiberlike crystals. For heat insulation & fire retardation. Pipes in steam- heating systems,ceiling,ironing-board cover,paints, roofing materials. • Inhalation of asbestos fiber is associated with unique form of lung cancer developed 20-30 years after the exposure. • Smoking Solution ? Risk Analysis • Toxicology – Science to study the impacts of toxic substances on human health (especially the link to cancer). • Risk analysis=important tool=an approach to the problems of environmental health. • =Major element in public policy (billions spent on environment protection). • Risk analysis = process of evaluating risk associated with a particular hazard before taking some action in which the hazard is present. (example: 82 million people go swimming/year, 2600 drown -> the risk of drowning is 32 in a million. To reduce the risk, swim at beach with lifeguard, calm lagoon etc. • Not many people make choices base on such risk assessment. • Risk analysis = an important process in public policy development. Risk Analysis in US (EPA) • 4 steps – Hazards assessment, dose- response assessment, exposure assessment & risk characterization. Hazards assessment • Hazards assessment: Which chemical cause cancer? = process of examining evidence linking a potential hazard to its harmful effects. • Important 1st step in risk analysis. • Accident – easier for finding the link. i.e. car usage and road accident. Historical data (annual highway death toll) is useful in calculating risk. • Cancer – harder:linkage not obvious,time delay in first exposure and final outcome. • When linkage is less obvious, data may come from 2 sources – (1)Epidemiological Studies; (2) Animal Testing. (1) Epidemiological Study • Study that tracks how a sickness spreads through a community. • Epidemiologist who study would examine all the people exposed to the chemical & determine whether this population has more sickness (example: cancer). (2) Animal Testing • To find out NOW what might happen many years in future. • Example: Don’t want to wait 20 years to find out a new food additive cause cancer -> accept evidence from animal testing. • Costly: Test involve several hundreds animals, takes ~ 3 years & cost > US$250,000. (2) Animal Testing • If test=significant, the results indicate that a substance is either a possible or probable human carcinogen. • 3 Objections-(a) Rodent & human have different responses to a given chemical (b) The dose are usually unrealistically high (c)Ethical grounds • All chemical shown epidemiologically to be human carcinogens are also carcinogenic to test animals. Dose Response & Exposure Assessment • How much for how long? • When animal tests show a link -> the next step is to analyze relationship between the chemical in the test (the dose) & both the incidence & severity of the response in the test animals. • Then projections are made to humans pop about the number of cancers that may develop who are exposed to different dose = Dose response assessment. • Exposure assessment = identify human groups already exposed, learning how that exposure came about & calculating the doses & length of exposure time. Risk Characterization • How many will die? • Combine info.gathered in the 1st 3 steps to determine the risk & its accompanying uncertainties. • Risk is express as probability. • The Clean Air Act (1990), US directs EPA to regulate chemicals that have a cancer risk > 1 / million. • Risk may be express as reduction in life expectancy. i.e. smoking 1 cigeratte reduces life expectancy by 5 minutes. Risk Management • Risk management naturally follows after risk analysis. • Responsibility of lawmakers & administrators. • Risk management involves (1) A thorough review of risk analysis information (2) a decision on whether the weight of evidence justifies a regulatory action. • Public opinion play a powerful role in determining these decisions. Consideration on a regulatory decision • Cost-benefit analysis = very clear-cut. • Risk-benefit analysis = useful when cost-benefit analysis cannot be easily expressed in $ value. i.e. X- rays (cancer risk vs. bone fracture). • Public preferences = People have greater tolerance for risks that they feel are under their control / voluntarily accepted. Risk Analysis & Public Policy • Public concern (risk perception) rather than cost-benefit analysis or risk analysis drives public policy. • Some serious risk will get < attention than they deserve. i.e. environment/ecological risk is perceived less important than they are, because public’s pre-occupation with human-health related risk. • Extinction of species & loss of biodiversity – not in public concern. For Next Lecture • Define MORBIDITY & MORTALITY.