Professional Documents
Culture Documents
08w FuelSyst
08w FuelSyst
08w FuelSyst
Chapter 8
Fuel System
These lecture notes are available for the students of the Polytechnic of Milan for free download. 8.1
No commercialisation allowed.
Queste dispense possono essere gratuitamente scaricate da Internet dagli studenti del Politecnico di Milano.
E’ vietata la commercializzazione.
POLITECNICO DI MILANO - DIPARTIMENTO DI INGEGNERIA AEROSPAZIALE
AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS – LECTURE NOTES, VERSION 2004
Chapter 8 – Fuel System
8.1 Introduction
The fuel system must store the fuel in suitable areas of the aircraft and supply it to
the engines. Old piston engine aircraft had simple systems, where usually the engine
was fuel supplied by gravity. Current jet engines require high fuel rate, to be
sometimes distributed along considerable lengths, then needing important studies of
the system layout and sizing.
Safety of the fuel system is also a major issue, because the fatality rate during
accidents is significantly increased by post-crash fire. Therefore great efforts are
being done to reduce this hazard, in two directions: modification of the chemical
properties of fuels, to reduce the risk of ignition outside the combustion chamber, and
crashworthiness of tanks and pipes, to reduce the risk of leakage during impacts.
8.2 Tanks
The fuel mass is a significant fraction of the total aircraft mass; for turboprop or
turbofan airliners and helicopters the fuel mass is in the range 20 – 30 % of the
maximum take-off mass, for a combat aircraft up to 40 %, for a bomber more than 50
%. This little statistics shows the importance of fuel storage layout and location on
board, and its influence on flight trimming.
For fixed wing aircraft a typical choice is wing tanks, which gives many advantages:
• a free and available volume is used;
• the location is not far from the aircraft centre of gravity;
• the wing root bending moment is reduced with respect of a configuration where
the fuel is stored in fuselage tanks.
On the other hand this solution has
some drawbacks for aerobatics
because it increases the roll moment
of inertia, and for combat aircraft
because the wing is a wide exposed
surface and, in particular for
supersonic aricraft, the wing is very
thin, the providing limited room for fuel
recovery.
On rotary-wing aircraft fuel storage presents more difficulties, because there is not a
wing or any other structure that is free and available for fuel containment. Moreover
crashworthiness requirements are very tight: the fuel must be far from cabin, engines
and those areas mainly exposed to crash. Often the tanks are then located in bays
aft of the cabin, with a suitable distance from the occupants and bottom structure.
Fuel contained in wide tanks, like those in the wings, can easily slosh in any aircraft
manoeuvre; this can cause fluctuations of the centre of gravity and errors in quantity
measurement. Anti-slosh baffles are normally used in these tanks.
The risk of significant liquid sloshing would be particularly high in the wing tanks, but
here the effect is well attenuated by the ribs; moreover the rib lightening holes are
often closed with flap check valves, that allow the fuel to be collected in the root area
and prevent it to slosh towards the tip area.
In some cases the tanks are pressurised, to favour the flow from a tank to another
when gravity is not sufficient and no transfer pumps are installed.
In many cases the fuel is transferred and consolidated in collector tanks before
feeding to the engines by the booster pumps. The pumps in combat and aerobatic
aircraft have the suction pipe extremity immersed in a region of the tank where part
of the fuel can be trapped, in case of reverse or negative-g flight.
A vent system allows for air compensation, from the top of the tanks, during fuelling,
defuelling and fuel transfer operations.
Most military aircraft have the possibility of in-flight refuelling, with great improvement
of mission range and flexibility. Two techniques are currently used: probe/drogue and
boom/receptacle method, shown in fig. 8.2.
In the first case, a flexible pipe is lowered in the air stream from the tanker aircraft,
with a large cone-shaped metal basket at the end. The recipient aircraft has a probe
and the pilot must control the flight in order to insert the probe into the basket. The
centre of the basket has a hose connection with a quick-locking mechanism; when
These lecture notes are available for the students of the Polytechnic of Milan for free download. 8.3
No commercialisation allowed.
Queste dispense possono essere gratuitamente scaricate da Internet dagli studenti del Politecnico di Milano.
E’ vietata la commercializzazione.
POLITECNICO DI MILANO - DIPARTIMENTO DI INGEGNERIA AEROSPAZIALE
AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS – LECTURE NOTES, VERSION 2004
Chapter 8 – Fuel System
the probes pulls in, it is locked and high pressure refuelling starts, with a flow that
may reach 2500 kg/minute. As the probe stops pulling, the mechanism is unlocked
and the flow is shut off so that there is no loss of fuel. A tanker may have one centre
hose and two on the wings, with the possibility to refuel three aircraft in the same
time. This system is mostly used by the European aviation.
US aviation has a method developed by Boeing, where the pipe from the air tanker is
a telescopic boom lowered under the tail, and the inlet to the recipient is a receptacle
on top of the aircraft. The
boom is controlled by an
operator on board the tanker,
and the boom end is out of the
recipient pilot view in the final
part of the operation, so that
this technique is more risky
than the probe/drogue, but
Fig. 8.2 – Probe and boom refuelling techniques allows a faster refuelling up to
3500 kg/minute.
Apart from a normal defuelling that can be done for maintenance reasons, the aircraft
may be in the condition to jettison a large quantity of fuel. This may happen in
emergency landing conditions, especially when the aircraft is in the first part of its
flight and needs to bring its weight down to the maximum landing weight or even to a
nearly zero-fuel condition, if a crash landing is expected. Typical positions for jettison
valves are along the feed
line to the engines, where
the fuel has a pressure that
allows it to be tapped off with
a considerable flow rate.
When possible dumping is
obtained from outlets located
rear of the wing tips, then far
from the engines and other
aircraft parts. Fig. 8.3 shows
the schematic representation
of the Boeing 747 fuel feed
system including the jettison
sections. In this case 2
additional outlets are located
under the centre wing.
Fig. 8.3 – Boeing 747 fuel jettison system
These lecture notes are available for the students of the Polytechnic of Milan for free download. 8.4
No commercialisation allowed.
Queste dispense possono essere gratuitamente scaricate da Internet dagli studenti del Politecnico di Milano.
E’ vietata la commercializzazione.
POLITECNICO DI MILANO - DIPARTIMENTO DI INGEGNERIA AEROSPAZIALE
AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS – LECTURE NOTES, VERSION 2004
Chapter 8 – Fuel System
First information comes from comparing the characteristic pump functioning diagram
with the head loss diagram; the head loss, or flow pressure difference between a
section in the pipeline at the pump outlet pP and a section at engine inlet pE, can be
derived by eq. 2.6, as
follows:
L1 2
pP − pE = f ρv ,
D2
The system must work also in emergency conditions. This means that, in case of
fault of one pump, or leakage in one tank, this branch must be isolated by the shut off
valves and the other branch (or branches) must be able to supply enough fuel for all
the engines. The problem can be better outlined in the case of a twin engine aircraft,
like that shown in fig. 8.7.
Normally one booster pump
CROSSFEED
feed one engine. In case of
malfunction of one feeding
branch, the other must
supply both the engines. This
means that:
1. one pump must be able
to supply enough fuel flow
rate for both the engines;
2. a crossfeed line must be
open to link the two
branches.
For head loss reasons it is
Fig. 8.7 – Emergency crossfeed clear that the crossfeed line
These lecture notes are available for the students of the Polytechnic of Milan for free download. 8.6
No commercialisation allowed.
Queste dispense possono essere gratuitamente scaricate da Internet dagli studenti del Politecnico di Milano.
E’ vietata la commercializzazione.
POLITECNICO DI MILANO - DIPARTIMENTO DI INGEGNERIA AEROSPAZIALE
AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS – LECTURE NOTES, VERSION 2004
Chapter 8 – Fuel System
should be installed as close as possible to the tanks. In this case, in fact, the flow is
immediately split into two parallel pipes, with no significant increase of head loss with
respect to the normal operation condition. If the crossfeed line is located near the
engines, a considerable pipe length has double flow rate with respect to normal
conditions, that means double or quadruple head loss (depending on the flow type),
that would bring to a major sizing of the booster pumps.
These lecture notes are available for the students of the Polytechnic of Milan for free download. 8.7
No commercialisation allowed.
Queste dispense possono essere gratuitamente scaricate da Internet dagli studenti del Politecnico di Milano.
E’ vietata la commercializzazione.