Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Effects of COVID Clothing Final
Effects of COVID Clothing Final
Effects of COVID Clothing Final
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background of the study
Clothing Stores (March 27). Firstly COVID-19 was detected during December in Wuhan,
China. Later the impact of corona virus has been spread worldwide impacting every
sectors of daily life including small businesses like fancy stores (clothing store). For the
safety of people government have issue an order to shutdown all the stores including
clothing store except essential stores like department stores which provide basic
household items under strict rules and regulation.
The COVID-19 pandemic has also had significant economic consequences globally. In
particular, the world economy faces a negative supply stock because of the pandemic,
which has forced many business stores like restaurant, department stores, clothing
stores to keep shutting down. More generally, because of COVID-19, people have been
advised to maintain “social distancing” with severe effects on the business of clothing
store and others.
The restricted movement and lockdowns across worldwide constitute both demand side
shock and supply side shock. Clothing Stores face falling sales during COVID-19
pandemic; several retailers have been stuck with last season stocks. People are wary of
entering stores and may continue to prefer online shopping. During the pandemic there
is both shortage in demand and supply for the retailers as well as for customers.
1
1.2 Statement of problem
In this pandemic situation of covid-19 every business activities are closed due to
lockdown and clothing stores are also one of them. To deal with this situation and to run
clothing store. The effect of covid-19 has spread rapidly throughout the world impacting
every aspects of daily life activities, including business of clothing stores. In an attempt
to continue business of clothing store following safety protocol which has set by the
government.
Clothing stores have been facing downfall on sales, stores closure , several retailers have
been stuck with last season stocks, some of the clothing store can’t keep up with
demands made by customer. Some of clothing stores cannot pay their rent and the
employee who work on clothing stores are losing their job, while some clothing stores
are trying to keep their employee employed. While customers wary of entering stores
and may continue to prefer online shopping because of safety concern.
To analyze what effect does covid-19 pandemic has made on clothing store.
To examine the effect of covid-19 on sales of clothing store.
To find out their operating channels while buying clothing apparel.
To examine what preventive measures they take during the pandemic
To examine the adjustments they have made since the beginning of pandemic.
To find out the source of their supply during the pandemic.
2
1.4 Literature review
Disruptions, in this sense, have been investigated from two main perspectives in the
literature. The first perspective focuses on the geographical location of the disruption.
More specifically, two types of disruption scenarios based on location have been
explored: local disruptions and local plus global disruptions (Sawik 2011; Paul et al. 2016;
Paul et al. 2017). In the case of local disruption, the events at issue involve a single
factory or supplier, such as a fire or the breakdown of machinery at a specific plant. On
the other hand, for the scenarios that entail both local and global disruptions, all or
some of the supply chain partners across the globe are simultaneously impacted (Ritchie
& Brindley 2000; Ivanov 2020a; Manuj & Mentzer 2008; Zhao et al. 2013). The other main
perspective on disruption considers the functions of the supply chains that are affected.
In this connection, research has considered supply-side disruption (Pal et al. 2014;
Gülpnar et al. 2014; Ray & Jenamani 2013; Wang & Yu 2020), production disruption (Paul
et al. 2019b; Bao et al. 2020), transportation and distribution disruption (Chaghooshi &
Moein 2014; Wilson 2007; Hishamuddin et al. 2015), demand-side disruption (Paul et
al. 2014a and b; Kirchoff et al. 2011; Ray & Jenamani 2016), and the combination of two
or more the previously listed types of disruption. This perspective focuses on how a
disruption in a particular function of a supply chain can imbalance the entire supply
chain network, due to the ripple effect it creates (Kim et al. 2014; Dolgui et al. 2020; Das
et al. 2019; Ivanov et al. 2019; Pavlov et al. 2019).
3
al. 2013), as well as collaborative strategies such as on-time and quality information
sharing (Sarkar & Kumar 2015; Chowdhury et al. 2016) and flexibility (Glenn et al. 2009),
have also been suggested for purposes of disruption management. The proper
configuration of resources and infrastructure is also required, along with disruption
orientation, to ensure that firms can manage disruptions efficiently (Ambulkar et
al. 2015). These strategies for managing disruption can make a supply chain more
resilient (Tang 2006).
Transparency is a vital step towards a more sustainable future for the industry. What we
can’t see, we cannot fix.
If major brands and retailers publish information about who their suppliers are and how
they do business with them, then brands can be held to account for leaving their
suppliers and supply chain workers in the lurch during such a terrible public health and
financial crisis.
Since the outbreak, fashion brands have reportedly stopped taking deliveries while
clothing is piling up in warehouses during the lockdown. By the time stores reopen
these products may well be considered ‘out of season’. This begs the question: what will
happen to all of these perfectly good items and all the material that was used to make
them? Will they be sold, reused, given to charities, go to landfill, be incinerated,
recycled? Fashion already has such a huge waste problem; will this crisis exacerbate the
problem or will companies accelerate the development of better textile recycling
technology?
4
Furthermore, as people are forced to stay at home and retail stores continue to be
closed around the world, the demand for clothing has plummeted. It is causing people
to reassess and reprioritise what they spend money on. This could result in fashion
trends slowing down for a while and potentially influence brands to focus on delivering
fewer, better quality products to remain profitable. Or, things could go back to business-
as-usual with a focus on speed and high- volume production. However, we suspect that
consumers and brands will have to adapt to a new normal, what that looks like only
time will tell but taking action to mitigate the issues we will learn about throughout the
course, will be more important than ever.
5
1.5 Research methodology
To serve the purpose of research paper descriptive research design is used. Primary data
is collected with the help of close ended questionnaire.
This study is mainly focused on the primary data. Therefore the main tool used for the
data collection is questionnaire.
6
The study involves sample size of 30 respondents. The study is taken from the retailers
through questionnaire form.
7
CHAPTER II
DATA ANALYSIS AND MAJOR FINDINGS
The objective of this chapter is to give the results of the data analysis and interpret the data into
findings. Besides, it also answers the research questions and tests the proposed hypotheses.
Mainly, the statistical methods of analysis were discussed, which included descriptive analysis,
correlation analysis and regression analysis through SPSS version 20.
2.1 Through which social media site are you most influenced by when purchasing fashion
Table 1 : social media site are you most influenced by when purchasing fashion.
Frequency Percent
facebook 17 56.7
instagram 9 30
other 4 13.3
Total 30 100
13%
facebook
instagram
30% 57% other
Table 1 and figure 1 shows the social media site influence to the retailers while purchasing fashion. Out
of 30 respondent 57% retailers are influenced by facebook, 30% were influenced by instagram whereas
13% retailers are influenced by other social media sites.
8
2.2 Which market channels do retailers operate through.
Frequency Percent
physical stores 13 43.3
brand website 6 20
3rd party 11 36.7
Total 30 100
37%
43% physical stores
brand website
3rd party
20%
Table 2 and figure 2 shows the marketing channels of retailers. Out of 30 respondents 43% operate
their market through going in physical stores, 20% operate their market channel through brand website
and other 37% retailers operate their market through 3 rd party.
9
2.3 primary verticals operate by clothing store.
Frequency Percent
apparel fashion 11 36.7
sports wear 6 20
foot wear 5 16.7
all of above 8 26.7
Total 30 100
27%
37% apparel fashion
sports wear
foot wear
all of above
17%
20%
Table 3 and figure 3 show the vertical did the clothing store operate in. Out of 30 respondent 36%
clothing store operate in apparel fashion, 20%on sportswear, 17% on footwear and other 27% operate
on all of the above verticals.
10
2.4 Covid effect on clothing store
Frequency Percent
most negatively 8 26.7
somewhat negatively 13 43.3
mostly positive 4 13.3
somewhat positive 5 16.7
Total 30 100
17%
27%
most negatively
13% somewhat negatively
mostly positive
somewhat positive
43%
Table 4 and figure 4 show how covid -19 has effect the business of clothing store. Out of 30 respondent
27% of clothing store have been affected mostly negatively, 43% of clothing store have been affected
somewhat negatively, 13% of clothing have been affected mostly positively and other 17% of clothing
store have been affected somewhat positive.
Frequency Percent
physically store closed 20 66.7
salary reduction 5 16.7
ecommerce facility closed 1 3.3
reduction in workforce 13.3 13.3
11
Total 30 100
34%
physically store closed
salary reduction
51% ecommerce facility closed
reduction in workforce
3%
13%
Table 5 and figure 5 show the preventive measures implemented by clothing stores. Out of 30
respondents 51% of clothing store have been closed, 13% of clothing store reduce the salary of its
employee, 2% of clothing store have closed their ecommerce facility and 34% of clothing store have
reduce their workforce.
Frequency Percent
get back to business as asap 10 33.3
focus on moving more business to online channels 9 30
focus on getting physical store back 8 26.7
focus on retention 3 10
Total 30 100
12
10%
30%
Table 6 and figure 6 shows that the how they will adapt the new normal. Out of 30 respondents 33% of
clothing store will try to get back to business as soon as possible, 30% of clothing store will focus on
moving more business to online channels, 27% of them will focus on getting physical store back and
other 10% will focus on retention.
2.7 when did they expect the new normal will immerge.
Frequency Percent
in the mid of 2020 1 3.3
in the end of 2020 12 40
2021 17 56.7
Total 30 100
13
23%
1
2
3
77%
Table 7 and figure 7 shows the prediction of retailers predict when the new normal immerge. Out of 30
respondents 23% predict that pandemic will end in the end of 2021, where others have expect that it
will end in 2021.
14
CHAPTER III
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
This chapter summarizes the whole study, presents the conclusions and forwards the
recommendations on the basis of the major findings.
15
The Findings of the Study are as follows:
It shows the social media site influence to the retailers while purchasing
fashion. Out of 30 respondent 57% retailers are influenced by facebook,
30% were influenced by instagram whereas 13% retailers are influenced
by other social media sites.
It shows the vertical did the clothing store operate in. Out of 30
respondent 36% clothing store operate in apparel fashion, 20%on
sportswear, 17% on footwear and other 27% operate on all of the above
verticals.
It shows how covid -19 has effect the business of clothing store. Out of 30
respondent 27% of clothing store have been affected mostly negatively,
43% of clothing store have been affected somewhat negatively, 13% of
clothing have been affected mostly positively and other 17% of clothing
store have been affected somewhat positive.
It shows that the how they will adapt the new normal. Out of 30
respondents 33% of clothing store will try to get back to business as soon
as possible, 30% of clothing store will focus on moving more business to
16
online channels, 27% of them will focus on getting physical store back and
other 10% will focus on retention.
3.2 Conclusion
The covid-19 pandemic has greatly affected the business around the world one of
them is clothing stores. Clothing stores of lamjung besisahar has also been affected
by the covid-19. So some of the clothing stores of lamjung, besisahar trying to
stabalize , others are still struggling to cope up with the pandemic. Almost all of the
stores are willing to open physically and some of them are trying to transform into
online marketing. Half of the stores believe that there will be loss this year, and
other half is trying to maintain their sales. Some of the stores use preventive
measures like reduction on work force, cutting salaries of their employee to cut off
cost.
3.3 Recommendation
In this situation of pandemic where physical communication is not possible
so, communicate yours customers through facebook, google hangout or
other social platforms.
18
1. Adeleke OM, Daniel AO, Ojeleke OM (2020) Supply chain risk
management and performance of quoted food and beverage firms in
Nigeria Opaleye. Ilorin J Hum Resour Manag 4(1):237–246
19
9. Chen J, Sohal AS, Prajogo DI (2013) Supply chain operational risk
mitigation: a collaborative approach. Int J Prod Res 51(7):2186–
2199. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2012.727490
10.Choi T (2020) Innovative “ Bring-Service-Near-Your-Home ” operations
under Corona-Virus ( COVID-19 / SARS-CoV-2 ) outbreak : can logistics
become the messiah? Transp Res Part E
140:101961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2020.101961
11. Chowdhury P, Lau KH, Pittayachawan S (2016) Supply risk mitigation of
small and medium enterprises: a social capital approach. In: The
proceedings of 21st international symposium on logistics. Nottingham
University, Nottingham, Centre for Concurrent Enterprise, pp 37–44
12. Chowdhury P, Lau KH, Pittayachawan S (2019) Operational supply risk
mitigation of SME and its impact on operational performance: a social
capital perspective. Int J Oper Prod Manag 39:478–502
13. Chowdhury P, Paul SK (2020) Applications of MCDM methods in research
on corporate sustainability: a systematic literature review. Manag Env Qual
31:385–405. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-12-2019-0284
14.Creswell JW (2013) Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and
mixed methods approaches, 4th edn. Sage Publications, Inc, Thousand
Oaks, California
15. Darom NA, Hishamuddin H, Ramli R, Mat Nopiah Z (2018) An inventory
model of supply chain disruption recovery with safety stock and carbon
emission consideration. J Clean Prod 197:1011–
1021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.246
16. Das A, Gottlieb S, Ivanov D (2019) Managing disruptions and the ripple
effect in digital sup-ply chains: empirical case studies. In: Ivanov D, Dolgui
A, Sokolov B (eds) Handbook of the ripple effects in the supply chain.
Springer, New York, pp 261–285
17. Dasaklis TK, Pappis CP, Rachaniotis NP (2012) Epidemics control and
logistics operations: a review. Int J Prod Econ 139:393–
410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.05.023
20
19. Dolgui A, Ivanov D, Rozhkov M (2020) Does the ripple effect influence the
bullwhip effect? An integrated analysis of structural and operational
dynamics in the supply chain. Int J Prod Res 58:1285–
1301. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1627438
20. Eisenhardt KM (1989) Building theories from case study research.
Acad Manag Rev 14:532–550
21