Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CA Intermediate Auditing & Assurance Dec 2021 Suggested Answers
CA Intermediate Auditing & Assurance Dec 2021 Suggested Answers
in
CA Intermediate
Auditing & Assurance
Dec 2021
Suggested Answers
f) Incorrect. 2
Reason: As per Section 139 (5) of the Companies Act, 2013, in the case of a
government company, the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India (CAG) shall
appoint the subsequent auditor within a period of 180 days from commencement
of the financial year.
g) Correct. 2
Reason: As per Rule 11 of the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rule, 2014, the
auditor has to disclose the impact of pending litigations (if any) on the financial
position of the company.
h) Incorrect. 2
Reason: As per Section 143 read with Rule 13 of the Companies (Audit and
Auditors) Rules, 2014, in the case of a fraud involving an amount of ₹1 crore or
above, the auditor shall report the matter to the Board or the Audit Committee, as
the case may, immediately but not later than 2 days of his knowledge of the fraud,
seeking their reply and observation within 45 days.
2.
a) As per SA 210, “Agreeing the Terms of Audit Engagement”, in order to establish the 4
presence of preconditions of an audit, the auditor shall:
1. Determine whether the financial reporting framework is acceptable.
2. Obtaining the agreement of management that it acknowledges and understands
its responsibility for:
✓ preparation of financial statements as per acceptable financial reporting
framework,
✓ for the internal control as management considers necessary, and
✓ to provide the auditor with:
i) access to all information such as records documentation and other
matters;
ii) additional information that the auditor may request from management
for the purpose of audit;
iii) unrestricted access to persons within the entity from whom the auditor
may obtain audit evidence.
b) The attitude of the audit assistants is not justified and they should keep an open 4
mind. Following are some discussion points for the same:
1) Businesses may vary in nature, size and composition; work which is suitable to
one business may not be suitable to others; efficiency and operation of internal
controls and the exact nature of the service to be rendered by the auditor are
the other factors that vary from business to business. Evolving one audit
programme applicable to all businesses under all circumstances is not
practicable
2) Further, there should be periodic reviews of the audit programme to
assess whether the same continues to be adequate for obtaining requisite
knowledge and evidence about the transactions. Unless this is done, any change
in the business policy of the client may not be adequately known, and
consequently, audit work may be carried on, on the basis of an obsolete
programme and, for this negligence, the whole audit may be held as negligently
Since, as per the question, KSR Ltd. has diversified its business into newer areas,
earlier year audit programme may not serve the right approach. Thus, the auditor
of KSR Ltd. should review and update the audit programme on timely basis.
c) i) The desired level of assurance: An increase in the auditor’s desired level of 3
assurance that tolerable misstatement is not exceeded by actual misstatement
in the population will increase the sample size. Hence, the greater the level of
assurance that the auditor requires that the results of the sample are, in fact,
indicative of the actual amount of misstatement in the population, the larger
the sample size needsto be.
ii) Stratification of the population: Stratification is the process of dividing a
population into subpopulations, each of which is a group of sampling units that
have similar characteristics (often monetary value). When the stratification of
the population is appropriate, then sample size will decrease as when there is a
wide range (variability) in the monetary size of items in the population, it may
be useful to stratify the population. When a population can be appropriately
stratified, the aggregate of the sample sizes from the strata generally will be
less than the sample size that would have been required to attain a given
level of sampling risk, had one sample been drawn from the whole population.
d) When a business operates in a more automated environment, it is likely that we 3
will see several business functions and activities happening within the systems.
Consider the following aspects:
✓ Computation and Calculations are automatically carried out (for example,
bank interest computation and inventory valuation).
✓ Accounting entries are posted automatically (for example, sub-ledger to GL
postings are automatic).
✓ Business policies and procedures, including internal controls, are applied
automatically (for example, the delegation of authority for journal approvals,
customer credit limit checks are performed automatically).
✓ Reports used in business are produced from systems. Management and other
stakeholders rely on these reports and information produced (for example,
debtors ageing report).
✓ User access and security are controlled by assigning system roles to
users(for example, segregation of duties can be enforced effectively).
3.
a) The auditor shall request the management to provide a written representation that 4
it has fulfilled its responsibility for the preparation of the financial statements in
accordance with the applicable financial reporting framework.
The auditor may also ask management to reconfirm its acknowledgement and
understanding of those responsibilities in written representations in following
situations:
✓ Those who signed the terms of the audit engagement on behalf of the entity no
longer have the relevant responsibilities;
✓ The terms of the audit engagement were prepared in a previous year;
✓ There is any indication that management misunderstands those
responsibilities; or
✓ Changes in circumstances make it appropriate to do so.
b) 1) In addition to the procedures undertaken for verifying rights and obligations, 4
completeness etc of additions to PPE during the period under audit, the
auditor, while performing testing of additions, should also verify that all
PPE purchase invoices are in the name of the entity that entitles legal title of
ownership to the respective entity.
2) For all additions to land, building in particular, the auditor should obtain copies
of the conveyance deed/sale deed to establish whether the entity is
mentioned to be the legal and valid owner.
3) The auditor should insist and verify the original title deeds for all immovable
properties held as at the balance sheet date.
4) In case the entity has given such immovable property as security for any
borrowings and the original title deeds are not available with the entity, the
auditor should request the entity’s management for obtaining a confirmation
from the respective lenders that they are holding the original title deeds of
the immovable property as security.
5) In addition, the auditor should also verify the register of charges available
with the entity to assess that any charge has been created against the PPE.
c) While the auditor may also choose to analyse the monthly trends for expenses like 3
rent, power and fuel, repairs and maintenance, insurance, travelling, miscellaneous
expenses, etc. Further, an auditor generally prefers to vouch for such expenses to
verify the following attributes:
✓ Whether the expenditure pertained to the current period under audit.
✓ Whether the expenditure qualified as revenue and not a capital expenditure.
✓ Whether the expenditure had valid supporting documents like travel tickets,
insurance policy, third party invoice, etc.
✓ Whether the expenditure has been classified under the correct expense head.
✓ Whether the expenditure was authorised as per the delegation of authority
matrix.
✓ Whether the expenditure was in relation to the entity’s business and not a
personal expenditure.
d) The following disclosures, as required under Schedule III (Part 1) of the Companies 3
Act, 2013, shall be made in the financial statements:
Cash and Cash Equivalents:
i) Cash and cash equivalents shall be classified as:
✓ Balances with banks;
✓ Cheques, drafts on hand;
✓ Cash on hand;
✓ Others (specify nature);
ii) Earmarked balances with banks (for example, for unpaid dividends) shall be
separately stated.
iii) Balances with banks to the extent held as margin money or security against the
borrowings, guarantees, other commitments shall be disclosed separately.
iv) Repatriation restrictions, if any, in respect of cash and bank balances shall be
separately stated.
v) Bank deposits with more than 12 months’ maturity shall be disclosed
separately.
4.
a) As per SA 250, “Consideration of Laws and Regulations in an Audit of Financial 4
Statements”, the following are the examples of types of policies and procedures an
entity may implement to assist in the prevention and detection of non-compliance
with laws and regulations:
✓ Monitoring legal requirements and ensuring that operating procedures are
designed to meet these requirements.
✓ Instituting and operating appropriate systems of internal control.
✓ Developing, publicizing and following a code of conduct.
✓ Ensuring employees are properly trained and understand the code of conduct.
✓ Monitoring compliance with the code of conduct and acting appropriately to
discipline employees who fail to comply with it.
✓ Engaging legal advisors to assist in monitoring legal requirements.
✓ Maintain a register of significant laws and regulations with which the entity has
to comply within its particular industry and a record of complaints.
In larger entities, these policies and procedures may be supplemented by assigning
appropriate responsibilities to the following:
✓ An internal audit function.
✓ An audit committee.
✓ A compliance function.
b) i) The company has raised money by public issue: The auditor shall state in his 4
report as per Companies (Auditor’s Report) Order, 2016, whether the money
raised by way of an initial public offer or further public offer (including debt
instruments) during the year were applied for the purposes for which those are
raised, if not, the details together with delays or default and subsequent
rectification, if any, as may be applicable, be reported.
ii) The company has made a private placement of shares: The auditor shall state in
his report as per Companies (Auditor’s Report) Order, 2016, whether the
company has made any preferential allotment or private placement of shares
or convertible debentures (fully, partially or optionally convertible) during the
year and if so, whether the requirements of section 42 and section 62 of the
Companies Act, 2013 have been complied with and the funds raised have been
used for the purposes for which the funds were raised, if not, provide details in
respect of amount involved and nature of the non-compliance.
c) Yes. The auditor of Sunshine Ltd.’s view is correct that due to greater management 3
intervention to specify the accounting treatment, the risk of material misstatement
is greater for non-routine transactions.
Risks of material misstatement may be greater for significant non-routine
transactions arising from matters such as the following:
✓ Greater management intervention to specify the accounting treatment.
✓ Greater manual intervention for data collection and processing.
✓ Complex calculations or accounting principles.
✓ The nature of non-routine transactions, which may make it difficult for the
entity to implement effective controls over the risks.
d) The auditor can independently verify the correctness of some expenses. He can do 3
so by using analytical procedures as given in SA 520. Some of the examples are as
follows:
1) An abnormal fall in the cost of manufacture or that in the administrative cost,
apart from the economy in expenses, there could be no provision or less
provision for expenses incurred in the year. When it is suspected, the auditor
should compare the entries in the outstanding book with those in the previous
year. He must also check the vouchers for one month immediately before the
close of the following years. To verify that none of the expenses in the accounts
under audit has been charged to the accounts of the following years. Often it is
possible to independently verify the correctness of some of the items of
expenses included in the Statement of Profit and Loss.
2) The cost of importing goods that are subjected to an ad-valorem duty at a
uniform rate can be verified from the amount of duty paid. Similarly, the
quantity sold can be verified independently from the amount of GST paid.
3) Similarly, the amount of any income or expenses which has a direct
relationship with the amount of profits or that of sales can be verified
independently, e.g.,commission paid to a manager calculated on the basis of
net profits, commission paid to a selling agent as a percentage of sales, etc.
Such calculation of ratios, trends and comparisons is also termed as analytical
review.
5.
a) The auditor shall form an opinion on whether the financial statements are prepared, 4
in all material respects, in accordance with the applicable financial reporting
framework.
In order to form that opinion, the auditor shall conclude as to whether the auditor
has obtained reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a
wholeare free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
That conclusion shall take into account:
✓ Whether sufficient appropriate audit evidence has been obtained;
✓ Whether uncorrected misstatements are material, individually or in aggregate;
✓ The evaluations.
b) As per Section 140 (2) of the Companies Act, 2013, if the auditor has resigned from 4
the company, he shall file a statement in Form ADT-3 with the company and the
Registrar within a period of 30 days from the date of such resignation. The auditor
shall indicate the reasons and other facts that are relevant with regard to his
resignation.
As per Section 140 (3) of the Companies Act, 2013, if the auditor does not comply
with the above provisions, then the auditor shall be liable to a penalty of ₹50,000,
or an amount equal to the remuneration of the auditor, whichever is less. In the
case of a continuing failure, the auditor shall be liable to a further penalty of ₹500
for each day after the first during which such default continues but subject to a
maximum of ₹5 Lakhs.
Facts of the case:
CA G was appointed as the auditor of RJ Ltd. at the remuneration of ₹35,000. He
resigned after 7 months on health grounds but failed to file the required statement
with the Registrar of Companies.
Conclusion:
In the present case, CA G has to follow the above procedures in order to properly
resign from the company.
c) The procedure used by the auditor is inspection. 3
1) The inspection involves examining records or documents, whether internal or
external, in paper form, electronic form, or other media, or a physical
examination of an asset. Inspection of records and documents provides audit
evidence of varying degrees of reliability, depending on their nature and source
and, in the case of internal records and documents, on the effectiveness of the
controls over their production.
2) The reliability of information to be used as audit evidence, and therefore of the
audit evidence itself, is influenced by its source and its nature, and the
circumstances under which it is obtained, including the controls over its
preparation and maintenance where relevant. Therefore, generalisations about
the reliability of various kinds of audit evidence are subject to important
exceptions. Even when information to be used as audit evidence is obtained
from sources external to the entity, circumstances may exist that could affect
its reliability.
d) Rule 11 of the Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014 prescribes the other 3
matters to be included in the auditor’s report. The auditor’s report shall also
include their views and comments on the following matters:
1) Whether the company has disclosed the impact, if any, of pending litigations on
its financial position in its financial statement;
2) Whether the company has made provision, as required under any law or
accounting standards, for foreseeable material losses, if any, on long term
contracts including derivative contracts;
3) Whether there has been any delay in transferring amounts required to be
transferred to the Investor Education and Protection Fund by the company.
4) Whether the management has represented that, to the best of its knowledge
and belief, other than as disclosed in the notes to the accounts, no funds have
been advanced or loaned or invested (either from borrowed funds or share
premium or any other sources or kind of funds) by the company to or in any
other person or entity, including foreign entities (Intermediaries), with the
understanding, whether recorded in writing or otherwise, that the
Intermediary shall, whether, directly or indirectly lend or invest in other
persons or entities identified in any manner whatsoever by or on behalf of
the company (Ultimate Beneficiaries) or provide any guarantee, security or the
like on behalf of the Ultimate Beneficiaries;
5) Whether the management has represented that, to the best of its knowledge
and belief, other than as disclosed in the notes to the accounts, no funds have
been received by the company from any person or entity, including foreign
entities (Funding Parties), with the understanding, whether recorded in
writing or otherwise, that the company shall, whether, directly or indirectly,
lend or invest in other persons or entities identified in any manner
whatsoever by or on behalf of the Funding Party (Ultimate Beneficiaries) or
provide any guarantee, security or the like on behalf of the Ultimate
Beneficiaries;
6) Based on such audit procedures that the auditor has considered reasonable
and appropriate in the circumstances, nothing has come to the notice that has
caused them to believe that the representations under sub-clause (i) and (ii)
contain any material misstatement;
7) Whether the dividend that is declared or paid during the year by the company
is in compliance with section 123 of the Companies Act, 2013.
6.
a) As per the present case, cases of frauds has been already detected and reported by 4
cost auditor. Hence the auditor CA R will do following:
1) He should apply professional skepticism to evaluate/verify that the fraud was
indeed identified/detected in all aspects by the management or through the
company’s vigil/whistleblower mechanism so that distinction can be clearly
made with respect to frauds identified/detected due to matters raised by the
auditor vis-a-vis those identified/detected by the company through its
internal control mechanism.
2) If a suspected offence of fraud has already been reported under section 143
(12) by another auditor like cost auditor, and the auditor becomes aware of
such suspected offence involving fraud, he need not report the same since he
has not identified the suspected offence of fraud. So CA R will do report it
again.
3) Further, since the fraud that involved is more than ₹1 crore, CA R should
review the steps taken by the management/those charged with governance in
respect of the fraud, and if he is not satisfied with such steps, he should state
the reasons for his dissatisfaction in writing and request the
management/those charged with governance to perform additional procedures
to enable him to satisfy himself that the matter has been appropriately
addressed. If the management/those charged with governance fail to
undertake appropriate additional procedures within 45 days of his request, CA
R would need to evaluate to check whether he should report the matter to the
Central Government in accordance with the prescribed rules.
4) Also, CA R should report whether the fraud in accordance with Companies 4
(Auditor’s Report) Order, 2020.
OR
The audit programme for the audit of accounts of local bodies shall include:
Auditor’s Concerns: The auditor, while auditing the local bodies, should report on
the following:
✓ Fairness of the contents and presentation of financial statements.
✓ Strengths and weaknesses of the system of financial control.
✓ The adherence to legal and/or administrative requirements.
✓ Whether the value is being fully received on money spent.
Besides the above points, he should also look into the following:
1) Rules & Regulations: The auditor should ensure that the expenditure incurred
conforms to the relevant provisions of the law and is in accordance with the
financial rules and regulations framed by the competent authority.
2) Authorizations: He should ensure that all types of sanctions, either special or
general, are accorded by the competent authority.
3) Provisioning: He should ensure that there is a provision of funds and the
expenditure is incurred from the provision, and the same has been authorized
by the competent authority.
4) Performance: The auditor should check that the different schemes,
programmes and projects, where large financial expenditure has been
incurred, are running economically and getting the expected results.
b) 1) Bank’s Duties: Banks should ensure that drawings in the working capital 4
account are covered by the adequacy of the current assets. Drawing power is
required to be arrived at based on the current stock statement. However,
considering the difficulties of large borrowers, stock statements relied upon by
the banks for determining drawing power should not be older than three
months. The outstanding in the account based on drawing power calculated
from stock statements older than three months is deemed as irregular.