Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 76

BE 2601

Management Principles,
Competencies and Skills

Welcome Back!

Dr Koh Cheng Boon


1
Group Project

Dr Koh Cheng Boon


Senior Lecturer
2
LMO, NBS-NTU
Each Seminar Group will have 2 shifts

Seminar Groups Shift 1 Shift 2

2 0830 – 1000 hrs: Teams 6, 1, 2 1000 – 1130 hrs: Teams 4, 5, 3

6 0830 – 1000 hrs: Teams 2, 4, 6 1000 – 1130 hrs: Teams 5, 3, 1

7 1430 - 1600 hrs: Teams 1, 6, 5 1600 – 1730 hrs: Teams 3, 2, 4

3/9/2020

3
Project Work (Group) Report
(30% of total grade)
Learning Outcomes:

1. Evaluate and apply the relevant theoretical management concepts and principles to
the context of the question

2. Demonstrate critical thinking, reasoning and evaluative analysis skills by providing


supporting justifications and illustrations

3. Communicate, critique and present the research findings

4. Show creative thinking with the inclusion of novel ideas and recommendations with
good supporting analysis Due Dates:
1. Seminar Group 2: 01 Apr (W) 1130 hrs
2. Seminar Group 6: 02 Apr (Thu) 1130 hrs
3/9/2020 3. Seminar Group 7: 02 Apr (Thu) 1730 hrs)

4
Requirements: Project Work (Group) Report

Perform research to identify and analyze the management strategies and practices of
an organization which exemplify how it manages change, achieve sustainability and
competitiveness while achieving productivity and stability in its business operations.
You are required to perform your analysis within any 1-2 of the following scope of
elements:

• Types of Strategic Planning involving Long-Term Survival and Growth


• Organization’s Structure and/or Organisation Culture
• Competition in the Global Market
• Effectiveness and Efficiency of the Organizational Controls and Processes
• Leadership
• Quality Management
• Competitive advantage through Human Resource Management

3/9/2020 5
Requirements (Con’t)

• Please note that you are to decide on the appropriateness of the above
scope based on the problem that you have identified from the selected
organization.

• Focusing on any one (1) of the element is adequate. Alternatively, if your


discussion requires a broader scope, it is advisable to keep to a maximum of
any 2 elements of the above scope.

• The time-frame for the case should be examined from its present/current (i.e.
“real-time”) context.

3/9/2020 6
Assessment Rubric

3/9/2020 7
Possible Resources
The organization selected must have a workforce of not less than 100 employees. It may be a Singapore-based organization or any regional or global
organization. The group can elect to conduct the research through publication or official website search or an interview with the organization. The source/s of the
information and data contained in your research must be provided in your report.

Below are some possible sources for your project but you are not constrained to pick from this list:

• World’s Most Admired Companies – Hay Group partners with Fortune Magazine to pick an annual list.

• Press Releases – Singapore 1000 and Singapore SME 1000 Ranking

• Aon Hewitt’s Best Employers study – annually

• Singapore HR Award, organized annually by Singapore HR Institute

• International Enterprise Singapore, formerly known as Singapore Trade Development Board (TDB)

• Singapore Indian Chamber of Commerce & Industry


a) SICCI-DBS Singapore Indian Entrepreneur Award
b) SICCI-DBS Singapore-India Business Award
c) SICCI-DBS Indian Enterprise Award

• Business Excellence Awards by SPRING such as Singapore Quality Award, Innovation Award, People Excellence Award 8

• HRM Awards
3/9/2020
Project Work (Group) Submission

Submission date is by 48 hours from the ending time of students’ respective seminar session in Week 11 through NTULearn
(Turnitin).

• All sources are to be cited, properly referenced and used correctly inline to Harvard or APA referencing style.

• Report is to be organized, concise, and have a clear write-up with proper paragraphing

• Refer to ‘Penalties and Academic Integrity’ of this ‘Course Assessment’ document (p. 6) for the “Student Assignment Declaration Cover
Sheet”. You are required to submit the declaration cover sheet together with coursework assignments.

• The softcopy of the Student Assignment Declaration cover sheet form will be available via NTULearn at your respective SEM sites,
under the folder ‘Course Information (Course Outline & Course Assessment Document)’

• Upload the 3,000-word essay to “Turnitin Assignment” for plagiarism check. (Note: Do not use the lecture site. Use your own seminar
group website).

• Submit the final version of your group project work report through NTULearn to “Turnitin Assignment” of the seminar you belong to. You
will work with your group and submit the report as per deadline advised above.
9

3/9/2020
Project Work (Group) Presentation
The presentation will be scheduled on week 12 during the seminar session.

The following instructions are to assist as a reference guide for the Project work report and Presentation.

Instructions/Guidelines:

Group report (30% of the total marks)

• The Project Work is based on a well analysed and argued written report (group), weighted at 30% and a formal oral presentation (group) of the
report, weighted at 15% which includes your performance on peer evaluation.

• The dates for the oral presentation are scheduled in Week 12 during the Seminar session. Further specific time slots for the groups and instructions will be
advised by the respective tutors upon term commencement.
• Format: The research report should be written in 3,000 words with Times New Roman font (size 12) for main text, double-spacing, with a tolerance level of +/-
5% of word count limit.
• There should be a cover page with all group members’ details and an executive summary included, but the word count excludes these two pages.
• The work presented must make extensive use and application of appropriate theories or concepts considered within the module and from independent reading
of the subject (both textbooks and academic journals).
• Full reference details (inline to Harvard or APA referencing style) must be included with respect to the academic literature and all other sources of information
used (reference to and use of material from the internet such as Wikipedia are not acceptable).
• The essay should be presented in an appropriate and professional style with a coherent structure, logic and connected line of analysis, evaluation and
reasoning.
• The report must be submitted in MS words format and not in PDF format.
• Word limit: 3,000 words (with a tolerance level of +/- 5%). The headings, in-text citations and footnotes are included in the word count. The title page,
diagrams, figures, tables, list of references and appendices are all excluded from the word count. However, please note that tables, diagrams, figures should
only have key pointers within them, i.e. in short phrases. If they comprise of long sentences, then this is not allowed and the word count within the tables, 10
diagrams or figures will be counted in. You should state the number of words on the front title page of your report.

3/9/2020
Project Work (Report): Assessment Rubric

3/9/2020

11
Project Work (Report): Assessment Rubric

3/9/2020

12
Group Presentation and Peer Appraisal

3/9/2020 13
Team Presentation

3/9/2020 14
Group Project:
Briefing

Dr Koh Cheng Boon


Senior Lecturer
15
LMO, NBS-NTU
Project Work (Group) Report
(30% of total grade)
Learning Outcomes:

1. Evaluate and apply the relevant theoretical management concepts and principles to
the context of the question

2. Demonstrate critical thinking, reasoning and evaluative analysis skills by providing


supporting justifications and illustrations

3. Communicate, critique and present the research findings

4. Show creative thinking with the inclusion of novel ideas and recommendations with
good supporting analysis

3/9/2020

16
Lesson 11:

Globalisation and the Manager – Managing


the Global Market

17
Why Globalisation and Management?

 Alibaba Holding Group achieved S$17.7 Billion in recording-shattering 24-hr


buying spree.

 Three times more than the Black Friday and Cyber Money put together

Chinese companies are buying businesses such as Starwood Hotel,


Smithfield Foods, and GE’s Appliance Business.

“Globalisation and the Manager” is an important topic.

Source: https://www.techinasia.com/alibaba-smashes-records-sells-billion-on-singles-day

18

Nanyang Business School Nurturing Global Leaders for a Sustainable World


Closer to Home: Regional

19

Nanyang Business School Nurturing Global Leaders for a Sustainable World


Globalisation and the Manager

20

Nanyang Business School Nurturing Global Leaders for a Sustainable World


Managing in a Global Environment

21
Managing in a Global Environment

Impacts on us…

22

Nanyang Business School Nurturing Global Leaders for a Sustainable World


Which one describe you?

Education is not about theories or degree BUT to educate your mind to think Going to be
different and be prepare for the real-world…..including assignments: we are here to tough world out
help you to develop your thinking, attitude (meticulous, learning attitude)… there…..

23

Nanyang Business School Nurturing Global Leaders for a Sustainable World


Managing in a Global Environment

Set of forces or conditions outside Organization's


boundaries

Affects the way organization operates


Global
Environment
Change over time

Presents opportunities and threats

24

Nanyang Business School Nurturing Global Leaders for a Sustainable World


Global Environment
Example: Huawei
Set of forces or conditions outside
Organization's boundaries
How experience creates global
leadership
Affects the way organization
operates Building on the founder’s philosophy, Huawei has moved to an
employee performance system that measures “global
experience”, an important criterium for identifying future leaders.
As Zhengfei noted: “You need to get down and manage at the
front lines to get a true tasting of things. To qualify for greater
Change over time responsibility, you need successful experience in the field.” A
belief exists in Huawei that leaders of global (and virtual) teams
Things are going to be need to be able to diagnose and interpret potential cultural
tripwires in the group. In other words, one needs to be able to
different in VUCA understand and deal with how cultural differences might impact
Presents opportunities and threats environment….. team functioning to take up leadership within Huawei.

Are you READY?


https://www.london.edu/lbsr/lessons-from-huawei-when-chinese-companies-go-global 25

Nanyang Business School Nurturing Global Leaders for a Sustainable World


Globalisation

• Set of specific and general forces that work together to


integrate and connect economic, political and social systems
across countries, cultures or geographic regions

• Nations and people become increasingly interdependent


because the same forces affect them in similar ways

• Global organisations operate and compete both domestically


and globally

26

Nanyang Business School Nurturing Global Leaders for a Sustainable World


Forces in Global Environment

27
Forces in the Global Environment

General Environment (Macro Environment)

Economic
Technological
Task Environment (Competitive Environment)
Social
Competitors
Cultural Organization (Internal Environment)
Distributors
Demographic
Customers
Political
Suppliers
Legal

28

Nanyang Business School Nurturing Global Leaders for a Sustainable World


Key Issues of the Global Environment

29
Key Issues of the Global Environment

Profile of Trading Partners in Singapore

1. Number of trading partners increased from 188 in


1985 to 239 in 2007

2. G2 countries have traditionally been important


trading merchandise export has been decreasing
over the years.

3. Trade with Emerging Asian Countries, especially


with China grew robustly.
Ref: International Enterprise Singapore
https://slideplayer.com/slide/5810251/

30

Nanyang Business School Nurturing Global Leaders for a Sustainable World


Economic

31

Nanyang Business School Nurturing Global Leaders for a Sustainable World


Key Issues of the Global Environment

32
Consequences of Global Economy

• Expansion of international trade


• Foreign direct investments
• Imports penetrating deeper into world’s largest economies
• Home markets under attack from foreign competitors
• Opportunities are greater
• Environment more complex and competitive

Source: https://www.thebalance.com/globalization-and-its-impact-on-
economic-growth-1978843

33

Nanyang Business School Nurturing Global Leaders for a Sustainable World


Outsourcing and Offshoring

34
Outsourcing and Offshoring
Changi Airport
Group
• Contracting with outside provider
Outsourcing
• Achieve lower costs and improve
product quality of design

Banks offshoring more than


80,000 tech jobs
• Moving work to other countries
Offshoring
• Increases efficiency by tapping on
Specialized talents abroad.

Deutsche Bank recently said it intends to


shift 8,000 jobs to lower cost destinations, while
both Credit Suisse and UBS are accelerating
moving IT jobs away from Switzerland and
Singapore towards India and Eastern Europe.
Sources: https://news.efinancialcareers.com/ca- 35
en/134803/banks-offshore-as-many-tech-jobs-as-apple-
employs/
Nanyang Business School Nurturing Global Leaders for a Sustainable World
Factors to consider for Offshoring

What is the competitive advantage of the


products they offer?

Is the business in its early stages?

Can production savings be achieved locally?

Can the entire supply chain be improved?

36

Nanyang Business School Nurturing Global Leaders for a Sustainable World


Organizational Models

37
Organizational Models

Pressure for Global Integration


Global Transnational
High View the world as a single Specialized facilities permit
market. local responsiveness.

Operations are controlled Complex co-ordination


Two important considerations: centrally from the corporate mechanism provide global
office. integrations
1. Pressure for Global Integration
Multinational
2. Pressure for local responsiveness Low International
Several subsidiaries operating
Uses existing capabilities to as stand-alone business units
expand into foreign markets in multiple countries

Low High
Pressure for local responsiveness
38

Nanyang Business School Nurturing Global Leaders for a Sustainable World


Organizational Models

Pressures for global integration


Competitors

Cost reduction

Universal needs

Examples: Semiconductor chips, certain basic food,


appliances

40

Nanyang Business School Nurturing Global Leaders for a Sustainable World


Organizational Models

Pressures for local responsiveness


Difference in traditional practices

Distribution channels

Sales practices

 Economic and political demands of host countries

41

Nanyang Business School Nurturing Global Leaders for a Sustainable World


Organizational Models

Global Transnational
High Specialized facilities permit local
Pressure for Global
View the world as a single market.
Integration responsiveness.
Operations are controlled centrally from
the corporate office. Complex co-ordination mechanism
provide global integrations

Multinational
Low International
Several subsidiaries operating as
Uses existing capabilities to expand into stand-alone business units in multiple
foreign markets countries

Low High

Pressure for local responsiveness


42

Nanyang Business School Nurturing Global Leaders for a Sustainable World


Organizational Models: WHY?

Managers need to know and able to


determine the best strategy to compete
in Global marketplace.

Change is the only constant.

Remember to embrace it especially when


you are older….Remember what I said
today!

43

Nanyang Business School Nurturing Global Leaders for a Sustainable World


Organizational Models: International

International:
 Existing Core Capabilities to
expand into foreign markets

 Few pressures for economies of


scale or local responsiveness.

44

Nanyang Business School Nurturing Global Leaders for a Sustainable World


Organizational Models: International

Subsidiaries under Greater control by


parent company

Parent Company has control over:

 Research function
 Local Product
 Marketing Strategies

45

Nanyang Business School Nurturing Global Leaders for a Sustainable World


Organizational Models: International

High Integration and


Low Responsiveness
Level for pressure for Global Integration

High Advantages:
Low Integration and
Low Responsiveness  Facilitates the transfer of skills and know-how from the
parent company to global subsidiaries

Disadvantages:

Low  Does not provide latitude to respond to local


conditions

 Does not provide opportunity to achieve low-cost


Low High
position via scale of economies
Level for local responsiveness

46

Nanyang Business School Nurturing Global Leaders for a Sustainable World


Organizational Models: Multinational

Multinational
Global efficiency is not required, but
need to cater for local responsiveness
Multinational
 Manufacturing
Several subsidiaries operating as stand-
alone business units in multiple countries  Marketing
to meet the demands for local  Research
responsiveness
 Human Resources

47

Nanyang Business School Nurturing Global Leaders for a Sustainable World


Organizational Models: Multinational

Multinational
Global efficiency is not required, but
need to cater for local
responsiveness, examples such as
Heineken – Netherland-based
brewing company

With THREE Major global brands:  Adapt products to local attitudes and taste while maintaining its
high quality.
Heineken, Amstel, Affligem
 The company produces more than 250 brands around the world

48

Nanyang Business School Nurturing Global Leaders for a Sustainable World


Organizational Models: Multinational

Disadvantages:
 Higher manufacturing costs and duplication of efforts because
each subsidiary has their own functional departments
Advantages (manufacturing, marketing, research, HR)

 Transfer core skills among its  Cannot realise the economies of scale
international operation
 No standardized product to the global marketplace

 Launching coordinated global attacks against competitors is


difficult – great disadvantage if competitors have the ability to
do so.

49

Nanyang Business School Nurturing Global Leaders for a Sustainable World


Organizational Models: Transnational

Competitive advantages through: pursue local


responsiveness, transfer of know-how, and cost
economies
Decision Decision
Making Making

 Specialized facilities permit local Decision Centralised Decision


responsiveness. Making Functions Making

 Complex co-ordination mechanism


provide global integrations
Decision Decision
Making Making

51

Nanyang Business School Nurturing Global Leaders for a Sustainable World


Organizational Models: Transnational

Advantages
 Experiences of local subsidiaries are shared
worldwide to improve firm’s overall knowledge and Disadvantages:
capabilities
 Complex co-ordination
 Low cost of manufacturing: Optimal balance
between skills and costs.

 Ability to integrate the efforts of subsidiaries, deploy


talents/managers

52

Nanyang Business School Nurturing Global Leaders for a Sustainable World


Organizational Models: Transnational

Think Global Act Local

53

Nanyang Business School Nurturing Global Leaders for a Sustainable World


Organizational Models: Global

 View the world as a single market.

 Operations are controlled centrally


from the corporate office.

55

Nanyang Business School Nurturing Global Leaders for a Sustainable World


Organizational Models: Global

Disadvantages Advantages
 May be less responsive to  Centralised manufacturing – realise the
consumer tastes and demands in scale economies by spreading the fixed
different countries costs of investments in new product
development, plants and equipment and
 Needs a great deal of the like all over the world.
coordination with significant
amount of management and  Push down unit costs through centralised
paperwork costs manufacturing.

 Subsidiaries focused on marketing and


service functions

56

Nanyang Business School Nurturing Global Leaders for a Sustainable World


Organizational Models: Global

• Example: Sony

• Reasons: Cut cost, Skill, Market share

• Similar Customers’ tastes and product


preferences in different countries

57

Nanyang Business School Nurturing Global Leaders for a Sustainable World


Entry Modes

Entry Modes

 Exporting
 Franchising
 Joint Venture
 Licensing
 Wholly-
owned
subsidiaries

58
Entry Modes
Entry Modes: Export
 Exporting
 Franchising
 Joint Venture
 Licensing
Advantages of  Wholly-
Disadvantages of owned
Exporting: Exporting: subsidiaries
 Avoid costs of  High transporting cost
manufacturing abroad
 Cost of manufacturing
 Consistent global might be lower in
strategy other countries

 Tariff barriers

59

Nanyang Business School Nurturing Global Leaders for a Sustainable World


Entry Modes
Entry Modes: Franchise Business
 Exporting
 Franchising
 Joint Venture
 Licensing
Limited rights to use brand name
 Wholly-
owned
subsidiaries

60

Nanyang Business School Nurturing Global Leaders for a Sustainable World


Entry Modes
Entry Modes: Franchise Business
 Exporting
 Franchising
 Joint Venture
Advantages of  Licensing
Franchising:  Wholly-
owned
 Share risks subsidiaries

 Capital investments Disadvantages of


Franchising:
 Licenses its
technologies expertise  Quality Control
to overseas companies

61

Nanyang Business School Nurturing Global Leaders for a Sustainable World


Entry Modes
Entry Modes: Joint Venture
 Exporting
 Franchising
 Joint Venture
 Licensing
 Wholly-
owned
subsidiaries

62

Nanyang Business School Nurturing Global Leaders for a Sustainable World


Entry Modes
Entry Modes: Joint Venture
 Exporting
 Franchising
 Joint Venture
 Licensing
Manufacturing  Wholly-
owned
Rights subsidiaries

63

Nanyang Business School Nurturing Global Leaders for a Sustainable World


Entry Modes
Entry Modes: Joint Venture
 Exporting
 Franchising
 Joint Venture
 Licensing
 Wholly-
Advantages of Joint owned
Venture: subsidiaries
Disadvantages of Joint
 Need not bear costs Venture:
and risk of opening up
an overseas market  Licensing its technological
expertise to overseas
companies

64

Nanyang Business School Nurturing Global Leaders for a Sustainable World


Entry Modes: Joint Venture

Parent Corporation

Wholly owned Wholly owned Wholly owned


subsidiary subsidiary Subsidiary

65

Nanyang Business School Nurturing Global Leaders for a Sustainable World


Entry Modes: Joint Venture

Preferred modes of entry in the following industries:

 Semiconductor

 Electronics

 Pharmaceutical

66

Nanyang Business School Nurturing Global Leaders for a Sustainable World


Pros and Cons of Different Entry Modes

Exporting Licensing Franchising Joint Ventures Wholly Owned


Subsidiary
 Scale economies  Lower development  Lower development  Local knowledge  Maintain control
Pros costs costs over technology
 Consistent global  Shared costs and
strategy  Lower political risk  Lower political risk risk  Maintain control
over operations
 May be the only
option
 No low-cost sites  Loss of control over  Loss of control over  Loss of control  High cost
Cons technology technology over technology
 High transportation  High risk
costs  Conflict between
partners
 Tariff barriers

67

Nanyang Business School Nurturing Global Leaders for a Sustainable World


Managing Across Borders

68
Managing Across Borders

Host country Third-country


Expatriates
nationals nationals

• Individuals from • Natives of host- • Natives who are


parent company country where not from home
sent to work at overseas country or host-
foreign subsidiary subsidiary is country
located

69

Nanyang Business School Nurturing Global Leaders for a Sustainable World


Cultural Issues

70

Nanyang Business School Nurturing Global Leaders for a Sustainable World


Examples of cultural differences

• Americans tend to have specific views about the purpose of meetings and how much
time can be spent.

• International workers may have different preconceptions about the nature and
length of meetings and managers should make sure that foreign nationals are
comfortable with the American approach.

• Workers from other countries can work long hours but countries with strong labour
organisations often get more weeks of vacation than American workers.

• Europeans may balk at working on weekends.


71

Nanyang Business School Nurturing Global Leaders for a Sustainable World


Questions?

72

Nanyang Business School Nurturing Global Leaders for a Sustainable World


Class Activities

73
The Planet Starbucks

74
World Café: The Planet Starbucks

Question1
Discuss with supporting reasons the benefits to Starbucks from
expanding internationally?

Question 2
Explain the reasons why do you think Starbucks has been so successful
internationally?

Question 3
Identify Starbucks’ primary approach in entering the international
market. What are the benefits of this entry strategy?

Question 4
(a) What are the advantages of a joint venture entry mode for Starbucks
over entering through wholly owned subsidiaries?
(b) On occasion, though, Starbucks has chosen a wholly owned
subsidiary to control its foreign expansion. Why?

75
Case study: The Planet Starbucks

 Coffee bean in 1987 in Seattle’s famed Pike Place Market


 Today 8000 outlets in more than 30 countries, revenue in
excess of $3.3 Billion.

 Chairman and Chief Strategist: Howard Schultz


 Started in 1994 with first acquisition – The Coffee Connection
Inc., a 23-store Boston rival.
 Expansion from 400 in 1994 to 8000
 First Overseas Foreign partner in 1996 – Tokyo

 How: Starbucks purchases only speciality coffee at prices


higher than others

 Three strategies for international operations: Joint Venture,


Licensing, and wholly-owned operations

Nanyang Business School Nurturing Global Leaders for a Sustainable World


Case study: The Planet Starbucks (Con’t)

 United States : Two-thirds wholly owned , other joint-venture with vendors servicing
bookstores, hotels, college, campuses and airports. Other joint venture agreements
include Peps, Dreyer’s Grand Ice Cream, United and Canadian Airlines and hotel chains
such as Host Marriot International and Hyatt Hotel Corp

 Outside United States: One-third – company –owned, the rest partnerships.

 Asia: Licensing as “winning Formula” – generally worked well but became disenchanted
with some of the arrangements and converted several to joint-venture arrangements.

 Korea: ESCO Korea Ltd in 1999, 10 stores in double quick time

 Switzerland: Joint Venture

Nanyang Business School Nurturing Global Leaders for a Sustainable World


Are your ready?

For

Nanyang Business School Nurturing Global Leaders for a Sustainable World


World Café

Question1
Discuss with supporting reasons the benefits to Starbucks from expanding internationally?

Question 2
Explain the reasons why do you think Starbucks has been so successful internationally?

Question 3
Identify Starbucks’ primary approach in entering the international market. What are the benefits of this entry strategy?

Question 4
(a) What are the advantages of a joint venture entry mode for Starbucks over entering through wholly owned subsidiaries?
(b) On occasion, though, Starbucks has chosen a wholly owned subsidiary to control its foreign expansion. Why?

79

Nanyang Business School Nurturing Global Leaders for a Sustainable World

You might also like