Methodology 2.1 Modeling: Pak. J. Engg. Appl. Sci. Vol. 25, July., 2019

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 1

Pak. J. Engg. Appl. Sci. Vol. 25, July.

, 2019

and simulation tools. It is observed that increased


thickness requires higher actuation voltage while
increased length requires less voltage for actuation
[9]. Ansari studied sensitivity of MC with hole
near its fixed end using FEM simulation and found
thickness is directly related to sensitivity of MC of
this design [10]. Hawari studied the effects of
shape over sensitivity of MCs using ANSYS
simulations he obtained maximum deflections and
natural frequencies for 6 different shapes to study
their sensitivity [11]. Paul studied the effects of
substrate materials over sensitivity of MC and
concluded that it should be necessarily accounted Fig. 1: 2 sets of beams showing difference of gap
in sensitive applications [12]. height from beam to substrate
In the study of nonlinear dynamics of MCs
Another 2 sets of sketches are again drawn
it is seen that main cause of these non-linearity are
flexural rigidity especially these are occurring and extruded to remove the materials between the
because of varying lengths of the beams [13-16]. beams to give them the shape of cantilever. At the
end the sketches are drawn and extruded to get the
In the present study, effects of ambient different gap heights and thicknesses to make the
pressures, effects of this pressure over gap heights beams set different. Upper set is given the
of a micro cantilevers array and effects of thickness of 2.25 µm and gap height of 6.3 µm
substrate materials are studied. Modal Analysis while lower set is given gap height of 2.5µm and
and Transient Analysis are performed in Ansys thickness of beams is kept as 2.5µm as its cross-
Workbench to obtain the natural frequencies of the sectional view is shown in Fig.1 and an isometric
MC Array and FRF curves for two models having view is also shown in Fig. 2, difference of
difference in their substrate materials. These thickness and gap heights is indicated by arrows.
natural frequencies provided with a direct
comparison of sensitivity of two models while
FRF curves are analyzed to obtain damping ratios
and quality factors of both models. A comparison
of damping ratios and quality factor has been
made between two models to check for the more
sensitive model on these ambient pressures.

2. Methodology

2.1 Modeling
The comb like structure is modeled in
Ansys Design modeler in micro units. Base of the
structure (substrate) is modeled first so that other
Fig. 2: MCs Array; upper set have thickness of
beams structures may be constructed over it. Base
2.25µm and lower set has thickness of
has dimensions as 1000*300µm while its
2.5µm
thickness is kept as 30µm. 2 similar sets of
sketches are constructed, each set consisting of 4
beams of lengths 800,700,600 and 300 µm. The 2.2 Material Assignment
sketches are extruded later to get two set of beams. Simulations are done over 2 different
All the beams are having same width of 20µm. models having different substrates while the
These sketches are also used to print the faces beams material is same for both models. First
under the beams to get the perfect mesh. The two model is assigned material of N Type silicon while
sets are different in their gap heights from the 2nd is assigned as Quartz. Beams are made of
substrate and the thickness of the beams which polysilicon for both models. The materials
will be described later. properties are given in the table 1 below:

44

You might also like