Chapter 9.flood Control Plans 9.1 Basic Concepts For Formulating Flood Control Plans

Study of the Dolok-Penggaron River System
and Design of the East Floodway, Final Report

under JICA Loan IP-534 on Flood Control
CHAPTER 9. FLOOD CONTROL PLANS
9.1 Basic Concepts for Formulating Flood Control Plans

Considering the problems and issues as well as the proposed direction of flood control described in Chapter 8,
followings are the proposed basic concepts for formulating flood control plans.
(1) River System Principle: Treatment of Floods within Each River

System as much as possible
It is necessary to solve flood problems within each river system as much as possible,
and not to make adverse impacts to the neighboring river system in principle.
Therefore, the flood controls for the Penggaron River System and the Dolok River
System are better to be conducted separately as follows:
1) Penggaron River System:
 River improvements of the East Floodway (KBT), Babon River and Dombo-
Sayung River
2) Dolok River System
 River improvement of the Dolok River
 Stop inter-basin flood transfer from the Dolok River System to the Penggaron
River System through the Kebon Batur Canal
 To close the inlet gate of the Kebon Batur Canal during floods after
completion of the future river improvement of the Dolok River.
 To open the inlet gate in normal period for flowing down water through the
Dolok River and the Kebon Batur Canal for maintaining water use and
riverine environment.
(2) Design Scale: 50-Year Return Period
 Design scale of flood control shall be 50-year return period for the Penggaron River
System (KBT, Babon River and the Dombo-Sayung River) and the Dolok River.
9.2 Conditions of Setting Design Discharge
Conditions of setting design discharge in the Penggaron River System and the Dolok River System are proposed as
follows:
(1) Design Discharge in the Upstream Reach of the KBT: 140m 3/s
The design discharge in the upstream reach of the KBT is to be set at 140m 3/s for
considering the original design discharge of the Inlet Gate of 145m 3/s (source: Detail
Desain Sistem Sungai Dolok Penggaron (Kanal Banjir Timur – Dombo Sayung),
PT.Jasapatria Gunatama, November 2009 (DD study)).
However, according to the hydraulic model test conducted in 2007, if the 6 sliding
gates of the inlet gate of KBT are fully opened under the high floodwater level in the
Penggaron River, about 215m3/s will be discharged through the inlet gate to the KBT.
Hence, in order to limit the discharge through the inlet gate of KBT with maximum
140m3/s under the condition of design discharge of the Penggaron River, only 4 sliding
gates among the 6 gates can be fully opened during floods (215/6 x 4 =143m3/s). It is
based on the rating curve of KBT made by the hydraulic model test in 2007. The rest
of the 2 gates are to be closed during the floods.
CTI Engineering International Co., Ltd. 1

with Associates
Final Report and Design of the East Floodway,
on Flood Control under JICA Loan IP-534
(2) Design Discharge in the Upstream Reaches of the Babon River

and the Dombo-Sayung River
Division of the discharge to the Babon River through the Penggaron Weir and to the
Dombo-Sayung River through the Gergaji Weir at Pucanggading from the discharge
of the Penggaron River at downstream of the inlet gate of KBT shall be divided based
on the rating curves of the Hydraulic Model Test in 2007 for the above DD Study.
The divided discharges based on the rating curves shall be the design discharges of
the upstream reaches of the Babon River and the Dombo-Sayung River.
It is noted that the flood discharge before the division is the flood discharge of the
Penggaron River after inflow of flood discharge through the inlet gate of KBT.
(3) Design Discharge of Kebon Batur Canal: gate closing during floods
Design discharge to the Kebon Batur Canal shall be 0m 3/s by closing the inlet gate of
the Canal during floods after completion of the future river improvement of the
Dolok River.
The inlet gate can be opened during normal period for water use and riverine
environment.
(4) Design Discharge in the Upstream Reach of the Dolok River: without or with the
Proposed Dolok Dam
Alternative cases of the design discharges in the upstream reaches of the Dolok River
shall be set under the condition of two cases: with the proposed Dolok Dam in the
upstream of the existing Barang Weir (Alternative A site in the feasibility study of the
Dolok Dam) or without Dolok Dam.
9.3 Alternatives of Flood Control Plans
Based on the proposed “River System Principle for Flood Control” as described in the section 9.1, the Penggaron
River System and the Dolok River System are proposed to be separated for flood control by closing the inlet gate of
the Kebon Batur Canal during floods. Considering this, alternatives of flood control are set separately for the
Penggaron River System (the KBT, Babon and Dombo-Sayung River) and the Dolok River System (Dolok River).
9.3.1 Alternatives of the Penggaron River System

As described in the sub-section 2.2.2 (Figure 2.2.4), there is the wide natural retarding basin in the Penggaron River
in the upstream of Pucanggading. For the flood control for the Penggaron River System downstream of Pucanggading
(KBT, Babon River and Dombo-Sayung River), how to utilize this natural retarding basin for flood control is one of
the key points. Considering this, following two alternatives are set for the Penggaron River System.
Alternative-1 (Alt-1): River improvements of the KBT, Babon and Dombo-Sayung

Rivers with the natural retarding basin (utilization of the natural
retarding basin as it is)
Alternative -2 (Alt-2): River improvements of the KBT, Babon and Dombo-Sayung
Rivers with strengthening of the retarding basin (increase of
retarding capacity by excavation) for reducing the flood peak
discharge of the Penggaron River at Pucanggading
Figure 9.3 .1 and Figure 9.3 .2 show the above alternatives of the flood control for the Penggaron River System.
It is to be noted that in order not to increase so much the design discharge of the downstream
reach of the Dombo-Sayung River by the inflow of runoff discharge from the drainage channels
between Dombo-Sayung River and the Dolok River, the runoff discharge is recommended to be
treated separately for flowing directly down to the sea instead of through the Dombo-Sayung
River.
2 CTI Engineering International Co., Ltd.

with Associates
N
Penggaron River System:
Jawa Sea
 Utilize the Natural Retarding
Basin as it is.
Dombo-Sayung  River Improvements of the KbT,
River Babon and Dombo-Sayung Rivers.
Dolok River System:
 Existing River
Dolok  Close the Inlet Gate of the Kebon
East Floodway River Batur Canal during floods
(KBT)
Babon
River Drainage
Improvement:
For not increasing Legend:
flood discharge of
KBT the Dombo- River
Candi Sayung River Main Drainage Channel
River Downstream so Major Road
much, drainage
Bajak water is Railway
River recommended to Existing Overflow Weir
Kudung Close gate
Mundu during be treated Existing Gated Weir
River floods separately for
flowing down to Natural Retarding
Pucanggading Basin
the sea.
River Improvement
Penggaron Drainage Improvement
River Kebon-
between Dombo-
Batur Canal Barang Weir Sayung and Dolok
Rivers
Figure 9.3.1 Penggaron River System_Alt-1: River Improvements and Utilization of the
Natural Retarding Basin
N
Jawa Sea
Basin as it is.
Dombo-Sayung  River Improvements of the KBT,
Dolok River System:
 Existing River
(KBT)
Babon
River Drainage
Improvement:
flood discharge of River
KBT the Dombo- Main Drainage Channel
Candi Sayung River
Downstream so Major Road
River
much, drainage Railway
Bajak water is Existing Overflow Weir
River recommended to
Kudung Close gate Existing Gated Weir
Mundu during be treated
River floods separately for Strengthening of the
flowing down to Retarding Basin
Pucanggading the sea. River Improvement
River Kebon- between Dombo-
Rivers
Figure 9.3.2 Penggaron River System_Alt-2: River Improvements and Strengthening of

the Retarding Basin

with Associates
9.3.2 Alternatives of the Dolok River System (Dolok River)

Four (4) alternatives of the Dolok Rivers are set based on the combination of the followings.
 Reduction of the peak discharge of the floodwater in the upstream by the proposed
Dolok Dam or without reduction of the peak discharge without Dolok Dam
 To follow the present river course in the upstream reach of the Dolok River for river
improvement or to construct a bypass floodway
Current river course in the upstream reach has many small meanderings and houses
and small towns along the river. For river improvement along the upstream reach
needs short-cuts of the meanderings. Bypass floodway is set for flowing down
floodwater by avoiding this present upstream reach with many meanderings and
houses. A control weir (gated weir or closing dike with a hole for flowing small
water quantity to the downstream) and an overflow weir are to be installed in the
Dolok River and the Bypass Floodway respectively to control water, so that only
floodwater enters into the Bypass Floodway during floods.
Alternatives considerable in the Dolok River improvements are as follows:
Alternative-1 (Alt-1): River improvement along the present river course without Dolok Dam
Alternative-2 (Alt-2): River improvement and the Bypass Floodway without Dolok Dam
Alternative-3 (Alt-3): River improvement along the present river course with Dolok Dam
Alternative-4 (Alt-4): River improvement and Bypass Floodway with Dolok Dam to Figure
9.3 .6 show the above alternatives of the Dolok River. Starting site of the Bypass
Floodway is shown in .
Jawa Sea
Dombo-Sayung
River Dolok River System:
 River Improvement
 Close the Inlet Gate of the Kebon
Dolok
East Floodway Batur Canal during floods
River
(KBT)  Without Dolok Dam
Babon
River
 Existing Rivers
 Existing Natural Retarding Basin
KBT
Candi
River
Bajak
River Legend:
Kudung Close gate River
Mundu during Major Road
floods
River Railway
Pucanggading Existing Overflow Weir
Existing Gated Weir
Penggaron Natural Retarding
River Kebon- Basin
Batur Canal Barang Weir River Improvement
Figure 9.3.3 Dolok River_Alt-1: River Improvement without Dolok Dam

with Associates
Jawa Sea
Dolok River System:
Dombo-Sayung  River Improvement and Bypass
River
Floodway
 Close the Inlet Gate of the Kebon
Dolok
Batur Canal
East Floodway River  Without Dolok Dam
(KBT) Penggaron River System:
Babon
River  Existing Rivers
KBT
Candi Legend:
River River
Bajak Major Road
River Railway
Kudung Close gate Existing Overflow Weir
Mundu during
floods Existing Gated Weir
River
Natural Retarding
Pucanggading
Basin
Penggaron River Improvement
River Kebon- New Overflow Weir
Batur Canal Barang Weir New Control Weir
Close the Bypass Floodway
new gate
during
floods
Figure 9.3.4 Dolok River_Alt-2: River Improvement and Bypass Floodway without Dolok
Dam
Jawa Sea
Dombo-Sayung
River
Dolok River System:
 River improvement
(KBT)
Babon
 With Dolok Dam
River Penggaron River System:
 Existing Rivers
KBT
Candi
River
Bajak
River Legend:
Kudung Close gate River
Mundu during Major Road
floods
River Railway
Pucanggading Existing Overflow Weir
Existing Gated Weir
Penggaron Natural Retarding
River Kebon- Basin
Batur Canal Barang Weir River Improvement
Proposed Proposed Dolok Dam

Dolok Dam
Figure 9.3.5 Dolok River_Alt-3: River Improvement with Dolok Dam

with Associates
Jawa Sea
Dolok River System:
Dombo-Sayung
River  River Improvement and Bypass
Floodway
 With Dolok Dam
East Floodway River Batur Canal
(KBT) Penggaron River System:
Babon
River  Existing Rivers
KBT
Candi Legend:
River River
Bajak Major Road
River Railway
Mundu during
River
Natural Retarding
Pucanggading
Basin
River Improvement
Penggaron
Kebon- New Overflow Weir
River
Batur Canal Barang Weir New Control Weir
Close the Bypass Floodway
new gate Proposed
during Dolok Dam Proposed Dolok Dam
floods
Figure 9.3.6 Dolok River_Alt-4: River Improvement and Bypass Floodway with Dolok
Dam
Bifurcation Place of the Bypass View to the Starting Place of the Bypass
Floodway from the Dolok River Floodway
Legend:
Bypass
Floodway
Bypass Floodway Course

Figure 9.3.7 Photos of the Candidate Site of the Bifurcation Place of the Dolok
River and the Proposed Bypass Floodway

with Associates
9.4 Design Discharge of the Alternatives

Design discharges of the alternatives are set based on the hydrological and hydraulic simulation of the 50-year return
period of the Penggaron River System and Dolok River for the following cases.
1) Design Discharge of the Penggaron River System:

a) Alternative-1 (Alt-1): With the natural retarding basin in the upstream of
Pucanggading with KBT (140m3/s) and discharge to the Babon River and the
Dombo-Sayng River based on the rating curves of the overflow weirs at
Pucanggading.
b) Alternative-2 (Alt-2): With strengthening of the retarding basin by excavating
the retarding area and discharge to the KBT (140m 3/s) and discharge to the
Babon River and the Dombo-Sayung River based on the rating curves of the
weirs at Pucanggading. In this case, based on the simulation, due to delay of the
peak discharge reached to Pucanggading by retarding floodwater in the
retarding basin, simulated discharge along the KBT will be also reduced due to
time lag of joining the discharge from the tributaries along the KBT. However,
as it is difficult to fix the joining time of the hydrograph from the tributaries to
the KBT, the design discharge of the KBT is set at the same design discharge of
Alternative-1 (Alt-1) from the safe-side consideration.
Increase of peak discharge in the downstream reach of the Dombo-Sayung
River of Alternative-2 (Alt-2) becomes also smaller than that of Alt-1 due to
delay of peak discharge along the River, which makes bigger time difference of
the joining time with the runoff from the surrounding drainage channels.
Relating to the above, the design discharge in the downstream reach of the
Dombo-Sayung River will not increase with the inflow of runoff from the
surrounding drainage channels. Thus, it is recommended to treat separately the
runoff from the drainage channels between the Dombo-Sayung River and the
Dolok River, so that the runoff discharge from these drainage channels is
discharged separately and directly to the sea (refer to Section 9.11).
2) Design Discharge of the Dolok River:
a) Without Dolok Dam and inflow discharge to the Dolok River from its residual
sub-basin
b) With Dolok Dam and inflow discharge to the Dolok River from its residual sub-
basin
In the case of with Dolok Dam, reduction of peak discharge of the design flood is
calculated by flood routine analysis taking into account the storage volume above the
high water level (HWL) of the proposed Dolok Dam.

with Associates
9.4.1 Design Discharge of the Alternatives of Penggaron River System

Figure 9.4 .8 and Figure 9.4.2 show the design discharge of the alternatives of the Penggaron River.
N
Jawa Sea
Basin as it is.
Dombo-Sayung  River Improvements of the BKT,
River Babon and Dombo -Sayung Rivers.
Dolok River System:
 Existing River
(KBT)
Babon
River Drainage
Improvement:
Legend:
For not increasing
the Dombo- Main Drainage Channel
Candi Sayung River
Major Road
River Downstream so
Kudung Existing Gated Weir
Mundu be treated
separately for Natural Retarding
River Close gate
Basin
during flowing down to
Pucanggading River Improvement
floods the sea.
Drainage Improvement
Penggaron between Dombo-
River Kebon-
Sayung and Dolok
Batur Canal Barang Weir
Rivers
Figure 9.4.8 Penggaron River System_Alt-1: Design Discharge (50-Year Return Period)
N
Jawa Sea
 Strengthening of the Retarding
Basin by excavation.
River Babon and Dombo -Sayung Rivers.
Dolok River System:
 Existing River
(KBT)
Babon
River Drainage
Improvement:
the Dombo- Main Drainage Channel
Candi Sayung River
Downstream so Major Road
River
Mundu be treated
River Close gate separately for Strengthening of the
during flowing down to Retarding Basin
Pucanggading floods the sea. River Improvement
Rivers
Figure 9.4.9 Penggaron River System_Alt-2: Design Discharge (50-Year Return Period)

with Associates
Strengthening of the Retarding Basin:

For the Alt-2 of strengthening of the retarding basin, it is necessary to excavate the retarding area upstream of the
Pucanggading (length about 1.6km, maximum width about 550m, and area about 55ha).
One of the ideas of the Retarding basin is excavating the retarding area (see Figure 9.5.6). By keeping the low water
channel with bank height of 1 to 2m, necessary order of the excavation volume in this retarding basin to reduce flood
peak discharge of the Penggaron River at Pucanggading weir is estimated about 2.7 million m 3. However, as the
detailed topographic and river cross sectional data are not available in and around the retarding basin, the size of the
area and volume of the excavation are rough estimation based on the digital elevation model (DEM) with 2m x 2m
mesh. Hence, topographic survey and river cross sectional survey are necessary for detailed analysis (refer to 9.5.2).
Reference: Effect of Inflow Discharge from the Drainage Basin of D-9-1 and D-9-2:
Figure 9.4.3 and Figure 9.4.4 show the design discharge of the Dombo-Sayung River etc. under
the condition of inflowing the runoff discharge from the drainage channels between the Dombo-
Sayung River and the Dolok River (D-9-1 and D-9-2). In this case, the design discharge in the
downstream reach of the Dombo-Sayung River becomes 285m 3/s for Alt-1 and 180m3/s for Alt-
2, which are 1.8 to 2.1 times bigger than the case of without inflowing the runoff discharge of
D-9-1 and D-9-2 into the Dombo-Sayung River. This phenomenon makes river improvement to
be difficult especially due to many relocation of houses to be required by bigger design cross
sections. Therefore, it is recommended to drain D-9-1 and D-9-2 directly to the sea (not though
the Dombo-Sayung River).
N
Jawa Sea
Basin as it is.
Dolok River System:
 Existing River
(KBT)
Babon
River
Inflow
Legend:
runoff
River
discharge
Main Drainage Channel
of D-9-1
Candi Major Road
River and D-9-2
Railway
Bajak Existing Overflow Weir
River
Mundu Natural Retarding
River Close gate
Basin
during
Pucanggading floods River Improvement
Drainage Improvement
Penggaron between Dombo-
River Kebon-
Sayung and Dolok
Rivers
Figure 9.4.10 Alt-1 as Reference: Inflow Discharge of D-9-1 and D-9-2 to the Dombo-
Sayung River Downstream Reach

with Associates
N
Jawa Sea  Strengthening of the Retarding
Basin by excavation.
Dolok River System:
 Existing River
(BKT)
Babon
River
Inflow
runoff Legend:
discharge River
of D-9-1 Main Drainage Channel

Candi Major Road
River and D-9-2
Railway
Bajak Existing Overflow Weir
River
Mundu
River Close gate Strengthening of the
during Retarding Basin
Pucanggading floods River Improvement
Rivers
Figure 9.4.11 Alt-2 as Reference: Inflow Discharge of D-9-1 and D-9-2 to the Dombo-
Sayung River Downstream Reach

with Associates
9.4.2 Design Discharge of the Alternatives of the Dolok River

Design discharges of the alternatives of the Dolok River are shown in Figure 9.4 .12 to Figure 9.4 .15.
Jawa Sea
Dombo-Sayung
River
Dolok
East Floodway River
(KBT)
Babon
River
Candi Legend:
River River
KBT Major Road
Bajak
River Railway
Close gate
Kudung during
Existing Overflow Weir
Mundu floods Existing Gated Weir
River Natural Retarding
Pucanggading Basin
River Improvement
Penggaron
Kebon- Design Discharge of 50
River 380
Batur Canal Year Return Period
Barang Weir
(m3/s)
Figure 9.4.12 Dolok River_Alt-1: Design Discharge (50-Year Return Period)
Jawa Sea
Dombo-Sayung
River
Dolok
East Floodway River
(KBT)
Babon Legend:
River River
Major Road
Railway
KBT Existing Gated Weir
Candi
Natural Retarding
River
Basin
Bajak River Improvement
River Close gate
Kudung New Overflow Weir
during
Mundu New Control Weir
floods
River
Bypass Floodway
Pucanggading Bypass
Floodway Design Discharge of 50
380
Year Return Period
Penggaron (m3/s)
Kebon-
River
Close the
new gate
during
floods

with Associates
Jawa Sea
Dombo-Sayung
River
Dolok
East Floodway River
(KBT)
Babon
River
Candi Legend:
River River
KBT Major Road
Bajak
River Railway
Close gate
Kudung during
Mundu floods Existing Gated Weir
River Natural Retarding
Pucanggading Basin
River Improvement
Penggaron Proposed Dolok Dam
River Kebon-
Batur Canal Design Discharge of 50
Barang Weir 200
Year Return Period
Proposed (m3/s) with Dolok Dam
Dolok Dam
Jawa Sea
Dombo-Sayung
River
Dolok
East Floodway River
(KBT)
Babon
River Legend:
River
Major Road
Railway
KBT Existing Overflow Weir
Candi Existing Gated Weir
River
Natural Retarding
Bajak Basin
River Close gate River Improvement
Kudung
during New Overflow Weir
Mundu floods
River New Control Weir
Pucanggading Bypass
Bypass Floodway
Floodway
Proposed Dam
Penggaron
Kebon-
River 200 Design Discharge of 50
Batur Canal Barang Weir Year Return Period
Close the (m3/s) with Dolok Dam
new gate Proposed
during Dolok Dam
floods

with Associates
9.5 Hydrological and Hydraulic Study on the Alternative Flood Control

Plans
River water level and discharge for each alternative case were estimated by using one-dimensional hydrodynamic
model (MIKE11) and two-dimensional inundation model (MIKE21). The result of calculations is shown below.
9.5.1 Penggaron RS_Alternative-1

(1) Natural Retarding Area
Natural retarding area, which is shown in Figure 9.5 .1, is located upstream of
Pucanggading. Inundation model is used to represent existing flooding conditions in
the upstream area of Pucanggading. Hydrographs of inflow to the area and outflow
from the area are estimated as shown in Figure 9.5 .2.
Downstream of retarding area
Upstream of retarding area
Figure 9.5.1 Natural Retarding Area (50-year Return Period of Flood)

Penggaron River Discharge
700
Q:660 m3/s
600
Effect of Natural Q:530 m3/s
500 retarding area
Discharge (m3/s)
400
300
200
100
0
13:00
14:00
17:00
18:00
21:00
22:00
0:00
1:00
2:00
3:00
4:00
5:00
6:00
7:00
8:00
9:00
10:00
11:00
12:00
15:00
16:00
19:00
20:00
23:00
0:00
Figure 9.5.2 Calculated Hydrograph at Upstream and Downstream of Retarding Area

with Associates
(2) Structure of Hydraulic Model for Alternative-1 (MIKE11)

Hydrodynamic model is used to estimate water level and discharge of Alternative-1.
The structure of hydraulic model is shown below.
KBT
Babon
Candi Q
Dombo-sayung
Bajak Q QP：270m3/s
QP：140m3/s
Kedun Mundu Q QP：120m3/s
Penggaron Q
: Result of inundation
: Hydrodynamic model : Input Inflow data Analysis (MKE FLOOD)
(MKE11) Result of runoff analysis
Figure 9.5.3 Structure of hydraulic model for Alternative-1
Penggaron River BKT Candi Bajak Kedum mundu

600
500
Discharge (m3/s)
400
300
200
100
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Figure 9.5.4 Inflow Discharge to KBT

with Associates
(3) Result of Alternative-1

Cal water level（50year） River Bed Left Bank
BKT_longitudinal Water level & DIscharge Right Bank Low flow channel Cal discharge（50year）
30 Detail ed Design stretch 350
Candi River
25 300
Bajak River
20 Kedung Mundu 250
Water Level (m)
Discharge (m3/s)
15 200
10 150
5 100
0 50
-5 0
0
400
800
1,200
1,600
2,000
2,400
2,800
3,200
3,600
4,000
4,400
4,800
5,200
5,600
6,000
6,400
6,800
7,200
7,600
8,000
8,400
8,800
9,200
9,600
10,000
10,400
10,800
11,200
11,600
12,000
12,400
12,800
13,200
13,600
14,000
Distance from river mouth (m)
Babon River_longitudinal Water level & DIscharge Cal water level（50year）

Right Bank_rev
River Bed_rev
Low flow channel_rev
Left Bank_rev
Cal water level (org)
River Bed Low_water channel Existing River Bed
30 350
25 300
Water Level (m)
20 250
Discharge (m3/s)
15 200
10 150
5 100
0 50
-5 0
10,000
12,000
12,500
13,000
15,000
15,500
16,000
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
5,000
5,500
6,000
6,500
7,000
7,500
8,000
8,500
9,000
9,500
10,500
11,000
11,500
13,500
14,000
14,500
16,500
Dombo River_longitudinal Water level & DIscharge Cal water level（50year）

Right Bank
River Bed
Low flow channel
Left Bank
Existing River bed
Existing left bank Existing right bank Cal Discharge（50year）
45 210
180
35
Water Level (m)
150
Discharge (m3/s)
25
120
90
15
60
5
30
-5 0
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
5,000
5,500
6,000
6,500
7,000
7,500
8,000
8,500
9,000
9,500
0
500
10,000
10,500
11,000
11,500
12,000
12,500
13,000
13,500
14,000
14,500
15,000
15,500
16,000
16,500
17,000
17,500
18,000
18,500
19,000
Figure 9.5.5 Calculated Longitudinal Profile of Water Level and Discharge
9.5.2 Penggaron RS_Alternative-2

Alternative 2 is strengthening the natural retarding area for decreasing flow discharge to Pucanggading Weir. The
design discharge of the Babon and Dombo-Sayung rivers will be decreased.
Strengthening area is shown in Figure 9.5 .6. Hydrodynamic model (MIKE11) is used to estimate river discharge
and water level using plan cross section for retarding area. In order to more accurately grasp around the natural
retarding area, a satellite elevation model is purchased in this project. The digital elevation map is shown in Figure
9.5 .7 and the specification of satellite elevation data is shown in Table 9.5 .1.

with Associates
(1) Strengthening Area
Strengthening of the Retarding Basin by Excavation:

Area of the Retarding Basin: 54.6ha
Exsisting ground surface
Strengthening Area 1 to 2m
A=0.55 km2 Excavated ground surface
Excavation Volume: about 2.7 million m3
550m
1.6 km
Figure 9.5.6 Strengthening Area for Retarding Basin
Table 9.5.1 Specification of Satellite Elevation Data

Satellite Image :World View :2m DSM (2m mesh)
Projection Method :UTM/LatLon
Survey System :WGS84
Date of shooting :June 24, 2015
Resolution :0.56m
The reliability of hydraulic analysis to estimate retarding basin capacity highly

depends on the accuracy of ground elevation. To evaluate the capacity and excavation
volume of retarding area, the river cross section data was made by using satellite
elevation data.
These cross section data are shown in Annex-I-7.

with Associates
: Strengthening Retarding Area

: Cross section using 2m elevation data
Source: Study Team

Note: Satellite elevation data (2m_DSM data)
Figure 9.5.7 Satellite Elevation Data (2m DSM DEM data)
The excavation volume was estimated 2.7 million m 3 by using satellite elevation data.
The plan cross section was set that the low water channel depth was 1 to 2m.

with Associates
(2) The discharge at Pucanggading Weir

The flood peak discharge was reduced due to strengthening of the retarding area
(increase of retarding capacity by excavation). The flood discharge of existing
condition (natural retarding basin) and Alternative-2 (strengthening retarding area) is
shown as below.
<<Existing condition of the retarding basin>>
 Effect of natural retarding basin is 1,150,000m 3.

700
Q:660 m3/s
600
Effect of natural Q:550 m3/s
500 retarding basin
Discharge (m3/s)
1.15MCM
400
300
200
100
0
0:00
2:00
4:00
6:00
8:00
9:00
1:00
3:00
5:00
7:00
10:00
13:00
15:00
17:00
19:00
21:00
22:00
23:00
0:00
11:00
12:00
14:00
16:00
18:00
20:00
<<Alternative-2 Strengthening of the retarding basin>>

 Rivers with strengthening of the retarding basin (increase of retarding capacity by
excavation) for reducing the flood peak discharge at Pucanggading weir.
 Effect of natural retarding basin is 3,970,000m 3.
 The peak discharge at Pucanggading weir is 2 hours delay.

700
Q:660 m3/s
600
500 Q:390 m3/s

Discharge (m3/s)
400 Effect of natural

retarding basin
300 3.97MCM
200
100 2 hours delay
0
10:00
14:00
15:00
16:00
17:00
23:00
0:00
1:00
2:00
3:00
4:00
5:00
6:00
7:00
8:00
9:00
11:00
12:00
13:00
18:00
19:00
20:00
21:00
22:00
0:00
Figure 9.5.8 Calculated Hydrograph at Upstream and Downstream of Retarding Area

with Associates
(3) Structure of hydraulic model for Alternative-2 (MIKE11)

Hydrodynamic model is used to estimate water level and discharge of Alternative-2.
The structure of hydraulic model is shown as below.
Drainage
KBT basin
Babon
Dombo-sayung
Candi Q
Bajak Q
QP：
Kedun Mundu Q QP： The divided discharges

QP： based on the rating
curves of Hydraulic Test
in 2007 (refer to fig
3.2.3).
Penggaron Q
: Result of inundation
: Hydrodynamic model : Input Inflow data Analysis (MKE FLOOD)
(MKE11) Result of runoff analysis
Figure 9.5.9 Structure of hydraulic model for Alternative-2
(4) Result of Alternative-2

The result (longitudinal water level and discharge) of hydraulic calculation is shown
in Figure 9.5 .10.
Increase of peak discharge in the downstream reach of Dombo-Sayung River of
Alternative-2 becomes smaller than Alternative-1 due to delay of flood peak
discharge. The hydrograph in the downstream and upstream of Dombo-Sayung River
is shown in Figure 9.5 .11. As for hydraulic analysis result, drainage discharge flow
into the Dombo-Sayung River before the flood discharge flow to the Dombo-Sayung
River.

with Associates
Cal water level（50year） River Bed Low flow channel

BKT_longitudinal Water level & DIscharge Existing River Bed Existing Left Bank Exixting Right Bank
Cal discharge（50year）
28 320
26 Detail ed Design stretch 300
24 280
Candi River
22 260
20 Bajak River Kedung Mundu 240
Water Level (m)
18 220
Discharge (m3/s)
16 200
14 180
12 160
10 140
8 120
6 100
4 80
2 60
0 40
-2 20
-4 0
0
400
800
1,200
1,600
2,000
2,400
2,800
3,200
3,600
4,000
4,400
4,800
5,200
5,600
6,000
6,400
6,800
7,200
7,600
8,000
8,400
8,800
9,200
9,600
10,000
10,400
10,800
11,200
11,600
12,000
12,400
12,800
13,200
13,600
14,000
Babon River_longitudinal Water level & DIscharge Calculation Water level（50year）

Right Bank
River Bed
Low Flow Channel
Left Bank
Existing River Bed
Existing Left Bank Existing Right Bank Calculation Discharge（50year）
32 200
28 180
24 160
Water Level (m)
Discharge (m3/s)
20 140
16 120
12 100
8 80
4 60
0 40
-4 20
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
5,000
5,500
6,000
6,500
7,000
7,500
8,000
8,500
9,000
9,500
10,000
10,500
11,000
11,500
12,000
12,500
13,000
13,500
14,000
14,500
15,000
15,500
16,000
16,500
Dombo-Sayung River_Alt-2: Design Longitudinal Profile Cal water level（50year）

Existing River bed
River Bed
Existing left bank
Low flow channel
Existing right bank
Cal Discharge（50year）
35 120
Drainage basin [D-8-1]
30 : Station shows below hydrograph 105
25 Drainage basin [D-8-4]
90
Water Level (m)
Discharge (m3/s)
20 75
3,950m
15 60
6,150m 11,350m 18,850m
10 45
5 30
0 15
-5 0
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
5,000
5,500
6,000
6,500
7,000
7,500
8,000
8,500
9,000
9,500
10,000
10,500
11,000
11,500
12,000
12,500
13,000
13,500
14,000
14,500
15,000
15,500
16,000
16,500
17,000
17,500
18,000
18,500
19,000
Figure 9.5.10 Calculated Longitudinal Profile of Water Level and Discharge (Alt-2)
Dombo-Sayung Alt-2
DOMBO 3950.00 DOMBO 6150.00
DOMBO 11350.00 DOMBO 18850.00
120
100 Flood discharge peak

Discharge m3/s
Inflow from Drainage basin

80
60
Time of peak is different due
40 to the strengthening retarding
area at upstream of Penggaron
20 River.
0
0:00:00
1:00:00
2:00:00
3:00:00
4:00:00
5:00:00
6:00:00
7:00:00
8:00:00
9:00:00
10:00:00
11:00:00
14:00:00
15:00:00
16:00:00
19:00:00
20:00:00
21:00:00
23:00:00
12:00:00
13:00:00
17:00:00
18:00:00
22:00:00
Figure 9.5.11 Calculated Hydrograph (Alt-2)

with Associates
9.5.3 Dolok RS_Alternative-1

The result of alternative 1 is shown as below. Design discharge is set at 380 m3/s from analysis result.
Dolok River_longitudinal Water level & DIscharge Calculated water level River Bed Left Bank
Right Bank low-water channel Calculated discharge
55 480
45 400
Road
Water Level (m)
35 320
Discharge (m3/s)
Rail way
25 240
Road
15 160
5 80
-5 0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
5,000
5,500
6,000
6,500
7,000
7,500
8,000
8,500
9,000
9,500
10,000
10,500
13,500
14,000
14,500
15,000
17,500
18,000
18,500
19,000
21,500
22,000
22,500
23,000
0
11,000
11,500
12,000
12,500
13,000
15,500
16,000
16,500
17,000
19,500
20,000
20,500
21,000
23,500
24,000
24,500
25,000
Figure 9.5.12 Longitudinal Water Level and Discharge_Alt-1
5,000m
12,000m
:Hydrodynamic
model (MIKE11)
24,700m
Acc.Distance 5,000m Acc.Distance 12,000m

Dolok River Discharge Acc.Distance 24,700m
400
350
300
Discharge (m3/s)
250
200
150
100
50
0
0:00
2:00
4:00
7:00
9:00
0:00
1:00
3:00
5:00
6:00
8:00
10:00
11:00
12:00
13:00
14:00
15:00
16:00
17:00
18:00
19:00
20:00
21:00
22:00
23:00
Figure 9.5.13 Hydrograph_Alternative-1

with Associates
9.5.4 Dolok RS_Alternative-2


55 400
350
45
Road 300
Water Level (m)
35
Discharge (m3/s)
Rail way 250
25 200
Road 150
15
100
5
50
Dolok Bypass Flood way
-5 0
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
5,000
5,500
6,000
6,500
7,000
7,500
8,000
8,500
9,000
9,500
11,000
11,500
12,000
12,500
13,000
13,500
14,000
14,500
15,000
15,500
20,500
21,000
21,500
22,000
22,500
23,000
23,500
24,000
10,000
10,500
16,000
16,500
17,000
17,500
18,000
18,500
19,000
19,500
20,000
24,500
25,000
Figure 9.5.14 Longitudinal Profile of Water Level and Discharge_Alt-2
5,000m
12,000m
16,500m
Bypass
:Hydrodynamic
model (MIKE11)
25,500m

Dolok River Discharge Acc.Distance 16,500m Acc.Distance 25,500m
400
350
300
Discharge (m3/s)
250
200
150
100
50
0
0:00
1:00
2:00
3:00
4:00
5:00
6:00
7:00
8:00
9:00
11:00
12:00
14:00
15:00
18:00
21:00
0:00
10:00
13:00
16:00
17:00
19:00
20:00
22:00
23:00

with Associates
9.5.5 Set of Dolok Dam Outflow

(1) H-A-V Curve of Dolok Dam
According to the previous F/S study report (Feasibility Study Dan Basic Design
Bendungan Dolok Kapupaten Demak Provinsi Jawa Tengah,November 2015), H-V
and H-A curve of alternative-1 (optimum case) seems some strange curve around
EL.90m.
However, H-V curve was revised using H-A curve in this project. Revised H-V curve
is shown in Figure 9.5 .17.
Area is increasing but

Volume is not
increasing.
Source: Feasibility Study Dan Basic Design Bendungan Dolok Kapupaten Demak Provinsi Jawa
Tengah, November 2015
Figure 9.5.16 H-A-V Curve of Alternative-1
Revised H-V Revised H-V

120
110
100
EL. (m)
90
80
70
60
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Volume (MCM)
Figure 9.5.17 Revised H-V Curve

with Associates
(2) Outflow
Outflow of Dolok dam is estimated by using the revised H-V curve.
Table 9.5.2 Outflow of Dolok Dam (50 year)
Hour 50 year Return Period Reservoir Water Reservoir
Inflow Outflow Surface Storage Volume
3 3 3
(hr) (m /s) (m /s) (RL. m) (m )
0.0 0.0 102.0 0
1.0 0.1 0.0 102.0 181
2.0 0.1 0.0 102.0 544
3.0 0.1 0.0 102.0 905
4.0 0.1 0.0 102.0 1,264
5.0 0.1 0.0 102.0 1,621
6.0 0.1 0.0 102.0 1,975
7.0 0.1 0.0 102.0 2,325
8.0 0.1 0.0 102.0 2,673
9.0 0.1 0.0 102.0 3,017
10.0 0.1 0.0 102.0 3,357
11.0 1.6 0.0 102.0 6,352
12.0 91.2 2.9 102.1 170,536
13.0 316.9 32.6 102.5 856,086
14.0 250.4 87.8 103.0 1,656,810
15.0 146.5 115.9 103.2 1,993,881
16.0 92.1 118.3 103.3 2,021,774
17.0 53.9 104.6 103.2 1,862,829
18.0 38.3 89.6 103.0 1,679,332
19.0 30.5 76.0 102.9 1,505,648
20.0 21.5 64.3 102.8 1,346,825
21.0 17.5 54.4 102.7 1,203,908
22.0 19.0 46.7 102.7 1,088,423
23.0 21.1 41.3 102.6 1,002,619
24.0 11.8 36.4 102.6 921,588
25.0 10.7 31.7 102.5 839,709
26.0 4.6 27.3 102.5 760,973
27.0 1.5 23.1 102.4 681,262
28.0 0.5 19.5 102.4 608,283
29.0 0.2 16.6 102.3 544,841
30.0 0.1 14.1 102.3 490,379
104 500
103
RESERVOIR WATER SURFACE ELEVATION (m) .
102 400
101
DISCHARGE (m3/s) .
100 300
99
98 200
97
96 100
95
94 0
0.0 3.0 6.0 9.0 12.0 15.0 18.0 21.0 24.0 27.0 30.0
(Hour)
Reservoir… INFLOW… OUTFLOW…
Figure 9.5.18 Hydrograph of Dolok Dam

with Associates
9.5.6 Dolok RS_Alternative-3 (With Dolok Dam)

55 240
45 200
Road
Water Level (m)
35 160
Discharge (m3/s)
Rail way
25 120
Road
15 80
5 40
-5 0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
5,000
5,500
6,000
6,500
7,000
7,500
8,000
8,500
9,000
9,500
10,000
11,500
12,500
13,000
14,000
15,500
16,500
17,000
18,000
19,500
20,500
21,000
22,000
23,500
24,500
26,000
27,000
27,500
28,500
0
10,500
11,000
12,000
13,500
14,500
15,000
16,000
17,500
18,500
19,000
20,000
21,500
22,500
23,000
24,000
25,000
25,500
26,500
28,000
29,000
5,000m
12,000m
24,700m :Hydrodynamic
model (MIKE11)
Dolok Dam
Input estimated Dolok Dam outflow (refer to 9.5.5)

Dolok River Discharge Acc.Distance 24,700m
300
250
Discharge (m3/s)
200
150
100
50
0
0:00
1:00
2:00
3:00
4:00
5:00
6:00
7:00
8:00
9:00
10:00
11:00
12:00
13:00
14:00
15:00
16:00
17:00
18:00
19:00
20:00
21:00
22:00
23:00
0:00

with Associates
9.5.7 Dolok RS_Alternative-4 (With Dolok Dam)


55 240
45 200
Road
Water Level (m)
35 160
Discharge (m3/s)
Rail way
25 120
Road
15 80
5 40
Dolok Bypass Flood way
-5 0
500
0
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
5,000
5,500
6,000
6,500
7,000
7,500
8,000
8,500
9,000
9,500
10,000
10,500
16,000
16,500
17,000
17,500
18,000
18,500
19,000
19,500
20,000
24,500
25,000
11,000
11,500
12,000
12,500
13,000
13,500
14,000
14,500
15,000
15,500
20,500
21,000
21,500
22,000
22,500
23,000
23,500
24,000
5,000m
12,000m
16,500m
Bypass
:Hydrodynamic
model (MIKE11)
Dolok Dam 25,500m
Input estimated Dolok Dam outflow (refer to 9.5.5)

Dolok River Discharge Acc.Distance 16,500m Acc.Distance 25,500m
300
250
Discharge (m3/s)
200
150
100
50
0
2:00
3:00
5:00
6:00
7:00
9:00
10:00
11:00
12:00
13:00
14:00
15:00
16:00
17:00
18:00
19:00
20:00
21:00
22:00
23:00
0:00
1:00
4:00
8:00
0:00

with Associates
9.6 Design Profile and Design Cross Sections of the Alternative Flood
Control Plans
9.6.1 Concepts for Setting Design Bed Profile and Design Cross
Sections
In order to flow down safely the design discharge of floods and to maintain dynamic equilibrium condition of the
river bed profile, followings are the concepts for setting design bed profile and design cross sections.
(1) Design Bed Profile

 For considering stability of the riverbed profile under dynamic equilibrium
condition with movement of riverbed materials by flow including floods, the
design bed profile is set to follow the existing bed profile or ground profile or their
gradients as much as possible.
(2) Design Cross Sections
 The design discharge mainly will be conveyed through the low water channel to
ensure safety against floods. This will also minimize reconstruction of bridges by
making the minimal changes of existing river width.
 To ensure allowance height above the Design HWL by dikes or walls in principle
for safety against flood discharge.
 In order to keep dynamic equilibrium condition of the riverbed profile by keeping
movement of riverbed materials, the bigger water depth and velocity in the low
water channel shall be ensured as much as possible, especially in the downstream
reaches. For example, tractive force of water depth of 4m becomes about 20%
bigger than that of 3m in the downstream reaches. However, considering the
limitation such as depth of the footings of the existing major bridges etc., height of
the design low water channels is necessary to be adjusted.
 To provide revetment for both sides of the banks of the low water channels along
their entire stretches in order to protect banks and to keep the shape of the low
water channels in principle.
Concepts of setting design river bed are shown in Figure 9.6.1.
At least 1m.
River Improvements
At least 1m HL: Height of low

water channel
Bypass Floodway of
the Dolok River
D Example: BKT Downstream

Tractive Force (τ) τ (D4m) / τ (D3m) = about 1.2
Tractive Force
Figure 9.6.16 Concepts for Setting Design Cross Sections

with Associates
9.6.2 KBT: Design Profile and Typical Design Cross Sections

Design profiles including typical design cross sections of the Alt-1 and Alt-2 of the East Floodway (KBT) are the
same for both alternatives as shown in Figure 9.6.2 (1). This figure also shows the design high water level (HWL)
and design top of dikes or river walls (if necessary).
Considering the bank height of the existing low water channels in the mid-stream to upstream reaches (Majapahit
Bridge to the Inlet gate) with about 4m or more, the height of the low water channel of the typical cross sections in
these reaches is set at 4m.
In the downstream reach (Majapahit Bridge to the river mouth), considering the depth of the footings of the existing
bridges, the height of the low water channel is set at 3m.
Considering the present gradient of ground, the riverbed gradient in the downstream reach is set as same as the
existing ground gradient.
It is expected that deposition of sediment including wash load will definitely occur in the downstream reach
especially in the estuary. It will be necessary to conduct annual maintenance dredging of the river courses especially
in the downstream reach.
In addition, as an example of excessive flood, Figure 9.6.2 (2) shows water level of the 100-year Flood. Under 100-
year Flood, high water channel in the downstream reach will be also covered by floodwater, but there is still some
remaining allowance to the top of the dike or river wall.

with Associates
East Floodway (BKT): Design Profile, HWL and Cross Sections

30.00
BKT Gate
Design Discharge (50-year Return Period): 260m3/s 220m3/s 140m3/s
25.00
Majapahit Bridge Kedung Mundu R.
Candi River
20.00
HL
Bajak River
15.00 B
Elevation (El.m)
10.00 Railway Bridges
5.00
0.00
Stretch_1 Stretch_2 Stretch_3 Stretch_4 Stretch_5

-5.00 DG=1/2,500 Stretch_2A
DG=1/2,500 DG=1/714 DG=1/1,428 DG=1/500
DG=1/2,500
(PG=1/3,333) (PG=1/2,500) (PG=1/714) (PG=1,428) (PG=1/500)
(PG=1/2,500)
B=50m, HL=3m B=50m, HL=3m B=37m, HL=4m B=13m, HL=4m B=20m, HL=4m B=14m, HL=4m
-10.00
0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000 9,000 10,000 11,000 12,000 13,000 14,000 15,000 16,000
Acc. Distance (m)
Left Bank Lowest Bed Note:
Right Bank Present Bed Profile DG: Design Bed Gradient
Ground (Left) Ground (Right) PG: Present Bed Gradient
Design Bed Design Bank of Low Water Channel B: Design Bed Width
HL: Design Height of Low Water Channel
Design Top of Dike Design HWL
(1) KBT_Alt-1 and Alt-2: Design Profile, Cross Sections and HWL
BKT: Water Level of 100-Year Flood under the Design Profile and Design Cross Sections
30.00
BKT Gate
Design Discharge (100-year Return Period): 320m3/s 265m3/s 140m3/s
25.00
Majapahit Bridge Kedung Mundu R.
Candi River
20.00
HL
Bajak River
15.00
B
Elevation (El.m)
10.00 Railway Bridges
5.00
0.00
Stretch_1 Stretch_2 Stretch_3 Stretch_4 Stretch_5

-5.00 DG=1/2,500 Stretch_2A
DG=1/2,500 DG=1/714 DG=1/1,428 DG=1/500
DG=1/2,500
(PG=1/3,333) (PG=1/2,500) (PG=1/714) (PG=1,428) (PG=1/500)
(PG=1/2,500)
B=50m, HL=3m B=50m, HL=3m B=37m, HL=4m B=13m, HL=4m B=20m, HL=4m B=14m, HL=4m
-10.00
0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000 9,000 10,000 11,000 12,000 13,000 14,000 15,000 16,000
Acc. Distance (m)
HL: Design Height of Low Water Channel
Design Top of Dike WL of 100-Year Flood
(2) KBT_Alt-1 and Alt-2: Water Level of 100-Year Flood under the Design Profile and
Design Cross Sections (Example of Excessive Flood)
Figure 9.6.17 KBT_Alt-1 and Alt-2: Design Profile, Cross Sections and HWL

with Associates
9.6.3 Babon River: Design Profile and Typical Design Cross Sections
Design profile including typical design cross sections of the Alt-1 and Alt-2 of the Babon River are shown in Figure
9.6 .18 and Figure 9.6 .19, respectively. These figures also show the HWL and design top of dikes or river walls (if
necessary).
The design bed profile is set almost same as the present lowest riverbed profile. The bank height of low water channel
is set about 4m, which is almost same as the existing bank height except downstream reach.
9.6.4 Dombo-Sayung River: Design Profile and Typical Design Cross

Sections
Design profile including typical design cross sections of the Alt-1 and Alt-2 of the Dombo-Sayung River are shown
in Figure 9.6 .20 and Figure 9.6 .21, respectively. These figures also show the HWL and design top of dikes or
river walls (if necessary).
Considering that the design discharges of the Alt-1 (120 to 160m 3/s) and Alt-2 (70 to 85m 3/s) are not so big, height of
the design low water channel is set at 3m, which is almost same as the existing bank height. 3m is also set by
considering the assumed depth of footings of the existing bridges.

with Associates
Babon River_Alt-1: Design Profile, Cross Sections and HWL

30.00
Design Discharge (50-year Return Period): 270m3/s Pucanggading Weir
25.00 Babon Bridge

of Majapahit Road
Railway Bridge
20.00 HL
B
15.00
Elevation (El.m)
Babon Bridge
of Pantura Road
10.00
5.00
0.00
Stretch_1 Stretch_2 Stretch _3

-5.00 DG=1/1,111
DG=1/2,500 DG=1/714
PG=-1/2,000 PG=1/1,111 PG=1/714
B=40m, HL=4m B-25m, HL=4m B=20m, HL=4m
-10.00
0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000 9,000 10,000 11,000 12,000 13,000 14,000 15,000 16,000 17,000 18,000 19,000
Acc. Distance (m)
Note:
Left Bank Lowest Bed DG: Design Bed Gradient
Right Bank Present Bed Profile PG: Present Bed Gradient
Ground (Left) Ground (Right)
Design Top of Dike Design HWL HL: Design Height of Low Water Channel
Design HWL
Figure 9.6.18 Babon River_Alt-1: Design Profile, Cross Sections and HWL
Babon River_Alt-2: Design Profile, Cross Sections and HWL

30.00
Design Discharge (50-year Return Period): 180m3/s Pucanggading Weir
25.00 Babon Bridge

of Majapahit Road
Railway Bridge
20.00 HL
B
15.00
Elevation (El.m)
Babon Bridge
of Pantura Road
10.00
5.00
0.00
Stretch_1 Stretch_2 Stretch _3

-5.00 DG=1/1,111
DG=1/2,500 DG=1/714
PG=-1/2,000 PG=1/1,111 PG=1/714
B=25m, HL=4m B-15m, HL=4m B=12m, HL=4m
-10.00
0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000 9,000 10,000 11,000 12,000 13,000 14,000 15,000 16,000 17,000 18,000 19,000
Acc. Distance (m)
Note:
Right Bank Present Bed Profile PG: Present Bed Gradient
Ground (Left) Ground (Right)
Design HWL
Figure 9.6.19 Babon River_Alt-2: Design Profile, Cross Sections and HWL

with Associates
Dombo-Sayung River_Alt-1: Design Longitudinal Profile

35.00 Design Discharge (50-year R.P):
Q=160m3/s Q=135m3/s Q=120m3/s Gergaji Weir
30.00
Sayung Bridge of
Majapahit Road
25.00
HL
20.00
Railway Bridge
B
Elevation (El.m)
15.00 Sayung Bridge of

Pantra Road
10.00
5.00
0.00
Stretch_2 Stretch_3 Stretch_4 Stretch_5

Stretch_1
-5.00 DG=1/2,700 DG=1/1,230 DG=1/303 DG=1/179
DG=1/4,000
PG=1/2,700 PG=1/1,230 PG=1/303 PG=1/179
PG=-1/12,500
B=55m, HL=3m B=40m, HL=3m B=19m, HL=3m B=8m, HL=3m B=5m, HL=3m
-10.00
0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000 9,000 10,000 11,000 12,000 13,000 14,000 15,000 16,000 17,000 18,000 19,000 20,000
Acc. Distance (m)

系列40 系列38
Figure 9.6.20 Dombo-Sayung River_Alt-1: Design Profile, Cross Sections and HWL
Dombo-Sayung River_Alt-2: Design Longitudinal Profile

35.00 Design Discharge (50-year R.P):
Q=85m3/s Q=75m3/s Q=70m3/s Gergaji Weir
30.00
Sayung Bridge of
Majapahit Road
25.00
HL
20.00 Railway Bridge
B
Elevation (El.m)
15.00 Sayung Bridge of

Pantra Road
10.00
5.00
0.00
Stretch_2 Stretch_3 Stretch_4 Stretch_5

Stretch_1
-5.00 DG=1/2,700 DG=1/1,230 DG=1/303 DG=1/179
DG=1/4,000
PG=1/2,700 PG=1/1,230 PG=1/303 PG=1/179
PG=-1/12,500
B=30m, HL=3m B=20m, HL=3m B=10m, HL=3m B=3m, HL=3m B=3m, HL=3m
-10.00
0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000 9,000 10,000 11,000 12,000 13,000 14,000 15,000 16,000 17,000 18,000 19,000 20,000
Acc. Distance (m)

系列40 系列38
Figure 9.6.21 Dombo-Sayung River_Alt-2: Design Profile, Cross Sections and HWL

with Associates
9.6.5 Dolok River: Design Profile and Typical Design Cross Sections
Design profile including typical design cross sections of the Alt-1 to Alt-4 of the Dolok River are shown in Figure
9.6 .22 to Figure 9.6 .25, respectively. These figures also show the HWL and design top of dikes or river (if
necessary).
In the case of without Dolok Dam (Alt-1 and Alt-2), the design discharge of the Dolok River or Dolok River plus
Bypass Floodway is 380m3/s. In the case of with Dolok Dam (Alt-3 and Alt-4), the design discharge of the Dolok
River or Dolok River plus Bypass Floodway is 200m3/s.
For 380m3/s and 200m3/s, considering the existing height of single cross sections in the upstream to mid-stream
reaches of about 4m or more, the bank height of the improved low water channel is set at 4m for the Dolok River.
Dikes or river walls with height of minimum 1m are proposed to be constructed (if necessary) to keep allowance
above the HWL.
For the Bypass Floodway, in order to minimize modification of drainage systems around the Bypass Floodway,
single cross sections including allowance height of 1m above the HWL are set for the design cross sections of the
Bypass Floodway.
As the detailed topographic map is not available along the Bypass Floodway, it is recommendable to conduct
topographic survey along the Bypass Floodway for increasing accuracy of analysis in the feasibility study on the Alt-
2 or Alt-4 of the Dolok River.
In addition, it is recommended to excavate the sediment deposition of about 3m in the existing

river cross sections of the Dolok River downstream of the bifurcation to the Kebon Batur Canal,
so that water during normal period can flow down to the river channel. This will facilitate
improvement of riverine environment including scenery along the river when water flow can be
observed.
Dolok River_Alt-1 (Original River with Short-cuts): Longitudinal Profile, Cross Sections and HWL
55
50 Design Discharge (50-Year Return Period): 380m3/s
Bif. Kebon Batur Canal

45
40 Dolok Bridge of
Majapahit Road
35
HL
30
Railway Bridge
Elevation (El.m)
25 B
20
15 New Bridge of
Pantura Road
10
5 Stretch_5 Stretch_6
DG=1/385 DG=1/323
0 PG=1/385 PG=1/323
B=20m, HL=4m B=15m, HL=4m
-5 Stretch_1 Stretch_4
Stretch_2 Stretch_3
DG=1/5,000 DG=1/2,500 DG=1/1,000 DG=1/630
-10 PG=1/10,000 PG=1/2,500 PG=1/1,000 PG=1/714
B=150m, HL=4m B=50m, HL=4m B=30m, HL=4m B=25m, HL=4m
-15
0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000
Acc. Distance (m) Note:
Right Bank Ground (Left) PG: Present Bed Gradient
Ground (Right) Bed Profile B: Design Bed Width
Design Bed Design Bank of Low Water Channel HL: Design Height of Low Water Channel
Design HWL Design Top of Dike
Figure 9.6.22 Dolok River_Alt-1: Design Profile, Cross Sections and HWL

with Associates
Dolok River with Bypass Floodway: Design Longitudinal Profile

45.00
Design Discharge (50-year Return Period with Dolok Dam): 380m3/s Dolok River
40.00
Dolok River (Original Course) Bypass Floodway
35.00 New Dolok Bridge of
Majapahito Road
30.00 New Railway Br.
H
25.00 L
B
Dolok River Bypass Floodway
Elevation (El.m)
20.00
15.00 New Bridge of

Pantura Road
10.00
5.00
0.00
-5.00
Stretch_1 Stretch_2 Stretch_3 Bypass_St.1 Bypass_St.2 Bypass_St.3
DG=1/5,000 DG=1/2,500 DG=1/1,000 DG=1/1,000 DG=1/450 DG=1/190
-10.00 PG=1/10,000 PG=1/2,500 PG=1/1,000
B=150m, HL=4m B=50m, HL=4m B=40m, HL=4m B=50m, HL=4mB=35m, HL=4m B=20m, HL=4m
-15.00
0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000
Lowest Bed Right Bank Ground (Left)
DG: Design Bed Gradient
Ground (Right) Present Bed Profile Design BedPG: Present Bed Gradient
Left Bank Bank of Low Water Channel Dike Top B: Design Bed Width
Design HWL Majaphit 系列39 HL: Design Height of Low Water Channel
Dolok River_Alt-3 (Original River with Short-cuts): Longitudinal Profile, Cross Sections and HWL
55
50 Design Discharge (50-Year Return Period): 200m3/s
45 Bif. Kebon Batur Canal
40 Dolok Bridge of
Majapahit Road
35
HL
30
Railway Bridge
Elevation (El.m)
25 B
20
15 New Bridge of
Pantura Road
10
5 Stretch_5 Stretch_6
DG=1/385 DG=1/323
0 PG=1/385 PG=1/323
-5 Stretch_1 Stretch_4
Stretch_2 Stretch_3
DG=1/5,000 DG=1/2,500 DG=1/1,000 DG=1/630
-10 PG=1/10,000 PG=1/2,500 PG=1/1,000 PG=1/714
B=85m, HL=4m B=30m, HL=4m B=17m, HL=4m B=12m, HL=4m
-15
0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000
Right Bank Ground (Left) PG: Present Bed Gradient
Ground (Right) Bed Profile B: Design Bed Width
Design Bed Design Bank of Low Water Channel HL: Design Height of Low Water Channel
Design HWL Design Top of Dike

with Associates
Dolok River with Bypass Floodway: Design Longitudinal Profile

45.00
Design Discharge (50-year Return Period with Dolok Dam): 200m3/s Dolok River
40.00
Dolok River (Original Course) Bypass Floodway
35.00 New Dolok Bridge of
Majaphito Road
30.00 New Railway Br.
H
25.00 L
B
Dolok River Bypass Floodway
Elevation (El.m)
20.00
15.00 New Bridge of

Pantura Road
10.00
5.00
0.00
-5.00
Stretch_1 Stretch_2 Stretch_3 Bypass_St.1 Bypass_St.2 Bypass_St.3
DG=1/5,000 DG=1/2,500 DG=1/1,000 DG=1/1,000 DG=1/450 DG=1/190
-10.00 PG=1/10,000 PG=1/2,500 PG=1/1,000
B=85m, HL=4m B=30m, HL=4mB=20m, HL=4m B=11m, HL=4m
-15.00
0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000
Lowest Bed Right Bank Ground (Left)
DG: Design Bed Gradient
Ground (Right) Present Bed Profile Design BedPG: Present Bed Gradient
Left Bank Bank of Low Water Channel Dike Top B: Design Bed Width
Design HWL Majaphit 系列39 HL: Design Height of Low Water Channel
Bypass Floodway of the Dolok River (Alt-2 and Alt-4): Control Weir and Overflow Weir
(1) Course, Length and Typical Cross Sections of the Bypass Floodway
Following figure shows course, length and typical cross sections of the Bypass Floodway.
Bypass Floodway:
Alt-2 (Q=380m3/s):
HL=4m
B=20 to 50m
B’=42m to72m
Area=61ha
Alt-4 (Q=200m3/s):
HL=4m
Dolok River B=11 to 30m
B’=33m to 52m
Area=53ha
Length = 8.72km
Bypass Floodway
Overflow Weir
B’
Control Weir
Figure 9.6.26 Dolok River Bypass Floodway

with Associates
(2) Overflow Weir and Control Weir of the Bypass Floodway

Bypass Floodway will discharge only floodwater in case water level of the Dolok River at
the bifurcation point of the Bypass Floodway becomes more than certain water level that
starts causing floods in the upstream and mid-stream reaches along the Dolok River in the
downstream from the bifurcation point. It is supposed that water depth of about 1.5m is the
starting water level for flowing into the Bypass Floodway.
In order to control floods in the above way, an overflow weir is to be installed at the
starting place (uppermost place) of the Bypass Floodway.
In order to ensure diverting floodwater to the Bypass Floodway, a control weir is to be
installed at just downstream of the bifurcation point along the Dolok River.
There are two options for the Control Weir as follows:
 Optrion-1: Gated weir
 The gates are normally fully opened. When flood comes, the gates will be closed.
 It is recommended to operate the Gates based on telemetry automatic monitoring
of water level in the Dolok River at the site of bifurcation point or upstream site
such as at Barang Weir.
 Manual operation of the Gate shall be also possible for emergency cases such as
malfunctioning of the automatic operation system of the Gate.
 This option needs daily operation during floods and maintenance of the Gates.
 Option-2: Closing Dike with a Hole
 Close the Dolok River by dike etc. with concrete facing in the upstream side. In
addition, a hole with a size for flowing down non-harmful discharge (within the
limit of discharge which does not cause overflow from the river) to the
downstream reaches.
 This option does not need daily operation during floods except periodical
maintenance.
 Floating debris including floating logs and sediment will deposit in the upstream
side of the closing dike more than the Option-1. Hence, maintenance such as
removal of floating logs and sediment deposition in the upstream side of the
control weir will be more necessary than the Option-1.
Images of the above two options are shown in Figure 9.6.12 and Figure 9.6.13,
respectively.
Comparison of the estimated direct cost (without preparatory works) of the Option-1 and
Option-2 is shown in Table 9.6.1 (refer to Chapter 11). The Option-2 (closing dike with
hole and overflow weir) is cheaper cost than the Option-1 (gated weir and overflow weir)
for Alt-3 and Alt-4. However, the Option-1 (gated weir and overflow weir) is safer and
more reliable even in the case excessive floods. Hence, the Option-1 is more
recommendable than the Option-2.

with Associates
Table 9.6.3 Comparison of the Costs of the Options of the Control Weir for the
Bypass Floodway of the Dolok River
(Unit: Million Rp.)
Option of the Control
Alt-3 (Q=380m3/s) Alt-4 (Q=200m3/s)
Weir
1. Option-1
1) Overflow Weir 13,189 9,216
(L30m x H1.5m) (L16m x H1.5m)
2) Gated weir 9,171 9,171
Total 22,360 18,387

2. Option-1
1) Overflow Weir 13,189 9,216
(L30m x H1.5m) (L16m x H1.5m)
2) Closing Dike with 3,815 3,815
a Hole
Total 17,004 13,031

with Associates
Dolok River 1.5m 15m 1.5m

A A
Surface Protection 1.5m 6.75m Hoist & Motor
(Concrete Block)
Bed Protection 1m
(Concrete Block) Bypass Floodway
B B Main Body
(Reinforced Concrete) Roller Gates
(W6.75m x H5m x 2Nos.)
Surface Protection
(Concrete Block) 5m
11m
Gated Weir:
1) W15m x H5m
2) Close the gate during floods Breast Wall
3) Open the gate in the normal Revetment (Reinforced Concrete) 5m
period (Water depth of the river D: (Reinforced Concrete)
D<=1.5m)
Apron 1.5m
(Reinforced Concrete)
2.5m
Overflow Weir:
Concrete Pile
1) Q380m3 /s: W30m x H1.5m
2) Q200m3 /s: W16m x H1.5m
C C Impermeable Wall
(Steel Sheet Pile)
Upstream Surface
Layout
Control Weir (Gated Weir)
30m 15m
10m 5m 15m Apron

Dolok River Bed Floodway Bed
Overflow Portion: H1.5m
(Mass Concrete)
5m
1m 4m
1/2
1.5m
Bed Protection
Note:
Concrete Pile Impermeable Wall Automatic operation of the Gated
(Steel Sheet Pile)
Weir based of telemetric monitoring
of water level at the site and
upstream together with manual
operation for emergency cases is
Longitudinal Profile recommended to be applied.
Overflow Weir
Figure 9.6.27 Dolok River: Bifurcation of the Bypass Floodway (Option-1)
Dolok River
Revetment
Closing Dike (Reinforced Concrete)
1) L35m, W33m, H5m
2) Earthfill with Surface
Protection by Boulders
(Downstream Surface) and
Reinforced Concrete (Upstream River Outlet
Surface)) (Q=30m3 /s) Bypass Floodway
Surface Protection
(Concrete Block)
Concrete Facing (t=0.5m)
Bed Protection
Trash rack (Concrete Block)
Boom for stopping Apron

floating logs etc. (Reinforced Concrete)
Overflow Weir:
1) Q380m3 /s: W30m x H1.5m Note:
2) Q200m3 /s: W16m x H1.5m
Overflow Weir is same as the
Layout Option-1
Closing Dike with River Outlet River Outlet (Culvert)
1) L35m x W25m x H5m 1) W2.2m x H2.2m
Surface Protection 1) Earthfill and Surface Protection by 2) Q=30m3/s
(Concrete Block) Boulders
10m 3m 35m 3m 10m

Apron Revetment
5m
2m
1m Concrete Pile
Impermeable Wall
(Steel Sheet Pile)
Downstream Surface
Control Weir (Closing Dike with a Hole)
Figure 9.6.28 Dolok River: Bifircation of the Bypass Floodway (Option-2)

with Associates
9.7 Reconstruction of Bridges (etc.)

9.7.1 Existing River Crossing Structures
In the Study, preliminary inventory survey on the river crossing structures was conducted. Figure 9.7 .29 and Table
9.7 .4 shows locations and number of the existing river crossing and related structures (see also ANNEX-III for
detail).
Figure 9.7.29 Location of the River Crossing and Related Structures
Table 9.7.4 Number of the River Crossing Structures and Related Structures
River KBT KBT KBT Babon Dombo- Dolok Total
Structure Downstre Mid to Total Sayung
am Upstream
(River (Majapahi
Mouth to t Bridge
Majapahit to Inlet
Bridge) Gate)
(No.) (No.) (No.) (No.) (No.) (No.) (No.)
1. Road Bridge 7 7 14 16 39 55 138
1-1 Medium to 5 5 10 4 9 5 38
Major Bridge
1-2 Pedestrian and 2 2 4 12 30 50 100
Small Bridge
2. Railway Bridge 1 0 1 1 1 3 7
3. Water Pipe Bridge 1 2 3 3 0 0 9
4. Telecom. Bridge 2 0 2 0 0 0 4
5. Gas Pipe 2 0 2 1 1 0 6
6. Sluice Gate (Weir) 0 1 1 1 0 3 6
7. Water Pump 3 0 3 1 0 0 7
8. Drainage Outlet/ 2 5 7 0 10 2 26
Shipon
Total 18 15 33 23 51 63 203
Data Source: Preliminary Inventory Survey of the Study

with Associates
9.7.2 River Crossing Structures for Reconstruction

Corresponding to the proposed alternative plans for river improvement works, the following table shows number of
the river crossing structures to be reconstructed. Comparing the design cross sections of the rivers, if the existing
bridges of main roads or railways have enough length or slightly smaller length, which can be left as it is with
modification of bank slope to be steeper by keeping same flow area of design cross section, it is proposed that those
bridges will not be reconstructed.
(1) KBT
Table 9.7 .5 shows the number of the river crossing structures along the KBT for reconstruction. In addition to
these there are some bridges etc., which need strengthening of foundation such as piers. List of the bridges to be
reconstructed are also shown in Table 9.7 .8.
Table 9.7.5 KBT: Number of River Crossing Structures for Reconstruction

River KBT KBT Total
Structure Downstream Mid to
(River Mouth to Upstream
Majapahit (Majapahit
Bridge) Bridge to Inlet
Gate)
(No.) (No.) (No.)
1. Road Bridge 2 4 6
1-1 Medium to 0 3 3
Major Bridge
1-2 Pedestrian and 2 1 3
Small Bridge
2. Railway Bridge 0 0 0
3. Water Pipe Bridge 1 1 2
4. Telecom. Bridge 1 0 1
5. Gas Pipe 0 0 0
6. Sluice Gate (Weir) 0 0 0
7. Water Pump 0 0 0
8. Drainage Outlet/ 0 0 0
Shipon
Total 4 5 9
Among the bridges in the downstream reach of the KBT, the following bridges, two
pedestrian bridges (see Figure 10.1.6 and Figure 10.1.7), one water pipe bridge and one
telecommunication cable bridge are proposed to be reconstructed by the river improvement
in the downstream reach.
In addition to the above, the following bridges have also problems such as insufficient
freeboard above the design high water level.
Kaligawe Bridge (Existing Length 66m):

Freeboard above the design HWL is very small. During floods, floating debris is captured
by the Bridge, which aggravates conditions of floods in KBT.

with Associates
Data source: PU
Figure 9.7.30 Clogging in the Upstream Side of Kaligawe Bridge by Floating Debris
(after January 2016 Flood)
Railway Bridge (Upstream Side: Existing Length 70m):
Freeboard of the Railway Bridge (upstream side) is very small. It is understood that this
bridge will be heightened by the Perum Kereta Api (Railway Company), which is also to
be confirmed. It is necessary to design heightening of this Bridge based on the proposed
design cross section for the KBT.
Figure 9.7.31 Railway Bridge (Upstream Side) of the KBT
Railway Bridge (Downstream Side: Existing Length 70m):

Freeboard of the Railway Bridge (upstream side) is only about 0.5m. It is expected
heightening of this bridge in the near future. Design heightening of the bridge is necessary

with Associates
to be based on the proposed design cross section for the KBT.
Figure 9.7.32 Railway Bridge (Downstream Side) of the KBT
Reinforcement of the Foundation of the Bridges:

In addition to the reconstruction of the bridges, there are some bridges in the downstream reach
of the KBT, which are necessary to be reinforced their foundation of substructures such as piers.
Based on the simple investigation of the depth of the piers of bridges conducted by this study, it
is assumed that the foundation of Pantura Bridge, Citarum Bridge, Kartini Bridge etc. are to be
reinforced by concrete blocks or steel sheet piles. It is recommended to conduct detailed
investigation of the foundation of the bridges in the downstream reach of the KBT.
(2) Babon River and Dombo-Sayung River

Table 9.7 .6 shows the number of the river crossing structures along the Babon River and the Dombo-Sayung
River for reconstruction. List of the bridges to be reconstructed are also shown in Table 9.7 .9 and Table
9.7 .10.

with Associates
Table 9.7.6 Babon River and Dombo-Sayung River: Number of River Crossing Structures
for Reconstruction
Alternative Alt-1 Alt-2
River Babon Dombo- Total Babon Dombo- Total
Structure Sayung Sayung
(No.) (No.) (No.) (No.) (No.) (No.)
1. Road Bridge 12 27 39 10 24 34
1-1 Medium to 1 2 3 0 1 1
Major Bridge
1-2 Pedestrian and 11 25 36 10 23 33
Small Bridge
2. Railway Bridge 0 0 0 0 0 0
3. Water Pipe Bridge 3 0 3 3 0 3
4. Telecom. Bridge 0 0 0 0 0 0
5. Gas Pipe 1 1 2 1 1 2
6. Sluice Gate (Weir) 1 0 1 1 0 1
7. Water Pump 0 0 0 0 0 0
8. Drainage Outlet/ 0 0 0 0 0 0
Shipon
Total 17 28 45 15 25 40
Alt-1: River improvements with the Natural Retarding Basin in the Penggaron River
Alt-2: River improvements with Strengthening of the Retarding Basin in the Penggaron River
(3) Dolok River

Table 9.7 .7 shows the number of the river crossing structures along the Dolok River for reconstruction. List
of the bridges to be reconstructed are also shown in Table 9.7 .11 and Table 9.7 .12.
Table 9.7.7 Dolok River: Number of River Crossing Structures for Reconstruction or New
Construction
Alternative Alt-1 Alt-2 Alt-3 Alt-4
Structure
(No.) (No.) (No.) (No.)
1. Road Bridge 54 40 53 40
1-1 Medium to 4 8 3 8
Major Bridge (New: 6) (New: 6)
1-2 Pedestrian and 50 32 50 32
Small Bridge
2. Railway Bridge 3 New: 3 3 New: 3
3. Water Pipe Bridge 0 0 0 0
4. Telecom. Bridge 0 0 0 0
5. Gas Pipe 0 0 0 0
6. Sluice Gate (Weir) 3 3 3 3
7. Water Pump 0 0 0 0
8. Drainage Outlet/ 0 0 0 0
Shipon
Total 60 46 59 46
Alt-1: River improvement along the River without Dolok Dam
Alt-2: River improvement with Bypass Floodway and without Dolok Dam
Alt-3: River improvement along the River with Dolok Dam
Alt-4: River improvement with Bypass Floodway and with Dolok Dam

with Associates
Table 9.7.8 KBT: Bridges for Reconstruction
Alt-1 and Alt-2
To be Reconstructed with
BKT: Existing River Crossing Structures/ Bridges bridge length or
ID No. Name River Station Kind of Structure Material Length Width Depth Status Condition Road/Railway Related Structure/ Remarks Stretch Reinforce the Substructure
(m) (m) (m)

No reconst. (Reinforce
1 Pantura Bridge BKT 1+388 Road Bridge Concrete 365.0 40.0 7.0 Permanent str. Good Pantura Road Gas pipe is buried under the river. 1
substructure)
No reconst by the Project.

2 Railway Bridge BKT 1+950 Railway Bridge Steel 70.0 5.0 3.5 Permanent str. Good Pantura Road * Freeboard very low. Gas pipeline. 1
Required length 77m
* Freeboard very low. BINA MARGA wil be No reconst by the Project.

3 Kaligawe Bridge BKT 2+480 Road Bridge Steel Truss 66.0 35.0 2.0 Permanent str. Good Medium Road 2
in charge of reconstruction including design. Required length 96m
4 PDAM Bridge BKT 2+480 Water Pipe Bridge Steel Truss 66.0 - - Permanent str. Good Water Supply 2 68
5 Telecomunication Cable Bridge BKT 2+480 Telecommunication Steel Truss 66.0 - - Permanent str. Good Telecom Pier broken. 2 68
6 Pedestrian Bridge BKT 3+086 Pedestrian Bridge Steel 135.0 3.0 2.5 Temporaty str. Bad Small road Feeboard low 2 114
7 Pedestrian Bridge BKT 3+900 Pedestrian Bridge Steel 122.0 3.0 3.0 Temporaty str. Bad Small road Freeboard low 0 114
8 Citarum Bridge BKT 3+984 Road Bridge Concrete 268.0 17.0 4.5 Permanent str. Good Medium Road 2
substructure)
9 Kartini Bridge BKT 5+425 Road Bridge Concrete 213.0 9.0 7.8 Permanent str. Good Medium Road 2
substructure)
10 Telecomunication Cable Bridge BKT 5+450 Water Pipe Bridge Steel 135.0 - 4.5 Permanent str. Good Water Supply 2
substructure)
No reconstruct. Apply
11 Majapahit Bridge BKT 6+700 Road Bridge Concrete 71.5 15.0 6.0 Permanent str. Good Main Road 2
steeper revetment slope.
12 Lamper Sari Bridge BKT 7+600 Road Bridge Concrete 57.0 8.0 5.0 Permanent str. Good Medium Road 2 72
13 Guther Bridge for Ir igation BKT 8+300 Pedestrian Bridge Steel 44.0 2.0 4.0 Permanent str. Good Small road Drain outlet 3 No
Sendong Guo Bridge (Under-
14 BKT 9+100 Road Bridge Concrete 67.0 2.0 6.6 Permanent str. - - Under-construction 3 No
construction)
15 Sendong Guo Bridge BKT 9+100 Water Pipe Bridge Steel 33.0 - 6.2 Permanent str. Good Water Supply 3 45
16 Pedestrian Bridge BKT 10+214 Pedestrian Bridge Steel (Suspension) 35.0 1.5 7.0 Permanent str. Bad Small road 3 45
17 Gemah Permai Bridge BKT 10+500 Road Bridge Concrete 13.0 5.0 5.5 Permanent str. Good Medium Road Bridge slab is not good. 3 45
18 Ampo Sari Bridge BKT 10+700 Road Bridge Concrete 24.0 5.5 5.5 Permanent str. Good Medium Road Drain outlet 3 52
19 PDAM Steel Bridge BKT 11+300 Water Pipe Bridge Steel Cable Bridge 52.0 - 5.7 Permanent str. Good Water Supply 4 No
20 Pucang gading Bridge BKT 14+105 Road Bridge Concrete 56.0 10.0 10.0 Permanent str. Good Medium Road 5 No
21 Inlet Gate of BKT BKT 14+600 Gate Brick - - - Permanent str. Good Gate 5 No

with Associates
Table 9.7.9 Babon River: Bridges for Reconstruction
Alt-1 Alt-2
To be Reconstructed To be Reconstructed
Babon River: Existing River Cros ing Structures/ Bridges with bridge length or with bridge length or
Reinforce the Reinforce the

ID No. Name River Station Kind of Structure Material Length Width Depth Status Condition Road/Railway Related Structure/ Remarks Stretch
Substructure Substructure
(m) (m) (m)

1 Setelah pompa air Bridge Babon 2+175 Pedestrian Bridge Concrete 45.5 2.3 0.9 Permanent str. Good Smal road Pipe（Width=74mm,Upstream） 1 72 57
No reconstruct.
2 Semarang-Demak Bridge Babon 3+089 Road Bridge Ste l Trus 36.7 - 0.9 Permanent str. Good Pantura Road 2 57 Apply steeper
revetment slope.
3 Weir Babon 3+725 Ir igation Weir Concrete 16.2 3.0 5.5 Permanent str. Good - 2 57 47
4 Kudu Nangeng Bridge Babon 4+7 0 Road Bridge Concrete 29.2 5.4 5.4 Permanent str. Good Smal road Pipe（φ90 ,Upstream） 2 57 47
5 Suban Bridge Babon 5+60 Pedestrian Bridge Concrete 34.2 2.3 6.2 Permanent str. Good Smal road 2 57 47
6 Rusun Bridge Babon 6+290 Pedestrian Bridge Concrete 37.4 2.5 6.4 Permanent str. Good Smal road 2 57 47
8 Smi Berment Bridge Babon 6+780 Pedestrian Bridge Concrete & Wood Slub 36.7 1.7 5.8 Permanent str. Good Smal road 2 57 47
No reconstruct. No reconstruct.
7 Kudu Bridge Babon 6+80 Road Bridge Ste l Trus 40.2 9.2 6.7 Permanent str. Good MediumRoad Two pipes（φ90 ,Upstream） 2 Apply steeper Apply steeper
revetment slope. revetment slope.
9 Penggaron Lor Bridge Babon 7+80 Pedestrian Bridge Concrete 35.0 2.8 6.2 Permanent str. Good Smal road 3 52 4
10 Ponggaron lor Bridge（OLD） Babon 8+240 Road Bridge Concrete 36.3 3.7 7.0 Permanent str. Good Smal road 3 52 4
1 Ponggaron lor Bridge（New） Babon 8+390 Road Bridge Concrete 3 .5 3.3 6.8 Permanent str. Good Smal road 3 52 4
13 Jamus Sayangan Bridge（New） Babon 9+375 Road Bridge Concrete 35.0 2.0 7.0 Under construction - Smal road 3 52 4
No reconstruct.
14 Babon Jamus Bridge (Railway) Babon 10+217 Railway Bridge Ste l Trus 48.0 19.0 6.5 Permanent str. Good Railway Gas pipe is buried under the embankment 3 Apply steeper No
revetment slope.
14' Babon Jamus Bridge (Road) Babon 10+236 Pedestrian Bridge Concrete 37.0 2.8 6.2 Permanent str. Good Smal road 3 52 4
15 Jambon Bridge Babon 1 +300 Pedestrian Bridge Concrete 58.0 2.1 6.3 Permanent str. Good Smal road 3 No No
16 Majahit Bridge Babon 12+250 Road Bridge Concrete 52.0 16.7 0.0 Permanent str. Good Majapahit Road 3 No No
17 Dadisari bridge Babon 13+110 Road Bridge Concrete 47.5 2.0 8.0 Permanent str. Good Smal road 3 52 No
18 Babon Bridge Babon 16+810 Road Bridge Ste l Trus 56.0 9.0 9.0 Permanent str. Good MediumRoad 3 No No

with Associates
Table 9.7.10 Dombo-Sayung River: Bridges for Reconstruction
Alt-1 Alt-2
Dombo-Sayung River: Existing River Crossing Structures/ Bridges with bridge length or with bridge length or

ID No. Name River Station Kind of Structure Material Length Width Depth Status Condition Road/Railway Related Structure/ Remarks Stretch
(m) (m) (m)

No reconstruct.
1 Bridge Sayung 0+620 Road Bridge Concrete 51.0 7.0 4.0 Permanent str. Good Medium road 1 77 Apply steeper
revetment slope.
2 Bridge Sayung 1+800 Pedestrian Bridge Concrete 44.0 2.0 3.5 Permanent str. Good Small road 1 77 60
3 Setro Kemitir Bridge Sayung Pedestrian Bridge Concrete 42.0 2.2 4.0 Permanent str. Good Small road 1 77 60
4 Setro Bridge Sayung Pedestrian Bridge Concrete 44.0 2.0 4.0 Permanent str. Good Small road 1 77 60
5 Setro Poncol Bridge Sayung Pedestrian Bridge Concrete 39.0 1.5 4.0 Permanent str. Good Small road 1 77 60
6 Bridge Sayung 3+580 Pedestrian Bridge Concrete 31.0 2.0 4.5 Permanent str. Good Small road Downstream of Pantura Bridge 1 77 Remove
7 Semarang-Demak Bridge Sayung 3+600 Road Bridge Concrete 37.5 23.4 6.0 Permanent str. Good Pantura Road Oblique direction to the river (L=59.6m) 1 122 95
8 Sayung Market Bridge Sayung 3+800 Pedestrian Bridge Concrete 44.0 3.0 4.5 Permanent str. Good Small road Near the Market 1 77 60
9 Sayung 2 Bridge Sayung 3+920 Road Bridge Concrete 45.0 3.0 4.5 Permanent str. Good Small road 1 77 60
10 Sayung Bridge Sayung 3+980 Pedestrian Bridge Concrete 44.0 2.0 5.0 Permanent str. Good Small road 1 77 60
11 Bridge Sayung 4+406 Road Bridge Concrete 42.0 3.0 5.0 Permanent str. Good Small road 2 62 50
14 Bridge Sayung 5+105 Road Bridge Concrete 35.0 2.8 6.2 Permanent str. Good Small road 2 62 50
15 Prampelan Sayung 5+690 Pedestrian Bridge Concrete 48.0 2.0 5.3 Permanent str. Good Small road 2 62 50
16 Prampelan 3 Sayung 6+900 Road Bridge Concrete 46.5 1.8 5.5 Permanent str. Good Small road Drainage outlet 2 62 50
17 Prampelan 2 Bridge Sayung 8+370 Road Bridge Concrete 46.5 5.0 6.5 Permanent str. - Medium road Drain Outlet 3 No No
18 Prampelan 1 Bridge Sayung 8+600 Pedestrian Bridge Concrete 26.5 2.0 5.4 Under construction - Small road Pump 3 41 40
21 Krajan Bridge Sayung 9+010 Road Bridge Concrete 26.5 2.7 6.0 Permanent str. Good Small road 3 41 40
23 Dombo Bridge Dombo-Sayung 9+596 Pedestrian Bridge Concrete 26.3 2.0 6.0 Permanent str. Good Small road 3 41 40
No reconstruct.
24 Semen Bridge Sayung 10+380 Road Bridge Concrete 40.5 3.6 5.8 Permanent str. Good Medium road Sluice gate 3 Apply steeper No
revetment slope.
25 Menur 3 Bridge Sayung 11+230 Road Bridge Concrete 46.0 4.8 5.5 Permanent str. Good Small road Drainage 3 No No
26 Menur 2 Bridge Sayung 12+600 Road Bridge Concrete 46.0 4.8 5.5 Small road 3 No No
27 Menur 1 Bridge Sayung 13+100 Road Bridge Concrete 40.2 2.6 5.3 Permanent str. Good Small road 3 41 No
29 Railway Bridge Sayung 13+980 Railway Bridge Steel Truss 36.0 2.0 4.0 Permanent str. Good Railway 2 railway bridges 3 Apply steeper Apply steeper
30 Bandungsari Bridge Sayung 14+620 Road Bridge Concrete 39.2 2.2 5.4 Permanent str. Good Small road 3 41 40
31 Pedurungan Bridge Sayung 17+423 Pedestrian Bridge Concrete 29.5 1.9 7.8 Permanent str. Good Small road 4 30 33
32 Plamongan Indah 3 Bridge Sayung 16+450 Pedestrian Bridge Concrete 36.4 8.5 7.2 Permanent str. Good Small road 4 No No
33 Plamongan Indah 1 Sayung 16+910 Road Bridge Concrete 45.0 1.7 8.0 Permanent str. Good Medium road 2 bridges 4 No No
34 Semarang-Purwodadi Sayung 17+410 Road Bridge Concrete 45.6 19.0 7.0 Permanent str. Good Main road 5 No No
35 Bridge Sayung 18+040 Road Bridge Concrete 36.4 3.5 7.1 Permanent str. Good Medium road Sluice gate 5 No No
36 Pucang Gading Bridge Sayung 18+300 Road Bridge Concrete 35.8 9.6 7.2 Permanent str. Good Medium road 5 No No
37 Batursari 4 Bridge Sayung 18+400 Road Bridge Concrete 18.5 3.4 7.6 Permanent str. Good Small road Drainage 5 27 33
38 Batursari 3 Bridge Sayung 18+410 Pedestrian Bridge Concrete 36.0 1.7 6.4 Permanent str. Good Small road Drainage 5 No No
39 Batursari 2 Bridge Sayung 18+500 Road Bridge Concrete 36.0 1.7 6.3 Permanent str. Good Medium road 5 No No
40 Batursari Bridge Dombo-Sayung 18+710 Road Bridge Steel Truss 38.0 5.2 7.4 Permanent str. Good Medium road 5 No No

with Associates
Table 9.7.11 Dolok River: Bridges for Reconstruction
Alt-1 Alt-3
Dolok River: Existing River Crossing Structures/ Bridges with bridge length or with bridge length or

ID No. Name River Station Kind of Structure Material Length Width Depth Status Condition Road/Railway Related Structure/ Remarlks Stretch
(m) (m) (m)

1 Tigo Bridge Dolok 0 Road Bridge Concrete 15.8 2.6 3.3 Permanent str. Good Small road 1 182 117
Offtake and control structures

2 Bridge Dolok 0 Pedestrian Bridge Concrete 14.8 1.6 1.5 Permanent str. Good Small road 1 182 117
for irrigation
3 Tugu 2 Bridge Dolok 4+140 Road Bridge Concrete 13.2 2.6 2.5 Permanent str. Good Small road 1 182 117
5 Bridge Dolok Road Bridge Concrete 9.3 2.3 2.0 Permanent str. Good Small road 1 182 117
6 Bridge Dolok Road Bridge Concrete 11.8 2.1 1.9 Permanent str. Bad Small road 1 182 117
7 Bridge Dolok Pedestrian Bridge Concrete 9.8 1.3 1.4 Permanent str. Bad Small road 1 182 117
8 Bridge Dolok 5+250 Road Bridge Concrete 14.9 2.1 1.3 Permanent str. Good Small road 2 82 62
10 Karang Malang Bridge Dolok 5+570 Road Bridge Concrete 17.3 2.3 1.5 Permanent str. Good Small road 2 82 62
11 Jogo 4 Bridge Dolok 5+720 Road Bridge Concrete 13.8 3.0 1.6 Permanent str. Good Small road 2 82 62
16 Onggorawe Bridge Dolok 6+650 Road Bridge Concrete 7.2 5.3 1.3 Permanent str. Good Medium road 2 sluice gates 2 82 62
17 Pantura(Onggorawe) Bridge Dolok 7+550 Road Bridge Concrete 12.1 20.0 3.5 Permanent str. Good Pantura Road 2 82 62
18 Sukasari Bridge Dolok 9+105 Road Bridge Concrete 10.5 3.6 3.5 Permanent str. Good Small road 2 82 62
19 Pilangsari 8 Bridge Dolok 9+270 Road Bridge Concrete 9.3 3.2 4.0 Permanent str. Good Small road 2 82 62
26 Pilangsari Bridge Dolok 10+680 Road Bridge Concrete 9.4 3.5 3.0 Permanent str. Good Small road 3 62 49
27 Blerong 4 Bridge Dolok 11+990 Pedestrian Bridge Concre Pier & Wood Slub 15.0 1.3 3.0 Semi Permanent str. Dangerous Small road Drop structure 3 62 49
28 Blerong 3 Bridge Dolok 12+700 Pedestrian Bridge Concrete 18.0 1.5 3.5 Permanent str. Good Small road 3 62 49
29 Blerong 2 Bridge Dolok 12+820 Pedestrian Bridge Concrete 17.0 1.2 4.0 Permanent str. Bad Small road 3 62 49
30 Blerong Bridge Dolok 14+880 Road Bridge Concrete 26.2 4.8 4.7 Permanent str. Good Small road 4 57 44
31 Dolok Bridge Dolok 15+620 Road Bridge Concrete 27.3 4.5 6.0 Permanent str. Good Small road 4 57 44
32 Bridge Dolok 15+950 Pedestrian Bridge Concrete 17.3 1.2 4.5 Permanent str. Good Small road 4 57 44
33 Ngumpul Bridge Dolok 16+120 Pedestrian Bridge Concrete 18.6 2.0 4.7 Permanent str. Good Small road 4 57 44
35 Jetis Bridge Dolok 16+920 Pedestrian Bridge Concrete 11.2 0.9 3.2 Permanent str. Good Small road 4 57 44
36 Tamansari 2 Bridge Dolok 17+100 Pedestrian Bridge Concrete 19.0 2.0 5.0 Permanent str. Good Small road 4 57 44
37 Tamansari Bridge Dolok 18+160 Pedestrian Bridge Concrete 12.0 2.0 5.0 Permanent str. Good Small road 4 57 44
38 Kembangan 3 Dolok 18+420 Pedestrian Bridge Concrete 12.0 2.0 5.0 Permanent str. Good Small road 4 57 44
39 Kembangan 2 Bridge Dolok 18+560 Pedestrian Bridge Concrete 18.0 1.8 5.0 Permanent str. Good Small road 4 57 44
40 Kembangan 1 Bridge Dolok 19+000 Pedestrian Bridge Concrete 15.0 1.5 4.0 Permanent str. Good Small road 5 52 42
41 Semarang-Purwodadi Bridge Dolok 19+080 Road Bridge Concrete 21.0 11.0 4.0 Permanent str. Good Main road 5 52 42
42 Railway Bridge (down line) Dolok 19+080 Railway Bridge Steel 16.0 6.5 5.0 Permanent str. Good Railway 5 52 42
43 Railway Bridge (up line) Dolok 19+080 Railway Bridge Steel 14.0 4.0 5.0 Permanent str. Good Railway 5 52 42
44 Growong 2 Bridge Dolok 19+480 Road Bridge Concrete 15.0 2.8 4.0 Permanent str. Good Small road 5 52 42
45 Railway Bridge Dolok 19+500 Railway Bridge Steel 11.7 2.0 4.0 Permanent str. Good Railway 5 52 42
46 Growong Bridge Dolok 20+050 Road Bridge Concrete 17.0 3.5 4.5 Permanent str. Good Small road 5 52 42
47 Senggrong 2 Bridge Dolok 20+760 Road Bridge Concrete 12.0 2.8 5.0 Permanent str. Good Small road 5 52 42
48 New Bridge Dolok 22+010 Road Bridge Concrete 12.0 3.4 5.0 Under construction - Small road 5 52 42
49 Senggrong Bridge Dolok 22+960 Pedestrian Bridge Concrete pier and wood slub 27.2 2.0 7.0 Permanent str. Bad Small road 5 52 42
50 Krajan Bridge Dolok 23+640 Road Bridge Concrete 26.0 3.0 7.0 Permanent str. Good Small road 6 47 40
No reconstruct.
51 Dolok Bridge Dolok 24+220 Road Bridge Concrete 26.3 7.5 8.0 Permanent str. Good Medium road 6 47 Apply steeper
revetment slope.
52 Bridge Dolok 25+850 Pedestrian Bridge Concrete pier and wood slub 18.6 1.8 6.5 Permanent str. Good Small road 6 47 40
53 Kangkung Krajan Bridge Dolok 26+700 Road Bridge Concrete 21.0 2.5 7.0 Permanent str. Good Small road 6 47 40
54 Batur 2 Bridge Dolok 27+200 Pedestrian Bridge Concrete 25.0 1.0 7.0 Permanent str. Bad Small road 6 47 40
55 Batur Bridge Dolok 27+780 Road Bridge Concrete pier and wood slub 23.0 3.0 6.0 Permanent str. Good Small road 6 47 40
56 Dempel Bridge Dolok 28+620 Road Bridge Concrete 24.5 3.2 7.0 Permanent str. Good Small road 6 47 40
57 Dempel Bridge Dolok 30+400 Pedestrian Bridge Concrete 18.0 2.0 4.0 Permanent str. Good Small road 6 47 40
58 Banyumeneng Bridge Dolok 30+580 Road Bridge Concrete 36.0 4.0 7.0 Permanent str. Good Medium road 6 Apply steeper Apply steeper

with Associates
Table 9.7.12 Dolok River with Bypass Floodway: Bridges for Reconstruction and New
Construction
Alt-2 Alt-4
Dolok River: Existing River Crossing Structures/ Bridges with bridge length or with bridge length or

ID No. Name River Station Kind of Structure Material Length Width Depth Status Condition Road/Railway Related Structure Stretch
(m) (m) (m)

1 Tigo Bridge Dolok 0 Road Bridge Concrete 15.8 2.6 3.3 Permanent str. Good Small road 1 182 117
2 Bridge Dolok 0 Pedestrian Bridge Concrete 14.8 1.6 1.5 Permanent str. Good Small road Offtake and control structures for irrigation 1 182 117
5 Bridge Dolok 0 Road Bridge Concrete 9.3 2.3 2.0 Permanent str. Good Small road 1 182 117
6 Bridge Dolok 0 Road Bridge Concrete 11.8 2.1 1.9 Permanent str. Bad Small road 1 182 117
7 Bridge Dolok 0 Pedestrian Bridge Concrete 9.8 1.3 1.4 Permanent str. Bad Small road 1 182 117
10 Karang Malang Bridge Dolok 5+570 Road Bridge Concrete 17.3 2.3 1.5 Permanent str. Good Small road 2 82 62
16 Onggorawe Bridge Dolok 6+650 Road Bridge Concrete 7.2 5.3 1.3 Permanent str. Good Medium road 2 sluice gates 2 82 62
17 Pantura(Onggorawe) Bridge Dolok 7+550 Road Bridge Concrete 12.1 20.0 3.5 Permanent str. Good Pantura Road 2 82 62
18 Sukasari Bridge Dolok 9+105 Road Bridge Concrete 10.5 3.6 3.5 Permanent str. Good Small road 2 82 62
26 Pilangsari Bridge Dolok 10+680 Road Bridge Concrete 9.4 3.5 3.0 Permanent str. Good Small road 3 72 49
27 Blerong 4 Bridge Dolok 11+990 Pedestrian Bridge Concre Pier & Wood Slub 15.0 1.3 3.0 Semi Permanent str. Dangerous Small road Drop structure 3 72 49
28 Blerong 3 Bridge Dolok 12+700 Pedestrian Bridge Concrete 18.0 1.5 3.5 Permanent str. Good Small road 3 72 49
29 Blerong 2 Bridge Dolok 12+820 Pedestrian Bridge Concrete 17.0 1.2 4.0 Permanent str. Bad Small road 3 72 49
30 Blerong Bridge Dolok 14+880 Road Bridge Concrete 26.2 4.8 4.7 Permanent str. Good Small road 3 72 49
31 Dolok Bridge Dolok 15+620 Road Bridge Concrete 27.3 4.5 6.0 Permanent str. Good Small road 3 72 49
33 Ngumpul Bridge Dolok 16+120 Pedestrian Bridge Concrete 18.6 2.0 4.7 Permanent str. Good Small road 3 72 49
35a New Bridge at Majapahit Road Dolok Bypass 19+100 New Road Bridge Concrete 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 Major Road Bypass Floodway Byp_2 57 38
36a New Railway Bridge Dolok Bypass 19+100 New Railway Bridge Steel 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 Railway Bypass Floodway Byp_2 57 38
39a New Road Bridge Dolok Bypass 20+410 New Road Bridge Concrete 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 Medium road Bypass Floodway Byp_2 42 38
9.8 Relocation of Houses
with Associates
Number of the houses to be relocated by the proposed river improvements of the KBT, Babon, Dombo-Sayung and
Dolok Rivers is estimated as described below.
9.8.1 KBT: Relocation of Houses

(1) KBT: Downstream Reach from Majapahit Bridge to the River Mouth
Table 9.8 .13shows the number of houses to be relocated for the river improvement
of the downstream reach of the KBT from Majapahit Bridge to the river mouth.
Relocation of houses shall be conducted for the illegal houses, which locate within the
area between the both sides of the existing dikes or river walls.
Provision of resettlement houses at nearby places from the original living places as
much as possible and care for supporting their communities, living and job
opportunity are necessary to be provided for the people to be resettled.
Table 9.8.13 KBT Downstream Reach: Number of Houses to be relocated
Kecamantan/ District Kelurahan Total number Used for

Gayamsari 1. Pandean Lamper 643 stall, houses
Semarang Timur 2. Karangtempel 372 stall
Semarang Timur 3. Rejosari 261 stall, houses
Gayamsari 4. Sambirejo 212 houses
Semarang Timur 5. Bugangan 121 stall, houses
Gayamsari 6. Sawah Besar 229 stall, houses
Semarang Timur 7. Mlatiharjo 335 stall, houses
Gayamsari 8. Kaligawe 205 stall, houses
Semarang Timur 9. Kemijen 58 stall, houses
Gayamsari 10. Tambakrejo 117 stall, houses
Genuk 11. Terboyo Kulon 56 stall, houses
Semarang Utara 12. Tanjung Mas 145 stall, houses
Total 2,754
Source : Inventarisasi Bangunan Bantaran/Tanggul/Sempadan KBT, Balai PSDA Jragung Tuntang, 2015
(2) KBT: Mid-stream to Upstream Reach from Majapahit Bridge to Pucanggading

The number of the houses to be relocated related to the proposed river improvement
for the mid-stream to upstream reaches of the KBT (from Majapahit Bridge to the
Inlet gate at Pucanggading) was counted based on the Google Earth image as shown
in Table 9.8 .14. As it is not so clear about the houses in the Google Earth Image,
detailed investigation on the number of houses to be relocated is recommended to be
conducted before detailed design of the river improvement for the mid-stream to
upstream reaches of the KBT.
Table 9.8.14 KBT Mid-stream to Upstream Reach: Rough Estimation of the Number of
Houses to be relocated
Kecamantan/ District Kelurahan Total number Used for

with Associates
Semarang Selatan 1. Petrongan 36 houses etc.

Gayamsari 2. Pandean Lamper 47 houses etc.
Gayamsari 3. Gayamsari 30 houses etc.
Semarang Selatan 4. Lamper Lor 15 houses etc.
Semarang Selatan 5. Lamper Tengah 27 houses etc.
Tembalang 6. Sendangguwo 41 houses etc.
Tembalang 7. Kedungmundu 5 houses etc.
Pedurungan 8. Gemah 81 houses etc.
Pedurungan 9. Pendurungan Kidul 28 houses etc.
Tembalang 10. Sendangmulyo 0
Total 310
Source : Number of houses to be relocated are counted by the Consultant Team based on the Google
Earth.
9.8.2 Babon River and the Dombo-Sayung River: Relocation of Houses

Table 9.8 .15 and Table 9.8 .17 shows rough estimated number of houses to be relocated around the Babon River
and the Dombo-Sayung River for the Alt-1: River Improvement with the Natural Retarding Basin in the Penggaron
River and Alt-2: River Improvement with Strengthening of the Retarding Basin in the Penggaron River. As the
number of the houses for relocation was counted on Google Earth Image, the number is just for reference as rough
estimation. It is recommended to conduct count the houses for relocation at site in detail in the feasibility study stage.
Table 9.8.15 Babon River: Rough Estimation of Number of Houses for Relocation
Alt-1 Alt-2
Kecamantan/ District Kelurahan
(No.) (No.)
Genuk 1. Trimulyo 7 6
Genuk 2. Banjardowo 5 4
Genuk 3. Karangroto 21 14
Genuk 4. Sembungharjo 1 0
Genuk 5. Bangetayu Wetan 0 0
Genuk 6. Penggaron Lor 6 5
Mranggen 7. Jamus 0 0
Pedurungan 8. Penggaron Kidul 2 2
Pedurungan 9. Plamongansari 34 27
Total 76 58
Notes;
1) Number of houses to be relocated is counted by the Consultant Team based on the Google Earth.
2) Alt-1: River Improvement with the Natural Retarding Basin in the Penggaron River.
3) Alt-2: River Improvement with the Strengthening of the Retarding Basin in the Penggaron River.
Table 9.8.16 Dombo-Sayung River: Rough Estimation of Number of Houses for Relocation
Alt-1 Alt-2
(No.) (No.)
Mranggen 1. Batursari 2 2

with Associates
Mranggen 2. Plamongansari 2 1
Mranggen 3. Bandungrejo 12 5
Pedurungan 4. Penggaron Kidul 7 0
Mranggen 5. Menur 2 0
Mranggen 6. Waru 0 0
Mranggen 7. Wringinjajar 0 0
Sayung 8. Dombo 101 51
Sayung 9. Karangasem 16 10
Sayung 10. Prampelan 0 0
Sayung 11. Loireng 0 0
Sayung 12. Kalisari 0 0
Sayung 13. Sayung 182 57
Sayung 14. Purwosari 331 83
Sayung 15. Bedono 141 36
Total 796 245
Notes;
Table 9.8.17 Babon and Dombo-Sayung River: Rough Eatimation of Number of Houses
for Relocation
Alt-1 Alt-2
River
(No.) (No.)
Babon 76 58
Dombo-Sayung 796 245
Total 872 303
Notes;

with Associates
9.8.3 Dolok River: Relocation of Houses

(1) River Improvement of the Dolok River
Table 9.8 .18 shows rough estimation of number of houses for relocation of the Alt-1:
River Improvement of the Dolok River without Dolok Dam and the Alt-3: River
Improvement along the Dolok River with Dolok Dam.
Table 9.8.18 Dolok River (Alt-1 and Alt-3): Rough Estimation of Number of Houses for
Relocation
Alt-1 Alt-3
(No.) (No.)
Sayung 1. Tugu 43 29
Sayung 2. Surodadi 0 0
Sayung 3. Timbulsloko 0 0
Sayung 4. Gemulak 116 85
Sayung 7. Tambakroto 79 64
Sayung 8. Pilangsari 59 39
Mranggen 9. Blorong 31 27
Mranggen 10. Tegalarum 2 1
Mranggen 11. Tamansari 6 6
Mranggen 12. Kembangarum 89 67
Mranggen 13. Kangkung 36 22
Mranggen 14. Kebonbatur 60 46
Mranggen 15. Banyumeneng 10 6
Mranggen 16. Rowosari 13 8
Total 602 442
Notes;
2) Alt-1: River Improvement of the Dolok River without Dolok Dam.
3) Alt-2: River Improvement of the Dolok River with Dolok Dam.

with Associates
(2) River Improvement of the Dolok River with Bypass Floodway

Table 9.8 .19 shows rough estimation of number of houses for relocation of the Alt-2:
River Improvement of the Dolok River with Bypass Floodway and without Dolok
Dam as well as Alt-4: River Improvement of the Dolok River with Bypass Floodway
and with Dolok Dam.
Table 9.8.19 Dolok River with Bypass Floodway(Alt-2 and Alt-4): Rough Estimation of
Number of Houses for Relocation
Alt-2 Alt-4
(No.) (No.)
Dolok River:
Sayung 1. Tugu 43 29
Sayung 2. Surodadi 0 0
Sayung 3. Timbulsloko 0 0
Sayung 4. Gemulak 116 85
Sayung 7. Tambakroto 79 64
Sayung 8. Pilangsari 59 39
Mranggen 9. Blorong 31 27
Mranggen 10. Tegalarum 2 1
Mranggen 11. Tamansari 1 6
Sub-total 389 293
Bypass Floodway:
Mranggen Karangsono 0 0
Mranggen Kembangarum 58 58
Mranggen Kalitengah 0 0
Mranggen Kangkung 0 0
Mranggen Sumberejo 0 0
Mranggen Kebonbatur 0 0
Mranggen Banyumeneng 30 3
Sub-total 88 61
Total 477 354
Notes;
2) Alt-2: River Improvement of the Dolok River with Bypass Floodway and without Dolok Dam.
3) Alt-4: River Improvement of the Dolok River with Bypass Floodway and with Dolok Dam.

with Associates
9.9 Land Acquisition

9.9.1 KBT: Land Acquisition
Land acquisition in the downstream reach from Majapahit Bridge to the river mouth will not be required in principle.
Land acquisition will be necessary for the mid-stream to upstream reaches from Majapahit Bridge to the Inlet gate of
KBT.
Following table shows the required land acquisition along the KBT.
1) Downstream Reach (from River Mouth to Majapahit Bridge): 0m 2
2) Mid-stream to Upstream Reaches (from Majapahit Bridge to the Inlet gate):
Table 9.9.20 Estimated Land Acquisition of Mid-stream to Upstream Reaches of the KBT
Land Acuisition
(m2)
Semarang Selatan 1. Petrongan 4,965
Gayamsari 2. Pandean Lamper 8,501
Gayamsari 3. Gayamsari 7,903
Semarang Selatan 4. Lamper Lor 4,340
Semarang Selatan 5. Lamper Tengah 7,884
Tembalang 6. Sendangguwo 28,270
Tembalang 7. Kedungmundu 27,020
Pedurungan 8. Gemah 5,915
Pedurungan 9. Pendurungan Kidul 30,940
Tembalang 10. Sendangmulyo 5,688
Total 131,426
Note:
1) Land acquisition area was estimated by the Consultant Team based on Google Earth.
2) Above land acquisition area is the minimum required area for the proposed river improvement.

with Associates
9.9.2 Babon River and the Dombo-Sayung River: Land Acquisition

Table 9.9 .21 and Table 9.9 .22 show land acquisition of the Alt-1 and Alt-2 of the Babon River and the Dombo-
Sayung River respectively. Table 9.9 .23 shows sum of land acquisition of Babon and Dombo-Sayung Rivers, which
includes also land acquisition area for strengthening the Retarding Basin by excavation in the Penggaron River
upstream from Pucanggading under Alt-2.
Table 9.9.21 Babon River: Estimated Land Acquisition Area
Alt-1 Alt-2
(m2) (m2)
Genuk 1. Trimulyo 172,800 133,000
Genuk 2. Banjardowo 23,750 22,210
Genuk 3. Karangroto 100,700 93,410
Genuk 4. Sembungharjo 44,840 40,830
Genuk 5. Bangetayu Wetan 28,010 25,200
Genuk 6. Penggaron Lor 33,720 27,750
Mranggen 7. Jamus 17,180 15,330
Pedurungan 8. Penggaron Kidul 74,250 65,850
Pedurungan 9. Plamongansari 105,500 94,030
Total 600,750 517,610
Notes;
1) Land acquisition area was estimated by the Consultant Team based on the Google Earth.
2) Land acquisition area is the minimum required area for the above alternatives.
Table 9.9.22 Dombo-Sayung River: Estimated Land Acquisition Area

Alt-1 Alt-2
(m2) (m2)
Mranggen 1. Batursari 133,100 131,700
Mranggen 2. Plamongansari 940 890
Mranggen 3. Bandungrejo 33,200 32,520
Pedurungan 4. Penggaron Kidul 38,750 36,830
Mranggen 5. Menur 132,000 125,900
Mranggen 6. Waru 34,590 32,410
Mranggen 7. Wringinjajar 1,616 0
Sayung 8. Dombo 86,830 78,520
Sayung 9. Karangasem 116,600 100,500
Sayung 10. Prampelan 11,190 9,200
Sayung 11. Loireng 16,840 12,710
Sayung 12. Kalisari 26,290 19,800
Sayung 13. Sayung 112,700 86,800
Sayung 14. Purwosari 166,700 122,700
Sayung 15. Bedono 57,570 37,940
Total 968,916 828,420
Notes;

with Associates
Table 9.9.23 Babon and Dombo-Sayung Rivers: Estimated Land Acquisition Area
Alt-1 Alt-2
River
(m2) (m2)
Babon 600,750 517,610
Dombo-Sayung 968,916 828,420
Retarding Basin in the - 550,000
Penggaron River
Total 1,569,666 1,896,030
Notes;
9.9.3 Dolok River: Land Acquisition

Table 9.9 .24 shows land acquisition area for the Alt-1: River Improvement of the Dolok River without Dolok Dam
and Alt-3: River Improvement of the Dolok River with Dolok Dam.
Table 9.9 .25 shows land acquisition area for the Alt-2: River Improvement of the Dolok River with Bypass
Floodway and without Dolok Dam and Alt-4: River Improvement of the Dolok Dam with Bypass Floodway and with
Dolok Dam.
Table 9.9.24 River Improvement of the Dolok River_Alt-1 and Alt-3: Estimated Land
Acquisition Area
Alt-1 Alt-3
(m2) (m2)
Sayung 1. Tugu 375,100 243,500
Sayung 2. Surodadi 179,300 125,900
Sayung 3. Timbulsloko 202,900 105,800
Sayung 4. Gemulak 195,700 129,900
Sayung 7. Tambakroto 177,700 126,000
Sayung 8. Pilangsari 94,290 75,580
Mranggen 9. Blorong 175,800 142,000
Mranggen 10. Tegalarum 150,800 115,900
Mranggen 11. Tamansari 107,000 83,220
Mranggen 12. Kembangarum 189,800 148,600
Mranggen 13. Kangkung 100,700 86,970
Mranggen 14. Kebonbatur 209,100 178,300
Mranggen 15. Banyumeneng 190,300 146,600
Mranggen 16. Rowosari 74,030 59,050
Total 2,526,010 1,845,100
Notes;
3) Alt-1: River Improvement of the Dolok River without Dolok Dam.
4) Alt-3: River Improvement of the Dolok River with Dolok Dam.

with Associates
Table 9.9.25 River Improvement of the Dolok River with Bypass Floodway: Estimated
Land Acquisition Area
Alt-2 Alt-4
(m2) (m2)
Dolok River:
Sayung 1. Tugu 375,100 243,500
Sayung 2. Surodadi 179,300 125,900
Sayung 3. Timbulsloko 202,900 105,800
Sayung 4. Gemulak 195,700 129,900
Sayung 7. Tambakroto 177,700 126,000
Sayung 8. Pilangsari 94,290 75,570
Mranggen 9. Blorong 175,800 142,000
Mranggen 10. Tegalarum 150,800 115,900
Mranggen 11. Tamansari 87,170 69,150
Sub-total 1,742,250 1,211,500
Bypass Floodway:
Mranggen Karangsono 75,730 64,790
Mranggen Kembangarum 123,800 124,600
Mranggen Kalitengah 40,230 45,290
Mranggen Kangkung 101,000 77,270
Mranggen Sumberejo 75,720 72,750
Mranggen Kebonbatur 62,560 60,420
Mranggen Banyumeneng 127,800 83,930
Sub-total 606,840 529,050
Total 2,349,090 1,740,550
Notes;
3) Alt-2: River Improvement of the Dolok River with Bypass Floodway and without Dolok Dam.
4) Alt-4: River Improvement of the Dolok River with Bypass Floodway and with Dolok Dam.

with Associates
9.10 Consideration of Climate Change and Land Subsidence

Possibility of sea level rise and increase of frequency and amount storm rainfall is one of the problems in Indonesia
and also in and around Semarang and Demak. However, in order to grasp these phenomena, it is necessary to
continue observation of these phenomena for long-term.
According to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) 5th Assessment Report in 2013, mean sea level
rise around Indonesia from the periods of 1986-2000 to 2081-2100 is estimated at about 0.5m to 0.6m (0.5cm/year to
0.6cm/year) by Representative Concentration Pathway 4.5 scenario (RCP4.5).
In addition, there is serious problem of land subsidence in the plain area with relatively lower elevation in Semarang
and Demak. In order to grasp the rate (speed in m/year) of land subsidence in these areas, it is necessary to continue
monitoring as well.
Based on the observation of tide level at Tanjung Emas in Semarang Port and estimated rate of land subsidence
(6.33cm/year), the rate of sea water level rise is estimated at 0.45cm/year (source: PT. (PERSERO) PELABUHAN
INDONESIA III; Studi Pengamanan Banjir dengan
Sistem Polder di Pelabuhan Tanjung Emas” (Power Point Presentation)).
Although the rate of sea water level rise and increase of storm rainfall are still not so clear, it is necessary to consider
possibility of future effects of the climate change into the design of flood control such as river improvement.
Considering this, in the proposed design of river improvement of KBT, Babon, Dombo-Sayung and Dolok Rivers by
this Study include 1m allowance between the design high water level (HWL) and top of dikes or river walls. Such
allowance is 20cm more than the standard requirement of the freeboard of 0.8m (based on Japanese Standard)
corresponding to the design discharges of these rivers. Based on the monitoring of the effects of climate change,
stage-wise raising of dikes or river walls is to be conducted.
As for the land subsidence, countermeasures such as improvement of groundwater management in deep groundwater
and shifting water source to surface water as much as possible may be required to be conducted for making smaller or
hopefully for stopping land subsidence. Based on these countermeasures and monitoring of the phenomena of land
subsidence, stage-wise raising of dikes and river walls is to be conducted for the rivers.

with Associates
9.11 Conceptual Plan of Drainage Improvement

9.11.1 Drainage Systems and Drainage Problems
In addition to the flooding problems of the major Rivers such as KBT, Babon, Dombo-Sayung and Dolok Rivers,
there are also habitual problems of inland floods of the drainage systems. Drainage problems can be observed
between the KBT and the Dolok River. Figure 9.11 .33 shows the major drainage systems between the KBT and the
Dolok River. This figure also shows the ID number of the drainage basins set in this Study (see Sub-section 3.3.4).
Tenggang R.
(D-7-1)
D-9-3
Siringin R.
(D-7-2)
D-8-1
D-8-3
D-8-1
D-9-1
D-8-4
Note:
D-9-1 D-X-Y is the drainage basin
name set in this Study.
Figure 9.11.33 Major Drainage Systems between the KBT and Dolok River
Tenggang River and the Siringin River with their secondary and tertiary drainage channels form the major drainage
systems between right bank of the KBT and left bank of the Babon River (drainage basins: D-7-1 and D-7-2
respectively). These two (2) Drainage systems discharge rainfall runoff directly into the sea through the Tenggan
River and the Siringin River. It can be observed that there is serious problem of reducing discharge capacities of the
drainage channels by deposition of debris including garbage (example: the Tenggang River shown in Figure 9.11.2).
It seems that more than 70% of the cross section of the Tenggang River at the Railway Bridge is filled-up with debris
including garbage.
There are four (4) major drainage systems (drainage basis: D-8-1 to D-8-4) between right bank of the Babon River
and left bank of the Dombo-Sayung River. These drainage channels join with the mid-stream to downstream reaches
of the Dombo-Sayung River.
There are three (3) major drainage systems between right bank of the Dombo-Sayung River and left bank of the
Dolok River (drainage basins: D-9-1 to D-9-3). The drainage system of D-9-1 originates from the irrigation canal,
which starts from the irrigation intake at right side of Gergaji Weir of the Dombo-Sayung River at Pucanggading. The
drainage system of D-9-2 seems to be joined with the Dolok River before the construction of the existing dike on the
left bank of the Dolok River. Then, probably the flow direction of the drainage channel of D-9-2 was artificially
changed to west and joined with the drainage channel of D-9-1. Currently, the runoff discharge from the D-9-1 and
D-9-2 jointly flows through the drainage channel, and flows into the right bank side of Dombo-Sayung River (see
Figure 9.11 .36).
CTI Engineering International Co., Ltd. River cross section is filled-up 59

with Associates with debris including garbage,
which reduces discharge capacity
very much.
Figure 9.11.34 Tenggang River (Drainage Basin: D-7-1) at the Railway Crossing Point
Dombo-Sayung River
(a) Joint Drainage Channel of the (b) Sluice (Flap) Gate at the Inflow
Drainage Channels of D-9-1 and Point of the Joint Drainage
D-9-2 (to West Direction to the Channel of D-9-1 and D-9-2 to the
Dombo-Sayung River) Dombo-Sayung River
Figure 9.11.35 Joint Drainage Channel of the Drainage Basins of D-9-1 and D-9-2 at the
Right Bank Side of the Dombo-Sayung River
9.11.2 Condition and Mechanism of Inland Floods

Condition of Inland Flood:
Based on the results of the Flood Survey conducted by this Study (see Chapter 5), condition and mechanism
of inland floods were studied. As inland floods are the habitual problems, condition of annual flood is a good
reference. Flood map of annual flood with major drainage systems is shown in Figure 9.11.4. Relatively
deeper inundation with the maximum water depth of 0.5 to 1m occurs in the downstream of KBT, in the mid-
stream of the Tenggang River, along the drainage channel of D-8-4, D-9-1 and around the junction of the
Joint Drainage Channel of D-9-1 and D-9-2 with the Dombo-Sayung River. Shallower inundation with depth
of less than 0.5m occurs in wide areas around the major drainage systems.

with Associates
Note: D-8-2 Drainage Basin No.
Source: Flood Survey by the Study Team

Figure 9.11.36 Condition of Inland Flood (Annual Inundation)

with Associates
Mechanism of Inland Floods:

Based on the condition of inland floods as well as the information from people about sources of floods
(received during the Flood Survey), Figure 9.11 .37 shows categories and mechanism of inland floods.
The inland flood areas can be divided into the following three categories.
Category-1 Inland flood areas by drainage problem due to insufficient discharge capacity of
drainage systems: This area can be seen in the wide areas in the southern areas from
Pantura Road.
Category-2 Inland flood areas by drainage problem due to high tide together with insufficient
discharge capacity of drainage systems: This area can be seen in the northern area from
Pantura Road along the sea.
Category-3 Flooding areas by the rivers together with insufficient capacity of drainage systems:
These areas can be seen in the downstream of the KBT and downstream of the Dombo-
Sayung River around the junction with the joint drainage channel of the drainage basins
of D-9-1 and D-9-2.
Dolok R.
Dombo-Sayng R.
Babon R.
KBT
Mecanism/ Category of Inland
Flooding
Category-1:
Inland flood areas by drainage
problem due to insufficient
discharge capacity of drainage
systems
Category-2:
Inland flood areas by drainage
problem due to high tide
together with insufficient
discharge capacity of drainage
systems
Category-3:
Flood areas by the Rivers
together with insufficient
capacity of drainage systems
Figure 9.11.37 Mechanism/ Categories of Inland Flooding
9.11.3 Conceptual Plan of Drainage Improvement

Considering the phenomena and the mechanism of inland floods, the followings are the proposed conceptual plan of
drainage improvement (see Figure 9.11 .38).
(1) To clean up the Existing Drainage Channels

with Associates
Discharge capacity of the existing drainage channels, especially in the urban areas, are very much
reduced by the deposition of debris including garbage. Therefore, firstly, it is necessary to clean up the
existing drainage channels to recover their original discharge capacity. This will contribute for
mitigating the condition of inland floods very much.
(2) To improve the Drainage Channels
Inland floods are generally caused by insufficient discharge capacity of the drainage systems including
drainage channels against storm runoff. Therefore, it is necessary to improve drainage channels, so that
the drainage channels will have sufficient discharge capacity for flowing down design storm runoff.
This is also proposed by the JICA Master Plan and Feasibility Study in 1993 for the Tenggang River
and the Siringin River with their drainage channels (JICA study: “The Master Plan on Water Resources
Development and Feasibility Study for Urgent Flood Control and Urban Drainage in Semarang City
and Suburbs”, 1993).
This method can be generally applied for the southern areas from Pantura Road. However, among these
areas, there are also low-lying lands where high tide affects condition of inland floods. For these areas,
it is necessary to conduct step-wise land raising as well as land use management for not permitting new
building houses on the low-lying lands, or in case of approving development of land, it is necessary to
raise lands with enough height against floods.
In addition, it is recommended to keep ponds or wet land or paddy fields as much as possible for
keeping retention capacity in these areas, which will make smaller the necessary size of the drainage
channels.
(3) To treat separately the drainage channels between the Dombo-Sayung River and the Dolok River
In the present conditions, the drainage channels between right bank of the Dombo-Sayung River and the
left bank of the Dolok River (the drainage basins of D-9-1 and D-9-2) are jointly flow into the right
bank of the Dombo-Sayung River by changing their flow direction from north to west. The inflow
discharge from these drainage basins is heavy burden to the Dombo-Sayung River, which makes worse
the condition of flooding including overflow from the Dombo-Sayung River. Considering the
topography in-between the Dombo-Sayung River and the Dolok River, instead of flowing runoff of the
drainage basins into the Dombo-Sayung River, it is natural and also proposed to drain the runoff from
the above two drainage basins directly to the sea together with the runoff from the drainage basin of D-
9-3.
(4) To conduct land raising of the areas, where high tide affect inland flooding, together with improvement
of the drainage channels
Currently, in the land where inland floods are occurred by high tide together with insufficient discharge
capacity of drainage channels, small scale pump drainage or raising land of houses or installing small
low height blocking for stopping inflow water into houses can be seen. Considering sustainability of
solving the problem of inland floods in these areas, instead of providing large or medium scale of pump
drainage systems by surrounding the areas by polder dikes, it is better to conduct area by area step-wise
raising of the lands, which will make possible gravity drainage from these areas. People will be
temporary relocated during the construction of raising land and can return to the original areas after
completion of land raising one by one.
In addition, together with the land raising, improvement of the drainage channels is also to be
conducted.
Furthermore, in terms of new request for approving land development in these areas, it is necessary to
manage land use so that the requested land for development will be raised with sufficient height against
floods.
Normally, drainage improvement is planned with design scale of 5 to 10-year return period of storm rainfall. Suppose
that the design scale of the drainage improvement is set at 10-year return period, design peak discharges for the
improvement of the drainage channels are shown in Figure 9.11 .39 (refer to Figure 6.2.3 to 6.2.5) as an example.
It is recommended to conduct further study for drainage improvement based on the above conceptual drainage
improvement plan.

with Associates
N Stage Wise Land Raising with

Temporary Relocation of Houses
Note: People can return toJawa
the Sea
Dolok
original place after completion Dombo-Sayung River
of the land raising. River Combining the Drainage Channels
between the Dombo-Sayung and
Dolok River , treat drainage water
separately to the sea by drainage
improvement.
East Floodway
(KBT)
Improvement of
KBT
the Drainage Legend:
Channels River
Babon (including
Candi Main Drainage Channel
River dredging,
River
excavation and Major Road
Bajak enlargement) is
River Railway
necessary to be
during conducted.
Mundu
River
Natural Retarding
Pucanggading
Basin
Penggaron River Improvement (As
River Kebon- a supposition)
Batur Canal Barang Weir Drainage Improvement
Figure 9.11.38 Conceptual Plan of Drainage Improvement

with Associates
Jawa Sea Dolok

Dombo-Sayung
River
River Combining the Drainage Channels
between the Dombo-Sayung and
Dolok River, treat drainage water
separately to the sea.
Babon 70
River
East Floodway
25 20
(KBT) 54 44 21
24 Legend:
28 River
9 Major Road
KBT Railway
Candi Existing Overflow Weir
River Existing Gated Weir
Bajak
Natural Retarding
River
Kudung Close gate Basin
Mundu during River Improvement(As
River floods
a supposition)
Pucanggading Drainage Improvement
Penggaron 28 Runoff Peak Discharge

River Kebon- (m3/s) of 10-Year
Batur Canal Barang Weir Return Period
Figure 9.11.39 Design Discharge of Drainage Improvement (10-Year Return Period)

with Associates
*DO NOT PRINT THIS PAGE
内容
Chapter 9. flood control plans 9–1
9.1 Basic Concepts for Formulating Flood Control Plans 9–1
9.2 Conditions of Setting Design Discharge 9–1
9.3 Alternatives of Flood Control Plans 9–2
9.3.1 Alternatives of the Penggaron River System 9–2
9.3.2 Alternatives of the Dolok River System (Dolok River) 9–4
9.4 Design Discharge of the Alternatives 9–7
9.4.1 Design Discharge of the Alternatives of Penggaron River System 9–7
9.4.2 Design Discharge of the Alternatives of the Dolok River 9–7
9.5 Hydrological and Hydraulic Study on the Alternative Flood Control Plans 9–7
9.5.1 Penggaron RS_Alternative-1 9–7
9.5.2 Penggaron RS_Alternative-2 9–7
9.5.3 Dolok RS_Alternative-1 9–7
9.5.4 Dolok RS_Alternative-2 9–7
9.5.5 Set of Dolok Dam Outflow 9–7
9.5.6 Dolok RS_Alternative-3 (With Dolok Dam) 9–7
9.5.7 Dolok RS_Alternative-4 (With Dolok Dam) 9–7
9.6 Design Profile and Design Cross Sections of the Alternative Flood Control Plans9–7
9.6.1 Concepts for Setting Design Bed Profile and Design Cross Sections 9–7
9.6.2 KBT: Design Profile and Typical Design Cross Sections 9–7
9.6.3 Babon River: Design Profile and Typical Design Cross Sections 9–7
9.6.4 Dombo-Sayung River: Design Profile and Typical Design Cross Sections 9–7
9.6.5 Dolok River: Design Profile and Typical Design Cross Sections 9–7
9.7 Reconstruction of Bridges (etc.) 9–7
9.7.1 Existing River Crossing Structures 9–7
9.7.2 River Crossing Structures for Reconstruction 9–7
9.8 Relocation of Houses 9–7
9.8.1 KBT: Relocation of Houses 9–7
9.8.2 Babon River and the Dombo-Sayung River: Relocation of Houses 9–7
9.8.3 Dolok River: Relocation of Houses 9–7
9.9 Land Acquisition 9–7
9.9.1 KBT: Land Acquisition 9–7
9.9.2 Babon River and the Dombo-Sayung River: Land Acquisition 9–7
9.9.3 Dolok River: Land Acquisition 9–7
9.10 Consideration of Climate Change and Land Subsidence 9–7
9.11 Conceptual Plan of Drainage Improvement 9–7
9.11.1 Drainage Systems and Drainage Problems 9–7
9.11.2 Condition and Mechanism of Inland Floods 9–7
9.11.3 Conceptual Plan of Drainage Improvement 9–7

Chapter 9.flood Control Plans 9.1 Basic Concepts For Formulating Flood Control Plans

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Chapter 9.flood Control Plans 9.1 Basic Concepts For Formulating Flood Control Plans

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Study of the Dolok-Penggaron River System

and Design of the East Floodway, Final Report

CHAPTER 9. FLOOD CONTROL PLANS

9.1 Basic Concepts for Formulating Flood Control Plans

(1) River System Principle: Treatment of Floods within Each River

CTI Engineering International Co., Ltd. 1

(2) Design Discharge in the Upstream Reaches of the Babon River

9.3.1 Alternatives of the Penggaron River System

Alternative-1 (Alt-1): River improvements of the KBT, Babon and Dombo-Sayung

2 CTI Engineering International Co., Ltd.

Figure 9.3.2 Penggaron River System_Alt-2: River Improvements and Strengthening of

CTI Engineering International Co., Ltd. 3

9.3.2 Alternatives of the Dolok River System (Dolok River)

Figure 9.3.3 Dolok River_Alt-1: River Improvement without Dolok Dam

4 CTI Engineering International Co., Ltd.

Proposed Proposed Dolok Dam

Figure 9.3.5 Dolok River_Alt-3: River Improvement with Dolok Dam

CTI Engineering International Co., Ltd. 5

Bypass Floodway Course

6 CTI Engineering International Co., Ltd.

9.4 Design Discharge of the Alternatives

1) Design Discharge of the Penggaron River System:

CTI Engineering International Co., Ltd. 7

9.4.1 Design Discharge of the Alternatives of Penggaron River System

8 CTI Engineering International Co., Ltd.

Strengthening of the Retarding Basin:

CTI Engineering International Co., Ltd. 9

of D-9-1 Main Drainage Channel

10 CTI Engineering International Co., Ltd.

9.4.2 Design Discharge of the Alternatives of the Dolok River

Figure 9.4.12 Dolok River_Alt-1: Design Discharge (50-Year Return Period)

Figure 9.4.13 Dolok River_Alt-2: Design Discharge (50-Year Return Period)

CTI Engineering International Co., Ltd. 11

Figure 9.4.14 Dolok River_Alt-3: Design Discharge (50-Year Return Period)

Figure 9.4.15 Dolok River_Alt-4: Design Discharge (50-Year Return Period)

12 CTI Engineering International Co., Ltd.

9.5 Hydrological and Hydraulic Study on the Alternative Flood Control

9.5.1 Penggaron RS_Alternative-1

Downstream of retarding area

Upstream of retarding area

Figure 9.5.1 Natural Retarding Area (50-year Return Period of Flood)

Upstream of retarding area

Figure 9.5.2 Calculated Hydrograph at Upstream and Downstream of Retarding Area

CTI Engineering International Co., Ltd. 13

(2) Structure of Hydraulic Model for Alternative-1 (MIKE11)

Figure 9.5.3 Structure of hydraulic model for Alternative-1

Penggaron River BKT Candi Bajak Kedum mundu

14 CTI Engineering International Co., Ltd.

(3) Result of Alternative-1

Babon River_longitudinal Water level & DIscharge Cal water level（50year）

Dombo River_longitudinal Water level & DIscharge Cal water level（50year）

Distance from river mouth (m)

Figure 9.5.5 Calculated Longitudinal Profile of Water Level and Discharge

9.5.2 Penggaron RS_Alternative-2

CTI Engineering International Co., Ltd. 15

(1) Strengthening Area

Strengthening of the Retarding Basin by Excavation:

Figure 9.5.6 Strengthening Area for Retarding Basin

Table 9.5.1 Specification of Satellite Elevation Data

The reliability of hydraulic analysis to estimate retarding basin capacity highly

16 CTI Engineering International Co., Ltd.

: Strengthening Retarding Area