Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Descent: Now Determine The Step Length
Descent: Now Determine The Step Length
233
Here, - 1 ) = 4 + 3 - 5 x - Br,
-5x,-8
Sr, + 6u
and
So,
d 8-St-8
Sy +63 oo
8(0)-50)-
-5(0)+60) Joo
So the search direction is, S, =-V
S)
Now determine the steplength v in the direction S, ie. find vi by minimizing /0,
Now, f , + v S ) =f 8 y , 0) = 256Ví - 6 4 i with respect to Vi
64
V512 8
Me now set X+viS-X-v, ie. , X+VS
nce V-3)-
the process.
ropcat
1s not optimum, hence we
234 Optimization Methods for Engineers
Iteration 2: S- -X,)= =
d(75v-25V)=0,
dy
ie.
15025 =0
50 6
Since
lteration 3: S--)=V%=0
To find v. we minimize fa, +
V,S)
J0, +V)=S1 +4.16y, 0.83) =69.22v-50.54V 27.177
Setting dfldy, = 0 and solving, we get V = 0.365
)=0R33+0365416/251
Since
8(48/23)-5(40/23)-80
-548/23)+ 6(40/23)o
Tllustration 109 MinimizeandfC) x x+2,+4r, +5 using the stecp
= +
P e s t d e s c e n t
DD, respectively. We can understand here that tne tuncton value increases at a Tatert
along A4 at point A, but not at B. Similarly, the inercasing rate 1s tast along B at B,but
at C, and so on. Thus, the direction
varnes
pom pn d keeps ascending te
trom
Method
10.6 Cauchy's Steepest Descent
Cauchy was the first to make use of the negative gradicnt direction in 1847 for minimiz
problems. In this method, initial tial
an point A, is
chosen, which is iteratively moved alng
the stecpest descent direction until the optimum point is tound. The procedure is summaie
Step 3 Detemine the optimal step length y in the direction S and set
XpXVS, =X- V
Step 4: Test the new point, X,, for optimality, If X, is optimum. tnen so
Step 5 A 5 not optimal, set i m 1 t T and repcat the process trom uep omwards
Merits
and simpie.
Cauchy's method is easy
t s supposcd to be the best unconstrained optimization technique since u
one-dimensional search in the best direction.
Demerits
1. Cauchy's method is not really effective in most problems owing to u
steepest descent direction is a local property but not global
Though the function is differentiable at all the points, the calculation ol d
gradient dfdx, may be impractical or impossible in some cascs.
not be etfoctive,
3. computations for evaluation in t
This method requires large Th
tunctions which roquire large computation time for finding the g
time is wastod in just knowing the direction but not the optimal
4. This method cannot work if the gradient V is not defined at the po
5. This method is limitcd to continuous and differentiablefunctions aly