Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Contemporary World: Chapter 1: What Is Globalization?
Contemporary World: Chapter 1: What Is Globalization?
Contemporary World: Chapter 1: What Is Globalization?
Facebook
- A global social networking site that provides instantaneous communication across countries
and continents.
Globalization
- The integration of the national markets to a wider global market signified by the increased free
trade.
Anti-globalization
- Resisting the trade deals among countries facilitated and promoted by the global
organizations.
Manfred Steger
- Described globalization as “the expansion and intensification of social relations and
consciousness across world-time and world-space”
Expansion
- Refers to both the creation of new social networks and the multiplication of existing
connections that cut across traditional political, economic, cultural, and geographic
boundaries.
Non-governmental Organizations (NGOs)
- Are networks that connect a more specific group- social workers and activists- from different
corners of the globe.
Intensification
- Refers to the expansion, stretching, and acceleration of these networks.
Steger notes that “Globalization processes do not occur merely at an objective, material level but
they also involve the subjective plane of human consciousness”
Globalism
- is a widespread belief among powerful people that the global integration of economic markets
is a beneficial for everyone.
Arjun Appadurai
- he stated that there are different kinds of globalization that occurs on multiple and intersecting
dimensions of integration that is called scapes.
Ethnoscape
- Global movement of the people.
Technoscape
- Refers to the circulation of mechanical goods and software.
Financescape
- Denotes the global circulation of money.
Ideoscape
- Is the realm where political ideas move around.
1. There are countries or states that are independent and govern themselves.
2. Countries interact with each other through diplomacy.
3. There are international organizations, like the United Nations (UN) that facilitate the interactions.
4. International organizations also take on lives of their own.
How does the global system originate?
1. Village/Tribe - People in various regions of the world have identified exclusively with units.
2. Christian world - was started by apostles of Jesus Christ until Christianity became a state religion.
3. Nation-State - refers to state governing a nation.
What is the distinction between nation and state?
3.1 State - refers to a country and its government. It has four attributes known as
- It exercises authority over a specific population (citizens).
- It governs a specific territory
- It has a structure of government
- It has sovereignty over its territory.
3.2 Nation is defined as "imagined community' or group of people shared a common culture
language, history etc. (Benedict Anderson)
"After the brutal religious war between Catholics and Protestants, the Holy Roman Empire, Spain,
France, Sweden, and the Dutch Republic designed a system that would avert wars in the future by
recognizing that the treaty signers exercise complete control over their domestic affairs and swear
not to meddle in each other's affairs" (Claudio, p.30, 2018).
1. Westphalian system - is a system that gives a stability for European nations through direct
control to their domestic activities free from interference of other nations.
2. Napoleonic Code - is a principle that spread "liberty", "equality" and "fraternity" as themes for
creation of new form of government in France.
3. Metternich system - is an alliance of great powers; United Kingdoms, Austria, and Prussia and
etc. that restored monarchical, hereditary, and religious privileges of rulers.
1. Immanuel Kant - argued that citizens in the state must give up some freedom and establish a
continuously growing state consisting of various nations which will ultimately include the nations of
the world". Since, if there is no form of world government then international system will be
chaotic.
2. Jeremy Bentham - says that the objectives of the global legislators should aim to propose
legislation that would create " the greatest happiness of all nations taken together".
3. Giuseppe Mazzini - believes that free, unified nation-state should be the basis of global
cooperation.
4. Woodrow Wilson - forwarded the principle of self-determination and advocate for the creation of
League of Nations to prevent a world war II.
Socialist internationalism
Achievement: Declaration of International women's Day and Labor Day
1. Karl Marx -claimed a premium economic equality among the classes of citizens in the world.
2. Friedrich Engels and Karl Marx established a socialist revolution through a battle cry "Workers
of the world, Unite! you have nothing to lose but your chains."
3. Vladimir Lenin - established the Communist International (COMINTERN) in 1919 to serve as
central body for directing communist parties all over the world.
4. Stalin re-stablished the Comintern as Communist Information Bureau (COMINFORM) in order
to direct the various communist parties that had taken power in Eastern Europe.
Edward D. Mansfield and Helen V. Miller state that economic and political definitions of regions vary.
Non-State Regionalism
- It is not only states that agree to work together in the name of single cause or causes.
- The concept of "new regionalism" varies in form.
- New regionalism differs significantly from traditional state-to-state regionalism when it comes to
identifying problems.
- One of the challenges encountered by new regionalists are the discord that may emerge among
them.
Regionalism faces multiple challenges, the most serious of which is the resurgence of militant nationalism and
populism.
ASEAN members continue to disagree over the extent to which member countries should sacrifice their
sovereignty for the sake of regional stability.
Western governments may see regional organizations not simply as economic formations but also as
instruments of political democratization.
Singapore, China, and Russia see democracy as an obstacle to the implementation and deepening of
economic globalization because constant public inquiry about economic projects and lengthy debate slow
down implementation or lead to unclear outcomes.
In actuality, the relationship between religion and globalization is much more complicated. Peter
Burger argues that far from being secularized, the "contemporary world is... furiously religious.”
Religions
There is hardly a religious movement today that does not use religion to oppose "profane" globalization. Yet,
two of the so-called "old world religions" - Christianity and Islam - see globalization less as an obstacle and
more as an opportunity to expand their reach all over the world.
Religious fundamentalism may dislike globalization's materialism, but it continues to use "the full range of
modern means of communication and organization" that is associated with this economic transformation.
Major Religions
- Christianity
- Judaism
- Islam
- Hinduism
- Buddhism
- Confucianism
- Bragged about the superiority of the Islamic rule over its secular counterparts.
Nahdlatul Ulama
Alexis de Tocqueville
- French historian and diplomat that wrote “not only do Americans practice their religions
out of self-interest”
Jose Casanova
- Stated that “historically, religion has always been the very center of all great political
conflicts”
Jack Lule
When commentators refer to "media", they mean the technologies of mass communication.
Marshall McLuhan
- once declared that "the medium is the message." His statement was an attempt to
draw attention to how media, as a form of technology, reshape societies.
Television is not a simple bearer of messages it also shapes the social behavior of users and
reorient family behavior.
Smart phones allow users to keep in touch instantly with multiple people at the same time.
A lot of these early thinkers assumed that global media had a tendency to homogenize culture.
Commentators believed that media globalization coupled with American hegemony would create
a form of cultural imperialism.
Herbert Schiller
- argued that not only was the world being Americanized, but this process also led to the
spread of "American" capitalist values like consumerism.
Proponents of the idea of cultural imperialism ignored the fact that media messages are not just
made by producers, they are also consumed by audiences.
Media scholars began to pay attention to the ways in which audiences understood and interpreted
media messages.
The field of audience studies emphasizes that media consumers are active participants in the
meaning-making process, who view media "texts" (in media studies, a "text" simply refers to the
content of any medium) through their own cultural lenses.
As with all new media, social media have both beneficial and negative effects. This form of
communication has democratized access. Anyone with an internet connection or a smart phone can
use Facebook and Twitter for free. These media have enabled users to be consumers and producers
of information simultaneously.
The dark side of social media shows that even a seemingly open and democratic media may be co-
opted towards undemocratic means. Global online propaganda will be the biggest threat to face the
globalization of media deepens.
As consumers of media, users must remain vigilant and learn how to distinguish fact from falsehood.
People must be critical of mainstream media and traditional journalism that may also operate based
on vested interest.
Saskia Sassen
Gentrification
Banlieue
Most adolescents would say that “we do not have the power to inspire change” or
that “we are not heard so why should we speak up”. However, let us not forget that you are the
future leaders of our country. The advantage of youth is their zeal and optimism in effecting change
for the country. Youth participation should not be the exception, but rather the norm. In politics where
cynical attitudes dominate among older individuals, youth participation provides a breath of fresh air
in raising issues and concerns that impact society in general.
Active citizenship is also associated with “sense of community.” People, including
adolescents, participate in communal activities because it is their way of “giving back”. The sense of
community they feel with their location also persuades adolescents to do something for their
respective communities, especially those community groups considered to be a minority. Active
citizenship may facilitate ethnic pride and provide a voice to the woes of their social group.
The Self is a dynamic construct in that it is shaped by external forces and personal factors. Active
citizenship embraces one’s individuality through the choices a person make and the behaviors they
manifest. Early exposure to politics and political systems may augment adolescent’s development of
their self. It fosters critical thinking, formation of advocacies, comprehension and understanding, and
genuine concerns for the environment and communities. Such exposure may lead to successful
adaptation of a particular advocacy and ensuring everyone benefits in the long run.
Our political self is a result of various personal and environmental factors that impact
the individual. Our political identity doesn’t begin at the age of voting; together with active citizenship,
our awareness of community concerns may lead to optimal development of strong, intelligent, and
passionate community leaders and youth participants. Thus, there is no such thing as a right time to
start becoming involved; adolescent participation in political activities can strengthen their
standpoints, allowing them to be heard by the general public, and ensuring a strong, stable state,
shaped by a strong, stable citizenry. As adolescence is a time of searching for identity and
establishing a core Self, imbibing active citizenship, becoming aware of issues pervading society,
engaging in political discourse, and other similar behaviors can shape the millennial generation to
become effective agents of change.