Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Lexical Approach: Written Language
The Lexical Approach: Written Language
The Lexical Approach: Written Language
Use – spoken language -vocabulary -Input – process -coherence -competence -product -accuracy
exercises -usage -learning -intake - receptive skills – written language – performance -productive
1- Written language
Spoken language
Complete the following chart with the words / phrases discussed above
–––
Michael Lewis wrote his book “The Lexical Approach” in 1993. When he wrote it his intention
was to offer an applicable methodology book. He says that teachers should decide according
to their criteria whether:
Evidently in this approach the role of lexis in a language is highlighted as well as its
contribution to language pedagogy.
If we take into consideration the standard views about what a language is, we know that:
M. Lewis disagrees with this view. His key principle is that language consists of:
Grammaticalised lexis
Obviously according to this approach more attention should be paid to lexis. M. Lewis also
considers that language consists of chunks. Combinations of these chunks produce coherent
texts. These chunks can be of different types:
1. Single words: These are words that can stand alone. A single substitution brings about
a change in meaning.
e.g., Can you give me your pen?/ruler?/pencil?
2. Multi-word items: These are also called mini idioms: combinations that are not
reversible.
e.g., bread and butter – By the way – To and fro.
3. Expressions:
Semi-fixed : Expressions with slots which may be filled in a limited number of
ways.
e.g., I haven’t seen you + slot filler: Time expressions with for or since.
Fully fixed: For example, greetings, idioms, phrases such as thank you, etc.
M. Lewis pays special attention to collocations , the phenomenon whereby certain words
frequently co-occur in natural text.
1. Words that carry very little meaning are called de-lexicalized word.
2. Communicative power is most rapidly increased by expanding students’ vocabularies
but particularly high content words.
3. When relatively high content nouns are introduced, it should be natural to introduce
with them verbs and adjectives which form powerful or relatively fixed collocations.
4. Students could usefully be offered a group of sentences for comprehension and
reflection. These INSTITUTIONALIZED UTTERANCES could be both used to increase
communicative power and as a resource. The analysis of those sentences would
provide a basis for a gradual perception of pattern.
5. Well chosen groups of SENTENCE HEADS exemplify the frequent or probable pattern
of English.
6. Supra sentential LEXICAL linking is an important cohesive device in spontaneous
conversation.
7. A central requirement of the lexical Approach is that language should be discourse and
text rather than sentence based.
8. Value synonyms are alternative language items used in spontaneous speech.
9. In reported speech, the reporter summarises or synopsises the whole event lexically
and so requires an adequate repertoire of synopsises verbs.
Final Comments:
1. The importance of lexis and probable language should be taken into account.
2. The role of grammar should not be neglected but less attention is to be paid to
sentence grammar.
3. Uncollocated nouns should be avoided.
4. Probable rather than possible language.
5. Organizing learners’ notebooks to reveal patterns and retrieval.
6. The language which learners may meet outside the classroom.
Task1.
1. Absent from……………………………….
2. Guilty of………………………………………
3. A bar of………………………………………
4. Suspicious of……………………………..
5. It’s not relevant to the present situation.
6. We had a ……………………..time.
7. It consists…………………………….
8. It was very………………………….equipped
9. Prices fell……………………..
10. Things went……………………..wrong
Task 2
Bibliography
Lewis, Michael. The Lexical Approach. Hove: Language Teaching Publications, 1993.
Lewis, Michael. Implementing the Lexical Approach. Hove: Language Teaching Publications,
1995.