Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Finance 1
Finance 1
A Project submitted to
ofMaster in Commerce
By
Ms. Ruksar Ibrahim Mahadkar
Roll No. 3218
OCT - 2021
A PROJECT REPORT ON
“COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF CAPITAL STRUCTURE OFSME'S AT
NSIC”
A Project submitted to
University of Mumbai for partial completion of the degree
ofMaster in Commerce
Under the faculty of commerce
By
Roll No.3218
I the undersigned Ms. Ruksar Ibrahim mahadkar by, declare that the work in this
project work entitled “COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF CAPITAL STRUCTURE OF SME'S AT NSIC”
forms my own contribution to the research work carried out under the guidance of Mr.
Mansing S. Liman is a result of my own research work and has not been previously submitted
to any other University for any other Degree / Diploma to this or any otherUniversity.
Wherever reference has been made to previous works of others, it has been clearly
indicatedassuch and included in the bibliography.
I, here by further declare that all information of this document has been obtained and
presentedinaccordance with academic rules and ethical conduct.
Sign,
Certified by,
This is to certify that Ms. Ruksar Ibrahim Mahadkar has worked and duly
completed his project work for the degree of Master in Commerce under the faculty of
Commerce in the subject of Advanced Financial Accounting and his project is entitled,
It is his own work and facts reported by his personal findings and investigations.
Seal of
The
College
Date of Submission:
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
To list who all have helped me is difficult because they are so numerous and the depth isso
enormous. I would like to acknowledge the following as being idealistic channels and fresh dimensionsin the
completion of this project.
I take this opportunity to thank the University of Mumbai for giving me chance to do thisproject. I would like
to thank my Principal, Mrs. Anjali. S. Puranik for providing the necessaryfacilities required for completion
of this project. I take this opportunity to thank our Coordinator Mr. Mansing. S. Liman, for his
moralsupport and guidance. I would also like to express my sincere gratitude towards my project guide
Mr.Mansing S. Liman whose guidance and care made the project successful.
I would like to thank my College Library, for having provided various reference books and magazines
related to my project. Lastly, I would like to thank each and every person who directly or indirectly helped
me in the completion of the project especially My Parents and Peers who supported me throughout my
project.
LIST OF CONTENTS
S. No Topic Pg. no
Abstract 07
1. Chapter -1 08
Introduction 08
Objectives 11
Need for capital structure planning 11
Scope and coverage 12
Research and methodology 12
Limitations 13
2. Chapter-2
Literature review 14
3 Chapter-3
Company & Industry Profile 18,22 & 26
4 Chapter -4
Conceptual framework 30
5 Chapter-5
Data analysis & interpretation 44
6 Chapter -6
Findings & suggestions 52 & 53
7 Chapter-7
Conclusion 54
Bibliography
Annexures-1,2
LIST OF TABLES
LIST OF GRAPHS
s.n Graph Name Page No.
o No.
1 5.1(a) Debt –equity ratios between serwel and raghuvamsi companies 46
One of the most critical areas of the finance function is to make decisions about the firm’s
capital structure. Capital is required to finance investments in plant and machinery,
inventory, accounts receivable and so on. Capital structure is the part of financial structure,
which represents long term sources. It is the permanent financing of the company
represented primarily by shareholders’ funds and long term debt and excluding all short-
term credit. To quote Walker, “The term capital structure is generally defined to include
only long term debt and total stockholder’s investment” (Walker).It refers to the
Capitalization of long term sources of funds such as debentures, preference share capital,
long term debt and equity share capital including reserves and surplus (retained earnings).
According to Bogen, “Thecapital structure may consist of a single class of stock, or it may be
complicated by several issues of bonds and preferred stock, the characteristics of which may
vary considerably”. In other words, “capital structure refers to the composition of
capitalization i.e., to the proportion between debt and equity that make up capitalization”
(Philips).
Weston and Brigham have indicated the capital structure by the following equation
(Weston):
Capital Structure = Long term debt – Preferred stock + Net worth
(or) Capital Structure = Total Assets – Current Liabilities.
In this Project, an attempt has been made to study the “Pattern of Capital
Structure in SME at NSIC. An analysis of long-term solvency, assessment of
debt-equity, debt to total fund and justification for the use of debt through the
application of ratio analysis and statistical test has been undertaken. The time
period considered for evaluating the study is four years.
Chapter-1
INTRODUCTI
ON
Introduction of capital structure
The financing decisions occupy a pivotal role in the overall finance function in a
corporate firm which mainly concerns itself with an efficient utilization of the funds provided
by the owners or obtained from external sources together with those retained or ploughed
back out of surplus or undistributed profits. These decisions are mainly in the nature of
planning capital structure, working capital and mechanism through which funds can be
raised from the capital market whenever required. The financing decisions explains how to
plan an appropriate mix with least count, how to raise long term funds, and how to
mobilize the funds for working capital within a short span of time. Such a financing policy
provides an appropriate backdrop for formulating effective policies for investment of funds
as well as management of earnings. It contributes to magnifying the earnings on equity as
profitability (expressed as return on equity), to a large extent, is dependent on the degree of
leverage in the capital structure. Besides, the valuation of the structure of physical assets
depends fundamentally on the financing mix. This makes it necessary for the management of
a firm to pursue a well thought out of financing policy, which ought to be framed initially,
incorporating, among other things, the proportion of the debt and equity, types of debts and
own funds to be used and volume of the funds to be raised from each source or combination
of sources, to enable the firm to have a proper capitalization. In the absence of this, the firm
may face the problem of either over-capitalization or under-capitalization impeding its
smooth financial functioning.
It is obvious that functioning decisions are extremely important for corporate firms.
Such decisions, in management parlance, are termed as capital structure decisions. The term
capital structure is used to describe the combination of various sources of finance employed
to raise funds. It implies, in other words, that when a firm chooses to use a group of
sources in certain proportions the resulting pattern is
referred to as capital structure of the firm. The sources of finance could be divided in terms
of ownership of funds and duration of funds. The former comprises owned and borrowed
funds while the latter includes long, medium and short term funds. Of the two, the duration-
based classification is useful for preparing a plan to meet long term as well as short term
capital requirements while ownership-based classification is useful for selection of specified
sources, determining debt-equity ratio and analyzing impact of capital structure decisions
on the earnings on equity. As the ownership based classification suggests that there are two
types of sources of finance, namely owned and borrowed funds, the capital structure
represents the component relationship between owned and borrowed funds. The owned
funds which are also described as equity fund may be defined as funds provided by or
belonging to the share-holders. In the opinion Raj want Singh and Brij Kumar, the capital
structure is made up of the long term borrowings, the preferred stock and the common stock
equity including all related net worth accounts. Similarly Morarka.R observes that the
capital structure implies a degree of permanency and normally omits short term borrowings
of less than one year but would include other intermediate and long term borrowings. The
financial institutions consider only long term sources of finance for computing the debt-equity
ratio of corporate firm.
Definition
A mix of a company's long-term debt, specific short-term debt, common equity and preferred
equity, the capital structure is how a firm finances its overall operations and growth by
using different sources of funds.
Debt comes in the form of bond issues or long-term notes payable, while equity is classified
as common stock, preferred stock or retained earnings. Short-term debt such as working
capital requirements is also considered to be part of the capital structure
Theories of capital structure
Different kinds of theories have been propounded by different authors to explain the
relationship between capital structure, cost of capital and the value of the firm. The main
contributors to the theories are Durand, Ezra, Solomon, Modigliani and Miller.
The important theories are discussed below:
Net Income Approach
Net Operating Income Approach.
The Traditional Approach.
Modigliani and Miller Approach.
1. Net Income Approach. According to this approach, a firm can minimize the
weighted average cost of capital and increase the value of the firm as well as market
price of equity shares by using debt financing to the maximum possible extent. The
theory propounds that a company can increase its value and decrease the overall cost
of capital by increasing the proportion of debt in its capital structure. This approach
is based upon the following assumptions:
The cost of debt is less than the cost of equity.
There are no taxes.
The risk perception of investors is not changed by the use of debt.
2. Net Operating Income Approach. This theory as suggested by Durand is another
extreme of the effect of leverage on the value of the firm. It is diametrically opposite
to the net income approach. According to this approach, change in the capital
structure if a company does not affect the market value of the firm and the overall
cost of capital remains constant irrespective of the method of financing. It implies
that the overall cost of capital remains the same whether the debt- equity mix is
50:50 or 20:80 or 0:100. Thus, there is nothing as an optimal capital structure and
every capitalstructure is the optimum capital structure. This theory presumes that:
The market capitalizes the value of the firm as a whole.
The business risk remains constant at every level of debt equity mix;
There are no corporate taxes.
3. The Traditional Approach. The traditional approach, also known as intermediate
approach, is a compromise between extremes of net income approach and net
operating income approach. According to this theory, the
value of the firm can be increased initially or the cost of capital can be decreased by
using more debt as the debt is a cheaper source of funds than equity. Thus, optimum
capital structure can be reached by a proper debt- equity mix. Beyond a particular
point, the cost of equity increases because increased debt increases the financial risk
of the equity shareholders. The advantage of cheaper debt at this point of capital
structure is offset by increased cost of equity. After this there comes a stage, when
the increased cost of equity cannot be offset by the advantage of low-cost debt. Thus,
overall cost of capital, according to this theory, decreases up to a certain point,
remains more or less unchanged for moderate increase in debt thereafter; and
increases or rises beyond a certain point. Even the cost of debt may increase at this
stage due to increased financial risk.
Objectives
The present study aims at endeavoring the following objectives:
To analyze the pattern of capital structure;
To assess of long-term solvency; and
To ascertain the justification for the use of debt.
Capital structure means the mixture of share capital and other long term liabilities. In
capital structure, we include equity share capital, preference share capital, debenture and
long term debt. Some of companies want to become smart. They slowly decrease equity
share capital and increases loan excessively which may be very risky because these
company has to pay fixed cost of interest and has to manage repayment of loan after some
time. Some mistake in it, may be risky for its solvency. So, decision relating to capital
structure is very important for company
Need for capital structure
For the real growth of the company the financial manager of the company should plan an
optimum capital for the company. The optimum capital structure is one that maximizes the
market value of the firm. There are significant variations among industries and companies
within an industry in terms of capital structure. Since a number of factors influence the
capital structure decision of a company, the
judgment of the person making the capital structure decisions play a crucial part. A totally
theoretical model can’t adequately handle all those factors, which affects thecapital structure
decision in practice. These factors are highly psychological, complex and qualitative and do
not always follow accepted theory, since capital markets are not perfect and decision has to
be taken under imperfect knowledge and risk.
An appropriate capital structure or target capital structure can be developed only when all
those factors, which are relevant to the company’s capital structure decision, are properly
analyzed and balanced. The capital structure should be planed generally keeping in view the
interest of the equity shareholders and financial requirements of the company. The equity
shareholders being the owner of the company and the providers of risk capital (equity),
would be concerned about the ways of financing a company’s operations. However, the
interest of other groups, such as employee, customers, creditors, society and government,
should be given reasonable consideration when the company lays down its objective in terms
of the shareholders wealth maximization, it is generally compatible with the interest of
other groups. The management of companies may fix its capital structure near the top of this
range in order to make maximum use of favorable leverage, subject to other requirements
such as flexibility, solvency, control and norms set by the financial institutions- The Security
Exchange Board of India (SEBI) and Stock Exchanges.
Scope and coverage
The present study is confined to SME. This study is restricted to assess the pattern of capital
structure in SME with the help of the ratio analysis. The time period considered for
evaluating the study is four years
Research methodology
“Research Methodology is a systematic and objective process of identifying and formulating
the problem by setting objectives and methods for collecting, editing, calculating,
evaluating, analyzing, interpreting and presenting data in order to find justified solutions.”
Research design:
The Descriptive research design has been using in this study. Descriptive research studies,
which are concerned with describing the characteristics of a particular individual or of a
group or a situation. Studies concerned with specific predictions, with narration of facts and
characteristics concerning individual, group or a situation are examples of descriptive
research studies.in this project, income and balance statements are evaluated to know the
state of affairs as it existed during the years 2010-2015. This helps to know the performance
of the schemes.
Sources of Data:
There are two sources of data namely:
1. Primary data
2. Secondary data
Primary Data:
Primary data are those which are collected for the first time and so are in crude form. They
are original in character. If an individual or an office collects the data to study a problem,
the data are the raw material of the enquiry. Primary data are always collected from the
source. It is collected either by the investigator himself orthrough his agents.
Secondary Data:
Secondary data are those which have already been collected by someone for the purpose
and are available for the present study. The choice to a large extent depends on the
preliminaries to data collection some of the commonly used methods are discussed below;
In this research, the various sources of secondary data, which are used, are:
• Literature Reviews
• Journals
• Magazines
• Balance sheets
Tools of analysis
The present study is confined to SME. This study is restricted to assess the pattern of capital
structure in SME with the help of the ratio analysis. The time period considered for
evaluating the study is four years
Limitations
It requires a small business to make regular monthly payments of principaland
interest.
Availability is often limited to established businesses.
Since lenders primarily seek security for their funds, it can be difficult for
unproven businesses to obtain loans.
Very complicate and expensive to administer.
Chapter-2
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
Study on capital structure has become one of the most significant subjects of interest in
modern finance. It has acquired lot of recognition from researchers during recent years.
There exists a vast body of literature that has examined the determinants of the capital
structure of companies in developed economies. Empirical works based on theories of
capital structure has been previously conducted for Australia (Cassar and Holmes, 2003;
Johnsen and McMahon, 2005), Spain (Sorgorb, 2005), UK (Hall et al., 2000) and the US
(Gregory et al., 2005). However studies on capital structure have been extended to the
developing economy contexts only in recent past. The level of development of a country’s
legal and financial systems has been shown to influence the capital structure of its
enterprises (Fan et al., 2006). In economies with relatively weak investor protection,
enterprises are more likely to employ short-term debt than long-term debt in their capital
structure. This is in contrast to enterprises in economies with active stock
markets and large banking sectors which have more long-term debts (Demirguc- Kunt and
Maksimovic (1999). Despite of the growing volume of literature on the determinants of
capital structure in the developing economy context is available, there has been limited
work conducted on SMEs in these countries. One possible reason for this discrepancy is that
SME data is often scarce and sometimes not reliable, since these firms are not officially
required to disclose detailed information or to have their reports audited. Some preliminary
work has been carried out for Poland (Klapper et al., 2006), Vietnam (Nguyen and
Ramachandran, 2006), and Ghana (Abor and Biekpe, 2007). All these studies implies to the
fact that the that theories of capital structure developed to explain the financing decisions of
SMEs in developed economies are not equally applicable in developing economies, due to
their institutional and organizational differences. Many authors suggested the firm size as a
potential determinant of capital structure decision.
-Jean J. Chen”
“Small and medium-size enterprises: Access to finance as a growth constraints, June 2006
-Thorsten Beck”
Sheridan Titamin and Robert wessel’s in this paper analyzes the explanatory power of some
of the recent theories of optimal capital structure. The study extends empirical work on
capital structure theory in three ways. First, it examines a much broader set of capital
structure theories, many of which have not previously been
analyzed empirically. Second, since the theories have different empirical implications in
regard to different types of debt instruments, the authors analyze measures of short-term,
long-term, and convertible debt rather than an aggregate measure of total debt. Third, the
study uses a factor-analytic technique that mitigates the measurement problems encountered
when working with proxy variables.
In this study, Kenny Bell and Ed Vos has described SME capital structure behavior is found
typically to follow pecking order behavior. However, the theoretical underpinnings of the
pecking order theory are doubted in the case of SMEs as SME managers highly value
financial freedom, independence, and control while the pecking order theory assumes firms
desire financial wealth and suffer from severe adverse selection costs in accessing external
finance. Alternatively, the contentment hypothesis of Vos, et al (2007) contends the reason
SMEs exhibit pecking order behavior is the aversion to loss of control to outside financiers
and the preference for financial freedom. This paper develops the capital structure
predictions of the contentment hypothesis, reviews the predictions of the tradeoff and
pecking order theories for relevant variables, reviews the findings of existing SME capital
structure studies, and provides original empirical support for the contentment hypothesis
using a survey of over 2,000 firms from Germany, Greece, Ireland, South Korea, Portugal,
Spain, and Vietnam.
“SME Capital Structure: The Dominance of Demand Factors, August 2009
- By Kenny Bell and Ed Vos”
3.1 NSIC -
An ISO 9001:2008 Company
Industry profile
To collect and disseminate both domestic as well as international marketing
intelligence benefits of MSMEs. This cell, in addition to spreading awareness about
various programmers/schemes for MSMEs, will specifically maintain database and
disseminate information on the following.
National small industries corporation (NSIC), AN ISO 9001: 2008 certified
company and a govt. of India enterprise has been working to fulfill its mission of
promoting, aiding and fostering the growth of micro, small & medium enterprises in the
country. Over a period of five decades of transition, growth and development, NSIC has
proved its strength within the country and abroad by promoting modernization, up
gradation of technology NSIC operation through country wide network of 123 offices
and technical centre’s in the country. In addition, NSIC has 48 training cum incubation
centers & with a large professional manpower; NSIC provides a package of services as
per the needs of MSME sectors. To manage operations in African countries, NSIC
operatesfrom its office in Johannesburg, South Africa.
This cell provides a single point contact to collect database relating to bulk
buyers in government, public and private sectors, the detail of exporters, international
buyers and technology suppliers. Besides, the information on trade leads and products
wise buyers and sellers as well as database relating to DGS & D suppliers with prices of
their products, shall also be provided by this NSIC marketing intelligence cell to help
MSMEs in getting appropriate information at one place and at the right time which will
enable MSMEs in enhancing their ability to gauge and be at par with the global
demand. MSMEs need to be provided with market related information, new avenues for
their products, new business practices, both domestically as well as overseas. MSMEs
are handicapped because of non availability of information pertaining to central
government / state government policies and programs, the support schemes and services
of central /state PSUs availability of new technologies, international and national
tenders, opportunities available in various countries for products and project exports
Schemes of NSIC:
The national small industries corporation limited an ISO 9001: 2008 certified company
established in 1955, has been working to fulfill its mission of promoting, aiding and
fostering the growth of micro and small enterprises in the country.
NSIC carries forward its mission to assist micro and small enterprises with a set of specially
tailored schemes designed to put them in a competitive and advantageous position. The
scheme comprises of facilitating marketing support, credit support, technology support and
other support services.
Marketing is a strategic tool for business development and survival of the enterprises in
today’s Competitive era. NSIC acts as a facilitator to promote micro and small enterprises
products and has devised a number of schemes to support in their marketing efforts both in
the outside the country. Some of the schemes are briefly described an under.
Single point registration for government purchase:
Government is the largest buyer of product from micro and small enterprises. In
order to meet its requirement of purchase, NSIC operation a single point registration
scheme under the government purchase program, where in NSIC issue registration to
eligible micro and small enterprises for the purpose of suppliers to the government
departments. The registration is par with DGS & D, the unit registration under this gets the
following facilities.
• Issue of tender sets free of cost
• Exemption from payment of earnest money
• Waiver of security deposit up to the money limit for which the unit is registered
Infomediary services:
Information plays a vital role in the success if any business. Keeping in mind the
information needs to micro and small enterprises. NSIC has launched its infomediary
services. A one stop, one window bouquet for aids that will provide information on business,
technology, finance and also exhibit the core competence of Indian micro and small
enterprises in terms of price and quality internationally as well as domestically.
Some important services provided are:
• Tender information in your e-mail box and web based browsing
• Banner display on NSIC’C website
• Accesses to wide range of technologies from India and abroad
• Joint venture opportunities and information on of trade and events
• Comprehensive information on government policies rules, regulations,
schemes and incentives.
Raw material assistance:
NSIC extends short term financial assistance to micro and small enterprises for
procurement of raw material on need basis.
The salient features
• Financial assistance for procurement of raw material up to 90 days
• MOU with NALCO, HCL, SAIL, RINL FOR supply of bulk materials
• Easy and quick disbursement
• Flexibility of repayment
Tender marketing:
The corporation participates in bulk global tender enquiries and local tenders of central &
state government and public sector enterprises on behalf of micro and small enterprises.
It is aimed to assist micro and small enterprises with ability to manufacture quality products
with brand equity & credibility or have limited financial capabilities.
Benefits:
NSIC will provide all financial support depending upon the unit’s individual requirements
like purchase of raw materials and financing of sale bill. Enhance business volume helps
micro and small enterprises to achieve maximum capability utilization. Micro and small
enterprises are exempted from depositing earnest money. It ensures fair margin to micro and
small enterprises for their production.
Quality
Sewell is an ISO 9001:2000 certified company with a commitment of well defined quality
systems that ensures quality products and services are delivered to our customers. R & D is
a continuous process in Sewell and we are committed to introduce new products which can
be customized as per customers request and configurations. All products are tested on
various parameters like safety, electricity consumption, durability, maintainability, etc. The
stringent quality check imbibed by us assures conformance of products in relation to
international quality standards.
Products
Electronic voltage stabilizers.
Power & Distribution Transformers.
Automatic power Factor.
LT panel boards.
Energy saver.
UPS.
Infrastructure
We possess a state-of-the-art manufacturing units, which are facilitated with the latest
machinery, equipment and technology. With these facilities, we are able to meet the bulk
requirements of our clients. We make sure that we upgrade our machinery from time to time
for the smooth functioning of our manufacturing process.
Profile
Serwell is one of the leading manufacturers of Servo Stabilizers, Distribution and Power
Transformers, Ultra Isolation Transformers, APFC Panels, Auto Transformers and Power
Savers. Sewell constantly adds new products every year to existing product line and is in
business to address electrical needs of customers from more than 16 years.
Company Profile
Basic Information
Business Type
Supplier
Manufacturer
Service provider
Company USP
Experienced R&D Good financial
Primary competitive Department position &TQM
advantage
Statutory Profile
PAN No. AAECS3499J
Registration Authority Hyderabad
Registration No. AAECS3499JXM003
TIN No. / VAT No. 28250204177V
Packaging/Payment and Shipment Details
Payment Mode Cheque Credit card
DD LC
By road By sea
Core Value
Sewell Electronics Limited values its customers and enjoys working side-by-side with them
in delivering solid business value. We believe in respecting our customers, listening to their
requests and understanding their expectations. We strive to exceed their expectations in
affordability, quality and on-time delivery.
For our employees, we treat them with respect and trust, and lead through competence,
creativity and teamwork
Our Infrastructure
Sewell Electronics Limited processes modernized and sophisticated infrastructure that
spread across a widespread land area. To accomplish bulk demands with utmost ease, we
have segregated our infrastructure into a number of specialized departments. These
departments are well-equipped with modernized machines andrequisite tools to timely
execute our work processes with utmost precision. Our manufacturing cum designing
department is installed with hi-tech machines and sophisticated equipment and designing
patterns to ensure that dimensionally accurate and robust range of products in the market
Quality Policy / Processes
Premier aim of our organization is to offer quality-assured range of products to our
worldwide customers. To manufacture our exclusive product range, we make use of finest
grade components and material that are sourced from trusted sources. Besides the product
development is carried under strict surveillance of experienced quality inspectors. These
professionals ensure that the product range is developed as per the agreed demands and
regulatory specifications. Not only this, our ardent quality inspectors have proper
arrangement to cautiously check these products on the basis of varied quality checks. Owing
to robust and never failing quality control, we are able to offer internationally acclaimed
range of products to our customers.
Production Capacity
With installed modernized machines and sophisticated tools and equipment, we are able to
furnish bulk demands of our customers with utmost ease and within the constraints of time.
Besides, machines installed aids in conduction of thorough testing as per IS: 5142 norms.
Owing to the use of modernized machines and tools, we are able to produce around 35000
units per year. Our manufactured productsare safely stored in our capacious warehousing
facility. Owing to proper segregation into various sections, our warehouse aids in storing
range as per proper nomenclature and labeling, thereby ensuring quick retrieval and timed
dispatch. minimum turnover as of the eligibility criteria for MSE's.
Company Profile
About the company-
Incorporated in 1992 RaghuVamsi Machine Tools Pvt. Ltd have created an enviable niche in
industry for our products’ excellence in all across the nation. The company is engaged in
manufacturing, exporting and supplying a wide assortment of Aero Engine Components,
Aero structure Components, Avionic Components, Defense Components, Oil & Gas
Components and Power Transmission Components. Our company has earned a dignified
position by efficiently serving to its valuable clients’ with qualitative products. We develop
products incorporating advanced technologies and better quality material, which have
enabled us making best products available to the customers. The material, we use in the
production process, is sourced from trustworthy vendors, whom we have chosen conducting
stringent surveys of industry. We work in close proximity with the customers, in order to
comprehend their aspirations and offer products accordingly. As a result, we have acquired
the trust of maximum customers and expanded our base of satisfied clients from all across
the country.
Our company possesses team of extremely dedicated and talented professionals, who
dedicatedly perform the whole task and ensure accomplishing the specific targets
successfully. They cordially perform the whole operations and ensure to achieve the
predetermined objectives of a company successfully.
Mr. G.Vamshi Vikas is the managing director of our organization, who have helped us
growing and achieving a desired niche in industry. All these are just because of his sound
managerial qualities, business acumen, foresightedness, industrial experience and sincere
business approach.
Company Mission
To create value and make a difference in the field of Precision Manufacturing by using
world class machine shop, best quality methods, up to date technology - achieving consistent
delivery and zero-defect parts to our customers at competitiveprices.
Sheet Metal
Welding
NADCAP NDT
NADCAP Plating
Assembly Services
EMS Activity
ISO Certification
Chapter-4 CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
Capital structure theories
The financing decisions occupy a pivotal role in the overall finance function in a corporate
firm which mainly concerns itself with an efficient utilization of the funds provided by the
owners or obtained from external sources together with those retained or ploughed back out
of surplus or undistributed profits. These decisions are mainly in the nature of planning
capital structure, working capital and mechanism through which funds can be raised from
the capital market whenever required. The financing decisions explains how to plan an
appropriate mix with least count, how to raise long term funds, and how to mobilize
the funds for working capital within a short span of time. Such a financing policy provides
an appropriate backdrop for formulating effective policies for investment of funds aswell
as management of earnings. It contributes to magnifying the earnings on equity as
profitability (expressed as return on equity), to a large extent, is dependent on the degree of
leverage in the capital structure. Besides, the valuation of the structure of physical assets
depends fundamentally on the financing mix. This makes it necessary for the management of
a firm to pursue a well thought out of financing policy, which ought to be framed initially,
incorporating, among other things, the proportion of the debt and equity, types of debts and
own funds to be used and volume of the funds to be raised from each source or combination
of sources, to enable the firm to have a proper capitalization. In the absence of this, the firm
may face the problem of either over-capitalization or under-capitalization impeding its
smooth financial functioning.
It is obvious that functioning decisions are extremely important for corporate firms.
Such decisions, in management parlance, are termed as capital structure decisions. The term
capital structure is used to describe the combination of various sources of finance employed
to raise funds. It implies, in other words, that when a firm chooses to use a group of sources
in certain proportions the resulting pattern is referred to as capital structure of the firm. The
sources of finance could be divided in terms of ownership of funds and duration of funds.
The former comprises owned and borrowed funds while the latter includes long, medium and
short term funds. Of the two, the duration-based classification is useful for preparing a plan to
meet long term as well as short term capital requirements while ownership-based
classification is useful for selection of specified sources, determining debt-equity ratio and
analyzing impact of capital structure decisions on the earnings on equity. As the ownership
based classification suggests that there are two types of sources of finance, namely owned
and borrowed funds, the capital structure represents the component relationship between
owned and borrowed funds. The owned funds which are also described as equity fund may
be defined as funds provided by or belonging to the share-holders. In the opinion Raj want
Singh and Brij Kumar, the capital structure is made up of the long term borrowings, the
preferred stock and the common stock equity including all related net worth accounts.
Similarl Morarka.R observes that the capital structure implies a degree of permanency and
normally omits short term borrowings of less than one year but would include other
intermediate and long term borrowings. The financial institutions consider only long term
sources of finance for computing the debt-equity ratio of corporate firm.
Definition
A mix of a company's long-term debt, specific short-term debt, common equity andpreferred
equity, the capital structure is how a firm finances its overall operations and growth by
using different sources of funds.
Debt comes in the form of bond issues or long-term notes payable, while equity is classified as
common stock, preferred stock or retained earnings. Short-term debtsuch as working capital
requirements is also considered to be part of the capital structure
Theories of capital structure
Different kinds of theories have been propounded by different authors to explain the
relationship between capital structure, cost of capital and the value of the firm. The main
contributors to the theories are Durand, Ezra, Solomon, Modigliani and Miller. The
important theories are discussed below:
Net Income Approach
Net Operating Income Approach.
The Traditional Approach.
Modigliani and Miller Approach.
1. Net Income Approach. According to this approach, a firm can minimize the
weighted average cost of capital and increase the value of the firm as well as market
price of equity shares by using debt financing to the maximum possible extent. The
theory propounds that a company can increase its value and decrease the overall cost
of capital by increasing the proportion of debt in its capital structure. This approach
is based upon the following assumptions:
The cost of debt is less than the cost of equity.
There are no The risk perception of investors is not changed by the use of debt.
2. Net Operating Income Approach. This theory as suggested by Durand is another
extreme of the effect of leverage on the value of the firm. It is diametrically opposite
to the net income approach. According to this approach, change in the capital
structure if a company does not affect the market value of the firm and the overall
cost of capital remains constant irrespective of the method of financing. It implies
that the overall cost of capital remains the same whether the debt- equity mix is
50:50 or 20:80 or 0:100. Thus, there is nothing as an optimal capital structure and
every capitalstructure is the optimum capital structure. This theory presumes that:
The market capitalizes the value of the firm as a whole.
The business risk remains constant at every level of debt equity mix;
There are no corporate taxes.
The Traditional Approach. The traditional approach, also known as intermediate
approach, is a compromise between extremes of net income approach and net operating
income approach. According to this theory, the value of the firm can be increased initially
or the cost of capital can be decreased by using more debt as the debt is a cheaper source of
funds than equity. Thus, optimum capital structure can be reached by a proper debt- equity
mix. Beyond a particular point, the cost of equity increases because increased debt
increases the financial risk of the equity shareholders. The advantage of cheaper debt at this
point of capital structure is offset by increased cost of equity. After this there comes a stage,
when the increased cost of equity cannot be offset by the advantage of low-cost debt. Thus,
overall cost of capital, according to this theory, decreases up to a certain point, remains
more or less unchanged for moderate increase in debt thereafter; and increases or rises
beyond a certain point. Even the cost of debt may increase at this stage due to increased
financial risk
How can financial leverage affect the value?
One thing is sure that wherever and whatever way one sources the finance from, it cannot
change the operating income levels. Financial leverage can, at the max, have an impact on
the net income or the EPS (Earning per Share). The reason is explained further. Changing
the financing mix means changing the level of debts and change in levels of debt can impact
the interest payable by that firm. Decrease in interest would increase the net income and
thereby the EPS and it is a general belief that the increase in EPS leads to increase in the
value of the firm.
If DSCR is high then company can have more debt in capital structure as high DSCR
indicates ability of company to repay its debt but if DSCR is less then company must avoid
debt and depend upon equity capital only.
4. Return on Investment:
Return on investment is another crucial factor which helps in deciding the capital structure.
If return on investment is more than rate of interest then company must prefer debt in its
capital structure whereas if return on investment is less than rate of interest to be paid on
debt, then company should avoid debt and rely on equity capital. This point is explained
earlier also in financial gearing by giving examples.
5. Cost of Debt:
If firm can arrange borrowed fund at low rate of interest then it will prefer more ofdebt as
compared to equity.
6. Tax Rate:
High tax rate makes debt cheaper as interest paid to debt security holders is subtracted from
income before calculating tax whereas companies have to pay tax on dividend paid to
shareholders. So high end tax rate means prefer debt whereas
at low tax rate we can prefer equity in capital structure.
7. Cost of Equity:
Another factor which helps in deciding capital structure is cost of equity. Owners or equity
shareholders expect a return on their investment i.e., earning per share. As far as debt is
increasing earnings per share (EPS), then we can include it in capital structure but when
EPS starts decreasing with inclusion of debt then we must depend upon equity share capital
only.
8. Floatation Costs:
Floatation cost is the cost involved in the issue of shares or debentures. These costs include
the cost of advertisement, underwriting statutory fees etc. It is a major consideration for
small companies but even large companies cannot ignore this factor because along with
cost there are many legal formalities to be completed before entering into capital market.
Issue of shares, debentures requires more formalities as well as more floatation cost Whereas
there is less cost involvedin raising capital by loans or advances.
9. Risk Consideration:
Financial risk refers to a position when a company is unable to meet its fixed financial
charges such as interest, preference dividend, payment to creditors etc. Apart from financial
risk business has some operating risk also. It depends upon operating cost; higher operating
cost means higher business risk. The total risk depends upon both financial as well as
business risk.
If firm’s business risk is low then it can raise more capital by issue of debt securities
whereas at the time of high business risk it should depend upon equity.
10. Flexibility:
Excess of debt may restrict the firm’s capacity to borrow further. To maintain flexibility it
must maintain some borrowing power to take care of unforeseen circumstances.
11. Control:
The equity shareholders are considered as the owners of the company and they
have complete control over the company. They take all the important decisions for
managing the company. The debenture holders have no say in the management andpreference
shareholders have limited right to vote in the annual general meeting. So the total control of
the company lies in the hands of equity shareholders.
If the owners and existing shareholders want to have complete control over the company,
they must employ more of debt securities in the capital structure because if more of equity
shares are issued then another shareholder or a group of shareholders may purchase many
shares and gain control over the company.
Equity shareholders select the directors who constitute the Board of Directors and Board
has the responsibility and power of managing the company. So if another group of
shareholders gets more shares then chance of losing control is more.
Debt suppliers do not have voting rights but if large amount of debt is given then debt-
holders may put certain terms and conditions on the company such as restriction on
payment of dividend, undertake more loans, investment in long term funds etc. So company
must keep in mind type of debt securities to be issued. If existing shareholders want
complete control then they should prefer debt, loans of small amount, etc. If they don’t mind
sharing the control then they may go for equityshares also.
12. Regulatory Framework:
Issues of shares and debentures have to be done within the SEBI guidelines and for taking
loans. Companies have to follow the regulations of monetary policies. If SEBI guidelines are
easy then companies may prefer issue of securities for additional capital whereas if
monetary policies are more flexible then they may go for more of loans.
13. Stock Market Condition:
There are two main conditions of market, i.e., Boom condition. These conditions affect the
capital structure specially when company is planning to raise additional capital. Depending
upon the market condition the investors may be more careful in their dealings.
During depression period in the market business is slow and investors also hesitate to take
risk so at this time it is advisable to issue borrowed fund securities as these are less risky and
ensure fixed
repayment and regular payment of interest but if there is Boom period, business is
flourishing and investors also take risk and prefer to invest in equity shares to earn more in
the form of dividenz
Essential features of a capital mix
A sound or an appropriate capital structure should have the following essentialsfeatures:
1. Maximum possible use of leverage.
2. The capital structure should be flexible so that it can be easily altered.
3. To avoid undue financial/business risk with the increase of debt.
4. The use of debt should be within the capacity of a firm. The firm should be in aposition
to meet its obligations in paying the loan and interest charges as when due.
5. It should involve minimum possible risk of loss of control.
6. It must avoid undue restrictions in agreement of debt.
7. It should be easy to understand and simple to operate to the extent possible.
Ratio analysis:
Ratio analysis is one of the oldest methods of financial statements analysis. It was developed
by banks and other lenders to help them chose amongst competing companies asking for
their credit. Two sets of financial statements can be difficult to compare. The effect of time,
of being in different industries and having different styles of conducting business can make it
almost impossible to come up with a conclusion as to which company is a better investment.
Ratio analysis helps creditors solve these issues.
Ratio analysis is a tool that was developed to perform quantitative analysis on numbers
found on financial statements. Ratios help link the three financial statements together and
offer figures that are comparable between companies and across industries and sectors.
Ratio analysis is one of the most widely used fundamental analysis techniques.
However, financial ratios vary across different industries and sectors and comparisons
between completely different types of companies are often not valid. In addition, it is
important to analyze trends in company ratios instead of solely emphasizing a single
period’s figures.
What is a ratio? It’s a mathematical expression relating one number to another, often
providing a relative comparison. Financial ratios are no different—they form a basis of
comparison between figures found on financial statements .As with all types of fundamental
analysis, it is often most useful to compare the financial ratios of a firm to those of other
companies.
Financial ratios fall into several categories. For the purpose of this analysis, the commonly
used ratios are grouped into four categories: activity, liquidity, solvency and profitability.
Following ratios have been used to analyze and interpret the result of the study:
Debt – Equity ratio.
Solvency ratio.
Interest coverage ratio.
Earnings per share ratio.
Computation of ratio
Debt-equity ratio
The main object of calculating the debt-equity ratio is to measure the relative interest of
owners and creditors in the firm. From the creditors’ point of view, it measures the extent to
which their interest is covered by owned funds. A standard debt-equity norm for all
industrial units is neither desirable nor practicable. Different standard debt-equity ratios are
used for different industry groups. However, in less developed countries, such standards
cannot be accepted. Therefore, this ratio depends upon industry, circumstances, and
prevailing practices and so on. The generally accepted standard norm of debt-equity ratio is
2:1. The ratio may be calculated in terms of the relative proportion of long term debt i.e.
borrowed funds and shareholders' equity i.e. net worth. This is a vital ratio to determine
the
efficiency of the financial management of business undertakings (Roy Chowdhary). Debt -
The debt - equity ratio of Serwel private Limited and Raghuvamsi private limited is
presented in
Table -5.1
Solvency ratio
Solvency is the term which is used to describe the financial position of any business which is
capable to meet outside obligations in full out of its own assets. So their ratio establishes
relationship between total liabilities and total assets.
Solvency ratio is calculated by using the following formula:
Solvency ratio = total liabilities / total assets.
The solvency ratio of Serwel private Limited and Rraghuvamshi private limited is presented
in
Table – 5.2
5.2(b) Interpretation:
Table 2 shows solvency ratio of Serwel pvt. Ltd. And Raghuvamshi pvt.ltd.
Solvency ratio is calculated by dividing total liabilities by total assets giving 1 as
ratio from the year 2010 to 15.
Total assets and liabilities had a gradual rise in 2011 of Rs.172610403 and a
rapid fall in 2015 by 1074191635 in serwel electronics and also it is rise from
Rs.5736776 in 2010 to Rs.110996369 in 2015 in raghuvamsi electronic Pvt.
Ltd.In other words Net Worth is fluctuating in the entire study.
5.3(b) Interpretation
Table 3 shows EBIT ratio of Serwel pt. Ltd. And Raghuvamshi pt. ltd. EBITratio
is calculated by dividing EBT by interest from the year 2010 to 2015.
EBIT had a gradual rise in 2011 of Rs.71508287 and increasing gradually to
Rs.951254340 in 2015 in Serwel electronics Ltd. In the same way RAGHU VAMSI
company has rise from Rs.5477108 in 2010 to Rs. 8524233.In other words EBIT has
been increasing from past few years.
Graph shows that Serwel Company has decreased EBIT ratio from year 2010 of 36.2
to 2015 of 10.3 where as raghuvamshi company has increased EBIT ratio from 2010
of 1.4 to 1.7 in 2015.
FINDINGS
The average ratio of debt and equity is better in serwel as compared to raghuvamsi
electronics. It shows that serwel is more using debt financing in its capital structure
pattern as compared to raghuvamsi electronics. It implies that company is adopting
NOI approach of capital structure. The more use of debt financing in this industry is
increasing the value of the firm and minimising the cost of capital resulting in overall
wealth maximisation ofshareholders.
It has been found from the study that average of debt equity ratio of serwel in 2014-
15 i.e. 2.97 where as the average of debt equity ratio in Raghu vamsi pvt.Ltd. is only
1.5 as per the standard norm of 2:1 of debt equity ratio forthe industries.
It has been found from the study that the average solvency ratio is maintained as 1:1
from the last five years in both raghuvamsi and serwel electronics.
The average EBIT ratio of serwel is better compared to Raghuvamsi in past few
years and the ratio has been declined from 36.2 in 2010 to 10.6 in 2015,where as
raghuvamsi is maintained with 1.4 in 2010 to 1.7 in 2015.
The EPS of Serwel private Limited is far better compared to Raghuvamsi private
limited in the year 2014-15 is 22.6 and 8.05 respectively.
The rising overall average of trend of debt and equity in case of both the SME’s this
implies that these industries have access to market for both equity and debt
financing. Initially, companies were raising maximum debt fund to reduce the cost of
capital but which resulted in increase in financial risk. So they shifted to equity
financing also .They are maintaining a trade-off
between debt and equity.
SUGGESTIONS
The SERWEL and Raghuvamsi industries should improve their debt equity ratio as it
is not as per the standard norm. These industries are not using as much debt as
expected from them.
The average ratio of debt and equity is not better in raghuvamsi industry as
compared to serwel industry. The Raghuvamsi industry should pay more attention
towards their reserves and surpluses, because due to this they are not getting higher
profits. They should more focus towards debt financing to maximise the wealth of
shareholders.
Both the SME’s are advised to maintain a trade –off between debt and equityin future
also so as to achieve the objective of optimum capital structure.
The solvency ratio of Serwel private Limited and Raghuvamshi private limited
presented is good and if maintained in the same manner would be profitable.
The EPS of Serwel private Limited and Raghuvamsi private limited presented shows
that serwel has better yields in as profits, if Raghu vamshi shareholders investment
is to be increased in coming years then this would excellent opportunity for
raghuvamsi to maximize the profits.
The interest coverage ratio of serwel is great compared to raghuvamsi capital
structure of Raghuvamsi is to be increased for good profit returns.
Chapter-7
CONCLUSION
Results of the present empirical study revealed that long term funds had apportioned nearly
two-third of total funds when compared to short term funds in the SMEs selected for the
study. The firms had utilized more owned funds than borrowed funds. The SMEs had shown
an inclination in strengthening long term funds consisting of both shareholders’ funds as
well as long term borrowed funds in order to finance its assets requirement. The financial
risk of the firms is comparatively low since it mostly depended on equity financing. The
mobilization of the debt funds by the company means that it could raise the external funds to
bring the optimum capital structure i.e. minimize the cost of capital and maximize the share
value of the firm. This may due to the tax deductibility of the interest paid on debt. Thus the
benefits of financial leverage can be reaped for improving the financial performance of the
firm. The behaviour of the interest coverage ratio was unpredictable. The interest charges
are fully covered by the earnings before interestand taxes. A higher interest coverage ratio is
desirable, but too high ratio indicates that the firm is very conservative in using debt, and it
is not using debt to the best advantage of the shareholders. Hence, it is suggested that SMEs
shall tap the debt funds optimal to maintain a balanced capital structure. The financial
performance of a firm is greatly influenced by its capital structure. An optimal capital
structure maximizes the shareholder’s wealth with best combination of debt and equity mix
thereby minimizing the cost of capital
BIBLIOGRAPHY
References
1. Khan M Y., Financial Services, Tata McGraw Hill Education Private Ltd. Fifth
Edition, 2010.
7. Kenny Bell and Ed Vos., SME Capital Structure: The Dominance of Demand
Factors,SSRN,August,2009.
Stable URL: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1456725
D K Y Abeywardhana, Impact of Capital Structure on Firm Performance: Evidence from Manufacturing Sector
SMEs in UK,WBI conference., November 2015.
Stable URL: http://www.wbiworldconpro.com/pages/paper/melbourne-conference-2015-
november/3392
WEBSITES
http://www.nsic.co.in/
http://www.raghuvamsi.com/
http://serwel.com/
8. http://www.moneycontrol.com/