Root Cause Analysis Page 1 of 4

1- Basic Information
Terminal TCBUEN RCA Serial #
Name of Terminal Local Serial Number for this
RCA
Which RTG 710 Failure Subject Falla en el freno de hoist #2
Equipment/Asset ID Title of failure
Manufacturer RTG Konecranes G1596 – Año
and Model 2014
Of the asset
Which Fusible abierto y rectificador Who BD:
Failed del freno #2 en corto. Team/Shift and/or person Luis Gerardo Jaramillo - Electricista
Component/Function involved
Diego Capote – Mecánico
John Ferney Cundumi - Encargado
When 25 de Julio del 2021 Status Asset Status (In Operation)
Date & Time of failure BD= 07:35 – 9:05 90 minutos (1.5 Current Equipment/Asset Fallo durante la Operación
Status
horas).
CM= 12 Horas
Created By Dionisio Tello Benitez Approved By Fabio Fantoni (Director M & R TCBUEN)
Name/s and/or IDS Name/s and/or IDS
2- Failure Information
What No responde el movimiento de hoist.
Happened? El freno del motor #2 no abre
Description of the
failure

Pictures of Failure

3- Failure Analysis
Downtime of equipment to be repaired. This includes all the time when the equipment is not available for operations to use it, even if the
operation doesn’t need the equipment.
Downtime
(Hours) BD = 1.5 horas. Iniciando el 25/07/2021 a las 7:35 AM y finalizando el 25/07/2021 a las 9:05 AM.
Total: BD = 1.5 Horas

APMT-MnR-FRM-0084-1.0 Standard Form of Technical Root Cause Analysis. 01-04-2018 Version 1.0 By: TRA082 Approved by KBL020
Clas
Reference: APMT-MnR-SOP-0056 Defect Elimination & Root Cause Analysis Procedure.
sific
atio
 Root Cause Analysis Page 2 of 4

Cost of

Rating 1

Rating 2

Rating 3

Rating 4

Rating 5
Material +
Repair Equipment Downtime (Hours)
(USD) (Depends on the equipment type) Safety Environment Occurrence
QC/SQC/MHC/SHL/SST/MST (Including
Spreader):
< 0.5
RTG/ARMG/RMG/RGC/SC
(Including Spreader): There is no
<1 hazard or Unlikely
No Impact on
0 < 1,000 0 RS/EH/TL/OHF: 0 little 0 0 once per
Environment
<5 hazard year
TT/AGV/ATT: identified.
< 12
TRL/BOC/RT/FL/MC/CP and Others:

< 36
QC/SQC/MHC/SHL/SST/MST (Including
Spreader):
From 0.5 to < 1
Failure Criticality RTG/ARMG/RMG/RGC/SC
Hazard
Class: (Including Spreader):
Identified, Impact of 5 to 50 Frequent
From 1 to < 3
1,000 to < and/or litres of pollutant More than
3 1 RS/EH/TL/OHF: 5 3 2
10,000 Near Hit affected the once per
From 5 to < 12
with no environment. year
TT/AGV/ATT:
injury
From 12 to < 24
TRL/BOC/RT/FL/MC/CP and Others:

From 36 to <120
QC/SQC/MHC/SHL/SST/MST (Including
Spreader):
From 1 to 2 Very
First Aid
RTG/ARMG/RMG/RGC/SC Frequent
Treatment,
(Including Spreader): from 4 to 6
or medical Impact of > 50
From 3 to 4 times in
10,000 to treatment litres of pollutant
4 3 RS/EH/TL/OHF: 7 6 3 one month
< 100,000 or Lost affected the
From 12 to 24 or
Time environment.
TT/AGV/ATT: 3 to 5
Injury or
From 24 to 120 times in
Disability
TRL/BOC/RT/FL/MC/CP and Others: one week

From 120 to 240

QC/SQC/MHC/SHL/SST/MST (Including
Spreader):
>2
RTG/ARMG/RMG/RGC/SC
Chronic
(Including Spreader):
> 6 times in
>4
one month
5 > 100,000 5 RS/EH/TL/OHF: 12 Fatality 4
or
> 24
> 5 times in
TT/AGV/ATT:
one week
> 120
TRL/BOC/RT/FL/MC/CP and Others:

> 240

Write down the values in the coloured rectangles below based on your selection in each rating from the matrix

Total
Rating =
0 +  5 +  0 +  0 + 0 =  5

The table below shows the criticality class corresponding to the Total Criticality Rating
Criticality Rating Criticality Class Action
RCA is required to be done and shared in Work Front + 3rd Party Assistant in
More than 11 A
the investigation is recommended if applicable.
5 to 11 B RCA is required to be done and shared in Work Front
Less than 5 C No RCA is required.
Root Cause Analysis
(You can use this 5 Whys method or you can instead, use the fault tree method in Appendix A for advanced analysis)
1- Why did the
failure happen?
Sobrecorriente en el circuito del freno #2 de hoist.
You can mention
multiple causes
2- Why did This El Puente rectificador estaba en corto.
Happen?

APMT-MnR-FRM-0084-1.0 Standard Form of Technical Root Cause Analysis. 01-04-2018 Version 1.0 By: TRA082 Approved by KBL020
Clas
Reference: APMT-MnR-SOP-0056 Defect Elimination & Root Cause Analysis Procedure.
sific
atio
 Root Cause Analysis Page 3 of 4

You can mention

multiple causes
3- Why did This
Happen?
Alto consumo de corriente en la bobina del freno, lo cual causo recalentamiento en el diodo.
You can mention
multiple causes
4- Why did This
Happen?
You can mention
multiple causes
5- Why did This
Happen?
You can mention
multiple causes
4- Solutions and Preventive Actions to Avoid Recurrence
Actions/Solutions Owner Deadline Status
Incluir en el plan de mantenimiento la Se hará la socialización con
1 medicion del consumo de corriente de los RONALD 15/09/2021 los encargados y el
frenos. planeador y programador
Realizar mantenimientos predictivos a los
componentes para determinar cuando
2 esten finalizando su vida util y asi generar
DIONISIO 10/09/2021 Por Efectuarse

las acciones pertinentes.

3
4

Pictures of Solutions/Actions (Optional)

Mm

Appendix A:
.

APMT-MnR-FRM-0084-1.0 Standard Form of Technical Root Cause Analysis. 01-04-2018 Version 1.0 By: TRA082 Approved by KBL020
Clas
Reference: APMT-MnR-SOP-0056 Defect Elimination & Root Cause Analysis Procedure.
sific
atio
 Root Cause Analysis Page 4 of 4

Failure
Title Here

Cause A1 Cause A2 Cause A3

Cause B1 Cause B2 Cause B1 Cause B2 Cause B1 Cause B2

Cause C1 Cause C1 Cause C1 Cause C1 Cause C1 Cause C1

Cause C2 Cause C2 Cause C2 Cause C2 Cause C2 Cause C2

APMT-MnR-FRM-0084-1.0 Standard Form of Technical Root Cause Analysis. 01-04-2018 Version 1.0 By: TRA082 Approved by KBL020
Clas
Reference: APMT-MnR-SOP-0056 Defect Elimination & Root Cause Analysis Procedure.
sific
atio