Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 15 views

    Prioritization Matrix: Alternatives

    Uploaded by

    Sead Zejnilovic
    The document is a prioritization matrix to determine the best university league table to use out of 5 options. It assesses each option against 8 criteria on a scale of 1 to 5, with criteria like having regional rankings, ability to filter by country, focus on key performance areas, and independent auditing. The matrix calculates total scores for each option, with QS scoring highest at 18 points, followed by Times at 15 points, and Shanghai ARWU at 10 points. The conclusion is that QS and Times score highest overall by providing regional tables and options to filter rankings.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Prioritization Matrix: Alternatives

    Uploaded by

    Sead Zejnilovic
    15 views4 pages
    The document is a prioritization matrix to determine the best university league table to use out of 5 options. It assesses each option against 8 criteria on a scale of 1 to 5, with criteria like having regional rankings, ability to filter by country, focus on key performance areas, and independent auditing. The matrix calculates total scores for each option, with QS scoring highest at 18 points, followed by Times at 15 points, and Shanghai ARWU at 10 points. The conclusion is that QS and Times score highest overall by providing regional tables and options to filter rankings.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    prioritization_matrix

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document is a prioritization matrix to determine the best university league table to use out of 5 options. It assesses each option against 8 criteria on a scale of 1 to 5, with criteria like having regional rankings, ability to filter by country, focus on key performance areas, and independent auditing. The matrix calculates total scores for each option, with QS scoring highest at 18 points, followed by Times at 15 points, and Shanghai ARWU at 10 points. The conclusion is that QS and Times score highest overall by providing regional tables and options to filter rankings.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    15 views4 pages

    Prioritization Matrix: Alternatives

    Uploaded by

    Sead Zejnilovic
    The document is a prioritization matrix to determine the best university league table to use out of 5 options. It assesses each option against 8 criteria on a scale of 1 to 5, with criteria like having regional rankings, ability to filter by country, focus on key performance areas, and independent auditing. The matrix calculates total scores for each option, with QS scoring highest at 18 points, followed by Times at 15 points, and Shanghai ARWU at 10 points. The conclusion is that QS and Times score highest overall by providing regional tables and options to filter rankings.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    of 4

    Prioritization Matrix

    Problem/Situation:

    1 2 3 4 5
    Alternatives

    Assessment criteria Weight


    1 1 0

    2 1 0

    3 1 0

    4 1 0

    5 1 0

    6 1 0

    7 1 0

    8 1 0

    Totals 0 0 0 0 0
    Rank

    Comments/Conclusion:
    Prioritization Matrix
    Problem/Situation: Which project to initiate from among the many possible choices

    1 2 3 4 5
    Alternatives

    Reduce strap Reduce stretch Reduce over


    Energy reduction Spoilage reduction
    width wrap usage varnish usage

    Assessment criteria Weight


    1 Cost effective 1 1 2 5 4 3 15

    2 Savings $ 3 3 5 2 1 4 15

    3 Months to complete 1 2 1 5 4 3 15

    4 1 0

    5 1 0

    6 1 0

    7 1 0

    8 1 0

    Totals 12 18 16 11 18
    Rank 4 1 3 5 1

    Comments/Conclusion:
    Prioritization Matrix
    Problem/Situation: Which is the best University League Table?

    1 2 3 4 5
    Alternatives

    QS Times Shanghai (ARWU) Webometrics

    Assessment criteria Weight


    1 Has a regional ranking table 1 3 2 1 6

    2 Can be filtered by country 1 3 3 3 9

    3 Can be viewed against key performance areas 1 3 3 3 9

    4 Less focus on research 1 3 1 1 5

    5 Audited independently 1 3 3 1 7

    6 Rank young universities 1 3 3 1 7

    7 1 0

    8 1 0

    Totals 18 15 10 0 0
    Rank 1 2 3

    Comments/Conclusion:
    Both QS and the Times have a selection of international and regional tables, but QS has one exclusive for the Arab Region.
    In Shanghai, 30% are counted for nobel prizes and field medals.
    In Shanghai, more than 1300 universities are actually ranked and the best 800 are published.
    In Times, universities are excluded if they do not teach undergraduates or if their research output is fewer than 1,000 articles between 2012 and 2016 (minimum 150 a year).
    In Times, to raise the university’s global profile contact branding@timeshighereducation.com, in QS, December every year, email: ranking@qs.com
    Times is audited independently by PWC.
    Times methodology uses the same 13 indicator to rank young universities, but they adjust the criteria to show their special characteristics, unlike QS.
    Webometrics, the aim of the ranking is to improve the presence of the academic and research institutions on the Web.

    You might also like