Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Q2 Mod3 Reviewingliteratures
Q2 Mod3 Reviewingliteratures
Q2 Mod3 Reviewingliteratures
Republic Act 8293, section 176 states that: “No copyright shall subsist in any work of
the Government of the Philippines. However, prior approval of the government agency or office
wherein the work is created shall be necessary for exploitation of such work for profit. Such
agency or office may, among other things, impose as a condition the payment of royalties.
Borrowed materials included in this module are owned by their respective copyright
holders. Effort has been exerted to locate and seek permission to use these materials from
the respective copyright owners. The publisher and author do not represent nor claim
ownership over them.
Office Address:
Telefax:
E-mail Address:
11
Practical Research 1
Quarter 1 – Module 4:
Learning from Others and Reviewing the Literature
What’s In?
In the previous lessons, you learned the importance of understanding the value
of qualitative research: its kinds, characteristics, uses, strengths, weaknesses,
specificity, and the feasibility of the study. A good introductory page is a baseline
statement of what and how a paper should go fluidly. However, a review of related
literature will strengthen your claims of a systematic, purposeful, and well-defined
research paper. In this part, you will be exploring the process or reviewing related
literature
What is New?
Activity 1.1
Picture Analysis
Directions: Examine the image below. What does it tell you?
The significance and rationale of related literature and studies is to find out
the similarities and differences between the past and present studies, to get ideas into
the critical and controversial aspects of the problem. It helps recognize and define a
research problem. It gives the researcher a background analysis aspect, which have
been studied. It guides the researcher on what to do on the mechanism of the
research methods; this also provides the thoughts to advance with the study until its
conclusion. It avoids redundant duplication of a study. Moreover, reading extensively
will enrich your background knowledge on your research topic that will enable you to
establish a good groundwork or course of your research endeavor.
What’s More?
Activity 1.2
Write on a sheet of paper a topic you are most interested to explore. Enumerate at least
three ways on how you will look for the information and data needed about the chosen
topic. Share important information that you would like to probe on the chosen subject.
For example, the topic is gender inequality among STE (Science, Technology and
Engineering) learners. What are you interested most? Is it the difference in quantity of
work? Is it the difference in quality of work? Alternatively, is it the type of PPE (Personal
Protective equipment)?
Follow the example and fill in your answers in the blank provided.
Topic Sentence:
Example: The number of learners, quality of work, quantity of work,
Answer:
My sources (works to be read, analyzed and cited)
Example: Bagale, S. (2016). Gender Equality and Social Inclusion in Technical and
Vocation Education and Training. Journal of Training and Development, 2(Ii), 25–32.
https://doi.org/10.3126/jtd.v2i0.15435
Answer:
1.
2.
3.
Body: What are the main points/arguments of my sources? How are these points
supported?
Example:
Source 1: Bagale found out that less women are included in Science, Technology
and Engineering programs, whereas there is poor participation in non-traditional
areas.
Answer:
vocational field.
Source1:
Source 2:
Source 3:
Body: Similarities in (comparing) two or more of the articles:
Example: Bagale and Mustapha agreed that there are still gender inequalities in the
technical vocational field and that women are still concentrated in certain types of area.
Answer:
Answer:
Conclusion: Summarizing
Example: This literature review was conducted to analyze opposing perspectives on
gender inequality among technical vocational learners.
Answer:
Why is the topic of this literature review important and/or what should be the next
step of this study?
Example: Further research is needed to examine recent statistics on gender inequality
among STE learners in the junior high schools of this division as compared to others
in this region.
Answer:
What I Have Learned?
Using the baseline information, discuss the process of a literature review and its
need and purpose by supplying the synonym of the word/s enclosed in parenthesis
needed to make the statement true and correct.
1. A literature (go over) is a summary of studies related to a
particular area of research.
2. When investigating a research topic, review only those that are directly
(connected) to your specific point of study.
3. (Keep away from) the temptation to copy paste everything you
find in the literature you have read.
4. Relate findings to previous (information) and suggest areas for
further research.
5. Included in literature review are (space) and (advice)
for additional study specified in related studies.
6. Theories give details of the presence of the problem and certain (factors)
that is connected to the problem.
7. A literature is a/an (spoken) or written record of man’s significant
experiences.
8. Some sources of direct (expressions) periodic is in books, journals,
papers, and online reading materials.
There are a lot of ways to bring in the flow of literature review that will help learners
develop their research. Frequently asked questions on how to proceed in the conduct
of literature review includes: how to look for sources, how many sources should be
cited, how to discuss ideas taken from the studies cited, how to cite authors, and
further. The aim of this lesson is to present a step-by-step guide in undertaking a
review of literature to facilitate your understanding.
What’s In?
In the previous lesson, you learned the definition, importance and purpose of
literature review. An effective literature review selects the right and specific write ups
that give close information to an identified topic, scrutinize and synthesize content
about key themes or issues, cites properly authors of information gathered, identify
similarities and differences between chosen literatures and a lot more. Selecting, citing
and synthesizing related literature needs a thorough development of skills in
searching, reading, paraphrasing, writing, and even creating your own page of article
after reviewing a whole bunch of related sources.
What’s New?
Activity 2.1
Text Development
Direction: Look back into one period of your life when you were so eager to know
something. What did you do to satisfy your desire to know about such thing? In
the space provided, write a brief memoir on your knowledge seeking.
Here are questions to guide you in this endeavor of selecting, citing, and
synthesizing related literature.
What is your prior knowledge about your research topic?
What do you have to critically say about your prior knowledge on the topic?
What do you want to know more about your topic?
Did anyone do similar research as yours?
What does your research have that other researches do not?
Who are these authors who have works which has more or less same ideas
as yours?
Example of References
3. Citation, or In-text-citation. Referring author within the main body of the text.
Citations can be done by paraphrasing, summarizing, or through quotations. It
can be written in the beginning of a text, between the text, or at the last part of
the paragraph. Examples are shown:
Sanchez (2015) found out building food systems that are more
sustainable, resilient and responsive …
There are three basic methods of referencing the author referred in your paper.
These are the APA (American Psychological Association), MLA (Modern Language
Association), and the Chicago Manual Style. In this module, we will be focusing on
the two most commonly used styles of referencing. Moreover, between the two, APA
is the most frequently used within the social sciences in citing various sources. The
following table shows examples of MLA and APA styles of referencing:
What’s More?
Print Sources
1. Book (one author) Example: Simban, J.H. (2012). Essentials of
HydroponicsFarming. Cebu City, Philippines: Digital Books.
Author’s Last First Initial Middle (Publication Book Title Place of Publisher
Name Initial Date) Publication:
Example of two authors: Roble, M. J., & Johnson, L. (2010). India (2nd ed.). New York,
NY: Marshall. Example of three authors: Carreon, A., Marcos, M., &
Genobaten, D. (2009). Work Under Pressure. Chicago, IL: Wilcon Press.
Example of more than six authors: Benson, B., Aller, C., Camelot, D., David, E., Ebiola,
F., Flores, G., Harison, I. (1994). The World Beneath. Los Angeles, USA: Paramoud
Era Press.
Author1’s First Middle Author2’s First Middle Author3’s First Middle Author4’s First Middle
Last Initial Initial Last Initial Initial Last Initial Initial Last Initial Initial
Name Name Name Name
Author5’s First Middle Author6’s First Middle (Publication Book Place of Publisher
Last Name Initial Initial Last Name Initial Initial Date) Title Publication:
Initial
Activity 2.3
A paraphrase restates another’s idea (or your own previously published idea)
in your own words. Paraphrasing allows you to summarize and synthesize information
from one or more sources, focus on significant information, and compare and contrast
relevant details. Published authors paraphrase their sources most ofthe time, rather
than directly quoting the sources; student authors should emulatethis practice by
paraphrasing more than directly quoting.
PARAPHRASING ACTIVITIES
Part 1
Read the original text below. Enclose in parenthesis the words that should not be
changed when paraphrasing. Underline which should be changed.
(Source: Sharma, S.H. Lyons, G. Mc. Roberts C. 2011. Biostimulant activity of brown
seaweed species from Strangford Lough: compositional analyses of
polysaccharides and bioassay of extracts using mung bean (Vigno mungo L.)
and pak choi (Brassica rapa chinensis L.). Springer Science+Business Media
B.V. 2011 J Appl Phycol (2012) 24:1081–1091 DOI 10.1007/s10811-011-
9737-)
Part 2
Between the two paraphrases below, which statement best provides the most
suitable paraphrase of the original text above? Further, justify your answer using
sentence structure and changes in keywords.
Paraphrase 1
An organic material that can promote plant growth and development which is
not caused by spraying of usual plant fertilizers are called biostimulants (Sharma et.al.,
2011).
Paraphrase 2
A biostimulant makes a plant grow beautifully and bigger when added with
traditional plant nutrient (Sharma et.al., 2011).
Justification
Part 3
Attaining food security and reduction of poverty has been the continuing
vision of our country (Balisacan, 2003).
Paraphrase 2
Based on the discussion above, process the methods of selecting, citing, and
synthesizing literature review by filling in the blanks provided in each statement.
1. In selecting sources of related literature, choose articles which are
related to your research interest.
2. A are brief summaries of research work presented at conferences.
3. A is a scholarly written article submitted for a doctorate or a higher
degree at a university.
4. A method of expressing borrowed ideas using different words to give clarity
to an idea is called .
5. Using is a technique in paraphrasing which utilize words of same
meanings.
6. In making , all materials including all books, journal, theses,
dissertations, and other literary works are listed alphabetically or
chronologically as it appears in the manuscript.
7. A/an format of referencing is the most frequently used within the
social sciences in citing various sources.
8. _ is a shortened version of the original text expressed in your own
language, picking only the most important details of the text.
9. It is necessary to acknowledge other people’s intellectual rights to avoid the act
of stealing other intellectual properties known as .
10. Referencing within the main body of the text is branded as .
What I Can Do
Activity 2.4
What’s In?
In the previous lessons, you learned the different manners and styles of
referencing, or giving credit to owners of ideas borrowed within the span of research.
Such referencing acts will make your study reliable and acceptable in the research
community once evaluated by an ethics review committee which sets out the
standards for research in each forum or platform where you share and present your
study. This part will also give you an idea about the researcher’s responsibilities
towards participants or respondents, common difficulties in the conduct of research,
possible solutions to answer it or minimize risks, conflicting values, and other ethical
issues that might engulfed the research process.
Activity 3.1
Mapping Out Issues (5PTS)
Directions: Write/draw near the image issues you are most likely to experience in
conducting research. Draw a line connecting the images if you think they aresomehow
If issues are associated.
School
Me
Home
Friends
What’s New?
During the course of the conduct of research, common difficulties may arise that
will greatly affect the result of your research. As a researcher, one must be adept
enough to foresee possible challenges to your research so that it will be resolved
sooner. Below is a summary of difficulties, challenges, and / or issues you may
encounter.
1. Unavailability of respondents
2. Non-cooperation or refusal of respondents to answer questions
3. Failure of respondents to remember data or give honest responses
4. Delayed or failure in returning questionnaires with responses
5. Incomplete documents and records
6. Unscientific data
7. No local data are available
8. Lacking instruments
9. Communication problems
10. Funds are tight
Activity 3.2
Situational Analysis
Directions. Choose three from the above summary of difficulties and try resolving the
conflict by filling-in the boxes below. An example is provided in each box.
Identify the Facts
2.
3.
What Is It?
“In every problem, there is a simple and plausible solution’, an adage once says.
Here are some tips to minimize problems in conducting research:
1. Ensure available funds and budget for study to be conducted.
2. Team members should know their assigned tasks well.
3. Identify respondents ahead of time and maintain a list of contact lines and
addresses to easily follow them up.
4. Draft a clear and reliable timeline of activities
5. Reproduce copies of essential documents always.
6. Ask for permits always before conducting any activity.
7. Conduct ocular inspection of research or sampling site ahead of time.
8. Always send emails, communications and appointments beforehand.
9. Have a clear written agreement with all participating persons, agencies, and
areas.
10. Bear in mind the objectives of the study and be flexible in adjusting to present
conditions when necessary.
Scientific misconduct might arise when ethical standards are not followed suchas
the following:
1. Plagiarism. This refers to fraudulent acts that entail claiming another person’s
ideas, work or publication violating intellectual property rights by stealing and
dishonesty. This usually happens in scientific publications.
2. Fabrication of data. It involves producing data without an actual
experimentation or altering data in recording with the intent to fit them to
desired results.
3. Falsification of data. Entails faulty gathering of data due to negligence and
carelessness which lead to errors in measurement or instrument use. Error
may also be caused by inappropriate application of treatment to the subjects
and poor data recording.
4. Non-publication of data. In contrast with fabrication and falsification, this
involves choosing not to include data because they do not conform to the well-
established body of knowledge or are unsupportive of the researchhypothesis.
Only the results that do not reject the hypothesis are reported and published.
To avoid such encounters and to ensure ethical standards are followed, ethics
review committees usually require research studies to undergo review
proceedings by submission of pertinent documents that will verify the truthfulness
of data, information, and paper presented. The following are some of these:
1. Checklist for Adult Sponsors which includes parents’ consent and
adviser’s consent.
2. Student Checklist which tell learners information, consent and ensure
student safety.
3. Human Participant’s Form which provides information for description,
recruitment, protection of privacy, and informed consent process.
4. For scientific researches: Research Institution and Qualified Scientists
Form, Human Participants form, Vertebrate Animals Form, Potentially
Hazardous Biological Agents Form, and Hazardous Chemical
Activities Form.
5. Research Plan which discusses in summary the rationale, hypotheses,
methods, risk and safety, data analysis, and references or bibliography.
6. Risk Assessment Form which evaluates the extent of hazards posed by
the conduct of research. It includes assessing safety of respondents, or
sampling locale, or in the events of scientific studies, the biosafety hazards
like methods of disposing chemical and biological agents, drug dosages,
and delicate instrument use.
7. Research Abstract which is not more than 250 words that clearly and
concisely state the purpose, procedures, data collected, and conclusions
of the research.
8. Research Logbook with start and end dates, pictures, documentations,
notes during the course of research that shows detailed and accurate
processes.
What’s More?
Activity 3.3
As we continue to unfold the mysteries of conducting reliable and factual study,
keep in mind your topic or research interest in the previous lesson. Give only
available information on the steps to take in fulfilling your research endeavor.
Based on your understanding about ethics in research, please complete this form.
Date of Application:__________
Research Title:
Summarize what you have learned in this lesson by supplying the keywords
missing in the paragraph.
The standard ethics for research is governed by the core values such as
(1) , confidentiality, (2) , (3) that is evident by
(4) , (5) , (6) , (7) , and right to review. It is
strengthened by principles narrated as follows: honesty, (8) _,
trustworthiness, openness, carefulness, respect for (9) property, and social
and (10) responsibility. Once research ethics are not tagged, it may give
rise to scientific misconduct. For example are falsification and fabrication of data,
(11) , and non-publication of data. To avoid these mishaps, the following are
required by the Ethics (12) Committee: (in any order) Research
Abstracts, Human Participants Form, Student Checklist, Risk (13) form,
Parents (14) _ Form, Research Plan, and Research (15) .
What I Can Do
The Respondent
Opol NSTS
Dear Sir/Ma’am:
Sincerely yours,
Erika P. Bucag
Assessment
Directions: From activity 2.4, extract key points and valuable information that are
related to your research topic. Cite the literatures using APA citation styles.
Present your activity using this table below where an example was provided.
Further, make your References.
-------------------END OF MODULE-----------------------
Buensuceso, D. B. et. al. 2016. Practical Research 1. Teacher’s Guide. Senior High
School. Department of Education – Bureau of Learning Resources. Pasig City,
Philippines. Lexicon Press, Inc.
Prieto, N.G., Naval, V.C. & Carey, T.G. (2017). Practical research 1 for senior high
school: Qualitative. Quezon City, Metro Manila: LORIMAR Publishing, Inc.
Ridley, D. 2012. The Literature Review: A Guide for Students. Los Angeles: Sage.
Sharp, J. 2012. Success With Your Educational Research. USA: John Wiley and
Sons.
This module was pulled together with help from following websites:
http:// library.concordia.ca/help/writing/literature-review.php
http://www.writing.utoronto.ca/advice/specific-types-of-writing/literature-review
http://www.lib.uoguelph.ca/get-assistance/writing/specific-types-papers/writing-
literaturereview
https://alexandercollege.ca/web-2018/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/3.-Literature-
Review-worksheet.pdf
https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=sites&srcid=ZGVmYXVsdGRvbWFpbnx2e
WVzdGFjZXl8Z3g6NzJiNTg5N2VlNzZmNDEwNg
https://www.fpconsulting.com.au/uploads/2/4/9/6/24962042/qualitative_analysis_guid
e.pdf
https://www.uts.edu.au/sites/default/files/Paraphrasing%20Handout%20-
%20Activities.pdf
http://researchchmsc.blogspot.com/2010/05/review-of-related-
literature.htmlhttps://www.utsc.utoronto.ca/twc/sites/utsc.utoronto.ca.twc/files/resourc
e-files/LitReview.pdf
https://www.google.com/search?q=worksheets+in+ethical+standards+in+research&t
bm=isch&source=iu&ictx=1&fir=xvM_9wXf4oAfWM%253A%252CN2j1rlwRBXOapM
%252C_&vet=1