DOCUMENT NO :

PEARLOIL (SEBUKU) LTD. RB-WPI-PLT-ST-CL-3001-1

DETAIL ENGINEERING DESIGN FOR
REVISION : 1
RUBY FIELD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
INPLACE ANALYSIS REPORT - PQP TOPSIDE PAGE : 8 of 43

2.0 SUMMARY OF RESULTS

This section presents the summary of the results for the inplace analysis of the PQP
Topside. Structural members have been code checked with API RP 2A (Ref. [1]) and
AISC 9th Ed (Ref. [2]).

1. Table 2-1 presents the weight comparison of the modelled structure and the
Topside Weight Control Report (Ref.[6]).

2. The member stress check is carried out as per the design criteria mentioned in
the structural design basis. Justification and strengthening is provided for some
members, stress of the topside beam/truss element where the unity check
exceeds one. However, some small changes on secondary members to be
expected due to preservice analyses and equipment supports. Refer to Section
7.2 for further details.

3. Maximum tubular joint stress check is 0.973, located at Module Support Frame
Leg A2. Refer to Section 7.3 for further details.

4. Vertical displacement along the main girder/beam span of PQP topside is below
the maximum allowable of L/200. Refer to Section 7.4 for further details.

Detail description of the above items above can be found in Section 7.0
 DOCUMENT NO :
PEARLOIL (SEBUKU) LTD. RB-WPI-PLT-ST-CL-3001-1
DETAIL ENGINEERING DESIGN FOR
REVISION : 1
RUBY FIELD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
INPLACE ANALYSIS REPORT - PQP TOPSIDE PAGE : 9 of 43

Table 2-1 Topside Weight Summary

Basic Weight (MT) Factored Weight (MT)
Description
SACS WCR SACS WCR
Topside MSF :
Primary Member 453.584 439.822 498.942 475.950
Secondary Member 237.805 232.021 261.586 253.664
Mechanical Equipment 377.401 375.302 415.141 412.832
Piping (including support) 260.408 260.378 286.449 286.416
Electrical and Instrumentation 114.665 114.907 126.131 126.398
Safety Equipment 4.078 3.699 4.486 4.069
Bridge Load 70.790 63.600 70.790 69.960
Sub Total 1518.731 1489.729 1663.525 1629.289
Topside Module P1 :
Primary Member 219.964 204.691 241.960 222.348
Secondary Member 238.247 212.885 262.072 233.330
Mechanical Equipment(1) 129.137 128.670 142.050 141.537
Piping (including support) 58.166 58.169 63.982 63.986
Electrical and Instrumentation 114.070 114.895 125.477 126.385
Safety Equipment 4.509 4.389 4.960 4.828
Sub Total 764.091 723.700 840.501 792.414
Topside Module P2 :
Primary Member 267.904 240.610 294.694 261.078
Secondary Member 207.654 198.859 228.419 217.369
Mechanical Equipment 212.610 211.241 233.871 232.365
Piping (including support) 263.769 264.850 290.146 291.335
Electrical and Instrumentation 39.936 35.501 43.929 39.051
Safety Equipment 1.100 0.932 1.210 1.025
Crane Dead Load (2) 122.324 80.000 134.557 88.000
Sub Total 1115.297 1031.993 1226.827 1130.223
Topside LQ Module + Helideck:
Primary Member 415.509 449.450 457.060 490.630
Secondary Member 188.149 146.356 206.963 160.043
Mechanical Equipment 23.700 30.495 26.070 33.545
Piping (including support) 30.820 30.769 33.902 33.846
Electrical and Instrumentation 0.000 43.020 0.000 47.322
Safety Equipment 27.198 27.140 29.918 29.854
Architectural Weight 0.000 151.680 0.000 166.848
Bulk Weight(3) 203.324 0.000 223.656 0.000
Helicopter Weight 9.300 9.300 10.230 10.230
Sub Total(4) 897.99 888.210 987.79 972.316
Flare Boom :
Primary Member 63.915 65.672 70.307 70.926
Secondary Member 25.067 22.925 27.574 25.187
Mechanical Equipment 0.180 0.180 0.198 0.198
Piping (including support) 10.543 10.540 11.597 11.594
Electrical and Instrumentation 2.000 - 2.200 -
Sub Total 101.705 99.317 111.876 107.905
Total 4397.823 4232.949 4830.527 4632.147
Percentage Different 3.90% 4.28%
Live Load at Module MSF 350.80 (4)
Live Load at Module P1 307.14 (4)
Live Load at Module P2 440.41 (4)
Live Load at Module LQ 638.88 (4)
Note: 1) Excluding Crane Operating Load
2) Consider Dynamic Load Factor as per API RP 2C
3) E&I Weight and Architectural Weight is considered under Bulk Weight
4) Live load presented are for local module check. Modules Live load on MSF load cases use factor of 0.7 or max
of 300MT whichever is less. No difference in live load application for operating and storm case as per Ref. [3].
 DOCUMENT NO :
PEARLOIL (SEBUKU) LTD. RB-WPI-PLT-ST-CL-3001-1
DETAIL ENGINEERING DESIGN FOR
REVISION : 1
RUBY FIELD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
INPLACE ANALYSIS REPORT - PQP TOPSIDE PAGE : 34 of 43

7.0 ANALYSIS RESULTS

7.1 LOAD SUMMARY

The detail summary of basic load including environmental are presented in

Attachment 4.1 whilst combined load matrices and loads summary are provided in
Attachment 4.2

7.2 MEMBER STRESS CHECK

All members satisfy code check requirements with UC less than 1.0. Following
table shows member unity check for each module during inplace analysis. Detailed
output results are presented in Attachment 4.3.

Table 7-1 Member Stress Check Summary

Load
Location Member Section Group UC Remark
Case

MODULE SUPPORT FRAME

1.151
2440-2192 3M11 Modification of Lz, and
0.64(1)
UB305x28 ST1 considering 10 mm
1.36
2121-2422 (1) 3M11 Plate
0.66
102.29
2439-2440 ST1 3M11
0.81(1)
102.04
2448-2449 ST1 3M11
Cellar deck 0.60(1)
secondary member 1.42
2422-2149 UB305x28 ST1 3M11 Modification of Lz
0.93(1)
1.16
2144-2180 ST1 2M16
0.59(1)
1.04
2196-2338 ST1 (1) 3M12
0.36
1.04 considering 10 mm
2029-2047 UB533x92 AB5 (1) 3M14
0.95 Plate
Cellar deck girder PG1200x500/ 1.36 Recalculated at the face
2002-2212 ABK 3M16
row A 16x25 0.95(1) of deck leg Ø1500
Recalculated using top
Bridge landing 1.126
2047-2037 UB762x147 AB4 2M16 flange replaced of
support 0.681(1)
450mm x 25mm thk

Cellar Deck 1.123 Recalculated at the face

2290-2008 UB533x92 AB5 3M11
Framing 0.94(1) of PG12C
 DOCUMENT NO :
PEARLOIL (SEBUKU) LTD. RB-WPI-PLT-ST-CL-3001-1
DETAIL ENGINEERING DESIGN FOR
REVISION : 1
RUBY FIELD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
INPLACE ANALYSIS REPORT - PQP TOPSIDE PAGE : 35 of 43

Load
Location Member Section Group UC Remark
Case

MODULE P1

Mezzanine Deck 1.27 Recalculate at the face

423G-4246 UB254x31 EB7 2015
Framing 0.94(1) of tubular Ø600
Mezzanine Deck 1.12 Recalculate at the face
423D-423Q UB254x31 EB7 (1) 2015
Framing 0.87 of tubular Ø600
Deck/Module Leg 400A-4003 Ø600x25 ET7 1.094 3016 Justification is provided
Deck/Module Leg 400C-4004 Ø600x25 ET7 1.069 2011 at Attachment 5
Mezzanine Deck
4027-440R UB305X40 EB6 0.937 3011 -
Framing
MODULE P2

Recalculate at the face

1.655 of crane pedestal
Top deck framing 5547-5522 UB914x289 GB7 3018
0.878(1) Ø1800, insert web of
25mm thk is provided.
1.561
5073-5022 GB2 3018
0.76(1)
Main deck framing UB914x289 Recalculate at the face
1.116
5048-5022 GB1 3013 of crane pedestal
0.88(1)
Ø1800
1.11
Top Deck Framing 552B-5522 UB838x176 GB2 3011
0.75(1)
1.55
5020-5048 GB1 3012
0.77(1)
UB914x289 Recalculate at the face
1.44
Main deck framing 507B-5020 GB1 3013 of Ø700 tubular and
0.76(1)
web of 30mm thk.
1.11
5020-5075 UB610x101 GB6 3012
0.61(1)
1.23 Recalculate consider 12
Main deck framing 5036-5076 UB610x101 GB6 3017
0.70(1) mm box beam.
1.18
Main deck framing 5320-5036 UB610x101 GB6 3017
0.70(1) Recalculate consider 10
1.18 plate.
Top deck framing 5579-5525 UB305X40 GBS (1) 3013
0.70
1.02 Recalculate with insert
Top Deck Framing 555G-5507 UB838x176 GB2 3011
0.31(1) web from padeye
Recalculate using
Deck Truss Row 1.01
5048-5547 Ø500x12 GT9 (1) 3011 correct member length,
2D 0.93
Ly, and Cm factor.
1.02 Recalculate with insert
Top deck framing 5507-5543 UB914x289 GB7 3018
0.33(1) web from padeye
1.003 Considering offset at
Main deck framing 5014-5329 UB610x101 GB6 (1) 3017
0.96 face beam UB914x289
 DOCUMENT NO :
PEARLOIL (SEBUKU) LTD. RB-WPI-PLT-ST-CL-3001-1
DETAIL ENGINEERING DESIGN FOR
REVISION : 1
RUBY FIELD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
INPLACE ANALYSIS REPORT - PQP TOPSIDE PAGE : 36 of 43

Load
Location Member Section Group UC Remark
Case

Truss Row 2D 5304-5515 Ø600x25 GTA 0.935 3013 -

LIVING QUARTER

1.690
6710-6019 QB1 3016 Add insert flange of
0.90(1)
UB610x101 20mm thk and 320mm
1.575
LQ Framing Lvl 1 6019-600J QB1 3011 width
0.88(1)
1.11 Add insert flange of
6123-6311 UB533x82 QB2 3015
0.73(1) 20mm thk.
Recalculate at the face
1.23 of Ø600. And using ring
LQ Framing Lvl 1 6086-6004 UB610x101 QB1 2011
0.37(1) plate of 50mm thk at
connection
1.39 Considering 8 mm thk
LQ Framing Lvl 1 601O-601M UB533x82 QB2 3011
0.67(1) plate
1.02
LQ Framing Lvl 1 6008-6701 UB610x101 QB1 3011 Modification Lz value
0.72(1)
1.13
LQ Framing Lvl 3 6403-6477 UB533x82 QB2 3015
0.94(1)
1.151
6003-6077 QB1 3015
0.99(1)
1.08
LQ Framing Lvl 1 6001-6039 UB610x101 QB1 2015
0.90(1) Recalculate at the face
1.01 of Ø600
6048-6002 QB1 3011
0.81(1)
1.02
6203-6285 QB2 3015
0.83(1)
LQ Framing Lvl 2 UB533x82
1.01
6201-6237 QB2 2015
0.83(1)
1.04
6074-6014 QB1 2014
0.95(1) Recalculate at the end
LQ Framing Lvl 1 UB610x101
1.062 of boxed member
6070-6071 QB1 3014
0.96(1)

Recalculated
1.21
LQ Framing Lvl 1 6143-6018 UB610x101 QB1 2016 considering 50 mm
0.41(1)
flange thickness
1.06 Considering 8 mm plate
LQ Framing Lvl 1 6011-6068 UB610x101 QB1 3014
0.79(1) thickness
1.145 Using haunch on the
LQ Framing Lvl 1 6131-600N UB305x40 QB4 3015
0.82(1) connection
LQ Framing Lvl 1 6054-6055 UB533x82 QB2 1.041 3016 Boxed with 12mm thk
 DOCUMENT NO :
PEARLOIL (SEBUKU) LTD. RB-WPI-PLT-ST-CL-3001-1
DETAIL ENGINEERING DESIGN FOR
REVISION : 1
RUBY FIELD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
INPLACE ANALYSIS REPORT - PQP TOPSIDE PAGE : 37 of 43

Load
Location Member Section Group UC Remark
Case
(1)
0.619 plate
1.037
6053-6054 QB2 3016
0.618(1)
1.023
6052-6053 QB2 3016
0.62 (1)
Ø219x8.18 1.01 Considering offset 25
601O-620X QC6 (1) 3011
Ø219x12.7 0.96 mm
1.013 Considering 20 mm
LQ Roof Framing 700E-680B UB610x101 MB2 2015
0.47(1) flange plate
LQ Framing Lvl 3 6473-640J UB533x82 QB2 1.009 3016

Note: (1) Recalculated UC, recalculation can be found in Attachment 5