website hits (X) weekly revenue (Y)

1,213 12,113
1,490 11,409
1,365 14,579
1,455 11,605
1,269 12,308
1,632 12,320
1,323 13,225
1,865 13,652
1,590 13,893
1,878 13,896
website hits (X) weekly revenue (Y)
1,213 12,113 Weekly Revenue (Y)
1,490 11,409
16,000
1,365 14,579
1,455 11,605 14,000

1,269 12,308 12,000

1,632 12,320
10,000
1,323 13,225
1,865 13,652 8,000

1,590 13,893 6,000

1,878 13,896
4,000

2,000

0
1,100 1,200 1,300 1,400 1,500 1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900

The graph indicate a weak relantionship between the x and y values. Y

venue (Y)

1,600 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000

etween the x and y values. Yes, the linear model is credible.

website hits (X) weekly revenue (Y)
1,213 12,113
1,490 11,409
Normal Probability Plot
20000

weekly revenue (Y)

1,365 14,579
1,455 11,605 15000
1,269 12,308 10000
5000
1,632 12,320
0
1,323 13,225
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
1,865 13,652
Sample Percentile
1,590 13,893
1,878 13,896

conclusion: In conclusion, the graph (residual plot) displays equal variances because there is no funneling effect

The normal probality plot shows that weekly revenue is normally distributed.The slope positive indic
ability Plot website hits (X) Residual Plot
3000
2000

Residuals
1000
0
-1000 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
50 60 70 80 90 100 1 ,1 1,2 1,3 1,4 1,5 1,6 1,7 1,8 1,9 2,0
-2000
ercentile website hits (X)

use there is no funneling effect in the variances of the expected revenue with the predicted revenue.

ributed.The slope positive indicates normality.

 website hits (x) weekly revenue (y) X-X(bar) Y-Y(bar) Product Square(X-X(bar))
1,213 12,113 -295 -787 232165 87025
1,490 11,409 -18 -1,491 26838 325
1,365 14,579 -143 1,679 -240097 20449
1,455 11,605 -53 -1,295 68635 2809
1,269 12,308 -239 -592 141488 57121
1,632 12,320 124 -580 -71920 15376
1,323 13,225 -185 325 -60125 34225
1,865 13,652 357 752 268464 127449
1,590 13,893 82 993 81426 6724
1,878 13,896 370 996 368520 136900
1,508 12,900 815394 488402

b(1)= 1.66951408 Y= 10382.37 + 1.67x

b(0)= 10382.37282
0
SUMMARY OUTPUT

Regression Statistics
Multiple R 0.3571112389292
R Square 0.1275284369696
Adjusted R Square 0.0184694915908
Standard Error 1078.9614371274
Observations 10

ANOVA
df SS MS F Significance F
Regression 1 1361312 1361312 1.169353 0.311051
Residual 8 9313262 1164158
Total 9 10674574

Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Lower 95%Upper 95%Lower 95.0%

Intercept 10382.372815836 2353.0592 4.412287 0.00225 4956.209 15808.54 4956.209
website hits (X) 1.669514047854 1.543893 1.081366 0.311051 -1.89071 5.229738 -1.89071

RESIDUAL OUTPUT PROBABILITY OUTPUT

Observation Predicted weekly revenueResiduals

(Y) Percentile
weekly revenue (Y)
1 12407.493355883 -294.4934 5 11409
2 12869.948747139 -1460.949 15 11605
3 12661.259491157 1917.7405 25 12113
4 12811.515755464 -1206.516 35 12308
5 12500.986142563 -192.9861 45 12320
6 13107.019741934 -787.0197 55 13225
7 12591.139901147 633.8601 65 13652
8 13496.016515084 155.98348 75 13893
9 13036.900151924 856.09985 85 13896
10 13517.720197706 378.2798 95 14579
 website hits (X) Residual Plot
3000
2000
Residuals 1000
0
-1000 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
,1 ,20 ,30 ,40 ,50 ,60 ,70 ,80 ,90 ,00
1
-2000 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2
website hits (X)

Normal Probability Plot

20000
weekly revenue (Y)

Upper 95.0% 15000

15808.537 10000
5.2297378 5000
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Sample Percentile

Y= 10382.37 + 1.67x

An increase in website hits is also an increase in weekly revenue