Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1994 Smythe Etal Kola92 Project Eos
1994 Smythe Etal Kola92 Project Eos
Pr*ct
The principal aim of the project was to de-
D. K. Smythe, S. B. Smithson, C. Gillen, C. Humphreys, Y. termine the reflection characteñstics of the
Kristoffesen, N. A. Kamev, V. Z. Garipov, N. I. Pavlenkova, and the upper crystalline crust. Obtaining a whole
Kola-92 Working Group crustal image was a secondary priority.
Since crustal reflection surveys of the
kind now commonplace in the west had
An anomaly in oor understanding of A crucial factor about SG-3, apart from its never been undertaken at the SG3 well, a
per continental crustal structure is caused by depth of 12.2 km, is that the primary lithologi- multinational geophysical team was assem-
conflicting observations from structural ge- cal layering of the Proterozoic supracrustal bled to obtain the necesary surface and
ologists and reflection seismologists. Near- rocks dips at 400—500 (Figure 2). Seismic
downhole seismic data. Reconnaissance site
surface structure in metamorphic terrain is re-
surveys were carried out by the summer of
frequently steeply dipping or vertical, but flections were observed from this layering
1991. The nonhem branch of Environmental,
seismic reflection images display flat-lying re- both on high-resolution shallow surface data
Geological and Geophysical Investigation or-
flectors below depths of a few kilometers. as well as on the previously recorded single
ganized the field work in cooperation with
The seismic image of the topmost 2—3 km is component analogue-record VSPs. There are
usually blank. How can this be, when seis- also flat•lying, lower•frequency reflections be- the Universities of Bergen, Glasgow, and Wp
mic reflections are supposed to represent pri- tween 6 and 9 km depth, cross-cutting the
mary geological structure? terozoic/Archean lithologies (Figure 2). The field work was carried out between
Seismic measurements in and around a Pavlenkova [ 19921 has reviewed the sig- early March and mid-May 1992. Normally, the
deep borehole could solve this dilemma. Sur- nificance of the flat•lying reflectors. The late winter provides the best combination of
face seismic observations and physical sam- depth range at which they occur corre- calm weather conditions, hard ground, and
ples collected from the hole by wireline sponds roughly to the zones of porosity in- enough daylight for seismic surveys. Unfoflu•
logging, particularly by vertical seismic crease, velocity inversion, increase in P wave nately, however, the unusually mild winter of
files (VSPs), could then be compared. anisotropy and pressure, and the presence of 1992 produced very deep snow but barely fro•
There are only two sites where hypothe- circulating fluids. Furthermore, the essen- zen ground.
ses on crustal reflection sources can be tially vertical variation in physical properties First, a 38-km long crustal seismic reflec-
against in situ geological and fluid sam- correlates well with discrete changes in meta- tion profile was recorded through the well in
ples. One of these sites, the Kola morphic facies. a direction at right angles to the regional
super- The SG3 well provided an ideal opportu- strike. The surface and VSP data were re
deep well in the Kola Peninsula, northwest nity to test hypotheses on several alternatives corded in three•component mode—ground
Rusia, has been cored with more than 80% to primary lithological layering as the source motion in x, y, and z directions—lo give the
recovery. Investigation has yielded exciting of reflections. The alternative sources of crus- full wave field, permitting separation of Pand
evidence of current and past fluid flow, as tal reflections include shear zones, fluids, Swaves. A surface seismic survey was then
well as physical property and logging data.
However, until now it has lacked the deep
crustal commondepth-point (CDP) seismic
section required for correlation efforts. To
remedy this gap in our knowledge, a major
multinational experiment, incorporating
truck•mounted vibrators, was performed dur•
ing the winter of 1992 (Figure l).
0.5 Reference
BABEL Working Group, Integrated seisrnic stu&
is of the Baltic shield IBing data in the
CAJIf of ü)thnia region, Geophys. J. Int..
1.0 '12, 305, 1993.
Durrheim, R. J. , and W. D. Mc»ney, Archean
and Prc*erozoic crustal evolution: Evidence
3 3 from crustal
Geology, 19, ü,
1.5 1991.
W. D.. and R. Meissner, Multi-ge
netic origin of reflectivity: A review of sei9
4 4 mic reflection pr(filing of the continental
lower crust and %ho, in Continental
2.0 Lower Crust, edited by D. M. Fountain, R.
Arculus, and R. W. Kay. Elsevier, Anster-
dam. 45, 1992.
5 5
4 5
Fig. 4. a) Bmte stack ofvertical component data from 'he south endofthe CDP line Inyering at
of sekmic