This document provides an overview of basic concepts in logic. It defines logic as the study of evaluating arguments. An argument consists of premises and a conclusion, where the premises provide evidence or support for the conclusion. Arguments can be deductive, where the premises make the conclusion necessarily true, or inductive, where the premises make the conclusion probably true. Deductive arguments are evaluated based on their validity and soundness, while inductive arguments are evaluated by strength and cogency. The document discusses how deductive and inductive arguments can be classified as valid/invalid or strong/weak based on the relationship between their premises and conclusions.
This document provides an overview of basic concepts in logic. It defines logic as the study of evaluating arguments. An argument consists of premises and a conclusion, where the premises provide evidence or support for the conclusion. Arguments can be deductive, where the premises make the conclusion necessarily true, or inductive, where the premises make the conclusion probably true. Deductive arguments are evaluated based on their validity and soundness, while inductive arguments are evaluated by strength and cogency. The document discusses how deductive and inductive arguments can be classified as valid/invalid or strong/weak based on the relationship between their premises and conclusions.
This document provides an overview of basic concepts in logic. It defines logic as the study of evaluating arguments. An argument consists of premises and a conclusion, where the premises provide evidence or support for the conclusion. Arguments can be deductive, where the premises make the conclusion necessarily true, or inductive, where the premises make the conclusion probably true. Deductive arguments are evaluated based on their validity and soundness, while inductive arguments are evaluated by strength and cogency. The document discusses how deductive and inductive arguments can be classified as valid/invalid or strong/weak based on the relationship between their premises and conclusions.
This document provides an overview of basic concepts in logic. It defines logic as the study of evaluating arguments. An argument consists of premises and a conclusion, where the premises provide evidence or support for the conclusion. Arguments can be deductive, where the premises make the conclusion necessarily true, or inductive, where the premises make the conclusion probably true. Deductive arguments are evaluated based on their validity and soundness, while inductive arguments are evaluated by strength and cogency. The document discusses how deductive and inductive arguments can be classified as valid/invalid or strong/weak based on the relationship between their premises and conclusions.
Logic, as a field of study, may be defined as the organized body of knowledge, or
science that evaluates arguments. The aim of logic is to develop a system of methods and principles that we may use as criteria for evaluating the arguments of others and as guides in constructing arguments of our own. Argument is a systematic combination of two or more statements, which are classified as a premise or premises and conclusion. A premise refers to the statement, which is claimed to provide a logical support or evidence to the main point of the argument, which is known as conclusion. A conclusion is a statement, which is claimed to follow from the alleged evidence. Depending on the logical and real ability of the premise(s) to support the conclusion, an argument can be either a good argument or a bad argument. However, unlike all kinds of passages, including those that resemble arguments, all arguments purport to prove something. Arguments can generally be divided into deductive and inductive arguments. A deductive argument is an argument in which the premises are claimed to support the conclusion in such a way that it is impossible for the premises to be true and the conclusion false. On the other hand, an inductive argument is an argument in which the premises are claimed to support the conclusion in such a way that it is improbable that the premises be true and the conclusion false. The deductiveness or inductiveness of an argument can be determined by the particular indicator word it might use, the actual strength of the inferential relationship between its component statements, and its argumentative form or structure. A deductive argument can be evaluated by its validity and soundness. Likewise, an inductive argument can be evaluated by its strength and cogency. Depending on its actually ability to successfully maintain its inferential claim, a deductive argument can be either valid or invalid. That is, if the premise(s) of a certain deductive argument actually support its conclusion in such a way that it is impossible for the premises to be true and the conclusion false, then that particular deductive argument is valid. If, however, its premise(s) actually support its conclusion in such a way that it is possible for the premises to be true and the conclusion false, then that particular deductive argument is invalid. Similarly, an inductive argument can be either strong or weak, depending on its actually ability to successfully maintain its inferential claim. That is, if the premise(s) of a certain inductive argument actually support its conclusion in such a way that it is improbable for the premises to be true and the conclusion false, then that particular inductive argument is strong. If, however, its premise(s) actually support its conclusion in such a way that it is probable for the premises to be true and the conclusion false, then that particular inductive argument is weak. Furthermore, depending on its actually ability to successfully maintain its inferential claim as well as its factual claim, a deductive argument can be either sound or unsound. That is, if a deductive argument actually maintained its inferential claim, (i.e., if it is valid), and its factual claim, (i.e., if all of its premises are true), then that particular deductive argument will be a sound argument. However, if it fails to maintain either of its claims, it will be an unsound argument. Likewise, depending on its actually ability to successfully maintain its inferential claim as well as its factual claim, an inductive argument can be either cogent or uncogent. That is, if an inductive argument actually maintained its inferential claim, (i.e., if it is strong), and its factual claim, (i.e., if all of its premises are probably true), then that particular inductive argument will be a cogent argument. However, if it fails to maintain either of its claims, it will be an uncogent argument. In this chapter, we will discuss logic and its basic concepts, the techniques of distinguishing arguments from non-argumentative passages, and the types of arguments.