This document provides a rubric for evaluating semester projects in the Department of Electrical Engineering at Indus University. It outlines five performance parameters (organization, research, procedure, results & discussion, data presentation) and defines criteria for unsatisfactory, partially satisfactory, and satisfactory performance in each parameter. Scores of 0-1, 2-3, and 4-5 are assigned respectively. The rubric also provides spaces to record marks and comments for individual students. It will be used to assess a complex engineering-based semester project worth 10% of the course marks.
This document provides a rubric for evaluating semester projects in the Department of Electrical Engineering at Indus University. It outlines five performance parameters (organization, research, procedure, results & discussion, data presentation) and defines criteria for unsatisfactory, partially satisfactory, and satisfactory performance in each parameter. Scores of 0-1, 2-3, and 4-5 are assigned respectively. The rubric also provides spaces to record marks and comments for individual students. It will be used to assess a complex engineering-based semester project worth 10% of the course marks.
This document provides a rubric for evaluating semester projects in the Department of Electrical Engineering at Indus University. It outlines five performance parameters (organization, research, procedure, results & discussion, data presentation) and defines criteria for unsatisfactory, partially satisfactory, and satisfactory performance in each parameter. Scores of 0-1, 2-3, and 4-5 are assigned respectively. The rubric also provides spaces to record marks and comments for individual students. It will be used to assess a complex engineering-based semester project worth 10% of the course marks.
This document provides a rubric for evaluating semester projects in the Department of Electrical Engineering at Indus University. It outlines five performance parameters (organization, research, procedure, results & discussion, data presentation) and defines criteria for unsatisfactory, partially satisfactory, and satisfactory performance in each parameter. Scores of 0-1, 2-3, and 4-5 are assigned respectively. The rubric also provides spaces to record marks and comments for individual students. It will be used to assess a complex engineering-based semester project worth 10% of the course marks.
Performance Parameter (PP) (0-1) Marks (2-3) Marks (4-5) Marks
The sequence of information is Information is presented in a Information is presented in a logical,
A. Organization/ difficult to follow. No logical somewhat logical manner. Results and interesting way, which is easy to Structure manner or continuity. Results and conclusions are stated and reflect follow. Results and conclusions are conclusions are not stated. acceptable knowledge of the stated and reflect complete experiment. Knowledge of the experiment. B. Research/ Did not collect any information Collected some basic information - Collected a great deal of information Information Gather that relates to the topic. most related to the topic. - all related to the topic. Solution pprocedures and methods Clear definition of the solution, No procedure tries things out C. Procedure are not always clearly defined. Few procedure and methods. Different unsystematically. alternative designs are evaluated. alternatives are considered and Very little information about why Generally clear discussion of results Clearly discuss evaluated. what results mean D. Results and the project was done and what the and conclusions but may miss some and what conclusions may be drawn Discussions results may mean. No references points. Some use of references and from them. Cites publishes standards to other studies. published standards. or other related reports. Data presented in a very obscure Presents data in appropriate manner Present data very clearly using E. Data Presentation manner. Graphs/waveforms, graphs/ waveform. Figure captions appropriate graphics/ waveforms. figure captions and units are and units are missed some time. Figure captions and units are always DETAILS never included. OF LAB COURSE included. Course Teacher: ASSESSMENT ACTIVITY Complex ENGINEERING-BASED Activity Marks: 10 Engr. Muhammad Mohsin Shaikh %age out of 50 Marks: 20% Semester Project Problem Complexity (WP/EP): WP-1 COURSE CODE) & TITLE: SEMESTER: 5th semester Knowledge Area / Sub Area (WK): WK-4 (EE -314A) Linear Control Systems OFFERED IN: Fall 2021 Washington Accord Attribute (WA): WA-9 Lab` FOR THE BATCH: Fall 2019 OBE ATTAINMENT (Course): OBE ATTAINMENT(Taxonomy): OBE ATTAINMENT (PLO) CEOs (Course Educational Objectives): 1 CLO/ Domain: Psychomotor Level: P5 Program Outcome: PLO-9 (Course Outcomes): CLO-3 EVALUATION OF SEMESTER PROJECT Marks Obtained Remarks Signature S# Student ID Student Name PP- PP-B PP-C PP-D PP-E Total 1. 1675-2019 Burhan Sohail A 2. 2115-2019 Khubaib Arshad 3. 2442-2019 Dar Ul Hasan Moin 4. 2463-2019 Muhammad 5. 2391-2019 Abrar Navaid Muhammad 6. 2125-2019 Sharjeel Raza Muhammad 7. 2287-2019 ZohaibUlAslam Rooh Amin 1364-2019 Memon Shah Zaman 8. 9. 2321-2019 Shahab Ud Din 10. 1121-2019 Syed Jahanzeb Raza 11. 2037-2019 Taimur Qureshi 12. 1293-2019 Usama Aziz 13. 1959-2019 Uzair Khalid 14. 2335-2019 Zeeshan Ali 15. 2440-2019 Zeeshan Tahir Lab Instructor Name: Theory Teacher Name: