Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Assignment Remit
Assignment Remit
Assignment Remit
Assignment:
The Chief Executive Officer of Virgin Mobile is planning to enter the Russian and
Brazilian markets. As a Global Marketing Consultant, Virgin Mobile requires you to
select one potential country for the market entry.
You should select the most favourable country for Virgin Mobile based on a clear
analysis of the marketing environment of both markets. This should be presented in
a report format. The report should also draw on and apply key international
marketing concepts and reliable data to support your analysis and key suggestions.
Therefore, you should develop a comprehensive profile of markets and prioritise the
chosen country, which you intend to target and justify why.
Make clear, well-justified recommendations, which result from your analysis.
Note:
Discuss the key uncontrollable factors that will influence your selection strategy.
Analyse environmental factors that need to be identified and considered prior market
selection; the above factors need to be discussed within the context of the case.
5. Report format with a word limit 1500 words maximum, clear layout, 1.5 line
spacing, font 12-point Times New Roman in the main text, consistent referencing
in the main text and the references section.
6. Tables should be single line spacing with font 10-pointTimes New Roman.
8. Figures, Tables and References are not part of the word limit (i.e. Assignment
length does not include figures, tables and references on the references’ list).
9. You may (if you really must) include an appendices section to provide any
supporting information you find pertinent, such as data/charts/tables etc.
However, appendices must not exceed 1 page at the most.
Within the report you should identify a country you feel would present an opportunity
for Virgin Mobile and those that you feel do not. You should also make clear to Virgin
Mobile the issues you feel they would have to deal with in entering this markets.
10. When developing your case study think about how the situation and practice you
learn about relates to module lecture topics and extra reading. In doing so,
reliable data should be combined with relevant theory to support points made.
Think about how you can use some of the frameworks we have discussed in the
lectures and seminars to structure your material.
11. In compiling your case you should draw on a range of material including but not
limited to: academic articles, news reports, market research reports and potential
countries’ Central Bank annual reports etc. You must make sure that you
reference all material that you use accurately to avoid plagiarism.
13. You must acknowledge any factual sources of information and include references
to ideas, assertions or concepts used in your piece of work. Failure to adequately
reference resources is treated as plagiarism under regulations of The University.
Feedback to Students:
Both Summative and Formative feedback is given to encourage students to reflect on their
learning that feed forward into following assessment tasks. The preparation for all
assessment tasks will be supported by formative feedback within the assignment
workshops. Written feedback is provided as appropriate. Please be aware to use the
browser and not the Canvas App as you may not be able to view all comments.
Grading Criteria:
60-69 (Merit) - A mark in this range is indicative of that the work is of a good to very
good standard for the current level of your degree. Work of this quality shows a good
level of knowledge of international marketing strategies and understanding of the
global environment. It will show evidence of reading a wide diversity of evidence that
support your arguments and of being able to use ideas gleaned from this reading to
support and develop your recommendations. Written work will exhibit good writing
skills with well organized, accurate footnotes and/or a bibliography that follows the
accepted ‘style’ of the subject. Arguments and issues will be illustrated by reference
to well documented, detailed and relevant examples. There should be clear evidence
of critical engagement with the international marketing literature and frameworks.
The analysis should be correct and any conclusions clearly and accurately
expressed.
50-59 (Pass) - A mark in this range is indicative that the work is of a satisfactory to
very satisfactory standard at the current level of your degree. Work of this quality will
show clear knowledge and understanding of international marketing strategies and
frameworks. It will focus on the question posed and show evidence that relevant
basic works of reference have been read and understood. The work will exhibit
sound written work and/or analytical skills in relation to the international market
environment. It will be reasonably well structured and coherently presented. Written
work should exhibit satisfactory use of footnotes and/or a bibliography and in
international markets it should be possible to follow the logical steps leading to the
answer obtained and the conclusions reached. Arguments and issues should be
discussed and illustrated by reference to international marketing frameworks, but
these may not fully documented or detailed.
40-49 (Pass) - A mark in this range is indicative that the work is of an acceptable
standard at the current the level of your degree. Work of this type will show limited
knowledge and understanding of international marketing strategies and frameworks.
It will show evidence of some reading and comprehension of how companies can
expand to global markets, but the written work or answer may be weakly structured,
cover only a limited range of analysis on international marketing framework or have
weakly developed or incomplete arguments. The work may be poorly-presented
without properly laid out footnotes and/or a bibliography, or there might flaws in the
logic and reasoning leading to the results obtained and the conclusions reached.
35-39 (Marginal fail) - A mark in this range is indicative that the work is below, but at
the upper end is approaching, the standard required at the current level of your
degree. It indicates weak work of an inadequate standard. This will be because
either the work is too short, is very poorly organized, or is poorly directed at the
written work title or question asked. It will show very limited knowledge or
understanding of international marketing material and display weak writing and/or
understanding of international marketing frameworks. Written work will exhibit no
clear argument, may have very weak spelling and grammar, very inadequate or
absent references and/or bibliography and may contain major factual errors.
Students should revise the module material.
1-34 (Fail) - A mark at this level is indicative that the work is far below the standard
required at the current level of your degree. It indicates that the work is extremely
weak and seriously inadequate and communicated limited if any knowledge of
international marketing. This will be because either the work is far too short, is badly
jumbled and incoherent in content, or fails to address the written work title or
question asked. It will show very little evidence of knowledge or understanding of
international marketing strategies and may exhibit very weak analytical skills in
discussing international marketing strategies and frameworks.