Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Workflow Automation Guide
Workflow Automation Guide
Management Guide
A Publica tion by I n te g r i fy
Overview of
Section
01 Workflow Management
W ork f l o w M a na ge me nt G ui d e
2
Section
A P ublica tion b y I n te g r i fy
3 Int e gri fy.c o m
Section
A P ublica tion b y I n te g r i fy
4 Int e gri f y.c o m
Section
User Portal
In many cases, a workflow is triggered by an
employee, vendor or customer who is requesting
something. Requests like these are managed
through a portal, sometimes called an Employee
Portal, User Portal, Request Portal, etc. This portal
gives users a personalized process for submitting
and real-time tracking of requests. See which tasks
are completed, pending, or in-progress.
A P ublica tion b y I n te g r i fy
5 Int e gri f y.c o m
Section
Streamline and speed up internal financial processes Reduced license overhead for enterprise systems (ERP,
by reducing manual entry and request handling. CRM, etc.)
Reduce errors and re-work. Monitor finance team performance against Service Level
Agreements.
Reduce risk of improperly approved requests.
Identify and remove finance process barriers or
Improve compliance with audit trails.
bottlenecks.
Increase output and increase productivity (this goes
Better align tasks with the appropriate skillsets.
for people handling requests as well as requestors).
Drastically reduce paperwork and associated costs and
A unified, personalized request experience for
waste.
employees.
Reduce need for manual decision making and handling
Track request status (completed, pending, or
with business rules.
in-progress, etc.) in real time
Identify performance trends (group and individual)
over time.
A P ublica tion b y I n te g r i fy
6 Int e gri fy.c o m
Section
A Publica tion b y I n te g r i fy
7 Int e gri fy.c o m
IT Workflow Management
Section
02 Use Cases
Introduction
Workflow management system allow employees to submit requests,
gather approvals, and see status updates while allowing IT departments
to provide rapid response and improved service levels to employees.
Requests for software changes, new technology projects, system access,
on-boarding setup, and technical services are drastically simplified.
A P ub l i c a t i o n b y Int e gri f y
8
Section
Workflow Examples
New IT Projects
IT Projects are discreet efforts to solve a business
problem within a specific timeline. Without an
organized, formal method for intake, requests
for IT projects can quickly become wasteful and
overwhelming.
Companies use workflow management to provide
a framework and process for submitting, reviewing,
approving, assigning and tracking IT project requests.
On the right is a simplified process flow for an IT
project request.
In the rudimentary example on the right, an IT project
request is submitted to a first approver (their manager)
and if not approved, it’s returned to the submitter
with a notification. If it is approved by their manager, it
proceeds to IT. If accepted, the process ends. If rejected
it’s returned to the submitter.
Support Requests
In a small organization, a phone call to Ray in IT can
usually resolve IT support issues fairly efficiently. In
larger organizations, an IT support request system is
required.
Workflow management is the backbone of these
systems. Advanced rules can be used to route requests
based on type, severity, department, etc. Users can
track their requests and IT managers can report on
performance. On the right is a simplified example of an
IT request workflow.
A Publica tion b y I n te g r i fy
9 Int e gri fy.c o m
Section
Workflow Examples
CapEx Request
Improperly tracking and
evaluating capital expenditure
requests is one of the top issues
preventing CapEx programs
from being successful. Workflow
automation plays a pivotal role
early in the CapEx process by
providing a consistent, compliant
and measurable method for
managing CapEx requests.
In the simple diagram on the
right, you can see the process
initiated with an employee
completing a form designed
to capture all the required
datapoints to initiate a capital
expenditure request. The
request, once approved by their
department manager, is passed
through a basic business rule
regarding the size of the request. Based on the
rule, the request is passed to the appropriate
Finance approver.
Once the request is approved, the requestor is
notified, the data is passed to the accounting
system and this part of the process ends or
continues to Purchasing, etc.
A P ublica tion b y I n te g r i fy
10 Int e gri fy.c o m
Section
About GlaxoSmithKline
GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), headquartered in the UK with operations based in the United States, is one of the leading
research-based pharmaceutical companies with an estimated seven percent of the world’s pharmaceutical market.
The Challenge
GSK has more than 100,000 employees worldwide and with such a
large, distributed workforce GSK’s IT team found its request workflow
to be diverse and disconnected. The company’s IT departments were
developing their own methods and interfaces for processing users’
requests for IT equipment and service without following a standard
template or system. There was a redundancy of some processes and
resources while some services and equipment weren’t even available
through online requests. Users were confused about where to go for
service and how to make their requests, and management wanted
a more organized and efficient method that would more effectively
manage and utilize staff and resources.
A Publica tion b y I n te g r i fy
11 Int e gri fy.c o m
Section
The Benefits
Initially over 50 different business processes were included in
the implementation resulting in over 100 request types. Since
implementing Integrify, GSK now uses Integrify to handle
more than 600 different types of requests, and with more
being added every day. The system processes almost 16,000
requests each month. The results have been impressive:
High User Adoption: One of the most immediate benefits was
providing a simple, universal interface to users, who were
previously confused and frustrated attempting to make a
request online.
Efficient Request Handling: Integrify has also helped IT handle
requests more efficiently. With Integrify, the system can
automatically route any request to a location where IT team
members are in the office and able to address it immediately. Integrify also enabled GSK to have
requests routed directly to the appropriate IT team or approvers based on criteria such as the client’s
location or business unit.
Better Use of IT Talent: GSK was also able to more effectively assign staff, as eight employees were
re-purposed to other areas within the company where they could be more productive rather than
remaining in the unproductive, non-value-added roles they played in creating and maintaining
redundant, out-of-sync systems. All of GSK’s core IT groups are now using Integrify, including the
Identity Management Group, Desktop Services Group, Email Operations Group and Security Services
Group, among many, many others.
A Publica tion b y I n te g r i fy
12 Int e gri fy.c o m
Section
ROI
The time savings was significant, as with one particular request type, 90 percent of requests were filled within
13 days. A year later, 90 percent of such requests were fulfilled in just eight days. In fact, the IT team evaluated
the nine worst-performing processes in one business area and found that Integrify had provided a 79 percent
reduction in request fulfillment time. Once Integrify replaced the scattered, homegrown solutions in place,
development time dropped by 77 percent and costs were cut 96 percent, as the average interface development
time was cut from three weeks to four days.
Conclusion
GSK has seen a vast improvement not just in the efficiency of its IT service groups, but in the overall satisfaction
of the employees who use the system on a regular basis. With plans for more development of automation in
the background to provide true self-service components, GSK’s IT team feels it has only just begun to tap the
potential of the system.
A Publica tion b y I n te g r i fy
13 Int e gri fy.c o m
Planning & Executing a
Section
03 Workflow Project
A P ub l i c a t i o n b y Int e gri f y
14
Section
A P ublica tion b y I n te g r i fy
15 Int e gri fy.c o m
Section
A P ublica tion b y I n te g r i fy
16 Int e gri fy.c o m
Section
A P ublica tion b y I n te g r i fy
17 Int e gri fy.c o m
Section
A Thoughtful Roll-Out
& Training Plan
People will fight the change you’re implementing, that’s just how we are. Be prepared to train and train
again. Don’t roll out everything all at once. Add workflows with a light touch and let people get used to the
new way. The benefits may be obvious to you but most people will believe it when they see it. Too much
change at once will distract people from their day-to-day and may cause resentment.
A P ublica tion b y I n te g r i fy
18 Int e gri fy.c o m
Environment
Section
04 & Considerations
A P ub l i c a t i o n b y Int e gri f y
19
Section
Public Cloud
Choose this option if you do not require integration with other
systems or the systems you need to integrate with can be accessed
over the internet. Commonly, internal applications are configured to
accept connections from the cloud.
The public cloud option requires that user accounts are managed
within the cloud system. This option requires no internal IT resources
to set up, is fully managed by the vendor and can be available almost
immediately after purchasing a license. No hardware is required.
Private Cloud
Choose this option if your require data isolation, an
encrypted database, custom login page or an SSO
bridge. The private cloud also allows you to schedule
your own updates and allows for direct access to your
SQL database.
On Premise
Choose this if you are required to integrate with systems that cannot be exposed
to the Internet or your corporate policy requires that your data reside within your
company’s firewalls. Integration with Active Directory is also available with the
on-premise option.
A P ublica tion b y I n te g r i fy
20 Int e gri f y.c om
Summary of
Section
05 Workflow Management
A P ub l i c a t i o n b y Int e gri f y
21
Section
A P ublica tion b y I n te g r i fy
22 Int e gri fy.c o m
About
Section
06 Integrify
Our Mission
For over ten years, Integrify has been a leader in request and workflow
management. Launched in 2001, with headquarters in Chicago, we’ve built
a reputation for creating software with the customer in mind. Users value
simplicity and integration. That has always been the focus of our product.
Rapid distribution, broad scalability, and high ROI are goals that we are
constantly reaching, only to again set the bar even higher.
A P ub l i c a t i o n b y Int e gri f y
23
Section
06 About Integrify
Our Mission
For over ten years, Integrify has been a leader in request and workflow
management. Launched in 2001, with headquarters in Chicago, we’ve built
a reputation for creating software with the customer in mind. Users value
simplicity and integration. That has always been the focus of our product.
Rapid distribution, broad scalability, and high ROI are goals that we are
constantly reaching, only to again set the bar even higher.
We believe that our job is to ensure customer success by helping them to do
more with more efficiency. We are constantly innovating to provide compelling
solutions that are simple to use and adopt. We believe that we can work
together with customers to build solutions to buck the status quo and make
organizations more productive.
GET A DEMO
A P ublica tion b y I n te g r i fy
24 Int e gri fy.c o m