Analysis Presentation and Interpretation of Data: Gender Frequency Percentage

You might also like

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3

CHAPTER IV

ANALYSIS PRESENTATION AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA


This chapter is intended to provide the analysis presentation and the interpretation of
data. Its purpose is to present and interpret the results of the Information Extraction
Questionnaire and Survey Questionnaire that the researchers have conducted online in all
honesty.
Information Extraction Questionnaire
A. Respondent Profile
Table 1: Frequency Distribution Table of Respondents according to Gender
GENDER FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE
Male 28 37.8%
Female 17 62.2%
TOTAL 45 100%

Table 2: Frequency Distribution Table of Respondents according to Strand


STRAND FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE
ABM 15 33.3%
HE 4 8.9%
HUMSS 9 20%
ICT 4 8.9%
STEM 13 28.9%
TOTAL 45 100%

B. Questions
Table 3: Frequency Distribution Table of Respondents according to the things needed to be
considered in determining the efficiency of the proposed Motivational Cards in encouraging
students experiencing lack of interest and motivation during Online Learning
FACTORS YES NO TOTAL
number percentage number percentage number percentage
A. Content 45 100% 0 0% 45 100%

1. timely burst of wisdom 42 93.3% 3 6.7% 45 100%

2. new age of quotes 44 97.8% 1 2.2% 45 100%

3. inspirational quotes 44 97.8% 1 2.2% 45 100%

B. Design 45 100% 0 0% 45 100%


1. eye-catching visuals 44 97.8% 1 2.2% 45 100%

2. creative presentation 44 97.8% 1 2.2% 45 100%

3. creative ideas 44 97.8% 1 2.2% 45 100%

C. Quality 44 97.8% 1 2.2% 45 100%

1. accessible 45 100% 0 0% 45 100%

2. comprehensible 45 100% 0 0% 45 100%

3. relevant 45 100% 0 0% 45 100%

Table 4: Frequency Distribution Table of Respondents according to the causes of Grade 12


student’s lack of motivation and interest during Online Learning
CAUSES YES NO TOTAL
number percentag numbe percentag number percentag
e r e e
A. Unstable internet 45 100% 0 0% 45 100%
connection

B. Lack of access to 45 100% 0 0% 45 100%


technology

C. Low self-esteem 40 88.9% 5 11.1% 45 100%

D. Pressure 44 97.8% 1 2.2% 45 100%

E. Noisy environment 41 91.1% 4 8.9% 45 100%

F. Lack of support at home 42 93.3% 3 6.7% 45 100%

Table
Survey Questionnaire
A. Respondent Profile
Table 1: Frequency Distribution Table of Respondents according to Gender
GENDER FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE
Male 28 37.8%
Female 17 62.2%
TOTAL 45 100%

Table 2: Frequency Distribution Table of Respondents according to Strand


STRAND FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE
ABM 15 33.3%
HE 4 8.9%
HUMSS 9 20%
ICT 4 8.9%
STEM 13 28.9%
TOTAL 45 100%

You might also like