Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Meta 2.2 Ocampo Libro
Meta 2.2 Ocampo Libro
Meta 2.2 Ocampo Libro
epithelial islands do not show the characteristic polarization most reported cases have not recurred after local excision.
seen in ameloblastomas (Fig. 15-97). Vacuolization and A few instances of recurrence have been reported, but these
individual cell keratinization within the epithelial islands have responded well to further local excision. Maxillary
are common features. Small microcysts are sometimes squamous odontogenic tumors may be somewhat more
observed within the epithelial islands. Laminated calcified aggressive than mandibular lesions, with a greater tendency
bodies and globular eosinophilic structures, which do not to invade adjacent structures. This may be because of the
stain for amyloid, are present within the epithelium in some porous, spongy nature of the maxillary bone. The multicen-
cases. The former probably represents dystrophic calcifica- tric lesions have typically exhibited a less aggressive, almost
tions; the nature of the latter is unknown. hamartomatous behavior when compared with solitary
Islands of epithelium that closely resemble those of the lesions. A well-documented example of apparent malignant
squamous odontogenic tumor have been observed within transformation of squamous odontogenic tumor has been
the fibrous walls of dentigerous and radicular cysts. These reported.
have been designated as squamous odontogenic tumorlike pro-
liferations in odontogenic cysts. These islands do not appear MIXED ODONTOGENIC TUMORS
to have any significance relative to the behavior of the cyst,
and evaluation of the clinical, radiographic, and histopatho- The group of mixed odontogenic tumors, composed of
logic features should permit differentiation from a squa- proliferating odontogenic epithelium in a cellular ectomes-
mous odontogenic tumor. enchyme resembling the dental papilla, poses problems in
In published reports, some squamous odontogenic classification. Some of these lesions show varying degrees of
tumors have been misdiagnosed initially as ameloblastomas, inductive effect by the epithelium on the mesenchyme,
resulting in unnecessary radical surgery. leading to the formation of varying amounts of enamel and
dentin. Some of these lesions (the common odontomas)
Treatment and Prognosis are clearly nonneoplastic developmental anomalies; others
appear to be true neoplasms. The nature of others is
Conservative local excision or curettage appears to be effec- uncertain.
tive for patients with squamous odontogenic tumors, and In some instances, the histopathologic findings alone
cannot distinguish between the neoplastic lesions and the
developmental anomalies. Clinical and radiographic fea-
tures often are of considerable assistance in making this
distinction.
◆ AMELOBLASTIC FIBROMA
The ameloblastic fibroma is considered to be a true mixed
tumor in which the epithelial and mesenchymal tissues are
both neoplastic. It is an uncommon tumor, but the data
regarding its frequency are difficult to evaluate because (par-
ticularly in earlier reports) some lesions that were diagnosed
as ameloblastic fibroma may actually have represented the
early developing stage of an odontoma.
A
23% 4%
69% 4%
the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, and it could be of the jaws, and the majority involves the mandible
argued that this was a biased sample of larger lesions that (Fig. 15-101). Males are affected somewhat more often than
were inherently more difficult to manage. In other series of females, with a 3 : 2 ratio noted in the literature. The lesion
cases, from 0% to 18% of ameloblastic fibromas were is commonly asymptomatic and is discovered when radio-
reported to recur after conservative removal and an ade- graphs are taken to determine the reason for failure of a
quate follow-up period. Based on these data, recent recom- tooth to erupt. Large examples may be associated with a
mendations have emphasized conservative initial therapy painless swelling of the affected bone.
for ameloblastic fibroma. More aggressive surgical excision Radiographically, the tumor shows a well-circumscribed
should probably be reserved for recurrent lesions. Approxi- unilocular or, infrequently, multilocular radiolucent defect
mately 35% of the cases of the rare ameloblastic fibrosar- that contains a variable amount of calcified material with
coma develop in the setting of a recurrent ameloblastic the radiodensity of tooth structure. The calcified material
fibroma. within the lesion may appear as multiple, small radiopacities
or as a solid conglomerate mass (Fig. 15-102). In most
◆ AMELOBLASTIC FIBRO-ODONTOMA instances, an unerupted tooth is present at the margin of
the lesion, or the crown of the unerupted tooth may be
The ameloblastic fibro-odontoma is defined as a tumor included within the defect. Approximately 5% of amelo-
with the general features of an ameloblastic fibroma but blastic fibro-odontomas contain only a minimal amount
that also contains enamel and dentin. Some investigators of calcifying enamel and dentin matrix and appear
believe that the ameloblastic fibro-odontoma is only a
stage in the development of an odontoma and do not
consider it to be a separate entity. Certainly the histo-
pathologic features of a developing odontoma may overlap
somewhat with ameloblastic fibro-odontoma. There are
well-documented examples, however, of this tumor exhibit-
ing progressive growth and causing considerable deformity 21% 14%
and bone destruction. Such lesions appear to be true
neoplasms. However, distinguishing between a developing
odontoma and an ameloblastic fibro-odontoma may be
difficult based on histopathologic grounds alone.
• Fig. 15-102 Ameloblastic Fibro-Odontoma. Radiolucent defect in the ramus containing small
calcifications having the radiodensity of tooth structure.
672 C H A P T E R 1 5 Odontogenic Cysts and Tumors
Histopathologic Features
B
The soft tissue component of the ameloblastic fibro-
• Fig. 15-104 Ameloblastic Fibro-Odontoma. A, The soft tissue
odontoma is microscopically identical to the ameloblastic component of the tumor is indistinguishable from an ameloblastic
fibroma and has narrow cords and small islands of odon- fibroma. B, Formation of disorganized tooth structure can be seen.
togenic epithelium in a loose primitive-appearing connec-
tive tissue that resembles the dental papilla. The calcifying
element consists of foci of enamel and dentin matrix forma-
tion in close relationship to the epithelial structures (Fig. ◆ AMELOBLASTIC FIBROSARCOMA
15-104). The more calcified lesions show mature dental (AMELOBLASTIC SARCOMA)
structures in the form of rudimentary small teeth or con-
glomerate masses of enamel and dentin. Some researchers The rare ameloblastic fibrosarcoma is considered to be the
have designated a similar tumor in which the calcifying malignant counterpart of the ameloblastic fibroma, and
component consists only of dentin matrix and dentinoid approximately 70 cases have been documented in the litera-
material as ameloblastic fibro-dentinoma. It is question- ture. Interestingly, in most cases, only the mesenchymal
able whether this lesion represents a separate entity, and it portion of the lesion shows features of malignancy; the
is probably best considered as only a variant of the amelo- epithelial component remains rather bland. These tumors
blastic fibro-odontoma. may apparently arise de novo; however, in at least one-third
of known cases, the malignant lesion represents a recurrence
Treatment and Prognosis of a tumor previously diagnosed as an ameloblastic fibroma
or an ameloblastic fibro-odontoma.
A patient with an ameloblastic fibro-odontoma is generally
treated by conservative curettage, and the lesion usually Clinical and Radiographic Features
separates easily from its bony bed. The tumor is well cir-
cumscribed and does not invade the surrounding bone. Ameloblastic fibrosarcomas occur about 1.5 times as often
The prognosis is excellent, and the recurrence rate after in males as in females. The lesion tends to occur in younger
conservative removal is estimated to be about 7%. Develop- patients (mean reported age, 27.5 years). Although either the
ment of an ameloblastic fibrosarcoma after curettage of an maxilla or the mandible may be involved, about 80% of cases
ameloblastic fibro-odontoma has been reported, but this is have occurred in the mandible. Pain and swelling associated
exceedingly rare. with rapid clinical growth are the common complaints.
CHAPTER 15 Odontogenic Cysts and Tumors 673
A B
• Fig. 15-105 Ameloblastic Fibrosarcoma. A, A 21-year-old woman complained of facial asymmetry
and recent increase in size of a mandibular mass that had been present for some years. B, Radiograph
of the same patient. Note the lytic destruction of the posterior mandible. (Courtesy of Dr. Sam McKenna.)
Histopathologic Features
Ameloblastic fibrosarcomas contain an epithelial compo-
nent similar to that seen in the ameloblastic fibroma,
although it is frequently less prominent. The epithelial com-
ponent appears histopathologically benign and does not
demonstrate any cytologic atypia. The mesenchymal portion
of the tumor, however, is highly cellular and shows hyper-
chromatic and often bizarre pleomorphic cells (Fig. 15-106).
Mitoses are usually prominent. In some cases with multiple • Fig. 15-106 Ameloblastic Fibrosarcoma. The cellular mesen-
recurrences, the epithelial component becomes progres- chymal tissue shows hyperchromatism and atypical cells. A small
sively less conspicuous so that the tumor eventually shows island of ameloblastic epithelium is present.
only a poorly differentiated fibrosarcoma.
In a few instances, dysplastic dentin or small amounts
of enamel may be formed. Some have called such lesions ◆ ODONTOAMELOBLASTOMA
ameloblastic dentinosarcomas or ameloblastic fibro-
odontosarcomas. This additional subclassification, however, The odontoameloblastoma is an extremely rare odonto-
appears unnecessary. Another rare event that actually may genic tumor that contains an ameloblastomatous compo-
be overrepresented in the literature is concurrent malignant nent and odontoma-like elements. Fewer than 20 cases have
transformation of both the epithelial and mesenchymal ele- been reported with sufficient documentation to support this
ments of an ameloblastic fibroma, resulting in an amelo- diagnosis. This tumor was formerly called ameloblastic odon-
blastic carcinosarcoma. toma and was confused with the more common (though
still relatively rare) lesion currently designated as amelo-
Treatment and Prognosis blastic fibro-odontoma. Because the clinical behavior of
these two tumors is quite different, they should be distin-
Once the diagnosis of ameloblastic fibrosarcoma has been guished from one another. This neoplasm is also frequently
confirmed, radical surgical excision appears to be the treat- confused with an odontoma that is in its early stages of
ment of choice. Curettage or local excision is usually fol- development.
lowed by rapid local recurrence. The tumor is locally
aggressive and infiltrates adjacent bone and soft tissues. Clinical and Radiographic Features
The long-term prognosis is difficult to ascertain because
of the few reported cases with adequate follow-up, with the Because of the rarity of odontoameloblastomas, little reli-
best estimates suggesting that 20% of these patients will able information is available. The lesion appears to occur
succumb to their tumor. Most deaths have resulted from more often in younger patients, and either jaw can be
uncontrolled local disease, and metastatic tumor has been affected. Pain, delayed eruption of teeth, and expansion of
documented in only four of 54 evaluable cases. the affected bone may be noted.
674 C H A P T E R 1 5 Odontogenic Cysts and Tumors
Radiographically, the tumor shows a radiolucent, destruc- a tooth to erupt. Odontomas are typically relatively small
tive process that contains calcified structures. These have the and seldom exceed the size of a tooth in the area where they
radiodensity of tooth structure and may resemble miniature are located. However, large odontomas up to 6 cm or more
teeth or occur as larger masses of calcified material similar in diameter are occasionally seen. These large odontomas
to a complex odontoma. can cause expansion of the jaw.
Odontomas occur somewhat more frequently in the
Histopathologic Features maxilla than in the mandible. Although compound and
complex odontomas may be found in any site, the com-
The histopathologic features of the odontoameloblastoma pound type is more often seen in the anterior maxilla;
are complex. The proliferating epithelial portion of the complex odontomas occur more often in the molar regions
tumor has features of an ameloblastoma, most often of the of either jaw. Occasionally, an odontoma will develop com-
plexiform or follicular pattern. The ameloblastic component pletely within the gingival soft tissues.
is intermingled with immature or more mature dental tissue Radiographically, the compound odontoma appears as
in the form of developing rudimentary teeth, which is a collection of toothlike structures of varying size and shape
similar to the appearance of a compound odontoma, or surrounded by a narrow radiolucent zone (Figs. 15-107 and
conglomerate masses of enamel, dentin, and cementum, as 15-108). The complex odontoma appears as a calcified
seen in a complex odontoma.
◆ ODONTOMA
Odontomas are the most common types of odontogenic
tumors. Their prevalence exceeds that of all other odonto-
genic tumors combined. Odontomas are considered to be • Fig. 15-107 Compound Odontoma. A small cluster of toothlike
structures is preventing the eruption of the maxillary canine. (Courtesy
developmental anomalies (hamartomas), rather than true
of Dr. Robert J. Powers.)
neoplasms. When fully developed, odontomas consist
chiefly of enamel and dentin, with variable amounts of pulp
and cementum. In their earlier developmental stages,
varying amounts of proliferating odontogenic epithelium
and mesenchyme are present.
Odontomas are further subdivided into compound and
complex types. The compound odontoma is composed of
multiple, small toothlike structures. The complex odon-
toma consists of a conglomerate mass of enamel and dentin,
which bears no anatomic resemblance to a tooth. In most
series, compound odontomas are more frequently diag-
nosed than complex, and it is possible that some compound
odontomas are not submitted for microscopic examination
because the clinician is comfortable with the clinical and
radiographic diagnosis. Occasionally, an odontoma may
show both compound and complex features.
• Fig. 15-109 Complex Odontoma. A large radiopaque mass is overlying the crown of the mandibular
right second molar, which has been displaced to the inferior border of the mandible.
• Fig. 15-110 Compound Odontoma. Surgical specimen consist- • Fig. 15-111 Complex Odontoma. This decalcified section shows
ing of more than 20 malformed toothlike structures. a disorganized mass of dentin intermixed with small pools of enamel
matrix.